• A Manhattan model based solely on clinical symptoms identifies a low-risk group needed to test strategies that minimize treatment.

  • MAGIC composite scores using both clinical and biomarker parameters further enlarge the low-risk group and most accurately predict outcomes.

Abstract

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grading systems that use only clinical symptoms at treatment initiation such as the Minnesota risk identify standard and high-risk categories but lack a low-risk category suitable to minimize immunosuppressive strategies. We developed a new grading system that includes a low-risk stratum based on clinical symptoms alone and determined whether the incorporation of biomarkers would improve the model’s prognostic accuracy. We randomly divided 1863 patients in the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) who were treated for GVHD into training and validation cohorts. Patients in the training cohort were divided into 14 groups based on similarity of clinical symptoms and similar nonrelapse mortality (NRM); we used a classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm to create three Manhattan risk groups that produced a significantly higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for 6-month NRM than the Minnesota risk classification (0.69 vs 0.64, P = .009) in the validation cohort. We integrated serum GVHD biomarker scores with Manhattan risk using patients with available serum samples and again used a CART algorithm to establish 3 MAGIC composite scores that significantly improved prediction of NRM compared to Manhattan risk (AUC, 0.76 vs 0.70, P = .010). Each increase in MAGIC composite score also corresponded to a significant decrease in day 28 treatment response (80% vs 63% vs 30%, P < .001). We conclude that the MAGIC composite score more accurately predicts response to therapy and long-term outcomes than systems based on clinical symptoms alone and may help guide clinical decisions and trial design.

1.
Martin
PJ
.
How I treat steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease
.
Blood
.
2020
;
135
(
19
):
1630
-
1638
.
2.
Akahoshi
Y
,
Spyrou
N
,
Hogan
WJ
, et al
.
Incidence, clinical presentation, risk factors, outcomes, and biomarkers in de novo late acute GVHD
.
Blood Adv
.
2023
;
7
(
16
):
4479
-
4491
.
3.
Greinix
HT
,
Eikema
DJ
,
Koster
L
, et al
.
Improved outcome of patients with graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies over time: an EBMT mega-file study
.
Haematologica
.
2022
;
107
(
5
):
1054
-
1063
.
4.
Khoury
HJ
,
Wang
T
,
Hemmer
MT
, et al
.
Improved survival after acute graft-versus-host disease diagnosis in the modern era
.
Haematologica
.
2017
;
102
(
5
):
958
-
966
.
5.
Bolanos-Meade
J
,
Hamadani
M
,
Wu
J
, et al
.
Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis
.
N Engl J Med
.
2023
;
388
(
25
):
2338
-
2348
.
6.
Watkins
B
,
Qayed
M
,
McCracken
C
, et al
.
Phase II trial of costimulation blockade with abatacept for prevention of acute GVHD
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2021
;
39
(
17
):
1865
-
1877
.
7.
Akahoshi
Y
,
Igarashi
A
,
Fukuda
T
, et al
.
Impact of graft-versus-host disease and graft-versus-leukemia effect based on minimal residual disease in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia
.
Br J Haematol
.
2020
;
190
(
1
):
84
-
92
.
8.
Martin
PJ
,
Rizzo
JD
,
Wingard
JR
, et al
.
First- and second-line systemic treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: recommendations of the American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
.
2012
;
18
(
8
):
1150
-
1163
.
9.
Malard
F
,
Holler
E
,
Sandmaier
BM
,
Huang
H
,
Mohty
M
.
Acute graft-versus-host disease
.
Nat Rev Dis Primers
.
2023
;
9
(
1
):
27
.
10.
Penack
O
,
Marchetti
M
,
Aljurf
M
, et al
.
Prophylaxis and management of graft-versus-host disease after stem-cell transplantation for haematological malignancies: updated consensus recommendations of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
.
Lancet Haematol
.
2024
;
11
(
2
):
e147
-
e159
.
11.
MacMillan
ML
,
DeFor
TE
,
Weisdorf
DJ
.
The best endpoint for acute GVHD treatment trials
.
Blood
.
2010
;
115
(
26
):
5412
-
5417
.
12.
Levine
JE
,
Logan
B
,
Wu
J
, et al
.
Graft-versus-host disease treatment: predictors of survival
.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
.
2010
;
16
(
12
):
1693
-
1699
.
13.
Saliba
RM
,
Couriel
DR
,
Giralt
S
, et al
.
Prognostic value of response after upfront therapy for acute GVHD
.
Bone Marrow Transplant
.
2012
;
47
(
1
):
125
-
131
.
14.
Inamoto
Y
,
Martin
PJ
,
Storer
BE
,
Mielcarek
M
,
Storb
RF
,
Carpenter
PA
.
Response endpoints and failure-free survival after initial treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease
.
Haematologica
.
2014
;
99
(
2
):
385
-
391
.
15.
Biavasco
F
,
Ihorst
G
,
Wasch
R
, et al
.
Therapy response of glucocorticoid-refractory acute GVHD of the lower intestinal tract
.
Bone Marrow Transplant
.
2022
;
57
(
10
):
1500
-
1506
.
16.
Akahoshi
Y
,
Spyrou
N
,
Hoepting
M
, et al
.
Flares of acute graft-versus-host disease: a Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium analysis
.
Blood Adv
.
2024
;
8
(
8
):
2047
-
2057
.
17.
El Jurdi
N
,
Rayes
A
,
MacMillan
ML
, et al
.
Steroid-dependent acute GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: risk factors and clinical outcomes
.
Blood Adv
.
2021
;
5
(
5
):
1352
-
1359
.
18.
Etra
A
,
Capellini
A
,
Alousi
A
, et al
.
Effective treatment of low-risk acute GVHD with itacitinib monotherapy
.
Blood
.
2023
;
141
(
5
):
481
-
489
.
19.
Akahoshi
Y
,
Kimura
SI
,
Tada
Y
, et al
.
Cytomegalovirus gastroenteritis in patients with acute graft-versus-host disease
.
Blood Adv
.
2022
;
6
(
2
):
574
-
584
.
20.
Akahoshi
Y
,
Kimura
SI
,
Inamoto
Y
, et al
.
Effect of cytomegalovirus reactivation with or without acute graft-versus-host disease on the risk of nonrelapse mortality
.
Clin Infect Dis
.
2021
;
73
(
3
):
e620
-
e628
.
21.
Weisdorf
DJ
,
Hurd
D
,
Carter
S
, et al
.
Prospective grading of graft-versus-host disease after unrelated donor marrow transplantation: a grading algorithm versus blinded expert panel review
.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
.
2003
;
9
(
8
):
512
-
518
.
22.
Przepiorka
D
,
Weisdorf
D
,
Martin
P
, et al
.
1994 consensus conference on acute GVHD grading
.
Bone Marrow Transplant
.
1995
;
15
(
6
):
825
-
828
.
23.
Cahn
JY
,
Klein
JP
,
Lee
SJ
, et al
.
Prospective evaluation of 2 acute graft-versus-host (GVHD) grading systems: a joint Societe Francaise de Greffe de Moelle et Therapie Cellulaire (SFGM-TC), Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI), and International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) prospective study
.
Blood
.
2005
;
106
(
4
):
1495
-
1500
.
24.
Bayraktar
E
,
Graf
T
,
Ayuk
FA
, et al
.
Data-driven grading of acute graft-versus-host disease
.
Nat Commun
.
2023
;
14
(
1
):
7799
.
25.
MacMillan
ML
,
Robin
M
,
Harris
AC
, et al
.
A refined risk score for acute graft-versus-host disease that predicts response to initial therapy, survival, and transplant-related mortality
.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
.
2015
;
21
(
4
):
761
-
767
.
26.
MacMillan
ML
,
DeFor
TE
,
Holtan
SG
,
Rashidi
A
,
Blazar
BR
,
Weisdorf
DJ
.
Validation of Minnesota acute graft-versus-host disease risk score
.
Haematologica
.
2020
;
105
(
2
):
519
-
524
.
27.
Levine
JE
,
Braun
TM
,
Harris
AC
, et al
.
A prognostic score for acute graft-versus-host disease based on biomarkers: a multicentre study
.
Lancet Haematol
.
2015
;
2
(
1
):
e21
-
e29
.
28.
Hartwell
MJ
,
Ozbek
U
,
Holler
E
, et al
.
An early-biomarker algorithm predicts lethal graft-versus-host disease and survival
.
JCI Insight
.
2018
;
3
(
16
):
e124015
.
29.
Holtan
SG
,
DeFor
TE
,
Panoskaltsis-Mortari
A
, et al
.
Amphiregulin modifies the Minnesota acute graft-versus-host disease risk score: results from BMT CTN 0302/0802
.
Blood Adv
.
2018
;
2
(
15
):
1882
-
1888
.
30.
Etra
A
,
Gergoudis
S
,
Morales
G
, et al
.
Assessment of systemic and gastrointestinal tissue damage biomarkers for GVHD risk stratification
.
Blood Adv
.
2022
;
6
(
12
):
3707
-
3715
.
31.
Spyrou
N
,
Akahoshi
Y
,
Ayuk
F
, et al
.
The utility of biomarkers in acute GVHD prognostication
.
Blood Adv
.
2023
;
7
(
17
):
5152
-
5155
.
32.
Robin
M
,
Porcher
R
,
Michonneau
D
, et al
.
Prospective external validation of biomarkers to predict acute graft-versus-host disease severity
.
Blood Adv
.
2022
;
6
(
16
):
4763
-
4772
.
33.
McCurdy
SR
,
Radojcic
V
,
Tsai
HL
, et al
.
Signatures of GVHD and relapse after posttransplant cyclophosphamide revealed by immune profiling and machine learning
.
Blood
.
2022
;
139
(
4
):
608
-
623
.
34.
Luft
T
,
Benner
A
,
Jodele
S
, et al
.
EASIX in patients with acute graft-versus-host disease: a retrospective cohort analysis
.
Lancet Haematol
.
2017
;
4
(
9
):
e414
-
e423
.
35.
Socie
G
,
Niederwieser
D
,
von Bubnoff
N
, et al
.
Prognostic value of blood biomarkers in steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent acute graft-versus-host disease: a REACH2 analysis
.
Blood
.
2023
;
141
(
22
):
2771
-
2779
.
36.
Ferrara
JLM
,
Chaudhry
MS
.
GVHD: biology matters
.
Blood Adv
.
2018
;
2
(
22
):
3411
-
3417
.
37.
Srinagesh
HK
,
Ozbek
U
,
Kapoor
U
, et al
.
The MAGIC algorithm probability is a validated response biomarker of treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease
.
Blood Adv
.
2019
;
3
(
23
):
4034
-
4042
.
38.
Pepe
MS
,
Feng
Z
,
Janes
H
,
Bossuyt
PM
,
Potter
JD
.
Pivotal evaluation of the accuracy of a biomarker used for classification or prediction: standards for study design
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
.
2008
;
100
(
20
):
1432
-
1438
.
39.
Harris
AC
,
Young
R
,
Devine
S
, et al
.
International, multicenter standardization of acute graft-versus-host disease clinical data collection: a report from the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium
.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
.
2016
;
22
(
1
):
4
-
10
.
40.
Bacigalupo
A
,
Ballen
K
,
Rizzo
D
, et al
.
Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions
.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
.
2009
;
15
(
12
):
1628
-
1633
.
41.
Sorror
ML
,
Storer
B
,
Storb
RF
.
Validation of the hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) in single and multiple institutions: limitations and inferences
.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
.
2009
;
15
(
6
):
757
-
758
.
42.
Zhang
J
,
Ramadan
AM
,
Griesenauer
B
, et al
.
ST2 blockade reduces sST2-producing T cells while maintaining protective mST2-expressing T cells during graft-versus-host disease
.
Sci Transl Med
.
2015
;
7
(
308
):
308ra160
.
43.
Zhao
D
,
Kim
YH
,
Jeong
S
, et al
.
Survival signal REG3alpha prevents crypt apoptosis to control acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease
.
J Clin Invest
.
2018
;
128
(
11
):
4970
-
4979
.
44.
Al Malki
MM
,
London
K
,
Baez
J
, et al
.
Phase 2 study of natalizumab plus standard corticosteroid treatment for high-risk acute graft-versus-host disease
.
Blood Adv
.
2023
;
7
(
17
):
5189
-
5198
.
45.
Robin
X
,
Turck
N
,
Hainard
A
, et al
.
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
.
BMC Bioinformatics
.
2011
;
12
:
77
.
46.
Gholamy
A
,
Kreinovich
V
,
Kosheleva
O
.
Why 70/30 or 80/20 relation between training and testing sets: a pedagogical explanation
.
Int J Intell Technol Appl Stat
.
2018
;
11
(
2
):
105
-
111
.
47.
Bzdok
D
,
Krzywinski
M
,
Altman
N
.
Points of significance: machine learning: a primer
.
Nat Methods
.
2017
;
14
(
12
):
1119
-
1120
.
48.
Breiman
L
,
Friedman
J
,
Stone
CJ
,
Olshen
RA
.
Classification and Regression Trees
. 1st ed..
Taylor & Francis
;
1984
.
49.
Hartigan
JA
,
Wong
MA
.
A K-means clustering algorithm
.
J R Stat Soc C Appl Stat
.
1979
;
28
(
1
):
100
-
108
.
50.
Kanda
Y
.
Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics
.
Bone Marrow Transplant
.
2013
;
48
(
3
):
452
-
458
.
51.
Nikiforow
S
,
Wang
T
,
Hemmer
M
, et al
.
Upper gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease adds minimal prognostic value in isolation or with other graft-versus-host disease symptoms as currently diagnosed and treated
.
Haematologica
.
2018
;
103
(
10
):
1708
-
1719
.
52.
Manhattan Risk and MAGIC Composite Score Calculator
. Accessed 17 July 2024. https://gvhdmagic.com/.
53.
Luznik
L
,
O'Donnell
PV
,
Symons
HJ
, et al
.
HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies using nonmyeloablative conditioning and high-dose, posttransplantation cyclophosphamide
.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
.
2008
;
14
(
6
):
641
-
650
.
54.
Meybodi
MA
,
Cao
W
,
Luznik
L
, et al
.
HLA-haploidentical vs matched-sibling hematopoietic cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Blood Adv
.
2019
;
3
(
17
):
2581
-
2585
.
55.
Bolanos-Meade
J
,
Reshef
R
,
Fraser
R
, et al
.
Three prophylaxis regimens (tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclophosphamide; tacrolimus, methotrexate, and bortezomib; or tacrolimus, methotrexate, and maraviroc) versus tacrolimus and methotrexate for prevention of graft-versus-host disease with haemopoietic cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning: a randomised phase 2 trial with a non-randomised contemporaneous control group (BMT CTN 1203)
.
Lancet Haematol
.
2019
;
6
(
3
):
e132
-
e143
.
56.
D'Souza
A
,
Fretham
C
,
Lee
SJ
, et al
.
Current use of and trends in hematopoietic cell transplantation in the United States
.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
.
2020
;
26
(
8
):
e177
-
e182
.
57.
Rimando
J
,
McCurdy
SR
,
Luznik
L
.
How I prevent GVHD in high-risk patients: posttransplant cyclophosphamide and beyond
.
Blood
.
2023
;
141
(
1
):
49
-
59
.
58.
Mielcarek
M
,
Furlong
T
,
Storer
BE
, et al
.
Effectiveness and safety of lower dose prednisone for initial treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease: a randomized controlled trial
.
Haematologica
.
2015
;
100
(
6
):
842
-
848
.
You do not currently have access to this content.
Sign in via your Institution