• Our VRD regimen achieved a median PFS of 78 months and a 9-year overall survival rate of 66%, the longest reported with a triplet regimen.

  • BUMEL improved PFS in patients with ISS stage III disease, t(14;16) and del(1p). In contrast, MEL200 was favorable in patients with ISS stage I and del(17p).

Abstract

In retrospective studies, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) conditioning with intravenous busulfan and melphalan (BUMEL) led to longer progression-free survival (PFS) than melphalan alone (MEL200). We compared long-term outcomes of BUMEL vs MEL200 in the context of intensified bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) induction and consolidation therapies. GEM12 was a phase 3 trial for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) eligible for ASCT including 6 reinforced VRD cycles followed by ASCT conditioned with BUMEL or MEL200 and 2 VRD consolidation cycles. The primary end point was PFS. Subgroup analyses were based on International Staging System (ISS) stages and high-risk genetic abnormalities. Patients were randomized with an open-label 2 × 2 factorial design and 1:1:1:1 allocation ratio to ensure the balance between the GEM12 and the subsequent phase 3 GEM14 trial. Between 2013 and 2015, 458 patients were randomized (BUMEL, n = 230; MEL200, n = 228). The 10⁻⁶ MRD-negative rate was 63%, 68% for BUMEL vs 58% for MEL200 (odds ratio, 1.51; P = .035). The median PFS was 89 months for BUMEL and 73.1 for MEL200 (hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.14]; P = .3). BUMEL showed benefit for patients with ISS stages II or III, t(14;16), and del(1p). For subcohorts ISS stages II or III treated with BUMEL and ISS I treated with MEL200 the median PFS was 96.5 months (95% confidence interval, 76 to not estimable). No safety concerns were observed. After a median follow-up of 8.4 years, GEM2012 demonstrated one of the longest PFS values reported in patients with NDMM, with significant differences favoring BUMEL in advanced ISS stages. The trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT01916252 and at European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials as EudraCT 2012-005683-10.

1.
Attal
M
,
Harousseau
JL
,
Stoppa
AM
, et al
.
A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Français du Myélome
.
N Engl J Med
.
1996
;
335
(
2
):
91
-
97
.
2.
Fonseca
R
,
Rajkumar
SV
.
Consolidation therapy with bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone versus bortezomib/dexamethasone after a dexamethasone-based induction regimen in patients with multiple myeloma: a randomized phase III trial
.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma
.
2008
;
8
(
5
):
315
-
317
.
3.
Mina
R
,
Gay
F
.
The role of autologous stem-cell transplantation in multiple myeloma in 2021
.
Curr Opin Oncol
.
2021
;
33
(
6
):
642
-
647
.
4.
Lahuerta
JJ
,
Mateos
MV
,
Martínez-López
J
, et al
.
Busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m2 versus melphalan 200 mg/m2 as conditioning regimens for autologous transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients included in the PETHEMA/GEM2000 study
.
Haematologica
.
2010
;
95
(
11
):
1913
-
1920
.
5.
Blanes
M
,
de la Rubia
J
,
Lahuerta
JJ
, et al
.
Single daily dose of intravenous busulfan and melphalan as a conditioning regimen for patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation: a phase II trial
.
Leuk Lymphoma
.
2009
;
50
(
2
):
216
-
222
.
6.
Lahuerta
JJ
,
Grande
C
,
Blade
J
, et al
.
Myeloablative treatments for multiple myeloma: update of a comparative study of different regimens used in patients from the Spanish registry for transplantation in multiple myeloma
.
Leuk Lymphoma
.
2002
;
43
(
1
):
67
-
74
.
7.
Bashir
Q
,
Thall
PF
,
Milton
DR
, et al
.
Conditioning with busulfan plus melphalan versus melphalan alone before autologous haemopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial
.
Lancet Haematol
.
2019
;
6
(
5
):
e266
-
e275
.
8.
Richardson
PG
,
Jacobus
SJ
,
Weller
EA
, et al
.
Triplet therapy, transplantation, and maintenance until progression in myeloma
.
N Engl J Med
.
2022
;
387
(
2
):
132
-
147
.
9.
Moreau
P
,
Hulin
C
,
Perrot
A
, et al
.
Daratumumab plus bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone followed by DARA maintenance in transplant-eligible NDMM: plus 6-year update of cassiopeia
.
HemaSphere
.
2024
;
8
.
10.
Sonneveld
P
,
Dimopoulos
MA
,
Boccadoro
M
, et al
.
Daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma
.
N Engl J Med
.
2024
;
390
(
4
):
301
-
313
.
11.
Voorhees
PM
,
Kaufman
JL
,
Laubach
J
, et al
.
Daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the GRIFFIN trial
.
Blood
.
2020
;
136
(
8
):
936
-
945
.
12.
Attal
M
,
Lauwers-Cances
V
,
Hulin
C
, et al
.
Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone with transplantation for myeloma
.
N Engl J Med
.
2017
;
376
(
14
):
1311
-
1320
.
13.
Richardson
PG
,
San Miguel
JF
,
Moreau
P
, et al
.
Interpreting clinical trial data in multiple myeloma: translating findings to the real-world setting
.
Blood Cancer J
.
2018
;
8
(
11
):
109
.
14.
Richardson
PG
,
Weller
E
,
Lonial
S
, et al
.
Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
.
Blood
.
2010
;
116
(
5
):
679
-
686
.
15.
Rosiñol
L
,
Oriol
A
,
Ríos
R
, et al
.
Lenalidomide and dexamethasone maintenance with or without ixazomib, tailored by residual disease status in myeloma
.
Blood
.
2023
;
142
(
18
):
1518
-
1528
.
16.
Rosiñol
L
,
Oriol
A
,
Rios
R
, et al
.
Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy prior to autologous transplant in multiple myeloma
.
Blood
.
2019
;
134
(
16
):
1337
-
1345
.
17.
Kumar
S
,
Paiva
B
,
Anderson
KC
, et al
.
International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma
.
Lancet Oncol
.
2016
;
17
(
8
):
e328
-
e346
.
18.
Costa
LJ
,
Derman
BA
,
Bal
S
, et al
.
International harmonization in performing and reporting minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma trials
.
Leukemia
.
2021
;
35
(
1
):
18
-
30
.
19.
Richardson
PG
,
Durie
BG
,
Rosiñol
L
, et al
.
Clinical perspectives on the optimal use of lenalidomide plus bortezomib and dexamethasone for the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
.
Haematologica
.
2023
;
108
(
11
):
2894
-
2912
.
20.
Gandhi
AK
,
Kang
J
,
Capone
L
, et al
.
Dexamethasone synergizes with lenalidomide to inhibit multiple myeloma tumor growth, but reduces lenalidomide-induced immunomodulation of T and NK cell function
.
Curr Cancer Drug Targets
.
2010
;
10
(
2
):
155
-
167
.
21.
Mitsiades
N
,
Mitsiades
CS
,
Poulaki
V
, et al
.
Apoptotic signaling induced by immunomodulatory thalidomide analogs in human multiple myeloma cells: therapeutic implications
.
Blood
.
2002
;
99
(
12
):
4525
-
4530
.
22.
Adkins
DR
,
Salzman
D
,
Boldt
D
, et al
.
Phase I trial of dacarbazine with cyclophosphamide, carmustine, etoposide, and autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma
.
J Clin Oncol
.
1994
;
12
(
9
):
1890
-
1901
.
23.
Musso
M
,
Messina
G
,
Marcacci
G
, et al
.
High-dose melphalan plus thiotepa as conditioning regimen before second autologous stem cell transplantation for "de novo" multiple myeloma patients: a phase II study
.
Biol Blood Marrow Transpl
.
2015
;
21
(
11
):
1932
-
1938
.
24.
Sivaraj
D
,
Bacon
W
,
Long
GD
, et al
.
High-dose BCNU/melphalan conditioning regimen before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
.
Bone Marrow Transpl
.
2018
;
53
(
1
):
34
-
38
.
25.
Lahuerta
JJ
,
Martinez-Lopez
J
,
Grande
C
, et al
.
Conditioning regimens in autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: a comparative study of efficacy and toxicity from the Spanish registry for transplantation in multiple myeloma
.
Br J Haematol
.
2000
;
109
(
1
):
138
-
147
.
26.
Blanes
M
,
Lahuerta
JJ
,
González
JD
, et al
.
Intravenous busulfan and melphalan as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a matched comparison to a melphalan-only approach
.
Biol Blood Marrow Transpl
.
2013
;
19
(
1
):
69
-
74
.
27.
Andersson
BS
,
Madden
T
,
Tran
HT
, et al
.
Acute safety and pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan when used with oral busulfan and cyclophosphamide as pretransplantation conditioning therapy: a phase I study
.
Biol Blood Marrow Transpl
.
2000
;
6
(
5A
):
548
-
554
.
28.
Barta
SK
,
Jain
R
,
Mazumder
A
, et al
.
Pharmacokinetics-directed intravenous busulfan combined with high-dose melphalan and bortezomib as a conditioning regimen for patients with multiple myeloma
.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk
.
2017
;
17
(
10
):
650
-
657
.
29.
Krivoy
N
,
Hoffer
E
,
Lurie
Y
,
Bentur
Y
,
Rowe
JM
.
Busulfan use in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: pharmacology, dose adjustment, safety and efficacy in adults and children
.
Curr Drug Saf
.
2008
;
3
(
1
):
60
-
66
.
30.
Carreras
E
,
Rosiñol
L
,
Terol
MJ
, et al
.
Veno-occlusive disease of the liver after high-dose cytoreductive therapy with busulfan and melphalan for autologous blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients
.
Biol Blood Marrow Transpl
.
2007
;
13
(
12
):
1448
-
1454
.
31.
Clemmons
AB
,
Evans
S
,
DeRemer
DL
,
Awan
FT
.
Busulfan dosing (Q6 or Q24) with adjusted or actual body weight, does it matter?
.
J Oncol Pharm Pract
.
2015
;
21
(
6
):
425
-
432
.
32.
Kletzel
M
,
Jacobsohn
D
,
Duerst
R
.
Pharmacokinetics of a test dose of intravenous busulfan guide dose modifications to achieve an optimal area under the curve of a single daily dose of intravenous busulfan in children undergoing a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
.
Biol Blood Marrow Transpl
.
2006
;
12
(
4
):
472
-
479
.
33.
Mannis
GN
,
Andreadis
C
,
Logan
AC
, et al
.
A phase I study of targeted, dose-escalated intravenous busulfan in combination with etoposide as myeloablative therapy for autologous stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia
.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk
.
2015
;
15
(
6
):
377
-
383
.
34.
McCune
JS
,
Gibbs
JP
,
Slattery
JT
.
Plasma concentration monitoring of busulfan: does it improve clinical outcome?
.
Clin Pharmacokinet
.
2000
;
39
(
2
):
155
-
165
.
35.
Blanes
M
,
González
JD
,
Lahuerta
JJ
, et al
.
Bortezomib-based induction therapy followed by intravenous busulfan-melphalan as conditioning regimen for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
.
Leuk Lymphoma
.
2015
;
56
(
2
):
415
-
419
.
36.
Kim
M
,
Lee
JJ
,
Min
CK
, et al
.
Busulfan plus melphalan versus high-dose melphalan as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma with high-risk features (KMM 2015)
.
Ann Hematol
.
2023
;
102
(
8
):
2233
-
2240
.
37.
Park
S
,
Shin
DY
,
Hong
J
, et al
.
Busulfan plus melphalan versus melphalan alone conditioning regimen after bortezomib based triplet induction chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
.
Ther Adv Hematol
.
2021
;
12
:
20406207211012985
.
38.
Zhang
CY
,
Fu
WJ
,
Xi
H
, et al
.
Busulfan, cyclophosphamide and etoposide as conditioning for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma
.
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi
.
2013
;
34
(
4
):
313
-
316
.
39.
Gao
F
,
Lin
MS
,
You
JS
, et al
.
Long-term outcomes of busulfan plus melphalan-based versus melphalan 200 mg/m2 conditioning regimens for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Cancer Cell Int
.
2021
;
21
(
1
):
601
.
40.
Qazilbash
M TP
,
Milton
D
,
Kawedia
J
, et al
. Busulfan plus melphalan versus melphalan alone as conditioning before autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: long-term follow up of a randomized phase III trial.
Paper presented at the 21st International Myeloma Society Annual Meeting
;
2025
.
41.
Landgren
O
,
Prior
TJ
,
Masterson
T
, et al
.
EVIDENCE meta-analysis: evaluating minimal residual disease as an intermediate clinical end point for multiple myeloma
.
Blood
.
2024
;
144
(
4
):
359
-
367
.
42.
Jevremovic
D
,
Shi
M
,
Horna
P
, et al
.
FDA IDE validation of multiple myeloma MRD test by flow cytometry
.
Am J Hematol
.
2024
;
99
(
12
):
2399
-
2401
.
43.
Pawlyn
C
,
Schjesvold
FH
,
Cairns
DA
, et al
.
Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint in myeloma clinical trials: an evolving paradigm
.
Blood Cancer J
.
2024
;
14
(
1
):
134
.
44.
Leypoldt
LB
,
Tichy
D
,
Besemer
B
, et al
.
Isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for the treatment of high-risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2024
;
42
(
1
):
26
-
37
.
45.
Geng
J
,
Zhao
J
,
Fan
R
, et al
.
Global, regional, and national burden and quality of care of multiple myeloma, 1990-2019
.
J Glob Health
.
2024
;
14
:
04033
.
You do not currently have access to this content.
Sign in via your Institution