• With longer follow-up, significantly longer median PFS was maintained with ide-cel vs SRs; safety remained consistent.

  • OS analysis was confounded by patient crossover from SRs to ide-cel; crossover adjustment showed a trend of improved OS with ide-cel vs SRs.

Abstract

Outcomes are poor in triple-class–exposed (TCE) relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (R/RMM). In the phase 3 KarMMa-3 trial, patients with TCE R/RMM and 2 to 4 prior regimens were randomized 2:1 to idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) or standard regimens (SRs). An interim analysis (IA) demonstrated significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS; primary end point; 13.3 vs 4.4 months; P < .0001) and higher overall response rate (ORR) with ide-cel vs SRs. At final PFS analysis (median follow-up, 30.9 months), ide-cel further improved median PFS vs SRs (13.8 vs 4.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.63). PFS benefit with ide-cel vs SRs was observed regardless of number of prior lines of therapy, with greatest benefit after 2 prior lines (16.2 vs 4.8 months, respectively). ORR benefit was maintained with ide-cel vs SRs (71% vs 42%; complete response, 44% vs 5%). Patient-centric design allowed crossover from SRs (56%) to ide-cel upon progressive disease, confounding overall survival (OS) interpretation. At IA of OS, median was 41.4 (95% CI, 30.9 to not reached [NR]) vs 37.9 (95% CI, 23.4 to NR) months with ide-cel and SRs, respectively (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.73-1.40); median OS in both arms was longer than historical data (9-22 months). Two prespecified analyses adjusting for crossover showed OS favoring ide-cel. This trial highlighted the importance of individualized bridging therapy to ensure adequate disease control during ide-cel manufacturing. Ide-cel improved patient-reported outcomes vs SRs. No new safety signals were reported. These results demonstrate the continued favorable benefit-risk profile of ide-cel in early-line and TCE R/RMM. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03651128.

1.
Rodriguez-Lobato
LG
,
Pereira
A
,
Fernandez de Larrea
C
, et al
.
Real-world data on survival improvement in patients with multiple myeloma treated at a single institution over a 45-year period
.
Br J Haematol
.
2022
;
196
(
3
):
649
-
659
.
2.
Kumar
SK
,
Dimopoulos
MA
,
Kastritis
E
, et al
.
Natural history of relapsed myeloma, refractory to immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors: a multicenter IMWG study
.
Leukemia
.
2017
;
31
(
11
):
2443
-
2448
.
3.
Sonneveld
P
,
Broijl
A
.
Treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma
.
Haematologica
.
2016
;
101
(
4
):
396
-
406
.
4.
Dimopoulos
MA
,
Richardson
P
,
Lonial
S
.
Treatment options for patients with heavily pretreated relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma
.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk
.
2022
;
22
(
7
):
460
-
473
.
5.
Chari
A
,
Nair
S
,
Lin
X
,
Marshall
A
,
Slavcev
M
,
Kumar
S
. Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with triple-class exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in United States clinical practice.
Los Angeles, CA
:
Paper presented at: International Myeloma Workshop, Vol. P-237
;
25-27 August 2021
.
6.
Gandhi
UH
,
Cornell
RF
,
Lakshman
A
, et al
.
Outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma refractory to CD38-targeted monoclonal antibody therapy
.
Leukemia
.
2019
;
33
(
9
):
2266
-
2275
.
7.
Mateos
MV
,
Weisel
K
,
De Stefano
V
, et al
.
LocoMMotion: a prospective, non-interventional, multinational study of real-life current standards of care in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma
.
Leukemia
.
2022
;
36
(
5
):
1371
-
1376
.
8.
Kumar
S
,
Nair
S
,
Lin
X
, et al
.
Treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with triple-class exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: analysis of the Optum electronic health records and commercial claims database
.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk
.
2022
;
22
(
suppl 1
):
S183
.
9.
Lee
HC
,
Ramasamy
K
,
Weisel
K
, et al
.
Treatment patterns, survival, quality of life, and healthcare resource use among patients with triple-class refractory multiple myeloma in US clinical practice: findings from the Connect MM Disease Registry
.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk
.
2023
;
23
(
2
):
112
-
122
.
10.
Lee
H
,
Ailawadhi
S
,
Dhanda
D
, et al
.
P-285Real-world clinical outcomes and treatment patterns among patients with triple-class exposed multiple myeloma: an analysis using the Connect multiple myeloma disease registry
.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk
.
2023
;
23
(
suppl2
):
S193
-
S194
.
11.
Ramasamy
K
,
Goldschmidt
H
,
Moreau
P
, et al
.
Real-world clinical outcomes among triple-class exposed relapsed refractory multiple myeloma patients in US and Europe: a PREAMBLE registry study
.
HemaSphere
.
2023
;
7
(
S3
):
e642555a
.
12.
Moreau
P
,
Weisel
K
,
De Stefano
V
, et al
.
MM-464 LocoMMotion: a prospective, observational, multinational study of real-life current standards of care in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma–final analysis at 2-year follow-up
.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk
.
2023
;
23
(
suppl1
):
S500
-
S501
.
13.
Rodriguez-Otero
P
,
Ailawadhi
S
,
Arnulf
B
, et al
.
Ide-cel or standard regimens in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma
.
N Engl J Med
.
2023
;
388
(
11
):
1002
-
1014
.
14.
San-Miguel
J
,
Dhakal
B
,
Yong
K
, et al
.
Cilta-cel or standard care in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma
.
N Engl J Med
.
2023
;
389
(
4
):
335
-
347
.
15.
Sidana
S
,
Shah
N
.
CAR T-cell therapy: is it prime time in myeloma?
.
Blood Adv
.
2019
;
3
(
21
):
3473
-
3480
.
16.
Martin
T
,
Usmani
SZ
,
Berdeja
JG
, et al
.
Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, an anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: CARTITUDE-1 2-year follow-up
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2023
;
41
(
6
):
1265
-
1274
.
17.
Agha
ME
,
Cohen
AD
,
Madduri
D
, et al
.
CARTITUDE-2: efficacy and safety of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy, in patients with progressive multiple myeloma (MM) after one to three prior lines of therapy
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2021
;
39
(
15 suppl
):
8013
.
18.
Munshi
NC
,
Anderson
LD
,
Shah
N
, et al
.
Idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma
.
N Engl J Med
.
2021
;
384
(
8
):
705
-
716
.
19.
Raje
N
,
Berdeja
JG
,
Lin
Y
, et al
.
Anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy bb2121 in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
.
N Engl J Med
.
2019
;
380
(
18
):
1726
-
1737
.
20.
Jagannath
S
,
Lin
Y
,
Goldschmidt
H
, et al
.
KarMMa-RW: comparison of idecabtagene vicleucel with real-world outcomes in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma
.
Blood Cancer J
.
2021
;
11
(
6
):
116
.
21.
van de Donk
NWCJ
,
Agha
ME
,
Cohen
AD
, et al
.
Biological correlative analyses and updated clinical data of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a BCMA-directed CAR-T cell therapy, in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and early relapse after initial therapy: CARTITUDE-2, cohort B
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2022
;
40
(
16 suppl
):
8029
.
22.
Patel
K
,
Rodríguez-Otero
P
,
Manier
S
, et al
.
Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) versus standard regimens in patients With triple-class–exposed (TCE) relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): a KarMMa-3 analysis in high-risk subgroups
.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk
.
2023
;
23
(
23
):
S497
-
S498
.
23.
Dixon
JR
.
The International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice guideline
.
Qual Assur
.
1998
;
6
(
2
):
65
-
74
.
24.
Kumar
S
,
Paiva
B
,
Anderson
KC
, et al
.
International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma
.
Lancet Oncol
.
2016
;
17
(
8
):
e328
-
e346
.
25.
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4. 03
.
US Department of Health and Human Services
;
2010
.
26.
Lee
DW
,
Gardner
R
,
Porter
DL
, et al
.
Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of cytokine release syndrome
.
Blood
.
2014
;
124
(
2
):
188
-
195
.
27.
Question and Answer on Adjustment for Cross-Over in Estimating Effects in Oncology Trials
.
European Medicines Agency
;
2018
.
28.
Delforge
M
,
Patel
K
,
Eliason
L
, et al
.
Health-related quality of life in patients with triple-class exposed relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma treated with idecabtagene vicleucel or standard regimens: patient-reported outcomes from the phase 3, randomised, open-label KarMMa-3 clinical trial
.
Lancet Haematol
.
2024
;
11
(
3
):
e216
-
e227
.
29.
Aaronson
NK
,
Ahmedzai
S
,
Bergman
B
, et al
.
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
.
1993
;
85
(
5
):
365
-
376
.
30.
Giobbie-Hurder
A
,
Gelber
RD
,
Regan
MM
.
Challenges of guarantee-time bias
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2013
;
31
(
23
):
2963
-
2969
.
31.
Poh
C
,
Keegan
T
,
Rosenberg
AS
.
Second primary malignancies in multiple myeloma: a review
.
Blood Rev
.
2021
;
46
:
100757
.
32.
National Cancer Institute
.
SEER∗Explorer. Myeloma
. Accessed 11 July 2024. https://seer.cancer.gov/statistics-network/explorer/application.html.
You do not currently have access to this content.
Sign in via your Institution