The report of Cooling and colleagues adds importantly to the understanding of ABH blood group antigens on platelets and their clinical significance.1 However, we wish to comment on several aspects of this report that we believe could be misleading.
First, the authors suggest that platelets from individuals whose red cell phenotype is A2 are “Bombay-like” in that they lack detectable quantities of A and H antigen. Second, it is claimed that H and A antigens are “proportionately coexpressed” on platelets even in persons with high expression of A. Both observations conflict with our previous report showing that A2 and O platelets carry comparable amounts of H antigen and that H expression on platelets, as on red cells, is inversely related to expression of A antigen.2 In our studies, we used an H-specific monoclonal antibody (MoAb) BRIC-198, whereas Cooling et al used FITC-labeled Ulex europaeus lectin to quantify platelet H antigen by flow cytometry. To check whether these 2 H-specific probes might yield different results, we obtained FITC-labeled Ulex from the same source as Cooling et al (Sigma, St Louis, MO) and examined its reactions against platelets using 2-color flow cytometry and washed platelets of different phenotypes isolated by differential centrifugation. Using a phycoerythrin-labeled MoAb against CD42b to gate on platelets, we found that FITC-Ulex binds equally well to O and A2 platelets and reacts only very weakly with platelets from an individual with type II high expression of A1 (Table 1). Similar reactions were obtained with MoAb BRIC-198. Findings made with both probes confirm our previous observations that groups A2 and O platelets carry about the same amount of H antigen and that overexpression of A is associated with markedly decreased levels of H.2
Blood group A and H levels on platelets determined by 2-color flow cytometry
. | MFI . | . | . | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platelet . | BRIC 198 MoAb anti-H . | Ulex europaeus Lectin anti-H . | BRIC 145 MoAb anti-A . | ||
| Group O | 187.30 | 699.43 | 0 | ||
| Group A2 | 153.31 | 719.80 | 4.25 | ||
| Group A1 | 142.97 | 747.24 | 538.39 | ||
| Group A1 high expresser | 3.22 | 55.15 | 5433.41 | ||
. | MFI . | . | . | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platelet . | BRIC 198 MoAb anti-H . | Ulex europaeus Lectin anti-H . | BRIC 145 MoAb anti-A . | ||
| Group O | 187.30 | 699.43 | 0 | ||
| Group A2 | 153.31 | 719.80 | 4.25 | ||
| Group A1 | 142.97 | 747.24 | 538.39 | ||
| Group A1 high expresser | 3.22 | 55.15 | 5433.41 | ||
MFI indicates mean fluorescence intensity.
The alpha-2-fucosyltransferase responsible for the synthesis of H and the glycosyltransferases responsible for the synthesis of A and B antigens (including A2) are encoded at distinct loci on different chromosomes. It would be most unexpected for the H-transferase gene to be selectively inactivated in megakaryocytes of persons with the A2 red cell phenotype. Additionally, H antigen (the substrate for A-transferase) is eliminated when the “A” sugar is attached. Accordingly, it is to be expected that H substance will be decreased on platelets from individuals with high expression of A-transferase, rather than increased as found by Cooling et al.1 We suggest that the investigators need to re-examine their measurements of platelet H antigen expression made with FITC-Ulex.
ABH expression on human blood platelets
It is unclear that Curtis and Aster's findings represent ABH on circulating platelets. In this report and other published studies,1 the authors have used centrifuged washed platelets. In contrast, we carefully avoided activating platelets by diluting platelet-rich plasma in buffer, followed by a one-step labeling procedure using reagents specific for both ABH and CD41. Early studies showed minimal platelet activation (CD62, < 3%), with exclusion of ABH-positive senescent RBCs, with this method. The need to avoid platelet activation to study circulating platelets cannot be overemphasized. Platelet activation can dramatically alter platelet glycotype with physiologic consequences.2,3 Studies by Julmy et al have shown a 50% increase in ABH on A1 platelets following platelet activation.2 The mechanism surrounding this phenomenon is poorly understood, but may involve a combination of altered glycoprotein expression following alpha granule translocation and microparticle shedding. Changes in glycosyltransferase could also play a role. The activity of many glycosyltransferases, including sialyltransferases in human platelets, can be regulated by posttranslational modification.3,4 At least one study has found evidence for posttranscriptional regulation of FUT1, the fucosyltransferase responsible for H-antigen synthesis.5 To be comparable with our study, the authors would need to repeat their studies avoiding centrifugation and activation of platelets.
We disagree with the authors that FUT1 may not play a regulatory role in platelets. H is a developmentally regulated antigen during megakaryocytopoiesis and displays clonal variation.6,7 In colony agar assays, Dunstan observed clonal variation in A and H, with the highest A expression on colonies with high H expression. Based on their observations, Dunstan hypothesized that the ABH heterogeneity on circulating platelets may reflect, in part, clonal differences in megakaryocyte H-transferase (FUT1) activity.7 Our results support those findings.
Finally, the authors question the specificity of the UEA1 used in our study. Unlike previous reports,1 group A and group O RBCs were included in every experiment as internal controls. RBCs were stained with the same lots and working dilutions as platelets, allowing a direct comparison between RBCs and platelets. UEA1 staining to RBCs was consistent with serologic studies and differed dramatically from platelets. It is possible that the differences in UEA1 staining between the 2 studies may reflect working dilutions of reagents, since our reagents were titrated against RBCs to avoid hemagglutination. In unpublished experiments (L.C., 1996), we observed anti-H monoclonal antibody staining to platelets only at concentrations capable of agglutinating RBCs.
Among the reasons we chose FITC-UEA1 over monoclonal anti-H for labeling platelets is the ability to do one-step direct labeling, a high signal-noise ratio, and the ability of UEA1 to recognize H-antigen on N- and O-linked glycans. Commercial anti-H monoclonal antibodies are relatively weak and specific for type 2 chain H-antigen on N-glycans, which are capable of presenting a dense multivalent epitope. In contrast, UEA1 will recognize H-active structures on N-glycans, as well as branched, core 2 O-glycans like those on glycoprotein Ib. Unlike H on N-glycans, H-antigen on branched core 2 O-glycans may be sterically inaccessible substrates for A/B glycosyltransferases.
Correspondence: Laura Cooling, Assistant Professor, Pathology, Associate Medical Director, Transfusion Medicine, University of Michigan Hospitals, 2F225 UH, Box 0054, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0054; e-mail: lcooling@med.umich.edu.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal