Venetoclax enhances T cell–mediated antileukemic activity by increasing ROS production

Adoptive T-cell therapy, particularly chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, has achieved remarkable success in treating B-cell malignancies.^1,2  Despite various approaches investigated, similar success has not been translated for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), contributed to by inadequate target antigen, low mutational rate, and high disease heterogeneity.³ 

Recently, venetoclax, a Bcl-2 inhibitor, combined with the hypomethylating agent azacytidine, achieved complete remission or complete remission with incomplete count recovery in ∼70% of treatment-naive elderly patients unfit for conventional intensive chemotherapy.^4-6  The impressive clinical outcome led to accelerated US Food and Drug Administration approval of the treatment of this patient population. However, the mechanism of action of this drug combination is not fully understood. Although highly effective in the de novo setting, it is less active in patients who relapse after induction chemotherapy^7,8 ; the reasons for a reduced response rate in relapsed or refractory patients are not fully understood.

CD3⁺CD4^–CD8^– double-negative T cell (DNT) is a rare subset of mature T cells that comprises 1% to 5% of circulating leukocytes.^3,9-11  We recently developed a method to ex vivo expand the clinical quality and quantity of these unconventional immune cells from healthy donors. We further showed that ex vivo expanded allogeneic DNTs can selectively target AML without alloreactivity and off-tumor toxicity. DNTs also fulfill the requirements for an “off-the-shelf” cell therapy, including scalability, donor-independent activity, and lack of graft-versus-host disease and host-versus-graft rejection.¹¹  Clinical trials to assess the safety and efficacy of allogeneic DNT therapy as a treatment of high-risk AML patients are in progress.

In the current study, we discovered that venetoclax effectively enhances the effector function of DNT and CD8⁺ T cells by increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. We also show that azacytidine renders AML cells more susceptible to T cells via induction of viral mimicry. These data provide an important mechanism to explain the clinical activity of venetoclax and azacytidine in AML and highlight the potential of combining adoptive T-cell therapy with venetoclax for the treatment of this disease.

Human blood was collected from healthy adult donors after obtaining written informed consent and was used according to protocols approved by the University Health Network (UHN) Research Ethics Board (05-0221-T) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The AML samples were collected with informed consent and viably frozen in the Leukemia Tissue Bank at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre according to procedures approved by the UHN Research Ethics Board (UHN REB# 01-0573). Primary human AML samples were obtained from peripheral blood or bone marrow of AML patients with a malignant cell frequency of 80% among mononuclear cells, determined according to morphology. In addition, the frequency of malignant cells in each AML patient sample was determined by flow cytometry by using a combination of SSC^low CD45^low CD3^– CD33⁺ with or without CD34 and CD117 expression. Differential density centrifugation was used to isolate AML cells and healthy donor–derived peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Primary AML cells were frozen in Minimum Essential Medium α (Thermo Fisher Scientific) + 5% fetal bovine serum or 90% fetal bovine serum + 15 U/mL of heparin + 10% dimethyl sulfoxide.

The UHN institutional review boards approved the collection and use of human tissue for this study (Research Ethics Board protocol #15-9324). All specimens were deidentified, and each experiment was performed by using a single aliquot from a donor. Information about the patients who were the source of the cells is provided in supplemental Tables 1 and 2 (available on the Blood Web site).

DNT expansions were performed as previously described.¹¹  Briefly, CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ cell-depleted healthy donor–derived PBMCs were cultured on anti-CD3 antibody-coated plates (OKT3; BioLegend) for 3 days in AIM-V (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with 250 IU/mL of interleukin-2 (IL-2) (Proleukin; Novartis Pharmaceuticals); soluble anti-CD3 antibody and IL-2 were added to the cultures every 2 to 4 days. The purity of DNTs was assessed by staining cells with fluorochrome-conjugated anti-human CD3, -CD4, -CD8, and -CD56 antibodies and flow cytometry analysis. DNTs were used between days 10 and 20 of culture. For venetoclax treatment, 25 to 400 nM venetoclax (ABT-199; TargetMol) was added to DNT culture 4 hours to 3 days before use. DNTs were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline and counted before use for each experiment.

DNTs were cocultured with target cells for 2 to 4 hours, and cells were then stained with anti-human CD3 (HIT3a), CD33 (WM53), CD45 (HI30), and CD34 (561) antibodies, Annexin V, and 7AAD (all from BioLegend), and analyzed by using flow cytometry. Specific killing was calculated by $%AnnexinVwithout DNT+−%AnnexinVwithout DNT+100−%AnnexinVwithout DNT+×100$ as previously described¹⁰ 

All graphs and statistical analysis were generated by using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software). Student t test, 1-way analysis of variance, 2-way analysis of variance, and linear regression tests were used for analyses. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001, and ****P < .0001 indicate significance between experimental and control values. Error bars represent ± standard error of the mean (SEM) or standard deviation (SD) as indicated.

To identify drugs that increase the potency of T cell–mediated cytotoxicity against AML, we used ex vivo expanded DNTs as surrogates because DNTs can be expanded ex vivo and allow investigation of T-cell and AML-cell interaction without alloreactivity or xenogeneic graft-versus-host disease in vitro and in the xenograft model.¹⁰  We then validated the findings with conventional T (T_conv) cells, although our studies were not designed to compare the superiority of DNTs vs T_conv cells.

DNTs were treated with an in-house library of 189 on- and off-patent drugs for 18 hours and then used as effectors against the human AML cell line OCI-AML2. From this screen, we identified venetoclax as the top hit that increased the cytotoxicity of DNTs (Figure 1A). The effects of venetoclax on DNTs were tested in dose-dependent studies against 3 AML cell lines (OCI-AML2, OCI-AML3, and KG1a). In all 3 tested cell lines, venetoclax increased the DNT-mediated killing of AML cells (Figure 1B) without reducing the viability of the DNTs (supplemental Figure 1). Increased antileukemic activity in venetoclax-treated DNTs was seen in DNTs derived from all 11 tested DNT donors with an average increase of 61.25 ± 31% (Figure 1C).

We also tested the effects of venetoclax-treated DNTs on primary AML samples. Venetoclax-treated DNTs showed superior cytotoxicity against 16 of 17 primary AML samples compared with untreated DNTs (Figure 1D); patient information is provided in supplemental Table 1. Notably, 4 samples (090271, 080043, 290985, and 150099) that were resistant to DNTs were effectively killed by venetoclax-treated DNTs. An inverse correlation between the susceptibility of AML to DNTs and the degree of increase in DNT-mediated cytotoxicity by venetoclax treatment was observed (supplemental Figure 2). Venetoclax-treated DNTs were equally effective at killing AML cells from patients at diagnosis and relapsed/refractory after induction chemotherapy (supplemental Figure 3). Venetoclax-treated DNTs also effectively reduced the colony formation of AML cell lines, OCI-AML2 and KG1a, and primary AML cells (Figure 1E). Similarly, a primary AML sample treated ex vivo with venetoclax-treated DNT engrafted fewer than the same cells treated with DNTs alone (Figure 1F).

To determine if venetoclax increases the cytotoxicity of DNTs against normal blood cells, autologous and allogeneic PBMCs from healthy donors were used as targets. In contrast to AML cell lines and primary samples, insignificant cytotoxicity was seen with both DNTs and venetoclax-treated DNTs against autologous and allogeneic PBMCs (Figure 1G), showing that venetoclax selectively increases the cytotoxic activity of DNTs against AML.

We next assessed the effect of venetoclax on T_conv cell–mediated cytotoxicity against AML. Ex vivo expanded T_conv cells were pretreated with venetoclax and used as effectors in cytotoxicity assays. As with DNTs, venetoclax pretreatment significantly increased T_conv cell cytotoxicity against AML cells in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 1H).

To determine the antileukemic activity of DNTs in the presence of venetoclax, KG1a and OCI-AML2 were treated with venetoclax, DNTs, or both. Treating AML cells with both DNTs and venetoclax resulted in a lower number of viable AML cells than either treatment alone (supplemental Figure 4).

To test whether venetoclax-treated DNTs are effective in vivo, mice xenografted with KG1a were treated with vehicle control, DNT, or venetoclax-treated DNT. Consistent with our previous report,⁹  DNTs alone had minimal effect on the KG1a xenograft. However, venetoclax-treated DNTs significantly lowered the KG1a engraftment level compared with vehicle control or DNT-treated groups (Figure 1I).

In addition, we examined the effects of venetoclax-treated DNTs on the engraftment of primary AML samples. Mice were injected intravenously with primary AML cells and then treated with DNTs or venetoclax-treated DNTs. Treatment of mice with venetoclax-treated DNTs decreased AML engraftment and counts compared with mice treated with vehicle control or DNTs (Figure 1J; supplemental Figure 5). Importantly, no notable toxicity was observed from these treatments (supplemental Figure 6). Collectively, these results show the superior antileukemic activity of T cells treated with venetoclax.

Increased T-cell cytotoxicity after venetoclax treatment may be due to direct activation of effector T cells or depletion of inhibitory naive and regulatory T cells, thereby enriching effector T-cell populations. Therefore, we tested whether venetoclax directly activates effector T cells or alters the abundance of T-cell subsets. We treated DNTs and T_conv cells with venetoclax for increasing times and measured T-cell activation and T-cell subsets. Treatment of DNTs and T_conv cells with venetoclax for as little as 4 hours and up to 3 days increased T-cell cytotoxicity against AML (Figure 2A) with increased expression of T-cell activation markers (CD69 and CD25) (Figure 2B) and activating receptors (NKG2D and DNAM-1) (Figure 2C) without changing the T-cell viability (Figure 2D) or abundance of T-cell subsets (Figure 2E). Thus, venetoclax directly activates effector T cells to increase their cytotoxicity without depleting naive or inhibitory T-cell subsets.

Finally, we tested the effects of venetoclax on T cells in patients with AML receiving this therapy. We isolated T cells from patients with AML before and on day 4 of their first cycle of venetoclax and azacytidine. Compared with the pretreatment sample, T cells obtained during treatment showed increased expression of a T-cell activation marker, CD25 (Figure 2F), and a T-cell activating receptor, NKG2D (Figure 2G). Thus, in vitro, in vivo, and in patients, venetoclax directly and rapidly augments the cytotoxicity of T cells against AML.

Venetoclax increases ROS generation in malignant cells,^6,13  and ROS plays an important role in the T-cell activation and differentiation.^14-17  Therefore, to understand the mechanism by which venetoclax activates T cells, we measured ROS generation in DNT and T_conv cells treated with venetoclax. Venetoclax increased cellular and mitochondrial ROS in DNT and T_conv cells at concentrations and times associated with increased T-cell effector function (Figure 3A-D).

We also measured ROS levels in T cells isolated from patients receiving venetoclax and azacytidine. Compared with pretreatment levels, T cells isolated on day 4 of the first cycle of venetoclax and azacytidine had higher levels of cellular ROS (Figure 3E).

To determine the functional relevance of increased ROS in venetoclax-treated DNTs, DNTs were cotreated with venetoclax and increasing concentrations of N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a ROS scavenger. Treatment with NAC abrogated venetoclax-induced ROS generation and blocked the upregulation of activation markers (Figure 3F). NAC also blocked venetoclax-mediated increases in DNT-mediated cytotoxicity against AML (Figure 3G). Thus, the upregulation of ROS is a functionally important mechanism by which venetoclax activates T cells. To determine the effect of other ROS-inducing agents on DNT-mediated cytotoxicity, DNTs were treated with increasing concentrations of cytarabine, daunorubicin, and antimycin. We observed increased ROS levels in DNTs treated with cytarabine and antimycin in a dose-dependent manner, with no to little loss of viability (supplemental Figure 7A-B). Daunorubicin-treated DNTs had lower ROS levels with a large reduction in viability. Unlike venetoclax treatment, cytarabine and antimycin did not enhance the cytotoxicity of DNTs despite the increase in cellular ROS level, and daunorubicin reduced DNT-mediated cytotoxicity against AML (supplemental Figure 7C). These data show that the ROS-dependent increase in DNT-mediated cytotoxicity is unique for venetoclax.

To understand the mechanism by which venetoclax increased ROS production, we measured levels of respiratory chain proteins. No change was observed in NDUFA9, UQCRC2, and MTCO1, subunits of electron transport chain complex I, III, and IV, respectively (Figure 3H; supplemental Figure 8). We also observed no changes in basal oxygen consumption, glycolysis, glycolytic capacity, or glutathione levels after venetoclax treatment (supplemental Figure 9).

ROS production is also regulated by formation of respiratory chain supercomplexes, higher order quaternary structures containing respiratory chain complexes I, III, and IV.^18,19  Decreased respiratory chain supercomplex formation can increase mitochondrial ROS production without altering other metabolic or mitochondrial parameters.^20-22  We therefore measured respiratory chain supercomplex formation in DNTs after venetoclax treatment. Venetoclax reduced formation of respiratory chain supercomplexes (Figure 3I).

Recent reports indicate that the combination of venetoclax and azacytidine produces high clinical response rates with low treatment-associated toxicities in patients with newly diagnosed AML.^5,6  Azacytidine did not affect the viability or cytotoxic activity of untreated DNTs (supplemental Figure 10A-B). Azacytidine also did not hinder the impact of venetoclax on the cytotoxic activity of DNTs (supplemental Figure 10C). We hypothesized that azacytidine-treated AML cells may have an increased susceptibility to DNT-mediated cytotoxicity, which is further enhanced by venetoclax, leading to a superior T cell–mediated antileukemic efficacy. Indeed, treating AML cell lines with azacytidine increased their susceptibility to DNT-mediated cytotoxicity in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 4A; supplemental Figure 11). Similarly, superior cytotoxicity was seen against 5 of 7 primary AML samples pretreated with azacytidine (Figure 4B). Moreover, we observed that the killing of azacytidine-treated AML was further augmented by treating DNTs with venetoclax (Figure 4C), suggesting that azacytidine and venetoclax may have a synergistic role to increase the potency of T-cell antileukemic function in patients. In contrast, DNTs or venetoclax-treated DNTs did not kill normal hematopoietic cells, and treatment of normal hematopoietic cells with azacytidine did not increase their susceptibility to DNTs or venetoclax-treated DNTs (supplemental Figure 12).

Previously, azacytidine has been reported to evoke a viral mimicry response in colon and ovarian cancer cells by increasing levels of double-stranded DNA(dsDNA)/double-stranded RNA in the cytoplasm.^23,24  To determine whether a similar mechanism renders AML more susceptible to T cell–mediated killing, we measured cytoplasmic levels of dsDNA, transposon DNA 14 (P14) and 24 (P24), after azacytidine treatment.^25,26  Azacytidine-treated AML cells had higher dsDNA levels in the cytoplasm (Figure 4D) and increased expression of type I interferons, interferon-β (IFN-β) and IL-1β (Figure 4E).

Next, we queried whether the induction of viral mimicry after azacytidine treatment was functionally important to explain the increased susceptibility of AML to DNT-mediated cytotoxicity. Primary AML cells were treated with azacytidine in the presence of the STING inhibitor N-(4-ethylphenyl)-N′-1H-indol-3-yl-urea (H-151). The addition of the STING inhibitor abrogated azacytidine-induced increases in IFN-β and IL-1β expression (Figure 4F). Importantly, cotreatment with the STING inhibitor abrogated azacytidine-mediated increases in susceptibility to DNTs in 5 of 6 primary AML samples tested (Figure 4G). Thus, these data show that azacytidine sensitizes AML to T cell–mediated cytotoxicity, at least partially, through the activation of the STING/cGAS pathway and induction of viral mimicry.

Although the combination of venetoclax and azacytidine is highly effective in treatment-naive patients, it is less effective in patients who received prior induction chemotherapy.^7,8  We hypothesized that the function of T cells may differ in samples from patients with AML after relapse/no response to induction chemotherapy compared with samples from newly diagnosed patients. Using single-cell analysis of secreted cytokines,^12,27  the cytokine profile and pSI of CD8⁺ T cells from patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed AML stimulated ex vivo with IL-2 were determined as a marker of T-cell functionality. The cytokine profile and pSI of CD8⁺ T cells from patients with newly diagnosed AML and healthy control subjects were similar. In contrast, CD8⁺ T cells from patients with relapsed AML were dysfunctional, with decreased pSI and lower levels of effector and stimulatory cytokines (supplemental Figure 13).

To determine the role of T cells in venetoclax and azacytidine combination therapy, PBMCs obtained from patients with AML were depleted or enriched for autologous CD3⁺ T cells (supplemental Figure 14) and then treated with venetoclax and azacytidine. We observed a greater reduction in viable AML cell counts in T cell–enriched samples compared with T cell–depleted samples (Figure 5A), supporting the role of patient T cells in the antileukemic effect of venetoclax and azacytidine.

To test whether the presence of T cells is important for the effectiveness of venetoclax and azacytidine in vivo, A20 murine leukemia/lymphoma cells were injected subcutaneously into immunocompetent BALB/c mice. Mice were then treated with venetoclax and azacytidine with or without preceding CD4⁺/CD8⁺ T-cell depletion. Treatment with venetoclax and azacytidine reduced tumor growth more effectively in mice with intact T cells than that of T cell–depleted mice (supplemental Figure 15). Collectively, these results suggest the role of endogenous T cells in the antileukemic effect, which can be enhanced by venetoclax and azacytidine.

Finally, T cells were isolated from patients with AML before and on day 4 of venetoclax and azacytidine treatment. Subsequently, patient autologous blasts were cocultured with the isolated T cells in the presence of IL-2 to stimulate T cells. The number of viable AML cells were measured after coculture. T cells obtained during venetoclax and azacytidine treatment were more cytotoxic to the leukemic cells compared with T cells isolated from the pretreatment samples of the same patients (Figure 5B). Collectively, these results support the importance of T-cell immunity in facilitating the antileukemic effect induced by the combination therapy of venetoclax and azacytidine.

The combination of venetoclax and azacytidine produces responses in up to 80% of newly diagnosed patients with AML. The response is rapid, with a median time to best response of 2.1 months,⁵  suggesting a unique mechanism of action for the combination therapy. However, the mechanism of action of the drug combination is not yet fully understood. We discovered that venetoclax directly increased the antileukemic effector function of T cells, whereas azacytidine renders AML cells more susceptible to T cells by inducing a viral mimicry response in leukemic cells.

In this study, DNTs were used as a surrogate for leukemia-specific T cells. Although DNTs share similar effector function as T_conv cells, such as perforin-granzyme mediated cytotoxicity and release of IFN-γ and TNF-α upon activation, these cells are not alloreactive. As such, they provide a good model to study the effects of venetoclax and azacytidine on T-cell function. However, we recognize that extrapolating the findings of DNTs to T_conv cells should be done with caution. Because DNTs can be expanded ex vivo and have been safely administered to patients with relapsed and refractory AML,²⁸  there may be an opportunity to combine DNT therapy with venetoclax and azacytidine to further enhance their antileukemic activity.

DNTs selectively target AML partly through NKG2D and DNAM-1¹⁰  and synergize with conventional chemotherapy, which induces expression of NKG2D and DNAM-1 ligands on AML.⁹  In this study, we observed increased NKG2D and DNAM-1 expression on DNTs and CD8⁺ T cells post–venetoclax treatment. Given the involvement of NKG2D and DNAM-1 in functioning of various effector immune cell subsets,^29-31  our results suggest that venetoclax may also enhance the antileukemic activity of other T-cell or natural killer–cell therapy products.

Venetoclax increased ROS generation in T cells, leading to increased effector activity. Although high levels of ROS can be toxic, moderate levels of ROS act as signaling messengers in T-cell activation and differentiation.^32,33  We showed that therapeutically relevant concentrations of venetoclax increased T-cell effector function without decreasing T-cell viability. We also showed that T cells isolated from patients receiving venetoclax also had increased levels of ROS. ROS enhances the localization of nuclear factor of activated T cells to increase expression of genes associated with T-cell activation,³²  thus potentially linking the increased ROS to enhanced T-cell activity.

Metabolic reprogramming toward oxidative phosphorylation is a common source of ROS production. However, venetoclax did not alter basal levels of oxygen consumption, glycolysis, levels of respiratory chain complex proteins, or levels of antioxidants in T cells. Instead, venetoclax disrupted respiratory chain supercomplex formation. The function of respiratory supercomplexes is not fully understood, but previous studies have reported that these complexes have multiple roles, including ensuring efficient oxidative phosphorylation¹⁹  and preventing ROS formation.^18,20,21  Recently, we showed that inhibiting respiratory chain supercomplex formation decreases oxidative phosphorylation in AML cells without increasing ROS production.³⁴  Our current results indicate that respiratory chain supercomplexes have different functions in different cells or tissues. Future studies will be required to understand how Bcl-2 controls the formation of respiratory chain supercomplexes, but the effect of venetoclax suggests that supercomplex formation in T cells may depend on the structural integrity of the inner mitochondrial membrane.

Azacytidine induces viral mimicry in tumors and makes them more immunogenic.^23,24  Despite the routine use of azacytidine to treat AML, the effects of azacytidine on the viral mimicry response in AML has not been reported. Here, we showed that azacytidine primes AML cells for killing by T cells by inducing a viral mimicry response. Azacytidine elevated cytoplasmic dsDNA/double-stranded RNA levels and activated the STING-cGAS pathway to induce a type I IFN response, similar to the response to a viral infection. Due to pleotropic functions of type I IFN,³⁵  how the viral mimicry response renders AML more susceptible to T cells remains to be elucidated.

A recent study by Pollyea et al⁴  indicated that venetoclax and azacytidine synergize to inhibit respiratory chain complex II activity and impair oxidative phosphorylation. As AML cells and stem cells have increased reliance on oxidative phosphorylation, targeting mitochondrial pathways and respiratory chain complex activity may lead to preferential killing of AML cells.^4,6  Our data do not contradict these previous findings but offer an additional mechanism of action for the combination therapy.

Although the combination of venetoclax and azacytidine is highly effective in patients newly diagnosed with AML, it is less effective in relapsed and refractory patients.^7,8  Induction chemotherapy lowers the number of T cells in patients.^36-39  Furthermore, increased T-cell exhaustion has been reported in nonresponders to chemotherapy.⁴⁰  Thus, the T-cell dysfunction in patients with AML who relapse after chemotherapy may explain why these patients are less responsive to venetoclax and azacytidine. Although our data provide a new and intriguing mechanism of action for venetoclax and azacytidine, we recognize the limitations to our study, including the limited number of patient samples studied and the majority of experiments conducted either in vitro or ex vivo. In future studies, characterizing T cells from a large number of patients who are responders and nonresponders to venetoclax and azacytidine treatment may help identify biomarkers that could be used stratifying those most and least likely to respond to this therapy.

In summary, our data highlight a new immune-mediated mechanism of action for venetoclax in promoting T-cell effector function. These data shed light on how venetoclax could be used to increase antileukemic activity of T-cell therapies and provide new insights to explain the antileukemic activity of the combination of venetoclax and azacytidine.

The authors thank all the donors and patients who participated in this study. They also thank Jill Flewelling (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre) for administrative assistance and the Leukemia Tissue Bank (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre) for providing the primary AML samples, and IsoPlexis for assistance in generating the single-cell cytokine data.

This work was supported by Canadian Cancer Society Impact Grant 704121, Canadian Institutes of Health Research Grant 419699, and Maria H. Bacardi Chair in Transplantation (all to L.Z.); the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research with funding provided by the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Foundation, and the Ministry of Long Term Health and Planning in the Province of Ontario (all to A.D.S.); and the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute (P30 CA16672), Cancer Prevention & Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) RP160693, and Haas Chair in Genetics (all to M.A.).

Contribution: J.B.L., D.H.K., L.Z., and A.D.S. conceived and designed the study; J.B.L., D.H.K., R.H., M.X., Y.N., H.K., S.M., X.W., M.G., Y.J., N.M., and Z.A. performed the experiments; J.B.L., D.H.K., M.X., S.M., and M.G. analyzed and interpreted the data; M.Y.K., M.D.M., and A.A. provided AML patient samples for the study; Z.A. and M.A. performed single-cell cytokine analysis; J.B.L. wrote the manuscript; D.H.K., M.G., M.D.M., L.Z., and A.D.S. provided feedback and edited the manuscript; M.A., L.Z., and A.D.S. provided funding support; and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: A.D.S. has received research funding from Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Medivir AB; has consulting fees/honorarium from Takeda, Novartis, Jazz, and Otsuka Pharmaceuticals; and holds stock in AbbVie. M.D.M. is a consultant for Astellas, AbbVie, and Celgene. L.Z. received funding and consulting fee/honorarium from WYZE Biotech Co Ltd; and holds stock in AbbVie. A.D.S., J.B.L., and L.Z. are inventors on patent applications claiming the use of DNTs for the treatment of AML. J.B.L. and L.Z. are cofounders of Denote Therapeutics. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Aaron D. Schimmer, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Research Tower, 101 College St, Room 8-706, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada; e-mail: aaron.schimmer@utoronto.ca; or Li Zhang, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Research Tower, 101 College St, Room 2-207, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada; e-mail: li.zhang@uhnresearch.ca.