Abstract
Previous work has shown several proteins defective in Fanconi anemia (FA) are phosphorylated in a functionally critical manner. FANCA is phosphorylated after DNA damage and localized to chromatin, but the site and significance of this phosphorylation are unknown. Mass spectrometry of FANCA revealed one phosphopeptide, phosphorylated on serine 1449. Serine 1449 phosphorylation was induced after DNA damage but not during S phase, in contrast to other posttranslational modifications of FA proteins. Furthermore, the S1449A mutant failed to completely correct a variety of FA-associated phenotypes. The DNA damage response is coordinated by phosphorylation events initiated by apical kinases ATM (ataxia telangectasia mutated) and ATR (ATM and Rad3-related), and ATR is essential for proper FA pathway function. Serine 1449 is in a consensus ATM/ATR site, phosphorylation in vivo is dependent on ATR, and ATR phosphorylated FANCA on serine 1449 in vitro. Phosphorylation of FANCA on serine 1449 is a DNA damage–specific event that is downstream of ATR and is functionally important in the FA pathway.
Introduction
Fanconi anemia (FA) is a genetic disorder characterized by a variety of congenital defects, aplastic anemia, and a susceptibility to cancer.1,2 At the cellular level, cells from patients are hypersensitive to agents that cause DNA crosslinking, including mitomycin C (MMC). Cells display increased levels of chromosomal aberrations, making FA a disease of genome instability. To respond to and repair DNA damage, replicating cells have cell-cycle checkpoints that halt cell-cycle progression when damage is detected. The S-phase checkpoint responds to stalled replication forks in dividing cells and is coordinated by ataxia telangectasia mutated (ATM) and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase, whereas the ATM kinase is activated by double-strand breaks (DSBs).3
Patients with FA have been categorized into at least 13 complementation groups (FA-A, -B, -C, -D1, -D2, -E, -F, -G, -I, -J, -L, -M, and -N), and the genes responsible for each of these have been identified (FANCA, FANCB, FANCC, FANCD1/BRCA2, FANCD2, FANCE, FANCF, FANCG, FANCJ/BRIP1, FANCL, FANCM, and FANCN/PALB2).4-8 Despite the progress made in identifying FA genes, the function of most of these proteins remains largely unknown. Several of the protein products interact in a complex termed the FA core complex. The composition of this complex changes with subcellular localization, but a nuclear form contains the FANCA, FANCB, FANCC, FANCE, FANCF, FANCG, FANCL, and FANCM proteins, together with FAAP24 and FAAP100.9-14 The integrity of the core complex is essential for FANCD2 mono-ubiquitylation after DNA damage and during S phase, at which point FANCD2 localizes to foci that correspond with proteins involved in homologous recombination, such as BRCA1 and Rad51.15,16 FANCI is also mono-ubiquitylated after damage and in S phase in a manner dependent on FANCD2 and the core complex.17 In response to DNA damage and during S phase, the core complex translocates from the cytoplasm to the nucleus and increases in molecular weight.9 Presence in the nucleus is essential for the complex to exert its function.18 The core complex is required for FANCD2 and FANCI mono-ubiquitylation, but may have other roles not yet determined.15,17,19 FANCA, FANCG, FANCM, FANCE, FANCD2, and FANCI are phosphoproteins, underscoring the importance of phosphorylation to the FA core complex and FA pathway.12,17,20-25 Importantly, identified posttranslational modifications of FA proteins, including mono-ubiquitylation and phosphorylation, FANCD2 foci formation, and translocation of the core complex into the nucleus all occur both during undamaged S phase and in response to DNA-damaging agents such as MMC. Cells arrest in S phase after induction of interstrand crosslinks.26 Together, these observations have led to the hypothesis that activation of the FA pathway occurs during normal S phase, and DNA damage–inducibility of the FA pathway represents checkpoint function in response to replication-associated damage encountered in S phase.27
ATR kinase has been implicated in the FA pathway. ATR is activated during replication stress in response to exposed ssDNA in cells, but the exact mechanism by which it coordinates cell-cycle arrest or repair is unknown.3 ATR is essential for FANCD2 mono-ubiquitylation in response to DNA damage.28 Both ATM and ATR contribute to FANCD2 phosphorylation.23,24 Furthermore, patients with Seckel syndrome, one form of which results from ATR deficiency, are phenotypically similar to FA patients.29 FANCA is a phosphoprotein, but the kinase responsible, as well as the site of phosphorylation, have not yet been identified.21,30 FANCA phosphorylation is abrogated in FA-A mutant cells derived from patients, suggesting it is functionally important.21,31 Previous work showed that FANCA is phosphorylated on chromatin after DNA damage.9 We wished to determine whether ATR is a kinase for FANCA. The observation that phosphorylation of FANCA is sensitive to wortmannin, a PIKK inhibitor, supports a role for ATR or ATM.30
In this study, we identify a FANCA phosphorylation event and demonstrate the functional importance of this phosphorylation to the FA pathway. We provide evidence for ATR as a FANCA kinase. Importantly, we also link FANCD2 mono-ubiquitylation with FANCA phosphorylation by showing FANCD2 mono-ubiquitylation is reduced in the absence of FANCA phosphorylation. Finally, we are the first to describe the posttranslational modification of an FA protein after DNA damage but not constitutively in S phase, suggestive of a DNA damage-specific modulation of the FA pathway.
Methods
Cell culture
Cells were maintained at 37° in a 5% CO2 incubator. HeLa cells were cultured in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). GM 6914 FA-A mutant cells were grown in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium plus 15% FBS. MG7 lymphoblasts were grown in RPMI + 15% FBS. Wild-type (GM02188), ATR-Seckel (DK0064), and ATM-deficient (GM01389D), generously provided by Penny Jeggo, were maintained in RPMI 1640 and 15% FBS.
Preparation of Flag-FANCA S1449A
pMMP-Flag-FANCA (S1449A) was constructed from pMMP-Flag-FANCA32 using Stratagene's QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (La Jolla, CA). The resultant plasmid was sequenced to confirm serine to alanine mutation and check for PCR-introduced mutations. GM6914 and GM6914 DR-GFP plus pMMP-vector, pMMP-FANCA, or pMMP FANCA (S1449A) were produced by retroviral transduction as previously described.21,33
Mass spectrometry
All mass spectroscopy work was performed by the Mass Spectrometry Core at the University of Virginia (Charlottesville, VA). Briefly, silver stained bands (SilverQuest; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) were trypsin-digested and subjected to liquid chromatography mass spectrometry on an ion spray mass spectrometer. Spectra were analyzed and identified using the Sequest search algorithm and manually (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA).
Cell lysate and chromatin extract preparation
Whole-cell lysates were prepared by suspending cell pellets in cell lysis buffer containing 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 1% Triton X-100, and protease and phosphatase inhibitors (2 μg/mL aprotinin, 1 μg/mL pepstatin, 2 μg/mL leupeptin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM β-glycerophosphate, and 1 mM Na3VO4). Cell suspensions were sonicated briefly and cleared by centrifugation at 15 000g (14 000 rpm) for 15 minutes. Concentration of proteins in the supernatant was determined by Bradford assay. Chromatin and cell extracts were prepared as described.34
Immunoprecipitation
To the indicated amount of protein in a volume of 1 mL was added 20 μL anti-Flag M2 agarose (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) previously washed in Tris-buffered saline (TBS). Immunoprecipitates were incubated for 1.5 hours, and beads were washed 3 times in the same cell lysis buffer and dried. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) loading buffer was added to the dried beads.
SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting
SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) was followed by transfer onto nitrocellulose in buffer containing 25 mM Tris, 200 mM glycine, and 20% methanol. Membranes were blocked in TBS + 5% bovine serum albumin for 1 hour. Blotting was as previously described.35 Primary antibodies were diluted in TBS + 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST) and incubated 3 hours to overnight. Membranes were washed 4 times in TBST, then horseradish-peroxidase linked secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom) were added in TBST for 1 hour. After a second wash, proteins were visualized by chemiluminescence. Antibodies used were against FANCA-N terminal32 and FANCA (ABP-6201, Cascade Bioscience, Winchester, MA), FANCD2-N terminal,20 FANCG-N terminal,34 β-tubulin (DM1B, Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), topoisomerase II (SWT3D1, Calbiochem), Ku86 (B-1, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), ATR (for immunoprecipitation, PA1-450, Affinity Bioreagents, Golden, CO), ATR (for immunoblotting, N-19, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and phospho-(Ser/Thr) ATM/ATR Substrate (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA).
Synchronization
HeLa cells were treated overnight with 2 mM thymidine, washed, released into regular media, and treated again overnight with thymidine to synchronize at the G1/S border. Cells were then released for 3 hours to obtain an S phase population and 6 hours to obtain a late S/G2 population.34
Phosphatase treatment
Phosphatase treatments were performed on whole-cell lysate. A total of 400 U of λ-phosphatase was added to 275 μg total protein in cell lysis buffer (total volume = 75 μL) and incubated for 30 minutes at 30°C; 75 μL of 2× SDS loading buffer was added to stop the reaction.
Preparation of anti-pS1449 polyclonal antiserum
The peptide C-QAAPDADLpSQEPHLF, identical to the C terminal 15 amino acids of FANCA, was conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin and used to generate a polyclonal rabbit-derived antiserum. Peptide synthesis, immunization, and serum collection were performed by Proteintech Group (Chicago, IL). Serum was affinity purified with phosphorylated peptide immobilized on a column (Aminolink; Pierce Chemical, Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer's instructions, eluted in 0.2 M glycine, pH 2.5, adjusted to pH 7.5 with 1 M Tris-HCl, pH 9.5, and diluted 1:1 in TBS. The resulting antibody was cross-adsorbed to an unmodified peptide column to produce antibody specific to phospho-serine 1449.
Growth inhibition assay
A total of 106 cells were plated into 75-cm2 culture flasks with growth medium containing 0, 100, 500, or 1000 nM MMC. Cells were grown until near confluence was reached in the untreated cultures (72 hours). At this time, cell numbers in each culture were determined using a hemocytometer after trypsinization. The data presented in Figure 4A represent the means of 3 independent experiments.
Chromosome breakage analysis
A total of 1 μM colcemid was added to cells treated for 24 hours with 1 μM MMC. After 6 hours, cells were collected with trypsin, washed 1 time in phosphate-buffered saline, swollen in hypotonic buffer (40 mM KCl, 25 mM sodium citrate) for 20 minutes at 37°, and fixed in acetic acid/methanol (1:3) for 10 minutes. Cells were dropped onto slides and stained with Giemsa, and at least 25 metaphase spreads were analyzed for the presence of gaps, single chromatid breaks, isochromatid breaks, fragments, and polyradials.
Analysis of homologous recombination frequency
GM6914 DR-GFP cells and an I-SceI expression vector, pCBASce, were generous gifts from Dr Maria Jasin (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY). These cells have one copy of an integrated homologous recombination reporter and have been described elsewhere.36 We transduced these cells with pMMP-vector, pMMP-FANCA, and pMMP-FANCA (S1449A), selected in puromycin, and assayed for frequency of homologous recombination as described.36
In vitro kinase
ATR was immunoprecipitated from HeLa lysate in cell lysis buffer (300 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 1% Triton X-100, plus protease and phosphatase inhibitors as in “Cell lysate and chromatin extract preparation”). A total of 10 mg of protein (2.5 mg/mL) was mixed with 12.5 μg anti-ATR antibody (PA1-450, Affinity Bioreagents) or 12.5 μg rabbit IgG overnight. Immunoprecipitated proteins were collected with 100 μL Protein A Sepharose (Invitrogen) for 1 hour, washed 3 times in lysis buffer, then 3 times in in vitro kinase buffer (50 mM Tris pH7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, plus protease and phosphatase inhibitors as in “Cell lysate and chromatin extract preparation”), and divided into 4 parts for 3 in vitro kinase assays and Western blot. Beads were dried, then incubated in 20 μL in vitro kinase buffer containing 1 μM cold ATP and 10 μCi [γ-32P]ATP. To this was added approximately 1 μg of GST-fusion substrate. GST-FANCA C terminus has been described.32 GST-FANCA (S1449A) was generated by PCR-mediated, site-directed mutagenesis of pGEX-FANCA(C) using QuikChange kit (Stratagene). GST fusion proteins were purified from bacteria on glutathione sepharose according to the manufacturer's instructions (GE Healthcare). In vitro kinase reactions were incubated for 1 hour at 30°C, after which 25 μL of 2× SDS loading buffer was added to stop the reaction. Resulting products were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, stained with Coomassie, then dried and detected by autoradiography.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was by analysis of variance test for significance.
Results
FANCA is phosphorylated in vivo on serine 1449
Previous work in our laboratory and others has shown that FANCA phosphorylation correlates with intact FA pathway function, and a phosphorylated form of FANCA was found on chromatin after DNA damage.9,21,37 Okadaic acid has been shown to increase the level of FANCA phosphorylation.30 Based on previous work, we hypothesized that phosphorylated FANCA would be enriched from cells doubly treated with MMC and okadaic acid. In an effort to stabilize the phosphorylation event, we treated HeLa cells stably expressing Flag-FANCA with the PP2A inhibitor, okadaic acid, and immunoprecipitated Flag-FANCA (Figure S1, available on the Blood website; see the Supplemental Materials link at the top of the online article).38 The band containing immunoprecipitated FANCA was excised from a silver-stained gel, trypsin digested, and peptides were analyzed by mass spectrometry. FANCA peptides were identified that resulted in 62% coverage of FANCA, and only one phosphopeptide was identified, QQAAPDADLS*QEPHLF, containing phosphoserine 1449 of FANCA. Of particular note was the presence of serine 1449 within an LSQE sequence, a consensus site for the PIKK kinases ATM and ATR.39
Antiphosphoserine 1449 antiserum detects phosphorylated FANCA
To directly detect and study phosphorylation of serine 1449, we raised an antiserum against a 15-amino acid peptide centered around and containing a phosphorylated serine 1449 residue. The antiserum was affinity purified over a phosphorylated peptide column, cross-adsorbed to an unmodified peptide column, and used to detect phosphorylated FANCA. HeLa whole cell lysate from cells treated with MMC was separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted for phospho-FANCA (S1449). An increase in signal was observed in cells treated with okadaic acid, consistent with the discovery of the phosphorylation event (Figure 1A lane 3). Similarly, treatment of extracts with lambda phosphatase eliminated signal detected with the antiphosphoserine 1449 antiserum, indicating the antiserum specifically detected phosphorylated FANCA (Figure 1A lane 5).
FANCA is phosphorylated after treatment with MMC
Because the previously identified, phosphatase-sensitive species of FANCA was only detected after treatment with MMC, we sought to investigate whether serine 1449 was phosphorylated after DNA damage. As shown in Figure 1A lanes 1 and 2, the amount of endogenous phosphorylated FANCA increased after MMC treatment, as detected with the phospho-specific antiserum. To confirm that this phosphorylation was on serine 1449, serine 1449 was mutated to alanine (S1449A) using PCR-mediated site-directed in vitro mutagenesis. HeLa cells were infected with pMMP-Flag-FANCA wild-type or pMMP-Flag-FANCA (S1449A). Cells expressing wild-type Flag-FANCA or Flag-FANCA (S1449A) were lysed, and extracts were analyzed by immunoblotting with antiphosphoserine 1449 antibody. This antibody specifically detected an increase in the amount of phospho-FANCA after DNA damage in cells overexpressing wild-type FANCA (Figure 1B lane 4), but not in cells expressing FANCA (S1449A) (Figure 1B lane 6). In Figure 1B lanes 1 and 2, endogenous FANCA was detected on a longer exposure, as shown in Figure 1A lanes 1 and 2.
In further support of our work, Elledge reported the identification of FANCA as a substrate for ATR/ATM in a phosphoprotein screen by immunoprecipitation, using an antibody specific for substrates of ATR/ATM (S. J. Elledge, personal communication, October 2006).40 The antibody used was raised against a phospho-leucine (serine/threonine) glutamine (L(S/T)*Q) motif (Cell Signaling Technology). Based on the sequence context of S1449, this antibody would be expected to recognize phosphoserine 1449. HeLa cells expressing Flag-FANCA or Flag-FANCA (S1449A) were lysed and immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag resin. The α-L(S/T)*Q antibody specifically detected immunoprecipitated wild-type FANCA only after MMC treatment (Figure 1C lane 2) and did not detect FANCA (S1449A) before or after MMC (Figure 1C lanes 3, 4), supportive of both the work from the Elledge laboratory and the DNA damage-inducibility of the phosphorylation event.
FANCA phosphorylation is induced in a time-dependent manner after MMC treatment
A time course of MMC treatment reveals that phosphorylation of FANCA increased after MMC treatment in a time-dependent manner. HeLa cells were treated for the indicated time with 1 μM MMC, lysed, and analyzed by immunoblotting (Figure 2A). Phosphorylation of FANCA was first detectable after 4 hours of MMC treatment (Figure 2A lane 2) and reached a peak level at 24 to 32 hours of MMC treatment (Figure 2A lane 6; Figure 2B lanes 4, 5). An extended time course revealed diminishing levels of phosphorylation at longer treatment times (Figure 2B).
FANCA is not phosphorylated on serine 1449 during S phase
Other FA proteins that are modified in response to DNA damage are also modified during S phase. Specifically, FANCD2 and FANCI are mono-ubiquitylated and FANCD2 is phosphorylated after DNA damage and during S phase.15,17,24 Similarly, FANCG is phosphorylated at serine 7 after DNA damage and during S phase.20 Consequently, we sought to determine whether phosphoserine 1449 followed the same paradigm. HeLa cells were synchronized at S phase using double thymidine block or treated with MMC. Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry to verify synchrony at S phase (data not shown). Surprisingly, phosphorylated FANCA could be detected after MMC treatment (Figure 2C lane 2), but not during S phase or in asynchronous extracts (Figure 2C lanes 3-5), indicating that phosphorylation of serine 1449 is specific to DNA damage by MMC. FANCD2 was mono-ubiquitylated both during the cell-cycle stages and after MMC (Figure 2C), confirming that phosphorylation of FANCA and FANCD2 mono-ubiquitylation can occur distinct from one another.
Phosphoserine 1449 FANCA is increased on chromatin after DNA damage
The original phosphorylated FANCA reported by our laboratory was found in a chromatin-associated core complex prepared from a DNA-damaged extract.9 Thus, we sought to determine whether phosphoserine 1449 FANCA was found on chromatin after DNA damage. Chromatin extracts were prepared from HeLa cells treated with MMC, and phosphorylated FANCA was detected using phospho-specific antiserum. Indeed, phosphorylated FANCA was associated almost exclusively with chromatin after MMC, whereas total FANCA was enriched on chromatin after DNA damage (Figure 3A lane 2), consistent with our previous report.34
FANCA S1449A is able to bind FANCG
FANCA is found within the larger FA core complex, where it forms an association with, among other proteins, FANCG. We wished to investigate whether phosphorylation on S1449 was essential for this interaction. HeLa cells expressing Flag-FANCA, Flag-FANCA S1449A, and the vector control were treated with MMC, and whole cell extracts were immunoprecipitated using anti-Flag antiserum-bound beads (Figure 3B). Importantly, FANCG was still found in association with FANCA (S1449A), indicating the core complex was at least partially intact in the absence of phosphorylation (Figure 3B lanes 3,4).
FANCA S1449A fails to fully correct FA-A mutant cells
Cells from FA patients display a marked hypersensitivity to DNA crosslinking agents, and correction of such cells with the appropriate wild-type cDNA results in complementation. If phosphorylation at serine 1449 were functionally important in the FA pathway, then mutants at S1449 would be expected to exhibit FA-associated phenotypes. To test the importance of serine 1449 phosphorylation, GM6914 FA-A mutant human fibroblasts were infected with the FANCA S1449A construct generated by site-directed mutagenesis. Cells expressing FANCA (S1449A) were assayed for sensitivity, using an MMC growth inhibition assay. FANCA (S1449A) failed to fully correct the MMC sensitivity seen in mutant FA-A cells (Figure 4A). Statistical testing using analysis of variance demonstrated the S1449A phenotype is statistically different from wild-type FANCA (P = .046) and from FA-A mutant cells (P = .018). Thus, the phosphorylation site in FANCA is functionally important for MMC resistance.
An intact FA core complex is required for FANCD2 mono-ubiquitylation after DNA damage and during S phase; therefore, FANCD2 mono-ubiquitylation is routinely used as a marker for core complex function and an intact FA pathway.15,16 FANCD2 mono-ubiquitylation was monitored in GM6914 (FA-A) cells expressing wild-type FANCA, FANCA (S1449A), and the vector control to assess the effect of the phosphorylation site mutant. Nuclear extracts were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. After MMC treatment, cells expressing wild-type FANCA showed the expected increase in the amount of mono-ubiquitylated FANCD2, whereas cells expressing FANCA (S1449A) had markedly less mono-ubiquitylated FANCD2, as confirmed by densitometry analysis and calculation of the long/short (L/S) ratio (Figure 4B top lanes 2,3). The vector control, as expected, exhibited no mono-ubiquitylated FANCD2 (Figure 4B top lane 1). Mutation of the phosphorylation site therefore reduced the efficiency of FANCD2 mono-ubiquitylation. Because mutation of serine 1449 to alanine did not result in complete loss of FANCD2 mono-ubiquitylation, we went on to clarify this defect using a time course of MMC treatment (Figure 4B bottom). In whole cell extracts from GM6914 cells expressing wild-type FANCA, an increase in mono-ubiquitylated FANCD2 was detectable at 4 hours of MMC treatment, and the level continued to increase with further treatment (Figure 4B bottom lanes 5-7). This was consistent with the time dependence of FANCA phosphorylation as shown in Figure 2A, where phosphorylation was initially detectable at 2 hours and continued to increase. In contrast, in cells expressing FANCA (S1449A), some increase in mono-ubiquitylation was detectable at 4 hours, but at later time points there is no further increase (Figure 4B bottom lanes 10-12). FANCD2 is mono-ubiquitylated constitutively at S phase; therefore, differences in FANCD2 ubiquitylation in cells expressing wild-type FANCA versus FANCA (S1449A) could potentially be explained by affected cell-cycle distribution. No differences in cell-cycle distribution were, however, detected in FA-A parental cells, those corrected by the wild-type FANCA cDNA, and those expressing the phosphomutant of FANCA (data not shown).
Cells from patients with FA have a characteristic increase in genome instability, displaying an increase in chromosomal aberrations both spontaneously and in response to DNA damage. For this reason, chromosomal breakage analysis is used as a clinical diagnostic test for FA. GM6914 fibroblasts expressing wild-type FANCA or FANCA (S1449A) and the vector control were exposed to MMC, treated with colcemid to arrest at metaphase, and metaphase spreads were prepared. Chromosomes were analyzed for the presence of gaps, single chromatid breaks, isochromatid breaks, fragments, and polyradials. Results were expressed as the number of aberrations per metaphase. At least 25 metaphases were counted per cell type. Whereas cells corrected with wild-type FANCA cDNA displayed low levels of aberrations, those expressing the phosphomutant FANCA (S1449A) exhibited an intermediate amount of chromosome aberrations compared with the vector control (Figure 4C). These data are consistent with our other findings that FANCA (S1449A) fails to fully correct the FA phenotype.
FANCA (S1449A) does not fully correct FA-A homologous recombination defect
Based on similarity of FA to other disorders of DNA repair and the interaction of FA proteins with proteins such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 known to be involved in homology directed repair (HDR), FA has been implicated in the repair of DSBs by HDR.15,41 Indeed, human cells from complementation groups FA-A, FA-G, and FA-D2 have been shown to be defective in repair of a DSB introduced on a recombination reporter.36 To assess the ability of cells expressing FANCA (S1449) to perform HDR, GM6914 (FA-A) cells were obtained (courtesy of M. Jasin, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center) with an integrated copy of the DR-GFP reporter.36 This reporter has 2 nonfunctional copies of GFP and a restriction site for the endonuclease I-SceI. A DSB is introduced by expression of I-SceI. If accurate HDR occurs, a functional GFP is produced, and HDR frequency can be calculated by the percentage of GFP-positive cells. GM6914 DR-GFP-expressing cells were infected with wild-type FANCA, FANCA (S1449A) cDNA, or the vector control and selected for stable expression. I-SceI was introduced on an expression vector, and cells were cultured for 3 days to allow time for expression of the enzyme, induction of the DSB, and repair. After this time, cells were harvested and analyzed for GFP expression using flow cytometry. GM6914 DR-GFP FANCA-corrected cells showed significantly more GFP-positive cells than the noncorrected vector control (Figure 4D; P = .027). The phosphomutant cells, GM6914 DR-GFP FANCA (S1449A), had a percentage of GFP-positive cells intermediate between the 2 and statistically distinct from wild-type FANCA (P = .043), consistent with the intermediate phenotype measured by MMC sensitivity, FANCD2 mono-ubiquitylation, and chromosome breakage. Cells transfected with an empty vector in the place of I-SceI had very low levels of GFP-positive cells (data not shown), indicating low levels of background homologous recombination on the reporter in the absence of a DSB.
Phosphorylation of FANCA is dependent on ATR kinase
Based on the presence of serine 1449 within a consensus ATM/ATR site, as confirmed by the detection of the peptide by a screen performed by the Elledge group, and given previous work implicating ATR in FA, we hypothesized that ATR could be the kinase for FANCA at serine 1449.28,42 GM6914 FA-A mutant MMC-exposed cells expressing wild-type FANCA, FANCA (S1449A), or vector control were treated with wortmannin, a PIKK inhibitor that inhibits both ATM and ATR.43 Phosphorylation of overexpressed, wild-type FANCA decreased after wortmannin treatment (Figure 5A lane 3 vs lane 4). We then wished to investigate the phosphorylation status of FANCA in cells lacking functional ATM and ATR proteins, as previously determined for FANCG.35 ATR-Seckel (DK0064) cells failed to express a detectable level of phospho-Ser1449-FANCA (Figure 5B lanes 4-6), although it was clearly evident in both wild-type (GM02188) and ATM-deficient (GM01389D) cells (Figure 5B lanes 1-3 and 7-9). Use of a wortmannin dose that inhibits ATM (20 μM) failed to reduce the expression of phosphorylated FANCA in wild-type (Figure 5B lane 2) and ATM cells (Figure 5B lane 8), although the higher dose of 100 μM, which inhibits ATR, does result in reduced expression in these cell lines (Figure 5B lanes 3,9). These data indicate that ATM activity is not required for FANCA phosphorylation, whereas ATR activity is required.
ATR kinase phosphorylates S1449 in vitro
Given the role of ATR in vivo, we wished to investigate whether serine 1449 in FANCA was a substrate for ATR in vitro. Endogenous ATR kinase was immunoprecipitated from HeLa cells (Figure 6B) and incubated with GST alone, a GST-FANCA C terminal fusion protein (amino acids 1250-1455) encompassing serine 1449, or GST-FANCA (S1449A) C terminal fusion in the presence of [γ-32P]ATP and in vitro kinase conditions. All substrates were expressed and purified (Figure 6A, Coomassie), but ATR was only able to phosphorylate the GST-FANCA wild-type C terminal fusion, as detected by autoradiography (Figure 6A autorad lane 2, *). The phosphorylation was eliminated in the S1449A mutant (Figure 6A autorad lane 3). This, together with the consensus site at serine 1449 for ATR or ATM, is suggestive that ATR is a kinase for FANCA on serine 1449 in vitro but does not eliminate the possibility that the activity may be from an associated immunoprecipitated kinase. Taken together with the in vivo studies, these data indicate that ATR is responsible either directly or indirectly for phosphorylation of FANCA. To rule out the likelihood that the downstream effector of ATR, CHK1, could be phosphorylating FANCA, we conducted a blot of HeLa cells exposed or not to MMC in the presence or absence of CHK1 inhibitor SB218078. As seen in Figure 6C, unlike wortmannin, the CHK1 inhibitor SB28078 failed to abrogate FANCA phosphorylation.
Discussion
With the exception of FANCL, a ubiquitin ligase, the helicase FANCJ/BRIP1, and FANCM/Hef, which contains a DNA binding motif, the functions of the other FA proteins remain elusive, partially because of their lack of functional motifs.11,12,44,45 Understanding the regulation and binding partners of the Fanconi proteins, including FANCA, can provide insight into the function of the proteins and the role of the FA pathway in genome stability. We report a phosphorylation of FANCA on serine 1449 that is DNA damage–inducible and essential to the function of the FA pathway. Importantly, we show this phosphorylation is dependent on ATR kinase. This, together with data showing that mono-ubiquitylation and phosphorylation of FANCD2 are dependent on ATR, places the FA pathway within the broader context of the DNA damage repair pathway and provides insight into the way in which ATR exerts its genome-maintenance role.24,42
We report here that phosphorylated FANCA is found on chromatin after DNA damage (Figure 3). Similarly, mono-ubiquitylated FANCD2 is found on chromatin after DNA damage, but mono-ubiquitylation is reduced in cells mutant at serine 1449. ATR kinase phosphorylates its binding partner, ATR interacting protein (ATRIP), and subsequently relocates to chromatin after DNA damage.46 FANCA (S1449A), however, localizes normally to chromatin (Figure S2). An interesting question is whether FANCA is phosphorylated before or on arriving on chromatin. Although we have demonstrated that FANCA phosphorylation is dependent on ATR, it remains a possibility that ATR may not be the direct kinase for FANCA in vivo or in vitro. ATR phosphorylates downstream effectors and adaptors that could possibly be responsible for the direct phosphorylation.47 We have investigated one downstream kinase, CHK1. In the presence of a specific inhibitor of CHK1, SB218078, FANCA is phosphorylated normally on S1449 after MMC treatment (Figure 6C), indicating that CHK1 is not required for FANCA phosphorylation.48 The presence of serine 1449 within an ATR/ATM consensus site, together with the data presented here and that provided by Elledge's group, is highly suggestive of a direct role for ATR.40
Importantly, we report the first differentiation of the FA pathway after DNA damage and during S phase. Until now, it has been understood that the function of the FA pathway in the DNA damage response was similar to its normal physiologic function at S phase. In support of this is evidence that FANCD2 and FANCI are mono-ubiquitylated and FANCG is phosphorylated both at S phase and after DNA damage.16,17,20 The core complex was also known to localize to chromatin under both conditions.49 This is the first report of an event in the pathway to occur specifically after DNA damage. This may represent a DNA damage-specific mechanism of activating the common FA pathway, or it may represent a mechanism by which a specialized function of the FA proteins is activated. Cells expressing FANCA (S1449A) will be useful reagents to dissect these possibilities and uncover potentially novel functions for the FA proteins. Separation of function seen after DNA damage versus S phase represents an important observation in FA biology.
How the phosphorylation modulates FANCD2 mono-ubiquitylation is unknown. Speculative mechanisms could include modulating the stability of FANCD2 itself or the stability of FANCD2 mono-ubiquitylation after MMC treatment, perhaps by negatively regulating the deubiquitylase, USP1, after DNA damage in a way that is not required at S phase.50 Consistent with this, we observe a slight but consistent decrease in FANCD2 expression after MMC treatment in cells expressing FANCA (S1449A) (Figure 4B top lane 3 and bottom lanes 11,12).
Cells mutant at serine 1449 of FANCA have an intermediate FA phenotype rather than a complete loss of function phenotype as measured by MMC sensitivity, FANCD2 mono-ubiquitylation, chromosome breakage, and homologous recombination. This partial correction of phenotype by a phosphorylation mutant is consistent with previous reports for several other FA proteins.20,22,24,25,35 PD20 (FA-D2) cells expressing T691A and S717A mutants of FANCD2 exhibit intermediate MMC sensitivity and partial restoration of radioresistant DNA synthesis,24 T346A and S374A mutants of FANCE result in incomplete restoration of MMC resistance,25 whereas S7A, S383A, and S387A mutants of FANCG confer an intermediate phenotype in both human and hamster cell lines.20,22 For FANCD2, these phosphorylations promote mono-ubiquitylation,24 whereas phosphorylation of Ser7 of FANCG promotes formation of a BRCA2-D2-G-XRCC3 protein complex.35 The reason for the partial complementation by S1449A FANCA is not yet clear, but it may be postulated that phosphorylation is necessary only for responding to increased cellular stress on the induction of DNA damage, rather than in normal cell activities such as maintaining replication during S phase in the presence of endogenous lesions or low levels of induced DNA damage. As presented in Figure 3B, FANCA (S1449A) is able to associate with FANCG and may retain partial function by forming associations with other proteins of the FA pathway. Thus, the S1449A protein may be able to operate normally during S-phase in undamaged cells but cannot be activated in response to DNA damage because of loss of a specialized function associated only with phosphorylated FANCA. The partial correction of the FA phenotype with the S1449A mutant and the specificity of FANCA phosphorylation on DNA damage strongly support this notion. Nevertheless, these data implicate S1449 as being necessary for complete correction of a variety of FA phenotypes, including cellular resistance to MMC, efficient FANCD2 mono-ubiquitylation, chromosomal stability after MMC, and repair of DSB by homologous recombination (Figure 4).
The online version of this article contains a data supplement.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Maria Jasin and Penny Jeggo for sharing cell lines, Steven Elledge for sharing unpublished data, and Jennifer Phillips for technical assistance.
This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (Bethesda, MD) grant R01-063776 (G.M.K.) and North West Cancer Research Fund (Liverpool, United Kingdom) grant CR751 (N.J.J.).
National Institutes of Health
Authorship
Contribution: N.B.C. designed and performed research, collected data, analyzed and interpreted data, and wrote the manuscript; T.B., A.T., J.B.W., and K.J.R. performed research and collected data; and N.J.J. and G.M.K. designed the research, analyzed and interpreted data, and assisted in writing the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Correspondence: Gary M. Kupfer, LMP 2074, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520; e-mail: gary.kupfer@yale.edu.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal