Hematopoietic stem progenitor cells (HSPCs) are highly enriched in a rare subset of Lin-CD34+CD38- cells. Independent of stage of human development, HSPC function segregates to the subset of Lin-CD34+CD38- cells. However, fetal-derived HSPCs demonstrate distinct self-renewal and differentiation capacities compared with their adult counterparts. Here, to characterize the molecular nature of fetal HSPCs, suppressive subtractive hybridization was used to compare gene expression of HSPCs isolated from fetal blood (FB-HSPCs) versus adult mobilized peripheral blood (MPB-HSPCs). We identified 97 differentially expressed genes that could be annotated into distinct groups that include transcription factors, cell cycle regulators, and genes involved in signal transduction. Candidate regulators, such as Lim only domain-2 (LMO2), nuclear factor–kappa B (NF-κB), tripartite motif 28 (Trim28), and N-myc protooncogene (MYCN), and a novel homeobox gene product were among transcripts that were found to be differentially expressed and could be associated with specific proliferation and differentiation properties unique to FB-HSPCs. Interestingly, the majority of genes associated with signal transduction belong to Ras pathway, highlighting the significance of Ras signaling in FB-HSPCs. Genes differentially expressed in FB-HSPCs versus adult MPB-HSPCs were verified using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR). This approach also resulted in the identification of a transcript that is highly expressed in FB-HSPCs but not detectable in more differentiated Lin-CD34+CD38+ FB progenitors. Our investigation represents the first study to compare phenotypically similar, but functionally distinct, HSPC populations and to provide a gene profile of unique human HSPCs with higher proliferative capacity derived from early in utero human blood development.

Proliferative and differentiation characteristics of human hematopoietic stem progenitor cells (HSPCs) allow the creation and maintenance of mammalian hematopoiesis.1  These rare cell types are operationally defined by their ability to reconstitute the hematopoietic system upon transplantation in vivo2  or give rise to large numbers of mature hematopoietic cells in vitro using long-term culture–initiating cells (LTC-ICs) or colony-forming unit (CFU) assays.3,4  Despite differences in readout assays used to define stem progenitors, human hematopoietic cells with these properties are highly enriched in the lineage-depleted (Lin-) population of hematopoietic cells with CD34+CD38- cell surface phenotype.5  The nonobese diabetic severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mouse has been extensively used to evaluate the in vivo proliferation and differentiation characteristics of HSPCs2,5  that are mainly enriched in the Lin-CD34+CD38- subset. HSPCs are distinct from hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) enriched in Lin-CD34+CD38+ subset, since HPCs are not able to repopulate in the NOD/SCID mouse and can only be detected using in vitro progenitor assays.5  To further illustrate the importance of this phenotype, HSPC function segregates to the subset of Lin-CD34+CD38- cells at all stages of human hematopoietic development, ranging from fetal to adult sources of HSPCs.6-9 

Despite the ability to isolate human HSPCs, our understanding of mechanisms governing self-renewal or differentiation of these rare cells is limited. For example, the intrinsic and extrinsic factors that regulate the mitotic transitions of human HSPCs have yet to be determined.10,11  The dormant status of adult HSPCs may explain the inability to expand these cells without loss of HSPC function and why they are refractory to efficient retroviral gene transfer.1  However, fetal blood (FB)–derived HSPCs enriched in Lin-CD34+CD38- cells possess unique properties that include distinct proliferative and differentiation capacities compared with their adult counterparts. Over a series of investigations, a novel population of human HSPCs has been recently identified in the fetal circulation that possesses distinct proliferation and differentiation characteristics compared with adult circulating HSPCs harvested from mobilized peripheral blood (MPB).8,9  Lin-CD34+CD38- FB-HSPCs are distinct from adult Lin-CD34+CD38- MPB-HSPCs in their frequency among total mononuclear cells, number of human SCID repopulating cells (SRCs),8  enhanced retroviral transduction ability into HSPCs, in vivo myelopoietic reconstitution potential of FB-HSPCs, and the number of cycling HSPCs in FB that retains SRC capacity.9  Accordingly, FB-HSPCs provide a unique source of human HSPCs that are actively cycling8,9  with the opportunity to study and define the molecular mechanisms involved in HSPCs proliferation when self-renewal divisions are more frequent than in the adult hematopoietic system.

Recent advances in the area of gene expression studies have provided novel approaches, such as microarray,12  serial analysis of gene expression,13  differential display,14  and suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH),15  to study gene expression profiles in different populations of cells. Here, we aimed to evaluate differences in gene expression between FB-HSPCs and MPB-HSPCs that are likely responsible for distinct functional characteristics of FB-HSPCs using SSH. Our study identifies a gene profile for functionally distinct human HSPCs that differs from adult sources that possess limited proliferative potential and thereby provides the first molecular description of human HSPCs derived from early human blood development.

Human cells

Samples of human FB (n = 10), from early gestation (16-22 weeks), and MPB (n = 6), mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), were obtained in conjunction with local ethical and biohazard authorities of the University of Western Ontario and London Health Sciences Center. FB and MPB samples were diluted (1:4) with α-minimal essential medium (GibcoBRL, Grand Island, NY) or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and mononuclear cells (MNCs) were isolated as previously described.8,9 Figure 1 provides a schematic of our experimental approach using purified FB- and MPB-HSPCs. Given the individual variation between different human samples, FB and MPB samples from each population were pooled for SSH. Independent of this approach, genes identified to be differentially expressed in FB-HSPCs were confirmed using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) on freshly isolated samples of FB and MPB as indicated in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Experimental approach to identify genes differentially expressed in FB-HSPCs compared with adult MPB-HSPCs. (A) Development of cDNA libraries for identifying differentially expressed genes in FB-HSPCs. Isolation of Lin-CD34+CD38- cells from fetal blood (10 samples) and mobilized peripheral blood (6 samples) followed by performing SSH as explained in “Materials and methods.” SSH was performed 2 more times to ensure the quality and reproducibility of the cDNA library. Screening of the colonies in the subtracted library will detect differentially regulated transcripts in FB-HSPCs and BLAST analysis will identify the closest transcripts in the human genome. We further narrowed our analysis toward key regulatory genes including transcription factors, cell cycle regulators, and signal transduction genes presumably responsible for fate determination of HSPCs. (B) Verification and quantification of candidate transcripts identified in the SSH reactions. Lin-CD34+CD38- cells from fetal blood (5 samples) and mobilized peripheral blood cells (5 samples) and also Lin-CD34+CD38+ from several fetal blood (12 samples) were isolated and used for real-time Q-PCR. The Q-PCR experiments were done in 3 different concentrations and each concentration in duplicate. This analysis confirmed and validated our experimental approach to identify genes that are consistently differentially expressed in FB-HSPCs versus adult counterparts from M-PB-HSPCs.

Figure 1.

Experimental approach to identify genes differentially expressed in FB-HSPCs compared with adult MPB-HSPCs. (A) Development of cDNA libraries for identifying differentially expressed genes in FB-HSPCs. Isolation of Lin-CD34+CD38- cells from fetal blood (10 samples) and mobilized peripheral blood (6 samples) followed by performing SSH as explained in “Materials and methods.” SSH was performed 2 more times to ensure the quality and reproducibility of the cDNA library. Screening of the colonies in the subtracted library will detect differentially regulated transcripts in FB-HSPCs and BLAST analysis will identify the closest transcripts in the human genome. We further narrowed our analysis toward key regulatory genes including transcription factors, cell cycle regulators, and signal transduction genes presumably responsible for fate determination of HSPCs. (B) Verification and quantification of candidate transcripts identified in the SSH reactions. Lin-CD34+CD38- cells from fetal blood (5 samples) and mobilized peripheral blood cells (5 samples) and also Lin-CD34+CD38+ from several fetal blood (12 samples) were isolated and used for real-time Q-PCR. The Q-PCR experiments were done in 3 different concentrations and each concentration in duplicate. This analysis confirmed and validated our experimental approach to identify genes that are consistently differentially expressed in FB-HSPCs versus adult counterparts from M-PB-HSPCs.

Close modal

Cell purification

Subsets of Lin-CD34+CD38- from FB and MPB and Lin-CD34+CD38+ from FB were isolated as described.8  Briefly, the lineage-depleted (Lin-) cells were isolated from each population using a cocktail of monoclonal antibodies (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada) against cell surface markers: CD2, CD3, CD14, CD16, CD19, CD24, CD33, CD38, CD41, CD56, CD66b, and glycophorinA. Next, the Lin- population was stained with antihuman CD34-allophycocyanin (APC) and antihuman CD38-phycoerithrin (PE; Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) antibodies. The stained cells were sorted on a FACS vantage SE (Becton Dickinson) using sorting gates illustrated in Figure 1A. Reanalysis of sorted Lin-CD34+CD38- cells from FB and MPB and Lin-CD34+CD38+ cells from FB demonstrated the isolation of the targeted populations with the highest purity (Figure 1A).

Synthesis and amplification of cDNA

The mRNA of pooled samples from each population was extracted using oligo(dT)-cellulose chromatography (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom) (Figure 1; experimental protocol). The mRNA underwent DNase-I digestion (GIBCO BRL, Burlington, ON, Canada) to eliminate the possibility of genomic DNA contamination. This was followed by the synthesis of full-length strand cDNA using 3′ and 5′ primers (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) as previously described.16  The full-length strand cDNA was used as a template for exponential amplification in PCR using Advantage PCR Amplification kit (Clontech). The PCR conditions are as follows: first denaturation at 95°C for 1 minute followed by cycles of amplification at 95°C for 15 seconds (denaturation), 65°C for 30 seconds (annealing), and 68°C for 6 minutes (extension). The quality of amplified sample was evaluated on 1.2% agarose gel by observing the amplified products ranging from 7 kb to 0.5 kb. Amplified cDNA was purified (Clontech), quantified using Spectrophotometer (Fischer Scientific, Hampton, NH), and stored at -20°C until used.

Suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH)

Amplified cDNA of FB and MPB Lin-CD34+CD38- was used as tester and driver, respectively, for SSH as described.15  Briefly, the amplified cDNA of tester and driver underwent RsaI (Fermentas, Burlington, ON, Canada) restriction digestion and were purified (Clontech) followed by quantification using Spectrophotometer (Fisher Scientific). Next, in 2 separate tubes 100 ng of purified RsaI-digested tester cDNA was ligated to 10 mM of 2 different adaptor primers. Finally, in hybridization step, in 2 tubes, 15 ng of adaptor ligated tester cDNA was hybridized with 300 ng cDNA of driver population for 8 hours at 68°C. This was followed by mixing the content of both tubes along with adding 75 ng cDNA of driver population and overnight incubation at 68°C. The subtracted tester cDNA was amplified in suppression and nested PCR.

The efficiency of subtracted library was verified in semiquantitative PCR and Q-PCR, using the following primers: β-actin forward 5′-GATCCACATCTGCTGGAAGG-3′ and reverse 5′-AAGTGTGACGTTGACATCCG-3′; Tal-1 forward 5′-ATGGTGCAGCTGAGTCCTCC-3′ and reverse 5′-ATATACTTCATGGCCAGGCGG-3′; and elongation-2, factor-1 (E2F1) forward 5′-CCAACTCCCTCTACCCTTGA-3′ and reverse 5′-TGTCTCCCTCCCTCACTTTC-3′. The PCR condition was composed of primary denaturation (96°C for 5 minutes) followed by 40 cycles of 94°C (45 seconds), 60°C (45 seconds), and 72°C (2 minutes). The PCR components consisted of 2 mM MgCl2, 12.5 mm of each set of primers, and 2.5 U Taq DNA polymeRase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). As indicated in Figure 1A, SSH between FB-HSPC and MPB-HSPC was repeated 2 additional times to ensure the subtracted library was enriched for differentially expressed genes in FB-HSPCs (data not shown for these rounds of SSH).

Cloning and Southern blotting

The nested PCR products, from the last step of SSH, were ligated into TA vector (Invitrogen) and were transformed into TOP10 Escherichia coli cells (Invitrogen). Three hundred twenty colonies were screened using the RsaI-digested amplified cDNA of driver population as a probe. Briefly, the recombinant plasmids underwent EcoRI restriction digestion followed by fractionation on 1% agarose gel. The DNA was then transferred to the nylon membrane (Amersham Pharmacia) using capillary action.17  The membrane was hybridized with 20 × 106 α32P–deoxycytosine triphosphosphate (dCTP) random primed labeled (Roche, Mississauga, ON, Canada) cDNA probe for overnight at 42°C. The membrane was washed with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS; 0.1%) standard saline citrate (SSC; 2×) at room temperature for 30 minutes and SDS (0.1%) SSC (0.1×) at 68°C for 30 minutes. The membrane was exposed to BIOMAX MS film (Kodak, Rochester, NY) overnight at -80°C.

Quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR)

The differential expression of some of the transcripts was confirmed and quantified in Q-PCR (MX4000; Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) using SYBRGREEN (Stratagene) DNA binding dye. Freshly harvested populations of purified Lin-CD34+CD38- and Lin-CD34+CD38+ from 5 independent FB samples (ranging from 16-22 weeks of gestation) and 5 independent MPB samples of Lin-CD34+CD38- cells were used to isolate FB-HSPCs, FB-HPCs, and MPB-HSPCs, respectively, for real-time Q-PCR analysis. The Primer design program (http://www.broad.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer/primer3_www.cgi) was used to design primers for the transcripts listed in Table 1. The regular PCR was performed for each gene to check the size of the amplicon followed by sequencing to ensure the authenticity of the amplified product. The Q-PCR condition was composed of 2 mM MgCl, 0.4 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP), 8% glycerol, 3% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 150 nM of each primer, 0.375 mL of 1:500 dilution of reference dye, and 2.5 mL of 1:2000 dilution of SYBRGREEN. The Q-PCR was performed along with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) or hydroxymethyl bilane synthase gene (HMBS) as housekeeping genes (internal control) to ensure the quality and efficiency of PCR reaction. Each reaction was performed in duplicate for all samples and the comparative quantification, based on the cycle threshold (Ct) of the gene of interest (GOI) normalized to housekeeping gene (HKG; GAPDH or HMBS) in each population, was used to evaluate the relative gene expression in FB-HSPCs versus MPB-HSPCs and FB-HPCs. The following equation18  was applied to calculate the relative expression of candidate genes in FB-HSPCs versus MPB-HSPCs and FB-HPCs: 2-ΔΔCt = comparative expression of GOI in FB-HSPCs compared with MPB-HSPCs or FB-HPCs. ΔΔCt for FB-HSPCs versus MPB-HSPCs or FB-HPCs = ΔCt for FB-HSPCs - ΔCt for MPB-HSPCs or FB-HPCs. ΔCt of FB-HSPCs = Ct GOI - CtHKG. ΔCt of MPB-HSPCs = Ct GOI - CtHKG. ΔCt of FB-HPCs = Ct GOI - CtHKG.

DNA sequencing and analysis

The recombinant DNA samples were sequenced (Sequencing Facility, Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada) using M13 reverse and/or forward primers from the predetermined sequence in the vector. The sequences were analyzed using McVector 6.5.1 program (Oxford Molecular Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom).

Development of cDNA libraries from purified Lin-CD34+CD38- cells derived from FB- and MPB-HSPCs

Distinct functional characteristics of FB-HSPCs compared with adult MPB-HSPCs8,9  prompted us to identify the molecular basis of these ontogenic differences. SSH has been shown by several investigations19-21  as one of the efficient approaches to study gene expression in closely related subpopulations of cells in which equally expressed transcripts are removed during the process of hybridization.15  However, one of the major difficulties in performing SSH in enriched HSPCs is the inability to obtain a sufficient number of cells to generate an adequate amount of cDNA using standard procedures. We overcame this limitation by amplification of first-strand cDNA, as was done in previous studies,16,22,23  in which the relative abundance of the primary transcripts is maintained during the amplification process. Given the distinct characteristics of FB-HSPC and its corresponding population of adult MPB-HSPC with identical cell surface phenotype, we used amplified cDNA of MPB-HSPCs as driver in SSH to remove genes that are equally expressed in both populations and enrich for transcripts that are differentially expressed in tester template generated from FB-HSPCs.

To ensure the purity of the populations of interest in FB and MPB, we used stringent selection gates to isolate the Lin-CD34+CD38- fraction from both sources (Figure 2Ai,iii). Upon reanalysis, these populations demonstrated as high as 99% purity (Figure 2Aii,iv), and preparations that were below 96% purity upon reanalysis were discarded and not used to generate cDNA template. Using an optimized cDNA amplification approach,16  we were able to generate up to 7 mg amplified cDNA, ranging from 7 kilobase (kb) to 0.5 kb in size (data not shown) from as few as 1 × 105 purified Lin-CD34+CD38- cells derived from FB or MPB sources. To evaluate the maintenance and representation of transcripts in the amplified preparations, expression of β-actin, as one of the highly expressed housekeeping genes,24  and β-glucoronidase, as a housekeeping gene expressed at a single transcript per cell,25  was determined by PCR. In addition, the size of β-glucoronidase amplicon (1.0 kb) is an indication of the integrity of amplified template. Using serial dilutions of amplified cDNA, β-actin and β-glucoronidase were detectable in both populations using as little as 0.07 ng of the amplified transcript (Figure 2B), indicating efficient cDNA amplification that has maintained the authenticity of the primary transcripts after several rounds of amplification. Based on these positive criteria, templates from MPB and FB Lin-CD34+CD38- cells representing HSPCs was used as driver and tester, respectively, in SSH reactions.

Figure 2.

Purification of HSPC populations from FB and MPB. (A) Lineage-depleted population from several fetal blood (n = 10) and MPB (n = 6) samples were pooled separately and stained with CD34 antibody conjugated to APC and CD38 antibody conjugated to PE. Using a stringent sorting gate (R1), the CD34+CD38- population in FB (i) and MPB (iii) were sorted and reanalysis of the sorted populations ensured the high purity of FB Lin-CD34+CD38- (ii) and MPB Lin-CD34+CD38- (iv) cells. (B) Amplification of β-actin and β-glucoronidase to verify the integrity and maintenance of the abundant of primary transcripts after cDNA amplification in FB Lin-CD34+CD38- and MPB Lin-CD34+CD38-. Different concentrations (7 ng, 0.7 ng, and 0.07 ng) of amplified cDNA from FB Lin-CD34+CD38- and MPB Lin-CD34+CD38- were used as the starting material in reverse transcriptase–PCR (RT-PCR) for the amplification of β-actin, as one of the highly expressed housekeeping genes, and β-glucoronidase, as one of the genes present as a single transcript per cell.

Figure 2.

Purification of HSPC populations from FB and MPB. (A) Lineage-depleted population from several fetal blood (n = 10) and MPB (n = 6) samples were pooled separately and stained with CD34 antibody conjugated to APC and CD38 antibody conjugated to PE. Using a stringent sorting gate (R1), the CD34+CD38- population in FB (i) and MPB (iii) were sorted and reanalysis of the sorted populations ensured the high purity of FB Lin-CD34+CD38- (ii) and MPB Lin-CD34+CD38- (iv) cells. (B) Amplification of β-actin and β-glucoronidase to verify the integrity and maintenance of the abundant of primary transcripts after cDNA amplification in FB Lin-CD34+CD38- and MPB Lin-CD34+CD38-. Different concentrations (7 ng, 0.7 ng, and 0.07 ng) of amplified cDNA from FB Lin-CD34+CD38- and MPB Lin-CD34+CD38- were used as the starting material in reverse transcriptase–PCR (RT-PCR) for the amplification of β-actin, as one of the highly expressed housekeeping genes, and β-glucoronidase, as one of the genes present as a single transcript per cell.

Close modal

Verification of SSH reactions between FB-HSPCs and MPB-HSPCs

In order to verify the efficiency of SSH reactions, the abundance of equally expressed transcripts in starting populations of FB-HSPCs and MPB-HSPCs from unsubtracted control reactions was compared with subtracted (SSH) reactions. Ideally, an efficient SSH reaction would allow the majority of common transcripts to be removed and would, therefore, require a higher number of PCR cycles to amplify and detect residual common transcripts within subtracted cDNA compared with the unsubtracted cDNA. Using semiquantitative PCR, amplified products from subtracted and unsubtracted samples were first analyzed for the abundant housekeeping transcript β-actin from 15 cycles PCR up to 40 cycles in 5-cycle intervals. As illustrated in Figure 3A, the presence of β-actin is observed after 15 cycles in the unsubtracted sample, whereas it is only clearly detectable in the subtracted template at 30 cycles. This difference in detectability indicated that the SSH was extremely efficient to remove equally expressed genes in both populations.

Figure 3.

Efficient SSH between FB-HSPCs versus MPB-HSPCs. The amplified cDNA of FB-HSPCs was subtracted from excess amount of MPB-HSPCs in a 2-step hybridization at 68°C to remove equally expressed genes. The differentially regulated genes in subtracted and unsubtracted libraries were amplified in suppression and nested PCRs. (A) In order to evaluate the quality of subtracted library, 50 ng of FB-subtracted and FB-unsubtracted DNA was used as a template to assess β-actin amplification in a semiquantitative PCR. An aliquot (7 mL) of amplified product was taken at 15 cycles and after every 5 cycles to 40 cycles followed by 2% agarose gel fractionation to estimate the abundance of β-actin at different cycles. (B) Q-PCR analysis of GAPDH, as one of the other housekeeping genes, verified the quality of FB-subtracted by using 10 ng of DNA from FB-subtracted (Ct = 36; ▦) and FB-unsubtracted (Ct = 23; ♦) libraries. (C) Amplification of Tal-1 as one of the key transcription factors involved in the occurrence of hematopoiesis. Semiquantitative PCR, the same methodology explained in Figure 2A, using 20 ng of amplified cDNA from FB-HSPCs and MPB-HSPCs, indicated equal expression of Tal-1 in both populations (Figure 2C top). In the FB-subtracted library, however, using 50 ng of DNA from FB-subtracted and FB-unsubtracted libraries, Tal-1 amplicon is detectable after 40 cycles in the FB-subtracted library as opposed to its appearance only after 15 cycles in the FB-unsubtracted library. (D) Amplification of E2F1 as one of the critical transcription factors involved in the cycling cells indicated a moderately higher expression in FB-HSPCs than MPB-HSPCs (Figure 2D top). In a semiquantitative approach, using 50 ng DNA as template, E2F1 is detectable in FB-HSPCs after 15 cycles but is present in MPB-HSPCs after 20 cycles. However, in an efficient SSH (Figure 2D bottom), using 100 ng DNA of subtracted and unsubtracted libraries, E2F1 is detected after 35 cycles in FB-subtracted but is observed at 40 cycles in the FB-unsubtracted library, indicating efficient SSH to enrich differentially regulated genes in FB-HSPCs.

Figure 3.

Efficient SSH between FB-HSPCs versus MPB-HSPCs. The amplified cDNA of FB-HSPCs was subtracted from excess amount of MPB-HSPCs in a 2-step hybridization at 68°C to remove equally expressed genes. The differentially regulated genes in subtracted and unsubtracted libraries were amplified in suppression and nested PCRs. (A) In order to evaluate the quality of subtracted library, 50 ng of FB-subtracted and FB-unsubtracted DNA was used as a template to assess β-actin amplification in a semiquantitative PCR. An aliquot (7 mL) of amplified product was taken at 15 cycles and after every 5 cycles to 40 cycles followed by 2% agarose gel fractionation to estimate the abundance of β-actin at different cycles. (B) Q-PCR analysis of GAPDH, as one of the other housekeeping genes, verified the quality of FB-subtracted by using 10 ng of DNA from FB-subtracted (Ct = 36; ▦) and FB-unsubtracted (Ct = 23; ♦) libraries. (C) Amplification of Tal-1 as one of the key transcription factors involved in the occurrence of hematopoiesis. Semiquantitative PCR, the same methodology explained in Figure 2A, using 20 ng of amplified cDNA from FB-HSPCs and MPB-HSPCs, indicated equal expression of Tal-1 in both populations (Figure 2C top). In the FB-subtracted library, however, using 50 ng of DNA from FB-subtracted and FB-unsubtracted libraries, Tal-1 amplicon is detectable after 40 cycles in the FB-subtracted library as opposed to its appearance only after 15 cycles in the FB-unsubtracted library. (D) Amplification of E2F1 as one of the critical transcription factors involved in the cycling cells indicated a moderately higher expression in FB-HSPCs than MPB-HSPCs (Figure 2D top). In a semiquantitative approach, using 50 ng DNA as template, E2F1 is detectable in FB-HSPCs after 15 cycles but is present in MPB-HSPCs after 20 cycles. However, in an efficient SSH (Figure 2D bottom), using 100 ng DNA of subtracted and unsubtracted libraries, E2F1 is detected after 35 cycles in FB-subtracted but is observed at 40 cycles in the FB-unsubtracted library, indicating efficient SSH to enrich differentially regulated genes in FB-HSPCs.

Close modal

To complement this analysis, Q-PCR was used to compare the expression level of another highly abundant housekeeping gene, glycerol aldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH),24  that is equally expressed in both FB-HSPCs and MPB-HSPCs (Figures 4B,5C), in subtracted and unsubtracted template cDNA (Figure 3B). The cycle threshold (Ct) for GAPDH in the unsubtracted sample was observed to be 26 cycles as opposed to 37 cycles in the subtracted sample, thereby providing additional evidence for the efficiency of SSH of MPB-HSPCs from FB-HSPCs. Similar observations were made by comparing the relative abundance of hematopoietic-specific transcripts for lower expressed genes, such as the transcription factor Tal-126  involved in definitive hematopoiesis.27 Tal-1 was shown to be equally expressed in starting populations of Lin-CD34+CD38- cells derived from FB and MPB (Figure 3C top) but could only be detected after 40 cycles of PCR in the subtracted cDNA (Figure 3C bottom). Conversely, efficient SSH would allow for more abundantly expressed genes from tester FB-HSPCs to be detected by using lower numbers of PCR cycles. E2F1 is a transcription factor shown to be more highly expressed in BM CD34+ than MPB CD34+.28  The significance of E2F1 in cycling status of human hematopoietic cells has also been demonstrated.29,30  Since FB-HSPCs differ from MPB-HSPCs based on cell cycle status, we examined expression of E2F1 in FB-HSPCs versus MPB-HSPCs. E2F1 was found to be more highly expressed in FB-HSPCs than MPB-HSPCs (Figure 3D top) using semiquantitative PCR. Using DNA template from FB-HSPC–subtracted libraries, E2F1 is detectable only after 35 cycles compared with 40 cycles in unsubtracted sample (Figure 3D bottom), indicating the enrichment of E2F1 in FB-HSPCs. Analysis of Tal-1 and E2F1 from subtracted libraries further confirms that the resulting FB-HSPC–subtracted library is enriched in differentially expressed genes. Taken together, these results indicate that the resulting subtracted cDNA is highly enriched for transcripts expressed differentially in purified FB-HSPCs compared with its adult counterpart derived from MPB-HSPCs, since the hematopoietic transcription factors common to both adult and fetal human HSPCs have been efficiently removed. SSH was repeated 2 more times to ensure the quality and reproducibility of the subtracted library through amplification profile of β-actin and E2F1 (data not shown).

Figure 4.

Screening of colonies in the FB-subtracted library using southern hybridization. (A) The blot of FB274 to FB320 is shown as a representative to explain the screening strategy to isolate colonies of FB-subtracted library for further analysis. The nested PCR products of FB-subtracted library were ligated to TA vector and transformed into DH5a cells. Bacterial plasmids were extracted, restriction digested with EcoRI, and gel fractionated on 1.5% agarose gel. Plasmid DNA were then transferred to nylon membrane and hybridized with MPB-HSCs amplified cDNA that was subsequently digested with RsaI and used as a probe. Colonies with the least signal or no hybridization signal were selected for further analysis. (B) Verification of the screening strategy. One of the colonies, MTCO-1, that showed a high hybridization signal with the cDNA of MPB-HSPCs was selected to further analyze its expression in FB-HSPCs and MPB-HSPCs in a Q-PCR approach. (Bi) Using 400 pg of amplified cDNA of FB-HSPCs and MPB-HSPCs, it is shown that there is not dramatic difference between the expression profile of MTCO-1 in both populations (FB-HSPCs Ct = 21.0 and MPB-HSPCs Ct = 20.5). (Bii) However, Trim-28 as one of the colonies with low hybridization signal with cDNA of MPB-HSPCs turned out to be expressed more in FB-HSPCs (Ct = 26.5) than MPB-HSPCs (Ct = 29.0).

Figure 4.

Screening of colonies in the FB-subtracted library using southern hybridization. (A) The blot of FB274 to FB320 is shown as a representative to explain the screening strategy to isolate colonies of FB-subtracted library for further analysis. The nested PCR products of FB-subtracted library were ligated to TA vector and transformed into DH5a cells. Bacterial plasmids were extracted, restriction digested with EcoRI, and gel fractionated on 1.5% agarose gel. Plasmid DNA were then transferred to nylon membrane and hybridized with MPB-HSCs amplified cDNA that was subsequently digested with RsaI and used as a probe. Colonies with the least signal or no hybridization signal were selected for further analysis. (B) Verification of the screening strategy. One of the colonies, MTCO-1, that showed a high hybridization signal with the cDNA of MPB-HSPCs was selected to further analyze its expression in FB-HSPCs and MPB-HSPCs in a Q-PCR approach. (Bi) Using 400 pg of amplified cDNA of FB-HSPCs and MPB-HSPCs, it is shown that there is not dramatic difference between the expression profile of MTCO-1 in both populations (FB-HSPCs Ct = 21.0 and MPB-HSPCs Ct = 20.5). (Bii) However, Trim-28 as one of the colonies with low hybridization signal with cDNA of MPB-HSPCs turned out to be expressed more in FB-HSPCs (Ct = 26.5) than MPB-HSPCs (Ct = 29.0).

Close modal
Figure 5.

Quantitative measurement of selected differentially regulated genes in FB-HSPCs versus MPB-HSPCs and FB-HPCs. (A) The cDNA of pooled FB-HSPCs and MPB-HSPCs was used in Q-PCR to evaluate the expression level of some of the differentially regulated genes in the group of transcription factors, cell cycle regulators, and signal transduction genes. Q-PCR reactions were performed in duplicate and GAPDH was used as an internal control in Q-PCR reactions, and the relative expression of these genes in FB-HSPCs versus MPB-HSPCs was calculated by 2-ΔΔCt equation (“Materials and methods”). Error bars indicate standard errors. (B) The same methodology was used to calculate the relative expression of the selected transcripts in FB-HSPCs versus FB-HPCs. *Lack of expression in FB-HPCs. (C) Amplification plot of FB248 as the transcript exclusively expressed in HSPC populations but not in FB-HPC. GAPDH amplification is shown as an internal control for Q-PCR reaction. However, FB248 amplification demonstrates the presence of amplicon in FB-HSPCs (Ct = 28.5) and MPB-HSPCs (Ct = 31.0) but not in FB-HPCs.

Figure 5.

Quantitative measurement of selected differentially regulated genes in FB-HSPCs versus MPB-HSPCs and FB-HPCs. (A) The cDNA of pooled FB-HSPCs and MPB-HSPCs was used in Q-PCR to evaluate the expression level of some of the differentially regulated genes in the group of transcription factors, cell cycle regulators, and signal transduction genes. Q-PCR reactions were performed in duplicate and GAPDH was used as an internal control in Q-PCR reactions, and the relative expression of these genes in FB-HSPCs versus MPB-HSPCs was calculated by 2-ΔΔCt equation (“Materials and methods”). Error bars indicate standard errors. (B) The same methodology was used to calculate the relative expression of the selected transcripts in FB-HSPCs versus FB-HPCs. *Lack of expression in FB-HPCs. (C) Amplification plot of FB248 as the transcript exclusively expressed in HSPC populations but not in FB-HPC. GAPDH amplification is shown as an internal control for Q-PCR reaction. However, FB248 amplification demonstrates the presence of amplicon in FB-HSPCs (Ct = 28.5) and MPB-HSPCs (Ct = 31.0) but not in FB-HPCs.

Close modal

Sequence analysis and annotation of differentially expressed transcripts derived from SSH of FB-HSPCs from MPB-HSPCs

To characterize individual transcripts differentially expressed in FB-HSPCs, amplified cDNA of MPB-HSPCs (RsaI digested) was used to probe colonies generated by subcloning FB-HSPC–subtracted transcripts into bacterial clones. Plasmid DNA was prepared from individual colonies containing FB-HSPC–inserted transcripts, electrophoresed, and transferred to membranes for hybridization against labeled cDNA generated from purified adult MPB-HSPCs. A representative example of 47 clones from 320 screened is shown in Figure 4A. Inserts with low hybridization signal were selected for further sequence analysis based on their relative low expression in MPB-HSPCs, suggesting they were unique to FB-HSPCs.

To demonstrate the efficiency of this screening and selection method to identify clones containing genes highly enriched in FB-HSPC versus MPB-HSPC, Q-PCR was used on representative clones given high (cytochrome c oxidase-I, MTCO-1) and low Trim28 signal after hybridization with labeled cDNA from MPB-HSPCs. Q-PCR results indicated that there is no difference in expression of MTCO-1 in freshly purified FB-HSPC versus MPB-HSPC (Figure 4Bi), whereas expression of Trim28 was higher in FB-HSPCs (Figure 4Bii), thereby validating our clone selection criteria. Using this strategy, 97 clones from 320 indicated low signal upon hybridization with labeled MPB-HSPCs (Table 2) and were subsequently selected and sequenced. The BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/seq/page.cgi?F=HsBlast.html&&ORG=Hs) analysis identified the closest transcript (gene) in human genome, and the SMART program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) showed the presence of domain structure(s), if any, in the amino acid sequences of the selected transcripts/genes. Using Gene Ontology Consortium (http://www.Geneontology.org/) and search of the available literature we categorized identified genes that led to the annotation of differentially expressed transcripts into 16 groups, including DNA binding, cell cycle regulator, protein synthesis, and transporters (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Illustration of annotated genes identified in FB-HSPC–subtracted library. Blast analysis (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/seq/page.cgi?F=HsBlast.html&&ORG=Hs) was used to identify the closest transcript in the gene bank, and SMART program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) identified the presence of domain(s) in the amino acid sequences of the selected transcripts. Gene Ontology Consortium (http://www.Geneontology.org/) and literature search were used to annotate selected transcripts differentially expressed in FB-HSPCs into 16 groups shown in a pie diagram. CCR indicates cell cycle regulator; TF/DNB, transcription factor/DNA binding protein; RNB, RNA binding; PP, protein processing; PS, protein synthesis; ECM, extracellular membrane; CYT, cytoskeletal; MET, metabolic genes; PIP, proteoglycan integral to plasma membrane; TRA, transports; ST, signal transduction; PF, protein folding; UBQ, ubiquitin pathway; UN EST, uncharacterized; DUB, deubiquitination; and AP, apoptosis pathway.

Figure 6.

Illustration of annotated genes identified in FB-HSPC–subtracted library. Blast analysis (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/seq/page.cgi?F=HsBlast.html&&ORG=Hs) was used to identify the closest transcript in the gene bank, and SMART program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) identified the presence of domain(s) in the amino acid sequences of the selected transcripts. Gene Ontology Consortium (http://www.Geneontology.org/) and literature search were used to annotate selected transcripts differentially expressed in FB-HSPCs into 16 groups shown in a pie diagram. CCR indicates cell cycle regulator; TF/DNB, transcription factor/DNA binding protein; RNB, RNA binding; PP, protein processing; PS, protein synthesis; ECM, extracellular membrane; CYT, cytoskeletal; MET, metabolic genes; PIP, proteoglycan integral to plasma membrane; TRA, transports; ST, signal transduction; PF, protein folding; UBQ, ubiquitin pathway; UN EST, uncharacterized; DUB, deubiquitination; and AP, apoptosis pathway.

Close modal

Quantitative analysis of differentially expressed genes in FB-HSPCs using Q-PCR

On the basis of the biologic differences of purified FB-HSPCs to other HSPCs derived from adult sources that possess identical phenotype, we concentrated our analysis on transcription factors, cell cycle regulators, and signal transduction that we hypothesized were more likely to account for these functional differences. In order to verify the authenticity and quantify the expression of these category of genes identified from FB-HSPC–subtracted library, we performed Q-PCR24,31-33  on newly isolated (Figure 1B) FB-HSPCs and MPB-HSPCs and extended our study to more mature FB hematopoietic cells lacking repopulating cells but enriched in hematopoietic progenitor cells, termed FB-HPCs, previously shown to be enriched in the Lin-CD34+CD38+ subpopulation.5  Required primers were designed from an area of the gene of interest that was not present in the clone originating from SSH to verify the expression of the gene and without limiting the analysis to the specific sequenced region represented in the subclone containing the insert.

Using 2-ΔΔCt equation, explained in “Materials and methods,”18  the relative expression of the candidate genes was calculated in FB-HSPCs compared with MPB-HSPCs and FB-HPCs. This approach provided a quantitative measure of genes in the population of cells enriched for HSPCs from in utero versus adult hematopoietic development (Figure 5A). All of the genes selected for this analysis were found to be more highly expressed in FB-HSPCs than MPB-HSPCs (Figure 5A), confirming the quality of the FB-HSPC–subtracted library. We also compared the relative expression of candidate genes in FB-HSPCs versus FB-HPCs (Figure 5B) to examine the potential role of these genes at 2 different stages of the fetal hematopoietic hierarchy. Q-PCR data analysis in FB-HSPCs versus FB-HPCs indicated that most differential expression of genes from FB-HSPCs versus MPB-HSPCs was also differentially expressed in FB progenitors devoid of repopulating activity. Interestingly, some of the candidate genes, such as CDK6, RALBP-1, and Rac1, are more highly expressed in FB-HPCs than FB-HSPCs, indicating that some of these genes are not exclusively highly expressed in the stem cell compartment of hematopoietic cells and may play some roles in later stages of in utero hematopoietic development. However, one of the transcripts (FB248) differentially expressed in FB-HSPCs compared with MPB-HSPCs (Figure 5A) is not detectable in FB-HPCs (Figure 5B-C), indicating its potential significance in FB-HSPCs. Analysis of amino acid sequences of FB248 indicated the presence of Src homology-3 (SH3) domains, suggesting its role in signal transduction of FB-HSPCs. Further analysis of this transcript is being pursued in our laboratory.

Previous studies from our laboratory identified a novel source of HSPCs from fetal circulation.8  Unlike hematopoietic stem progenitors derived from later stages of human ontogeny, such as adult or full-term cord blood, FB-HSPCs were less refractory to retroviral gene transfer,9  retained repopulating activity in NOD/SCID mice at a higher frequency,8,9  and demonstrated the presence of human repopulating stem cells actively traversing the cell cycle.9  Surprisingly, the phenotype of purified FB-HSPCs is identical to other sources of human HSPCs at later developmental stages and is almost exclusively in the Lin-CD34+CD38- subpopulation. The molecular basis of the functional differences between FB and adult HSPCs had yet to be examined. Despite circulating characteristics of FB-HSPCs and MPB-HSPCs, distinct mechanisms most likely govern the origin and nature of these FB-HSPCs in the circulation. MPB-HSPCs are mobilized by G-CSF,34,35  whereas unknown cellular and molecular mechanisms are responsible for circulating HSPCs in fetal blood. To better define the molecular basis for the distinct functional proliferative and differentiative characteristics of FB-HSPCs, here we use SSH to identify differentially expressed genes in FB-HSPCs that were minimally expressing in adult HSPC counterparts that lack active cycling status and are refractory to retroviral gene transfer. Our approach incorporates repeated SSH reactions between FB-HSPCs and MPB-HSPCs to provide a subset of candidate genes thought to be differentially expressed in FB-HSPCs and quantitatively verifies the differential expression of candidates using real-time Q-PCR from freshly isolated samples of FB-HSPCs and MPB-HSPCs. The study approach represents the first to compare gene expression of 2 human hematopoietic stem cells populations found at different stages of human ontogeny and to apply the results to functional characteristics of these subsets. Due to the nature of the differences between FB-HSPCs and adult HSPCs, our investigation focused on those genes most likely to control intrinsic factors of in utero–developing FB-HSPCs, including transcription factors, cell cycle regulators, and signal transduction genes. We have annotated differentially expressed FB-HSPC genes to 3 specific characteristics distinct to FB-HSPCs that were not demonstrated in functional assays to adult counterparts (Table 3).

In the group of transcription factors, previous reports have shown the expression pattern and the role of ring finger proteins (RNF) in embryonic period and its role on erythropoiesis.45,46  However, it is yet to be determined that the RNF4 identified in our library possess any role in the hematopoietic system. MYC oncogenes have been shown to be important in cell proliferation and differentiation.48,49  N-myc protooncogene (MYCN) has a key role in cell cycling through cooperation with cyclin D1 resulting in the generation of pre–B- and B-cell lymphoma in double transgenic mice36  and has been associated with a positive feedback loop between E2F1,50,51  thereby confirming our findings since both E2F1 and MYCN are found to be up-regulated in FB-HSPCs (Table 3). The ETS family of transcription factor contains an evolutionarily conserved DNA domain that regulates the expression of a wide range of genes through interaction with other transcription factors and cofactors.52,53 Ets2 has been shown to be involved in the regulation of cell cycle through interaction with cdc2 and cyclin D1 at the G2/M phase of the cell cycle.38  In addition to known transcription factors, our study identifies several expressed sequence tags (ESTs) with unknown function in FB-HSPCs. Amino acid sequence analysis, using SMART program, identified domain motifs in some of the ESTs, such as homeobox domain (HOX) in FB29, similar to domains in HOX genes known to induce self-renewal in mouse HSPCs.

In the group of cell cycle regulators, cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) is an inducer of the G1 phase of the cell cycle.37  Regulator of chromatin condensation-1 (RCC1) plays a key role in mitotic spindle assembly and is predominantly localized in the chromosomes of mitotic cells.54  Previous studies have shown that the generation of Ras-related nuclear protein (Ran-GTP) in the vicinity of chromosomes by RCC1 is important for the fidelity of mitotic assembly in human,41  supporting the higher frequency of cycling status of FB-HSPCs. The presence of CENPF, which accumulates during the G2 and rapidly degrades after mitosis,42  may be an indication of active cycling status of FB-HSPCs. Human WEE1 has been shown to play a key role in the negative regulation of entry to the mitotic phase of the cell cycle through induction of the inhibitory role of CDC2/cyclin B kinase.39,40  The presence of WEE1 in our differentially expressed FB-HSPC library also indicates the active regulation of cell cycling activity of FB-HSPCs that is not abnormally disrupted.

In the group of signal transduction genes, our identification of genes involved in the Ras signaling pathway suggests that the Ras pathway is significant to cycling status of FB-HSPCs, consistent with the role of Ras in the progression of G0 to S phase during activation of quiescent cells.55-57  Ral binding protein 1 (RALBP-1),58  downstream molecule of Ral signaling pathway, plays a key role in the activation of GTPase activity of Rac1 and CDC42.58,59  Interestingly, Rac1 was also identified as one of the transcripts differentially expressed in our library and found to be more expressed in FB-HSPCs than MPB-HSPCs. Very recent investigation has identified the significance of Rac1 in repopulating ability of HSPCs where Rac1-deficient mice fail to engraft in the bone marrow of irradiated mice.60  Our library also identifies homologs of mouse Lsc oncogene (human Sub1.5) as one of the activators of Rho family GTPases,61  which is consistent with previous studies indicating the higher abundance of Sub1.5 in human CD34+ progenitor cells.62  Recent investigation has shown the role of NF-KB1 in cell cycling63  and normal erythropoiesis,47  and several studies64-66  also demonstrated the activation of NF-KB1 by Rho, CDC42, and Rac1 proteins indicating their interaction in FB-HSPCs. We also identified a guanine nucleotide exchange factor that is considered to be one of the activators of Ras signaling pathways through activation of GTP-bound state of Ras superfamily proteins.65  Interestingly, this study also identified an EST transcript (FB248) with domain in receptor targeting proteins Lin-2 and Lin-7 (L27), guanylate kinase homologs (GuKc), domain present in PSD-95, Dlg, and ZO-1/2 (PDZ), SH3 domains, which is exclusively expressed in FB-HSPCs and MPB-HSPCs but not in FB-HPCs (Figure 5B-C). The presence of SH3 domain67  signifies the potential role of this transcript in signal transduction of FB-HSPCs.

Using the most widely used purified population of human HSPCs (Lin-CD34+CD38-), our study identifies differentially expressed genes in HSPCs during early stages of in utero human hematopoietic development that are not expressed in adult HSPCs. Creation and validation of this novel library will facilitate future work to define the functional effect and causal relationship of these genes in human HSPCs to be read out using in vitro and in vivo assays in misexpression approaches that include overexpression using retroviral transduction of MPB-HSPCs, or loss of function, through RNA interference. Since it appears that FB248 expression is restricted to HSPCs and not more differentiated progenitors, our laboratory is pursuing the potential function and role of this specific transcript in the context of human HSPC signal transduction.

Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, December 4, 2003; DOI 10.1182/blood-2003-09-3209.

Supported by the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC), and a Canada Research Chair in Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine (M.B.).

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.

1
Morrison SJ, Uchida N, Weissman IL. The biology of hematopoietic stem cells.
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol.
1995
;
11
:
35
-71.
2
Dick JE. Normal and leukemic human stem cells assayed in SCID mice.
Semin Immunol.
1996
;
8
:
197
-206.
3
Sutherland HJ, Eaves CJ, Eaves AC, Dragowska W, Lansdorp PM. Characterization and partial purification of human marrow cells capable of initiating long-term hematopoiesis in vitro.
Blood
.
1989
;
74
:
1563
-1570.
4
Sutherland HJ, Lansdorp PM, Henkelman DH, Eaves AC, Eaves CJ. Functional characterization of individual human hematopoietic stem cells cultured at limiting dilution on supportive marrow stromal layers.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
.
1990
;
87
:
3584
-3588.
5
Larochelle A, Vormoor J, Hanenberg H, et al. Identification of primitive human hematopoietic cells capable of repopulating NOD/SCID mouse bone marrow: implications for gene therapy.
Nat Med.
1996
;
2
:
1329
-1337.
6
Nicolini FE, Holyoake TL, Cashman JD, Chu PP, Lambie K, Eaves CJ. Unique differentiation programs of human fetal liver stem cells shown both in vitro and in vivo in NOD/SCID mice.
Blood
.
1999
;
94
:
2686
-2695.
7
Holyoake TL, Nicolini FE, Eaves CJ. Functional differences between transplantable human hematopoietic stem cells from fetal liver, cord blood, and adult marrow.
Exp Hematol.
1999
;
27
:
1418
-1427.
8
Gallacher L, Murdoch B, Wu D, Karanu F, Fellows F, Bhatia M. Identification of novel circulating human embryonic blood stem cells.
Blood
.
2000
;
96
:
1740
-1747.
9
Murdoch B, Gallacher L, Awaraji C, et al. Circulating hematopoietic stem cells serve as novel targets for in utero gene therapy.
FASEB J.
2001
;
15
:
1628
-1630.
10
Krause DS. Regulation of hematopoietic stem cell fate.
Oncogene
.
2002
;
21
:
3262
-3269.
11
Wagers AJ, Christensen JL, Weissman IL. Cell fate determination from stem cells.
Gene Ther.
2002
;
9
:
606
-612.
12
Duggan DJ, Bittner M, Chen Y, Meltzer P, Trent JM. Expression profiling using cDNA microarrays.
Nat Genet.
1999
;
21
:
10
-14.
13
Scott HS, Chrast R. Global transcript expression profiling by Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE).
Genet Eng (N Y)
.
2001
;
23
:
201
-219.
14
Stein J, Liang P. Differential display technology: a general guide.
Cell Mol Life Sci.
2002
;
59
:
1235
-1240.
15
Diatchenko L, Lau YF, Campbell AP, et al. Suppression subtractive hybridization: a method for generating differentially regulated or tissue-specific cDNA probes and libraries.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
.
1996
;
93
:
6025
-6030.
16
Chenchik A, Diachenko L, Moqadam F, Tarabykin V, Lukyanov S, Siebert PD. Full-length cDNA cloning and determination of mRNA 5' and 3' ends by amplification of adaptor-ligated cDNA.
Biotechniques
.
1996
;
21
:
526
-534.
17
Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, and Maniatis T. Analysis and cloning of eukaryotic genomic DNA. In:
A Laboratory Manual.
Ford N, Nolan C, Ferguson M, eds. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press;
1989
:
38
-41.
18
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.
Methods
.
2001
;
25
:
402
-408.
19
Miyasaka Y, Enomoto N, Nagayama K, et al. Analysis of differentially expressed genes in human hepatocellular carcinoma using suppression subtractive hybridization.
Br J Cancer
.
2001
;
85
:
228
-234.
20
Morales P, Thurston CF. Efficient isolation of genes differentially expressed on cellulose by suppression subtractive hybridization in Agaricus bisporus.
Mycol Res.
2003
;
107
:
401
-407.
21
Wang H, Zhan Y, Xu L, Feuerstein GZ, Wang X. Use of suppression subtractive hybridization for differential gene expression in stroke: discovery of CD44 gene expression and localization in permanent focal stroke in rats.
Stroke
.
2001
;
32
:
1020
-1027.
22
Brady G. Expression profiling of single mammalian cells—small is beautiful.
Yeast
.
2000
;
17
:
211
-217.
23
Brady G, Billia F, Knox J, et al. Analysis of gene expression in a complex differentiation hierarchy by global amplification of cDNA from single cells.
Curr Biol.
1995
;
5
:
909
-922.
24
Bustin SA. Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays.
J Mol Endocrinol.
2000
;
25
:
169
-193.
25
Oshima A, Kyle JW, Miller RD, et al. Cloning, sequencing, and expression of cDNA for human beta-glucuronidase.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
.
1987
;
84
:
685
-689.
26
Mouthon MA, Bernard O, Mitjavila MT, Romeo PH, Vainchenker W, Mathieu-Mahul D. Expression of tal-1 and GATA-binding proteins during human hematopoiesis.
Blood
.
1993
;
81
:
647
-655.
27
Shivdasani RA, Mayer EL, Orkin SH. Absence of blood formation in mice lacking the T-cell leukaemia oncoprotein tal-1/SCL.
Nature
.
1995
;
373
:
432
-434.
28
Steidl U, Kronenwett R, Rohr UP, et al. Gene expression profiling identifies significant differences between the molecular phenotypes of bone marrow-derived and circulating human CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells.
Blood
.
2002
;
99
:
2037
-2044.
29
Furukawa Y, Terui Y, Sakoe K, Ohta M, Saito M. The role of cellular transcription factor E2F in the regulation of cdc2 mRNA expression and cell cycle control of human hematopoietic cells.
J Biol Chem.
1994
;
269
:
26249
-26258.
30
Gala S, Marreiros A, Stewart GJ, Williamson P. Overexpression of E2F-1 leads to cytokine-independent proliferation and survival in the hematopoietic cell line BaF-B03.
Blood
.
2001
;
97
:
227
-234.
31
Cantz T, Jochheim A, Cieslak A, et al. PCR-based quantification of amplified RNA from laser microdissected mouse liver samples.
Exp Mol Pathol.
2003
;
75
:
53
-57.
32
Terskikh AV, Miyamoto T, Chang C, Diatchenko L, Weissman IL. Gene expression analysis of purified hematopoietic stem cells and committed progenitors.
Blood
.
2003
;
102
:
94
-101.
33
Wilson HL, O'Neill HC. Identification of differentially expressed genes representing dendritic cell precursors and their progeny.
Blood
.
2003
;
102
:
1661
-1669.
34
Levesque JP, Hendy J, Takamatsu Y, Simmons PJ, Bendall LJ. Disruption of the CXCR4/CXCL12 chemotactic interaction during hematopoietic stem cell mobilization induced by GCSF or cyclophosphamide.
J Clin Invest.
2003
;
111
:
187
-196.
35
Levesque JP, Hendy J, Winkler IG, Takamatsu Y, Simmons PJ. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor induces the release in the bone marrow of proteases that cleave c-KIT receptor (CD117) from the surface of hematopoietic progenitor cells.
Exp Hematol.
2003
;
31
:
109
-117.
36
Lovec H, Grzeschiczek A, Kowalski MB, Moroy T. Cyclin D1/bcl-1 cooperates with myc genes in the generation of B-cell lymphoma in transgenic mice.
EMBO J.
1994
;
13
:
3487
-3495.
37
Della Ragione F, Borriello A, Mastropietro S, et al. Expression of G1-phase cell cycle genes during hematopoietic lineage.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun.
1997
;
231
:
73
-76.
38
Kasten M, Giordano A. Cdk10, a Cdc2-related kinase, associates with the Ets2 transcription factor and modulates its transactivation activity.
Oncogene
.
2001
;
20
:
1832
-1838.
39
Heald R, McLoughlin M, McKeon F. Human wee1 maintains mitotic timing by protecting the nucleus from cytoplasmically activated Cdc2 kinase.
Cell
.
1993
;
74
:
463
-474.
40
McGowan CH, Russell P. Cell cycle regulation of human WEE1.
EMBO J.
1995
;
14
:
2166
-2175.
41
Bamba C, Bobinnec Y, Fukuda M, Nishida E. The GTPase Ran regulates chromosome positioning and nuclear envelope assembly in vivo.
Curr Biol.
2002
;
12
:
503
-507.
42
Liao H, Winkfein RJ, Mack G, Rattner JB, Yen TJ. CENP-F is a protein of the nuclear matrix that assembles onto kinetochores at late G2 and is rapidly degraded after mitosis.
J Cell Biol.
1995
;
130
:
507
-518.
43
Rooney JW, Calame KL. TIF1beta functions as a coactivator for C/EBPbeta and is required for induced differentiation in the myelomonocytic cell line U937.
Genes Dev.
2001
;
15
:
3023
-3038.
44
Warren AJ, Colledge WH, Carlton MB, Evans MJ, Smith AJ, Rabbitts TH. The oncogenic cysteinerich LIM domain protein rbtn2 is essential for erythroid development.
Cell
.
1994
;
78
:
45
-57.
45
Abdullah JM, Li X, Nachtman RG, Jurecic R. FLRF, a novel evolutionarily conserved RING finger gene, is differentially expressed in mouse fetal and adult hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors.
Blood Cells Mol Dis.
2001
;
27
:
320
-333.
46
Harada H, Harada Y, O'Brien DP, Rice DS, Naeve CW, Downing JR. HERF1, a novel hematopoiesis-specific RING finger protein, is required for terminal differentiation of erythroid cells.
Mol Cell Biol.
1999
;
19
:
3808
-3815.
47
Zhang MY, Sun SC, Bell L, Miller BA. NF-kappaB transcription factors are involved in normal erythropoiesis.
Blood
.
1998
;
91
:
4136
-4144.
48
Nesbit CE, Tersak JM, Prochownik EV. MYC oncogenes and human neoplastic disease.
Oncogene
.
1999
;
18
:
3004
-3016.
49
Zajac-Kaye M. Myc oncogene: a key component in cell cycle regulation and its implication for lung cancer.
Lung Cancer
.
2001
;
34
:
S43
-S46.
50
Mac SM, D'Cunha CA, Farnham PJ. Direct recruitment of N-myc to target gene promoters.
Mol Carcinog.
2000
;
29
:
76
-86.
51
Sears R, Ohtani K, Nevins JR. Identification of positively and negatively acting elements regulating expression of the E2F2 gene in response to cell growth signals.
Mol Cell Biol.
1997
;
17
:
5227
-5235.
52
Oikawa T, Yamada T. Molecular biology of the Ets family of transcription factors.
Gene.
2003
;
303
:
11
-34.
53
Sementchenko VI, Watson DK. Ets target genes: past, present and future.
Oncogene
.
2000
;
19
:
6533
-6548.
54
Moore W, Zhang C, Clarke PR. Targeting of RCC1 to chromosomes is required for proper mitotic spindle assembly in human cells.
Curr Biol.
2002
;
12
:
1442
-1447.
55
Hitomi M, Stacey DW. Cellular ras and cyclin D1 are required during different cell cycle periods in cycling NIH 3T3 cells.
Mol Cell Biol.
1999
;
19
:
4623
-4632.
56
Mulcahy LS, Smith MR, Stacey DW. Requirement for ras proto-oncogene function during serum-stimulated growth of NIH 3T3 cells.
Nature
.
1985
;
313
:
241
-243.
57
Takuwa N, Takuwa Y. Ras activity late in G1 phase required for p27kip1 downregulation, passage through the restriction point, and entry into S phase in growth factor-stimulated NIH 3T3 fibroblasts.
Mol Cell Biol.
1997
;
17
:
5348
-5358.
58
Cantor SB, Urano T, Feig LA. Identification and characterization of Ral-binding protein 1, a potential downstream target of Ral GTPases.
Mol Cell Biol.
1995
;
15
:
4578
-4584.
59
Matsubara K, Hinoi T, Koyama S, Kikuchi A. The post-translational modifications of Ral and Rac1 are important for the action of Ral-binding protein 1, a putative effector protein of Ral.
FEBS Lett.
1997
;
410
:
169
-174.
60
Gu Y, Filippi MD, Cancelas JA, et al. Hematopoietic cell regulation by Rac1 and Rac2 guanosine triphosphatases.
Science
.
2003
;
302
:
445
-449.
61
Glaven JA, Whitehead IP, Nomanbhoy T, Kay R, Cerione RA. Lfc and Lsc oncoproteins represent two new guanine nucleotide exchange factors for the Rho GTP-binding protein.
J Biol Chem.
1996
;
271
:
27374
-27381.
62
Aasheim HC, Pedeutour F, Smeland EB. Characterization, expression and chromosomal localization of a human gene homologous to the mouse Lsc oncogene, with strongest expression in hematopoetic tissues.
Oncogene
.
1997
;
14
:
1747
-1752.
63
Joyce D, Albanese C, Steer J, Fu M, Bouzahzah B, Pestell RG. NF-kappaB and cell-cycle regulation: the cyclin connection.
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev.
2001
;
12
:
73
-90.
64
Montaner S, Perona R, Saniger L, Lacal JC. Multiple signalling pathways lead to the activation of the nuclear factor kappaB by the Rho family of GTPases.
J Biol Chem.
1998
;
273
:
12779
-12785.
65
Overbeck AF, Brtva TR, Cox AD, et al. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors: activators of Ras superfamily proteins.
Mol Reprod Dev.
1995
;
42
:
468
-476.
66
Perona R, Montaner S, Saniger L, Sanchez-Perez I, Bravo R, Lacal JC. Activation of the nuclear factor-kappaB by Rho, CDC42, and Rac-1 proteins.
Genes Dev.
1997
;
11
:
463
-475.
67
Pawson T. SH2 and SH3 domains in signal transduction.
Adv Cancer Res.
1994
;
64
:
87
-110.
Sign in via your Institution