The present study was designed to test the concept that platelets release a humoral factor that plays a regulatory role in megakaryopoiesis. The results showed that, among various hematoregulatory cytokines examined, transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) was by far the most potent enhancer of mRNA expression of bone marrow stromal thrombopoietin (TPO), a commitment of lineage specificity. The TPO, in turn, induced TGF-β receptors I and II on megakaryoblasts at the midmegakaryopoietic stage; at this stage, TGF-β1 was able to arrest the maturation of megakaryocyte colony-forming units (CFU-Meg). This effect was relatively specific when compared with its effect on burst-forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E) or colony-forming unit–granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM). In patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), the levels of both TGF-β1 and stromal TPO mRNA were correlatively increased and an arrest of megakaryocyte maturation was observed. These in vivo findings are in accord with the aforementioned in vitro results. Thus, the results of the present investigation suggest that TGF-β1 is one of the pathophysiological feedback regulators of megakaryopoiesis.

THROMBOPOIETIN (TPO), one of the most potent stimulators of platelet production, had been shown to be produced by various organs such as the liver, kidney, spleen, and lung.1-5 Because the mode of TPO production by these organs is constitutive, serum levels of TPO had been proposed to be regulated by adsorption of TPO on the surface of platelets (sponge theory).6 However, we have recently found that bone marrow (BM) stromal cells nonconstitutively produced it, relative to the platelet counts, ie, higher levels of TPO mRNA were found in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) than in normal subjects, and these high levels were normalized upon treatment.7Therefore, it was speculated that there must be some sensor(s) on stromal cells to detect the platelet counts in the circulation, although the mechanism was unknown.

Alternatively, regulation of platelet formation by growth suppressors acting directly on megakaryopoiesis has also been proposed. Among these, transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) has attracted particular interest as a candidate for a mediator of feedback signal from the end product of megakaryopoiesis (platelets), because it is highly concentrated in platelets.8 Several investigators have indeed demonstrated a dose-dependent suppression of megakaryocyte colony-forming units (CFU-Meg) by TGF-β1.9,10 However, the fact that a similar growth inhibition by TGF-β1 has reportedly been observed with progenitors of erythroid, myeloid, and primitive hematopoiesis, although the inhibition was relatively intense on CFU-Meg, raised a question as to the specificity of TGF-β1 action on megakaryopoiesis. Contrarily, some in vivo experiments using murine models are suggestive of selectivity of TGF-β1 on megakaryopoiesis. Systemic administration of TGF-β1 was shown to evoke thrombocytopenia but not suppress the neutrophil and lymphocyte counts.11 In TGF-β1 gene knockout mice, an excess of megakaryopoiesis with increased platelet count in circulation was reported.12 13Taking these facts into account, we postulated that, in vivo, TGF-β1, in addition to its direct inhibitory action on CFU-Meg, specifically regulates the production of TPO by stromal cells and thereby indirectly defines its specificity on megakaryocyte lineage.

In the present investigation, therefore, we examined the effect of TGF-β1 on expression of TPO in stromal cells obtained from normal volunteers as well as its effect on CFU-Meg induced by TPO. We also elucidated the concentrations of BM TGF-β1, levels of stromal TPO mRNA, and profiles of BM megakaryopoiesis in normal subjects and patients with ITP.

The results obtained clearly indicated that TGF-β1 is indeed a feedback regulator of megakaryopoiesis in humans.

Patients and normal subjects.

Six patients with ITP admitted to our hospital from 1996 to 1997 were examined after informed consent was obtained. Five of the patients underwent steroid therapy. Normal subjects were volunteer doctors in our department and were also fully informed of the experimental protocol.

Cytokines.

Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), TPO, erythropoietin (EPO), interleukin-3 (IL-3), and IL-6 were kindly provided by Kirin Brewery Co, Ltd (Maebashi, Japan). Recombinant human TGF-β1 (rhTGF-β1) in active form and recombinant human tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were purchased from Genzyme Corp (Boston, MA).

Treatment of BM stromal cells with TGF-β1, TNF, IL-3, IL-6, TPO, G-CSF, or EPO.

BM stromal cells were prepared according to the previously published Dexter’s method.14-16 One milliliter of BM blood was taken from the iliac bone crest of patients with ITP and normal subjects using a heparinized syringe as described elsewhere. To examine the modulation of TPO mRNA expression by various hematoregulatory cytokines, BM stromal cells (1 × 106 cells) obtained from a normal subject (Y.H.) were incubated with various cytokines in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and 10% horse serum (HS) at 37°C in humidified 5% CO2 for 24 hours and then collected in RPMI 1640. The concentration range for each cytokine (TGF-β1, 0.1 to 2.0 ng/mL; TNF-α, 50 to 500 U/mL; IL-3, 5 to 50 ng/mL; IL-6, 5 to 50 ng/mL; TPO, 10 to 100 ng/mL; EPO, 0.2 to 2 U/mL; and G-CSF, 10 to 100 ng/mL) was determined to cover their upper limit of pathophysiological concentrations in biological fluid.17,18 In certain pathological conditions, circulating TGF-β1 often reach concentrations as high as 1.0 ng/mL. TNF-α at 500 U/mL has been previously used to stimulate growth factors mRNA expressions such as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), IL-6, and IL-1β in normal human BM stromal cells.19 In some pathological conditions, the concentration of IL-3 or IL-6 in biological fluid may reach as high as 50 ng/mL. TPO at 100 ng/mL, 100 ng/mL of G-CSF, and 2 U/mL of EPO have been routinely used for stimulation of CFU-Meg,20,21colony-forming unit–granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM),22 and burst-forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E).23 

Assay of hematopoietic progenitors (CFU-Meg, CFU-GM, and BFU-E).

CD34+ cells from normal subjects were collected from a suspension of BM mononuclear cells using immunomagnetic beads according to the method of Debili et al.24 The recovery rate (65.6% ± 3.8%) and purity (93.1% ± 2.9%) of CD34+ cells were sufficiently high for fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). CD34+ cells (1 × 103) were cultured in a 35-mm diameter plate (Corning, Corning, NY) in the presence of rhTGF-β1 (0.1 or 1.0 ng/mL) and TPO (1.0, 10.0, or 100 ng/mL), G-CSF (100 ng/mL), or EPO (2 U/mL) in 20% FCS containing 0.8% methylcellulose following the previous reported method.24The plates were then incubated at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air in a humidified incubator. After 14 days, the cultures were examined microscopically and the number of colonies formed in the presence of each TPO, G-CSF, or EPO were scored as CFU-Meg (>4 cells), CFU-GM (>50 cells), or BFU-E (>50 cells), respectively. To determine at which stage of megakaryopoiesis TGF-β1 acts, CD34+ cells from normal subject (Y.H.) were incubated with 1.0 ng/mL rhTGF-β1 in the presence of TPO (100 ng/mL) for 14 days and the number of CFU-Meg colonies were scored at days 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14, respectively. CD34+ cells that were preincubated with 1.0 ng/mL of rhTGF-β1 for 24 hours were also cultured with 100 ng/mL of TPO and CFU-Meg colony numbers were scored at day 14.

Preparation of standard mRNAs of TPO, G-CSF, and GAPDH for TaqMan polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

To quantitate an absolute amount of TPO and G-CSF mRNA in stromal cells by TaqMan PCR, standard curves for both cytokine mRNA were prepared.25 Briefly, total mRNA was prepared from stromal cells of Y.H. using RNA Sol B (Tel-Test, Inc, Friendswood, TX) according to the acid guanidium isothiocyanate extraction method.3,26 The first cDNA strand was synthesized using total mRNA (1 μg) at 42°C for 30 minutes in buffer containing 100 ng of oligo (dT), 500 mmol/L dNTPs, 10 mmol/L dithiothreitol (DTT), 200 U of SuperScript II RNase H-reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc, Gaithersburg, MD), and 1× reverse transcriptase buffer with a 20 μL reaction volume. The mixture was then denatured at 94°C for 3 minutes and cooled on ice. For amplification of the open reading frame, the following primers were used for TPO, G-CSF, and GAPDH mRNA, respectively: 5′ (102-126 nt), 3′ (1138-1163 nt); 5′ (32-53 nt), 3′ (636-655 nt); and 5′ (112-132 nt), 3′ (708-744 nt), respectively.1 27 These oligomers (1 μg) were phosphorylated at 5′-end by incubation with 10 U of T4 polynucleotide kinase (Takara Shuzo, Kyoto, Japan) at 37°C for 1 hour. PCR amplification was performed with 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 seconds and 68°C for 3 minutes by using Advantage-GC cDNA PCR kit (Clontech Laboratories, Inc, Palo Alto, CA). The PCR products were electrophoresed on a 1% agarose gel and a fragment of 1,062 bp (TPO) or 624 bp (G-CSF) in size was extracted by Geneclean kit (BIO 101, Inc, Vista, CA). TPO or G-CSF cDNA was subcloned into the EcoRV site of pPCR-Script Amp SK(+) cloning vector (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). To prepare the linear template DNA, the cloning vector containing TPO or G-CSF cDNA was digested with HindIII. Sense RNA of TPO or G-CSF was synthesized using T3 RNA polymerase. The linearized vector (0.5 μg) was incubated at 37°C for 1 hour with 10 U of T3 RNA polymerase (Takara Shuzo), 10 U of placental ribonuclease inhibitor (Takara Shuzo), 500 mmol/L NTPs, and 10 mmol/L DTT. After incubation, 10 U of RNase-free DNase I was added and incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes to digest out the template DNA. The transcribed RNA was purified by extraction with phenol/chloroform and concentrated by ethanol precipitation. The pellet was rinsed with 75% ethanol, dried, and dissolved in diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)-water. The concentration of RNA was calculated by absorbance at 260 nm. Serially diluted RNAs with DEPC-water containing 100 μg/mL of yeast tRNA as a carrier were subjected to TaqMan reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) followed by the method as described below. The TPO and G-CSF mRNA were amplified linearly in a range of 4 log dilutions of input molecules.

TaqMan real time quantitative RT-PCR assay for mRNAs of TPO, G-CSF, and GAPDH.

According to our previous report,7 TaqMan RT-PCR assay was conducted. In brief, oligonucleotides for TaqMan RT-PCR assay were labeled with FAM (6-carboxyfluorescein), JOE (6-carboxy-4,5-dichloro-2,7-dimethoxyfluorescein), or TAMRA (6-carboxytetramethylrodamine). RNA from stromal cells incubated with or without cytokines as described above was applied for reverse transcription and amplification using TaqMan EZ RT-PCR kit (Perkin Elmer, Foster City, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A master mixture that contained all reagents required for RT-PCR was prepared to give a final concentration of 1× TaqMan EZ buffer, 0.3 mmol/L dNTPs, 3 mmol/L manganese acetate, 0.01 U/mL AmpErase UNG, and 0.1 U/mL rTth DNA polymerase. Total RNA extracts (containing unknown amounts of target TPO, G-CSF, and GAPDH mRNA from BM stromal cells) were added to the master mixture. This mixture was used to generate two sets of tubes, set I and set II. To detect the amount of the TPO, G-CSF, and GAPDH mRNA RT-PCR amplicon, a target hybridization probe and primers were added to set I and an internal control hybridization probe and primers were added to set II to give final probe concentrations of 100 and 200 nmol/L primers. Each mixture was transferred to a set of thermocycler tubes. The increase in fluorescence (Δ Rn) was proportional to the concentration of template in the PCR. Threshold Δ Rn is calculated by multiplying the standard deviation of 3 Rn-values (no template controls) by 6.965 according to the manufacturer’s protocol for TaqMan RT-PCR Kit. The PCR cycle number at the threshold line represents cycle of threshold (CT).

RT-PCR for TGF-β receptor I and II mRNA.

BM CD34+ cells of normal subjects were cultured in α-minimum essential medium (α-MEM) containing TPO (100 ng/mL) and 20% plasma. The cells were harvested on days 0, 2, 4, 7, and 14 and mRNA was extracted on each day. An aliquot of 1.0 μg RNA from each sample was reverse transcribed according to the above-mentioned method. Using an oligonucleotide primer of TGF-β receptor I (5′, 1342-1360 nt; 3′, 1672-1690 nt)28 and II (5′, 1722-1740 nt; 3′, 2009-2027 nt),29 40 cycles of PCR were conducted. The amplified products were electrophoresed on 5% polyacrylamide gels and stained with ethidium bromide.

Preparation of platelet lysate.

Platelet pellets were obtained by centrifugation at 800g for 30 minutes from 100 mL of platelet-rich plasma from a healthy volunteer, followed by 5 cycles of freezing and thawing of the pellet in phosphate-buffered saline. Acidification of lysate (0.5 mL) was performed by incubation with 1 mL of 0.23 mol/L HCl.30After 12 hours, the concentrations of latent and active TGF-β1 were measured and stored at −20°C until use.

Assay for TGF-β.

The concentrations of TGF-β1 (both active and latent forms) in BM and peripheral blood (PB) plasma of patients with ITP and normal subjects and those of platelet lysates prepared as described below were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Promega Co, Madison, WI).31 Briefly, 1 mL of BM and PB samples were diluted with normal saline (3-fold) containing 100 U/mL of heparin; BM and PB samples (containing 100 U/mL heparin) were then placed on ice and centrifuged within 1 hour after collection at 2°C to 8°C for 30 minutes at 1,000g. The supernatants were collected as platelet-poor plasma for the following assay. The total (active + latent) TGF-β1 was assayed after acid activation of the plasma or platelet lysate by adding 1 μL of 1 N HCl to 50 μL diluted plasma (1:5 in Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline [DPBS]). The reaction solution was mixed and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes before it was neutralized by 1 μL of 1 N of NaOH. It was further diluted to 1:150 in DPBS buffer (containing K, Na+, Cl, HPO4, Ca2+, and Ma2+, pH 7.35) before ELISAs. To measure the amount of active TGF-β1, the acidification procedure was omitted. Concentration of latent TGF-β1 was calculated as a concentration of total TGF-β1 minus active TGF-β1. The color change of the final reaction was measured at a wavelength of 450 nm for the optimal density, and the standard curve (TGF-β1 concentrationv absorbances) was also a linear in a linear-linear scale.

Assay for TPO.

Concentrations of TPO in conditioned media from BM stromal cells stimulated with TGF-β1 or platelet lysates were measured using an ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Rochester, MN) following the instructions of the provided manufacturer’s manual as previously described.7 

Measurement of megakaryocyte numbers.

BM aspirates of patients with ITP or normal subjects were obtained from iliac bone crest during diagnostic procedures. After BM aspirates were 20-fold diluted with Turk medium, and the megakaryocyte number was counted with Fuchs-Rosenthal calculation glass (Kayagaki, Tokyo, Japan). Although counting megakaryocytes from aspirate may not be as accurate as counting from biopsy samples, the latter technique was not used in this particular investigation because it was difficult to obtain informed consent for biopsy from normal volunteers. The morphology of megakaryocytes was studied on May-Grunwald-Giemsa–stained smears by light microscopy. Immature megakaryocytes with a low cytoplasm-to-nucleus ratio, nongranular cytoplasm, and a nucleus that appears uniformly stippled were identified following the method reported by Odell and Jacson.32 

Statistical analysis.

Means and standard errors were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U-tests. A P value of less than .05 was accepted as statistically significant.

Suppression of CFU-Meg by TGF-β1 at midmegakaryopoiesis.

The effects of TGF-β1 on CFU-Meg from 3 normal subjects were examined in the presence of TPO. As shown in Fig 1, CFU-Meg was suppressed by TGF-β1 in a dose-dependent manner. TGF-β1 also suppressed CFU-GM and BFU-E, but to a lesser extent. For example, at 0.1 ng/mL of TGF-β1, CFU-Meg were suppressed 5 times more than CFU-GM and twice more than BFU-E. Therefore, suppression by TGF-β1 was considered to be relatively specific for CFU-Meg as compared with CFU-GM or BFU-E.

Fig. 1.

Dose-dependent suppression of CFU-Meg, CFU-GM, and BFU-E colony formation by TGF-β1. CD34+ cells for colony assays were obtained from 3 different normal volunteers (cases no. 1, 2, and 3). CFU-Meg colony assay from 1 × 103 of CD34+ cells was performed with TPO at a concentration of 100 ng/mL (○), 10 ng/mL (•), or 1.0 ng/mL (▪) in the presence of 0.1 and 1.0 ng/mL of TGF-β1. CFU-GM and BFU-E colony assay was performed with 100 ng/mL of G-CSF and 2 U/mL of EPO, respectively, in the presence of TGF-β1 (0.1 or 1.0 ng/mL). Data are shown as the mean of triplicate colony number with error bars as SD.

Fig. 1.

Dose-dependent suppression of CFU-Meg, CFU-GM, and BFU-E colony formation by TGF-β1. CD34+ cells for colony assays were obtained from 3 different normal volunteers (cases no. 1, 2, and 3). CFU-Meg colony assay from 1 × 103 of CD34+ cells was performed with TPO at a concentration of 100 ng/mL (○), 10 ng/mL (•), or 1.0 ng/mL (▪) in the presence of 0.1 and 1.0 ng/mL of TGF-β1. CFU-GM and BFU-E colony assay was performed with 100 ng/mL of G-CSF and 2 U/mL of EPO, respectively, in the presence of TGF-β1 (0.1 or 1.0 ng/mL). Data are shown as the mean of triplicate colony number with error bars as SD.

Close modal

We next determined if the suppression of CFU-Meg by TGF-β1 was limited to a specific stage of megakaryopoiesis. TGF-β1 was added at various times to CFU-Meg formed in the presence of TPO (Fig 2). CD34+ cells that were not exposed to TPO stimulation showed no susceptibility to TGF-β1. The effect of TGF-β1 was weak at early stages (days 0 to 2), became apparent between days 4 and 6, and then at later stages returned to low levels (days 8 to 14). The results indicate that the suppressive effect of TGF-β1 is seen primarily at mid-megakaryopoiesis.

Fig. 2.

Stage-specific suppression of CFU-Meg by TGF-β1. CFU-Meg colony assay was performed with CD34+ cells incubated with TGF-β1 (1.0 ng/mL) in a delayed addition fashion at days 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 ([▩] presence of TPO in culture medium; [▧] presence of TGF-β1 in the culture medium). CFU-Meg colony assays, without TGF-β1 and with TGF-β1 preincubation for 24 hours, were also performed.

Fig. 2.

Stage-specific suppression of CFU-Meg by TGF-β1. CFU-Meg colony assay was performed with CD34+ cells incubated with TGF-β1 (1.0 ng/mL) in a delayed addition fashion at days 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 ([▩] presence of TPO in culture medium; [▧] presence of TGF-β1 in the culture medium). CFU-Meg colony assays, without TGF-β1 and with TGF-β1 preincubation for 24 hours, were also performed.

Close modal
Induction of TGF-β receptor I and II by TPO at midmegakaryopoietic stage.

The above-noted observations prompted us to examine the expression of receptors for TGF-β during megakaryopoiesis. The results are shown in Fig 3. The expression(s) of TGF-β receptors I and II was demonstrated to be evident only on days 2 to 4 and not on earlier or later days. This finding was compatible with the above-noted results showing that the maximal suppression of CFU-Meg by TGF-β1 is observed at the midmegakaryopoietic period.

Fig. 3.

Serial expression of mRNAs for TGF-β receptors I and II in culture. CD34+ cells were cultured in -MEM containing TPO (100 ng/mL). mRNAs for TGF-β receptors I and II were examined by RT-PCR.

Fig. 3.

Serial expression of mRNAs for TGF-β receptors I and II in culture. CD34+ cells were cultured in -MEM containing TPO (100 ng/mL). mRNAs for TGF-β receptors I and II were examined by RT-PCR.

Close modal
Modulation of TPO expression in BM stromal cells by cytokines.

If TGF-β1 is indeed a feedback regulator for megakaryopoiesis, there should be a certain mechanism(s) that defines strict specificity of TGF-β action on megakaryopoiesis besides its relatively selective effect on CFU-Meg. We hypothesized that TGF-β1, as compared with other hematoregulatory cytokines, such as IL-3, IL-6, G-CSF, EPO, and TNF, might preferentially induce the stromal production of TPO, which, in turn, promotes commitment of stem cells into specific differentiation of megakaryolineage. Because, at present, there is no method to obtain large quantities of stromal cells directly from BM, we used the Dexter culture method that provides stromal cells comparable to their in vivo antecedents.33-35 Quantification of mRNA in stromal cells was performed using TaqMan RT-PCR. This method has been recently proven to be far more sensitive than RNAse protection assay and more accurate than competitive RT-PCR. The absolute amounts of mRNA in stromal cells were assessed by using standard curves of synthesized mRNA (Fig 4A). When normal BM stromal cells were treated with TGF-β1, expression of TPO mRNA showed an apparent and dose-dependent increment up to 7 times that of untreated cells (Fig 4B). TNF also showed an increment but to a much lesser degree, almost one fourth at maximal level than that of TGF-β1–treated stromal cells. TPO itself and IL-6 rather suppressed stromal TPO mRNA. G-CSF, EPO, and IL-3 showed essentially no effect on TPO mRNA expression.

Fig. 4.

(A) Standard curves of mRNAs for TPO (A), G-CSF (B), and GAPDH (C) in TaqMan RT-PCR analysis. Each standard mRNA preparation, synthesized using the method as shown in the text, was applied to the TaqMan RT-PCR system. The actual weight of each mRNA inputted to the system were plotted versus each cycle of threshold (CT). Absolute amounts of mRNA in stromal samples was determined by extrapolation to the x-axis. (B) Analysis of TPO mRNA expression in BM stromal cells treated with various cytokines. BM stromal cells obtained using Dexter culture method were cultured in -MEM with various cytokines for 24 hours. One microgram of total cellular RNA was isolated and TaqMan RT-PCR was performed with oligonucleotide primer for TPO. GAPDH was used as the internal control. Threshold Rn value and CT were obtained as described in Materials and Methods. TPO mRNA level and GAPDH mRNA level can be determined by standard curve of applied RNA weight and CT value. (C) Analysis of G-CSF mRNA expression in BM stromal cells treated with TGF-β1. BM stromal cells, obtained using the Dexter culture method, were cultured in -MEM with 0.3, 1.0, and 2.0 ng/mL of TGF-β1 for 24 hours. One microgram of total cellular RNA was isolated and TaqMan RT-PCR was performed with oligonucleotide primer for G-CSF. GAPDH was used as the internal control. G-CSF mRNA level and GAPDH mRNA level can be determined by standard curve of applied RNA weight and CT values.

Fig. 4.

(A) Standard curves of mRNAs for TPO (A), G-CSF (B), and GAPDH (C) in TaqMan RT-PCR analysis. Each standard mRNA preparation, synthesized using the method as shown in the text, was applied to the TaqMan RT-PCR system. The actual weight of each mRNA inputted to the system were plotted versus each cycle of threshold (CT). Absolute amounts of mRNA in stromal samples was determined by extrapolation to the x-axis. (B) Analysis of TPO mRNA expression in BM stromal cells treated with various cytokines. BM stromal cells obtained using Dexter culture method were cultured in -MEM with various cytokines for 24 hours. One microgram of total cellular RNA was isolated and TaqMan RT-PCR was performed with oligonucleotide primer for TPO. GAPDH was used as the internal control. Threshold Rn value and CT were obtained as described in Materials and Methods. TPO mRNA level and GAPDH mRNA level can be determined by standard curve of applied RNA weight and CT value. (C) Analysis of G-CSF mRNA expression in BM stromal cells treated with TGF-β1. BM stromal cells, obtained using the Dexter culture method, were cultured in -MEM with 0.3, 1.0, and 2.0 ng/mL of TGF-β1 for 24 hours. One microgram of total cellular RNA was isolated and TaqMan RT-PCR was performed with oligonucleotide primer for G-CSF. GAPDH was used as the internal control. G-CSF mRNA level and GAPDH mRNA level can be determined by standard curve of applied RNA weight and CT values.

Close modal

The increment of TPO expression in stromal cells by TGF-β1 was further verified by the measurement of TPO protein. As shown in Table 1, TPO concentrations in conditioned medium of stromal cells cultured for 24 hours and 48 hours with TGF-β1 were 37.5 ± 4.6 pg/mL and 162.7 ± 25.4 pg/mL, respectively. These were significantly higher than those (18.3 ± 2.5 pg/mL and 30.4 ± 3.7 pg/mL) of culture supernatants without TGF-β1.

Table 1.

Concentrations of TPO Protein in the Supernatant of BM Stromal Cells Stimulated With TGF-β1 or Platelet Lysate

graphic
 
graphic
 

Bone marrow stromal cells were suspended in 96-well plates at a concentration of 5 × 104/250 μL per well. After 24 hours of culture, the cells were refed with or without active TGF-β1 or platelet lysate. The concentration of TGF-β1 in platelet lysate was diluted to 2.0 ng/mL with α-MEM. The supernatants were removed after 24 and 48 hours of incubation and then assessed for ELISA. The platelet lysates were preincubated with 100 mg/mL of a polyclonal neutralizing anti–TGF-β1 antibody or an irrelevant mouse IgG1 at 37°C for 2 hours. Numbers represent TPO concentrations in picograms per milliliter.

Abbreviation: ND, not detectable.

*

P < .05.

To rule out the effect of agents other than TGF-β1 originating from platelets, we investigated the effect of anti–TGF-β antibody on TPO production of BM stromal cells by platelet lysates (Table 1). TPO concentrations in culture supernatant were 36.5 ± 3.1 pg/mL and 147.2 ± 18.4 pg/mL for 24 and 48 hours after incubation, respectively. This increment was blocked when the lysate was incubated with 100 μg/mL of anti–TGF-β1 polyclonal antibody (Selotec, Oxford, UK) but not with an irrelevant mouse Ig G1. These results clearly showed that TGF-β1, and no other factors originating from platelets, stimulates BM stromal TPO production.

We further studied the effect of TGF-β1 on stromal mRNA of 2 other essential hematopoietic factors: G-CSF and EPO. As shown in Fig 4C, the levels of G-CSF mRNA in TGF-β1–treated cells did show an increment, but only twice those of nontreated cells when treated at the same concentrations used for stimulation of TPO mRNA. EPO mRNA was not detectable in the stromal cell preparation; therefore, no effect due to TGF-β1 treatment was observed. Taken collectively, TGF-β1 was found to be a potent and considerably specific upregulator of TPO mRNA in stromal cells.

Increased expression levels of TPO mRNA in stromal cells and TGF-β concentrations in BM from the patients with ITP.

The pathophysiological significance of the previously stated in vitro findings were validated by examining the levels of BM TGF-β1 and stromal TPO mRNA expression in normal subjects and patients with ITP. Quantification of the stromal TPO mRNA was similarly performed using TaqMan RT-PCR. In Table 2 are shown the mean concentrations of active TGF-β1 together with those of latent form in BM and PB of normal subjects and patients with ITP. Both active and latent values in ITP were higher (P < .05) than those in normal subjects and returned to near-normal values after steroid therapy. As shown in Fig 5, in each case without exception, the level of active and latent TGF-β1 in BM was higher than that in PB. There was a strong positive correlation between values of TGF-β1 in BM and those in PB of these patients (active TGF-β1, r = .82; latent TGF-β1, r = .85). The inclination is steeper in latent TGF-β1 (y = 2.05x − 0.34) than in active TGF-β1 (y = 1.23x + 0.032). When the data of these results were plotted (Fig 6), a positive correlation between these concentrations of active TGF-β1 and levels of TPO mRNA was observed.

Table 2.

Laboratory Findings on Megakaryopoiesis of Normal Subjects and the Patients With ITP Before and After PSL Treatment

graphic
 
graphic
 

Immature megakaryocyte indicates a megakaryocyte with a low cytoplasm-to nucleus ratio, nongranular cytoplasm, and a nucleus that appears uniformly stippled. Data represent the mean ± SD.

*

P < .05.

Fig. 5.

Relationship between BM and PB TGF-β concentrations. The concentrations of TGF-β1 (both active and latent forms) in BM and PB plasma were measure by ELISA. (•) Normal subject; (□) patient with ITP; (▵) patient with ITP after PSL treatment. A positive correlation was observed in both active and latent TGF-β1 (r= .82 and .85, respectively). In each subject, the TGF-β1 concentrations in BM were consistently higher than those in the PB. (A) Active TGF-β1; (B) latent TGF-β1.

Fig. 5.

Relationship between BM and PB TGF-β concentrations. The concentrations of TGF-β1 (both active and latent forms) in BM and PB plasma were measure by ELISA. (•) Normal subject; (□) patient with ITP; (▵) patient with ITP after PSL treatment. A positive correlation was observed in both active and latent TGF-β1 (r= .82 and .85, respectively). In each subject, the TGF-β1 concentrations in BM were consistently higher than those in the PB. (A) Active TGF-β1; (B) latent TGF-β1.

Close modal
Fig. 6.

Relationship between the concentration of BM TGF-β1 and TPO mRNA expression in BM stromal cells. (•) Normal subject; (□) patient with ITP; (▵) patient with ITP after PSL treatment. Positive correlation was observed (r = .72).

Fig. 6.

Relationship between the concentration of BM TGF-β1 and TPO mRNA expression in BM stromal cells. (•) Normal subject; (□) patient with ITP; (▵) patient with ITP after PSL treatment. Positive correlation was observed (r = .72).

Close modal
Maturation arrest of megakaryocytes in BM of ITP patients.

BM trephines of ITP patients showed a higher number of megakaryocytes than normal subjects with hypolobulation (maturation arrest) that tended to normalize as the TGF-β1 concentration returned to normal in those who underwent steroid therapy (Table 2), consistent with the in vitro finding that TGF-β–treated CFU-Meg is impaired at middifferentiation stages but not at earlier stages (Fig 7).

Fig. 7.

Regulation of megakaryopoiesis. TPO mRNA expression in BM stromal cells is enhanced by TGF-β1, which suppresses the TPO-promoted CFU-Meg with relative specificity at midmegakaryopoiesis by interacting with receptors I and II, which were induced by TPO itself in normal subjects (A). Increased TGF-β1 from destroyed platelets or megakaryocytes markedly upregulates TPO mRNA expression in stromal cells. The subsequent production of TPO stimulates stem cells to commit to the megakaryocyte lineage. The expression of the TGF-β receptor on megakaryoblasts renders them susceptible to suppression by TGF-β1 in patients with ITP (B).

Fig. 7.

Regulation of megakaryopoiesis. TPO mRNA expression in BM stromal cells is enhanced by TGF-β1, which suppresses the TPO-promoted CFU-Meg with relative specificity at midmegakaryopoiesis by interacting with receptors I and II, which were induced by TPO itself in normal subjects (A). Increased TGF-β1 from destroyed platelets or megakaryocytes markedly upregulates TPO mRNA expression in stromal cells. The subsequent production of TPO stimulates stem cells to commit to the megakaryocyte lineage. The expression of the TGF-β receptor on megakaryoblasts renders them susceptible to suppression by TGF-β1 in patients with ITP (B).

Close modal

Inhibition of CFU-Meg by TGF-β has been previously shown by several investigators. However, in their investigations, relatively nonspecific stimulators for CFU-Meg, such as combined preparations of plasma of aplastic anemia, phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated lymphocyte conditioned medium, IL-3, or IL-6, were used because of the unavailability of TPO; therefore, the inhibitory effects were not discussed in reference to genuine TPO activity.9 10 

In the present study, we first demonstrated that TGF-β did strongly suppress TPO-induced CFU-Meg in a dose-dependent manner. The magnitude of suppression on CFU-Meg was greater than on G-CSF–induced CFU-GM or on EPO-induced BFU-E. Interestingly, the suppression was rather stage-specific (middifferentiation), with no effect on primitive stem cells, resulting in a maturational arrest of megakaryopoiesis. This observation is consistent with previous reports by Roberts and Sporn,36 who found a lack of responsiveness to TGF-β in matured megakaryocyte, and Kuter et al,37 who found the inhibition by TGF-β on endomitosis of megakaryocytes. In support of a stage-specific suppression of megakaryopoiesis, we also found that TPO induced the expression of TGF-β receptors on megakaryoblasts at midmegakaryopoiesis (Fig 3).

However, to establish the concept of feedback regulation, it may be required to prove further specificity of TGF-β action on megakaryopoiesis. In this context, because we have recently disclosed the fact that BM stromal TPO is a key regulator of megakaryopoiesis, we hypothesized that TGF-β may enhance expression of stromal TPO, which specifically induced proliferation and differentiation of megakaryocytes. To analyze the effect of TGF-β on TPO mRNA expression of BM stromal cells, we used TaqMan real time RT-PCR, because the expression level of TPO mRNA in BM stromal cells was far lower than the detection limit of RNAse protection assay. TGF-β was found to apparently stimulate stromal TPO mRNA expression, whereas other hemato-regulatory cytokines were shown to either suppress it (TPO and IL-6), slightly enhance it (TNF), or have no effect (G-CSF, EPO, and IL-3). Furthermore, when the effect of TGF-β1 on the other major hematopoietic cytokine, G-CSF, which is produced by stromal cells and defines the myeloid lineage specificity, was compared with that on TPO, the latter was stronger by far. Because another lineage-defining cytokine, EPO, was not produced by stromal cells, the effect of TGF-β1 on this particular cytokine was not examined in the present study. Thus, the specificity of TGF-β1 action on megakaryopoiesis is considered to be doubly assured at 2 steps: (1) an induction of stromal TPO and (2) at suppression of CFU-Meg. TGF-β1 selectively enhances the stromal TPO, which commits the stem cell specifically to the megakaryocyte lineage and, in turn, suppresses megakaryopoiesis at the middifferentiation period. We then verified these in vitro experimental results by in vivo comparison of the concentrations of BM TGF-β1, expression of stromal TPO mRNA, and BM profiles of megakaryopoiesis between patients with ITP and normal subjects. We focused our interest on ITP because, in this pathological state, TGF-β1 is speculated to be released from megakaryocytes or platelets that have been degradated by autoantibodies, and potency of megakaryopoiesis itself is not deteriorated. In patients with ITP, both active and latent TGF-β1 were higher (P < .05) than those in normal subjects and returned to near-normal values after steroid therapy. The levels of active and latent TGF-β1 in BM were higher than those in PB in each case without exception. This indicates that TGF-β1 in BM were mainly derived from cells in BM, most likely megakaryocytes and platelets.38-41 A strong positive correlation between values of TGF-β1 in BM and PB was observed; however, the inclination was steeper in latent TGF-β1 than in active TGF-β1. This may be explained by assuming the faster clearance of active TGF-β1, which interacts with TGF-β1 receptors expressed on megakaryocytes, than of latent TGF-β1, which normally exist as a complex with α2-macroglobulin (receptor-inaccessible form) in plasma. These results clearly suggest that active TGF-β1 is one of the key factors defining the TPO production by stromal cells. Nevertheless, the above-mentioned in vitro findings were compatible with the subsequently made in vivo observations that megakaryocytes in ITP patients were increased but hypo-lobulated (immature), had a profile of maturation arrest without any particular change in other hematopoietic lineages, and tended to become normal after steroid therapy. This unique BM feature is in agreement with that previously documented for ITP.42,43 In addition to ITP, there are some pathological conditions in which the relationship between levels of circulation TPO and platelet counts is unexplainable by the sponge theory. For example, in busulfan-treated mice, plasma TPO after platelet transfusion are elevated to such a high level as to be unaccountable for by the sponge theory.6However, this may be explained by assuming that transfused platelets supplied sufficient TGF-β to the stromal cells to produce TPO. Another example is found with NF-E2−/− mice in which normal serum thrombopoietin levels are seen in the face of profound thrombocytopenia.44 It may be that stromal cells had not been exposed to TGF-β due to innate platelet insufficiency. Measurement of TGF-β levels in these mice will confirm the above-noted assumption. Another pathological condition that indicates a relationship between TGF-β and megakaryopoiesis may be essential thrombocythemia. We have recently found that, in this particular disease, there is a mutation as kinase domain of type II receptor for TGF-β (data not shown). Elucidation as to whether this mutation has pathognomonic meaning is warranted.

As for the physiological test of the animal model, Carlino et al11 have already reported that, when TGF-β (0.1% wt/vol) was administered daily subcutaneously from day 0 to day 13 to C3H/He mice, a highly significant decrease was seen in platelet count in circulation, and the megakaryocyte count increased inversely. With regard to the gene knock-out effect, Shull et al12 have already observed that, in TGF-β (−/−) mice, there was an increase of platelets in the circulation as well as of neutrophils and monocytes. However, this phenomenon may not be solely ascribed to the direct effect of TGF-β1 deletion on hematopoiesis but possibly to the hyperimmunoreactive state caused by TGF-β1 depletion. In this context, Letterio et al,13 using TGF-β (−/−) major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II (−/−) double knockout mice, demonstrated an excess of megakaryopoiesis accompanied by a slight increase of granulocyte count.

These previous observations in TGF-β–administered or TGF-β knockout mice strongly support our model of megakaryopoiesis regulated by TGF-β and TPO.

In conclusion, we propose the concept of feedback regulation on megakaryopoiesis by TGF-β1 released from platelets or megakaryocytes; TGF-β1 from destroyed platelets or megakaryocytes stimulates TPO synthesis in stromal cells and, in turn, stimulates stem cells (CD34+ cells) to commit to the megakaryocyte lineage and to express TGF-β1 receptors that render them susceptible to suppression by TGF-β1 (Fig 7).

The authors thank Dr Susan Feldman for her editorial assistance; Dr Irving Listowsky for helpful discussion and critical reading of our manuscript; Dr Kohei Miyazono for helpful discussion; and Kevin Litton for critical reading of our manuscript.

Supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1
Lok
S
Kaushansky
K
Holly
RD
Kuijper
JL
Foster
DC
Cloning and expression of murine thrombopoietin cDNA and stimulation of platelet production in vivo.
Nature
369
1994
565
2
Kaushansky
K
Lok
S
Holly
RD
Broudy
VC
Lin
N
Bailey
MC
Forstrom
JW
Buddle
MM
Oort
PJ
Hagen
FS
Roth
GJ
Papayannopoulou
T
Foster
DC
Promotion of megakaryocyte progenitor expansion and differentiation by the c-mpl ligand thrombopoietin.
Nature
369
1994
568
3
de Sauvage
FJ
Hass
PE
Spencer
SD
Malloy
BE
Gurney
AL
Spencer
SA
Darbonne
WC
Henzel
WJ
Wong
SC
Kuang
WJ
Oles
KJ
Hultgren
B
Solberg
LA
Jr
Goeddel
DV
Eaton
DL
Stimulation of megakaryocytopoiesis and thrombopoiesis by the c-mpl ligand.
Nature
369
1994
533
4
Wendling
F
Maraskovsky
E
Debili
N
Florindo
C
Teepe
M
Titeux
M
Methia
N
Breton-Gorius
J
Cosman
D
Vainchenker
W
C-mpl ligand is a humoral regulator of megakaryocytopoiesis.
Nature
369
1994
571
5
Bartley
TD
Bogenberger
J
Hunt
P
Li
YS
Lu
HS
Martin
F
Chang
MS
Samal
B
Nichol
JL
Swift
S
Johnson
MJ
Hsu
RY
Parker
VP
Suggs
S
Skrine
JD
Merewether
LA
Clogston
C
Hsu
E
Hokom
MM
Hornkohl
A
Choi
E
Pangelinan
M
Sun
Y
Mar
V
McNinch
J
Simonet
L
Jacobsen
F
Xie
C
Shutter
J
Chute
H
Basu
R
Selander
L
Trollinger
D
Sieu
L
Padilla
D
Trail
G
Elliott
G
Izumi
R
Covey
T
Crouse
J
Garcia
A
Xu
W
Castillo
J Del
Biron
J
Cole
S
Hu
MCT
Pacifici
R
Ponting
I
Saris
C
Wen
D
Yung
YP
Lin
H
Bosselman
RA
Identification and cloning of a megakaryocyte growth and development factor that is a ligand for the cytokine receptor mpl.
Cell
77
1994
1117
6
Kuter
D
Rosenberg
RD
The reciprocal relationship of thrombopoietin (c-mpl ligand) to changes in the platelet mass during busulfan-induced thrombocytopenia in the rabbit.
Blood
85
1995
2720
7
Hirayama
Y
Sakamaki
S
Matsunaga
T
Kuroda
H
Kusakabe
T
Sasaki
K
Fujikawa
K
Kato
J
Kogawa
K
Koyama
R
Niitsu
Y
Concentrations of thrombopoietin in bone marrow in normal subjects and in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, aplastic anemia and essential thrombocythemia correlate with its mRNA expression of bone marrow stromal cells.
Blood
92
1998
46
8
Asssoian
RK
Komoriya
A
Meyers
CA
Miller
DM
Sporn
MB
Transforming growth factor β in human platelets: Identification of a major storage site, purification, and characterization.
J Biol Chem
258
1983
7155
9
Mitjavilla
MT
Villeval
JL
Kieffer
N
Henri
N
Testa
U
Breton-Gorious
J
Veinchenker
W
Human platelet alpha granules contain a nonspecific inhibitor of megakaryocyte colony formulation: Its relationship to type β transforming growth factor (TGF-β).
J Cell Physiol
134
1988
93
10
Ishibashi
T
Miller
SL
Burstein
SA
Type β transforming growth factor is a potent inhibitor of murine megakaryocytopoiesis in vitro.
Blood
69
1987
1737
11
Carlino
JA
Higley
HR
Creson
JR
Avis
PD
Ogawa
Y
Ellinsworth
LR
Transforming growth factor β1 systemically modulates granuloid, erythroid, lymphoid, and thrombocytic cells in mice.
Exp Hematol
20
1992
943
12
Schull
MM
Ormsby
I
Kier
AB
Pawlowski
S
Diebold
RJ
Yin
M
Allen
R
Sidman
C
Proetzel
B
Calvin
D
Targetted disruption of the mouse transforming growth factor-β1 gene results in multifocal inflammatory disease.
Nature
359
1992
693
13
Letterio
JJ
Geisei
AG
Kulkarni
AB
Dang
H
Kong
L
Nakabayashi
T
Mackall
CL
Gress
RE
Roberts
AB
Autoimmunity associated with TGF-β1-deficiency in mice is dependent on MHC class II antigen expression.
J Clin Invest
98
1996
2109
14
Dexter
TM
Allen
TD
Lajtha
LG
Conditions controlling the proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells in vitro.
J Cell Physiol
91
1979
335
15
Hirayama
Y
Kohgo
Y
Sakamaki
S
Matsunaga
T
Ohi
S
Niitsu
Y
Cytokine mRNA expression of bone marrow stromal cells from patients with aplastic anemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.
Br J Haematol
85
1993
676
16
Kohgo
Y
Hirayama
Y
Sakamaki
S
Matsunaga
T
Ohi
S
Niitsu
Y
Chronic idiopathic neutropenia associated with abnormal expression of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor mRNA of bone marrow stromal cells.
Int J Hematol
59
1994
177
17
Tahara
T
Usuki
K
Sato
H
A sensitive sandwich ELISA for measuring thrombopoietin in human serum: Serum thrombopoietin levels in healthy volunteers and in patients with haemopoietic disorders.
Br J Haematol
93
1996
783
18
Kosugi
S
Kurata
Y
Tomiyama
Y
Tahara
T
Kato
T
Tadokoro
S
Shiraga
M
Honda
S
Kanakura
Y
Matsuzawa
Y
Circulating thrombopoietin level in chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura.
Br J Haematol
93
1996
704
19
Rennick
D
Yang
G
Gemmell
L
Lee
F
Control of hemopoiesis by a bone marrow stromal cell clone: Lipopolysaccharide-and Interleukin-1-inducible production of colony-stimulating factors.
Blood
69
1987
682
20
Farese
AM
Hunt
P
Boone
T
MacVittie
TJ
Recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor stimulates thrombocytopoiesis in normal nonhuman primates.
Blood
86
1995
54
21
Bruno
E
Hoffman
R
Effect of interleukin 6 on in vitro human megakaryopoiesis: Its interaction with other cytokines.
Exp Hematol
17
1989
1038
22
Quesenberry
PJ
Ihle
JN
McGrath
E
The effect of interleukin-3 and GM-CSA-2 on megakaryocyte and myeloid clonal colony formation.
Blood
65
1985
214
23
Ogawa
M
Parnley
TR
Bank
LH
Spicer
SS
Human marrow erythropoiesis in culture I. Characterization of methylcellulose colony assay.
Blood
48
1976
407
24
Debili
N
Wendling
AK
Guichard
J
Gorius
JB
Hunt
P
Vainchenkerm
W
The Mpl-ligand or thrombopoietin or megakaryocyte growth and differentiative factor has both direct proliferative and differentiative activities on human megakaryocyte progenitors.
Blood
86
1996
2516
25
Gibson
UEM
Heid
CA
Williams
PM
A novel method for real time quantitative RT-PCR.
Genome Res
6
1996
995
26
Gough
NM
Rapid and quantitative preparation of cytoplasmic RNA from small numbers of cells.
Anal Biochem
173
1988
93
27
Nagata
S
Tsuchiya
M
Asano
S
Yamamoto
O
Hirata
Y
Kubota
N
Oheda
M
Nomura
H
Yamazaki
T
The chromosomal gene structure and two mRNAs for human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
EMBO J
5
1986
575
28
Franzen
P
Djike
PT
Ichijo
H
Yamasita
H
Miyazono
K
Cloning of a TGF-β type I receptor that forms a heteromeric complex with the TGF-β type II receptor.
Cell
75
1993
681
29
Lin
HY
Wang
XF
Ng-Eaton
E
Weinberg
RA
Lodish
HF
Expression cloning of the TGF-β type II receptor, a functional transmembrane serine/threonine kinase.
Cell
68
1992
775
30
Terui
T
Niitsu
Y
Mahara
K
Fujisaki
Y
Urusizaki
Y
Mogi
Y
Kohgo
Y
Watanabe
N
Oguma
M
Saito
H
The production of transforming growth factor-β in acute megakaryoblastic leukemia and its possible implications in myelofibrosis.
Blood
75
1990
1540
31
Wang
XL
Liu
SX
Wilken
DEL
Circulating transforming growth factor-β and coronary artery disease.
Cardiovasc Res
34
1997
404
32
Odell
TT
Jacson
CW
Polyploidy and maturation of rat megakaryocytes.
Blood
32
1968
102
33
Marsh
JCW
Chung
J
Testa
NG
Hows
JM
Dexter
TM
In vitro assessment of bone marrow ‘stem cell’ and stromal cell function in aplastic anemia.
Br J Haematol
78
1991
258
34
Kojima
S
Matsunaga
T
Kodera
Y
Hematopoietic growth factor released by marrow stromal cells from patients with aplastic anemia.
Blood
79
1992
256
35
Tisdale
JF
Stewart
AK
Dickstein
B
Little
RF
Dube
I
Cappe
D
Dunbar
CE
Brown
KE
Molecular and serological examination of the relationship of human herpesvirus 8 to multiple myeloma.
Blood
92
1998
2681
36
Roberts
AB
Sporn
MB
The transforming growth factor-β
The Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, vol 95.
Sporn
MB
Roberts
AB
1990
419
Springer-Verlag
Heidelberg, Germany
37
Kuter
DJ
Gminski
DM
Rosenberg
RD
Transforming growth factor β inhibits megakaryocyte growth and endomitosis.
Blood
79
1992
619
38
Childs
CB
Proper
JA
Tucker
RF
Moses
HL
Serum contains a platelet-derived transforming growth factor.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
79
1982
5312
39
Associan
RK
Komoriya
A
Meyers
CA
Miller
DM
Sporn
MB
Transforming growth factor-beta in human platelets. Identification of a major storage site, purification, and characterization.
J Biol Chem
258
1983
7155
40
Fava
RA
Casey
TT
Wilcox
J
Pelton
RW
Moses
HL
Nanney
LB
synthesis of transforming growth factor-beta 1 by megakaryocytes and its localization to megakaryocyte and platelet alpha-granules.
Blood
76
1990
1946
41
Roberts
AB
Anzano
MA
Meyers
CA
Wideman
J
Blacher
R
Pan
YE
Stein
S
Lehrman
SR
Smith
JM
Lamb
LL
Sporn
MB
Purification and properties of a type β transforming growth factor from bovine kidney.
Biochemistry
22
1983
5692
42
Pistiotta
AV
Stefanini
M
Dameshek
W
Studies on platelet X. Morphologic characteristics of megakaryocytes by phase contrast microscopy in normals and in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura.
Blood
8
1953
703
43
Queissr
U
Queiser
W
Spiertz
B
Polyploidization of megakaryocytes in normal humans, in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura.
Br J Haematol
20
1971
489
44
Shivdasani
RA
Rosenblatt
MF
Zucker
D
Kacson
CW
Hint
P
Saris
M
Orkin
SH
Transcription factor NF-E2 is required for platelet formation independent of the actions of thrombopoietin/MGDF in megakaryocyte development.
Cell
81
1995
695

Author notes

Address reprint requests to Yoshiro Niitsu, MD, PhD, Chief and Professor, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, South-1, West-16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, 060-8543, Japan; e-mail: niitsu@sapmed.ac.jp.

Sign in via your Institution