Synergic effects of arsenic trioxide and cAMP during acute promyelocytic leukemia cell maturation subtends a novel signaling cross-talk

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), characterized by differentiation arrest of granulopoiesis at the promyelocytic stage, is the first human malignancy that can be efficiently treated with a cell differentiation inducer, all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA).1 Despite the great success of ATRA and chemotherapy in both remission induction and maintenance therapy in APL, a fair percentage (30%-40%) of patients still have a relapse after initial remission and develop resistance to ATRA treatment.2 Recently, arsenic trioxide (As₂O₃), an ancient traditional Chinese medicine, has proven to be an effective drug in the treatment of patients with APL, not only in primary cases, but also in patients with relapses or refractory disease after ATRA or chemotherapy or both.3,4 

It is well known that APL blasts harbor a specific translocation t(15;17),5 fusing promyelocytic leukocyte (PML) and retinoic acid receptor-α (RARA) genes and leading to a PML-RARα oncoprotein,6-9 which exerts dominant-negative effects over PML and RARα,10 acquires an abnormally tight binding ability to the nuclear receptor corepressor complex including N-CoR and silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor (SMRT), and thus disturbs myeloid differentiation through transcriptional repression.11-13 It is well established that the therapeutic effect of ATRA relies on the binding of the drug to the ligand-binding domain on the RARα portion of PML-RARα resulting in dissociation of the corepressor complex to relieve the transcriptional repression, whereas arsenic targets the PML-RARα fusion protein through the PML moiety and triggers a prompt degradation of the chimeric protein.12-14 In vitro experiments showed that, at the cellular level, arsenic could exert a dual effect on APL cells: triggering apoptosis at relatively high doses (0.5-2 μM) with the collapse of mitochondrial transmembrane potentials in a thiol-dependent manner and inducing partial differentiation at low concentration (0.1-0.25 μM).15,16In vivo, both differentiation and apoptosis were observed among patients with APL or in APL animal models.15,17 However, the mechanism of arsenic-mediated differentiation is far from clear. Recently, efforts from several groups have been focused on the effects of combination of As₂O₃ and other drugs, such as ATRA, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF),17-20 and inhibitors of histone deacetylase (HDAC) including trichostatin A (TSA), on differentiation in APL cells (Z.C. et al, in preparation). Although some results obtained in vitro need further investigation, these studies strongly support the notion that differentiation of APL cells exposed to arsenic was the result of the synergism of distinct signaling pathways.

Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), one of the most common second messengers, plays an important role in the response to hormonal signals for cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis, including that in hemopoietic development.21 It was shown that cAMP was able to induce monocytic differentiation of M1 mouse myeloid leukemia cells22 and of HL60 cells.23 cAMP could also potentiate granulocytic differentiation of retinoid- or rexinoid-induced maturation of human APL cell.24-26 In the present work, in an attempt to investigate the possible interaction between As₂O₃ and several differentiation inducers, we found that the 8-CPT (4-chlorophenylthio)–cAMP, a cAMP analogue, synergizes with arsenic and significantly induces the differentiation of APL cell lines NB4 and NB4-R1, which are retinoid-induced maturation sensitive and resistant, respectively.24,27 This synergy was also observed in fresh APL cells. We provide here mechanistic evidence for synergic effects of As₂O₃ and cAMP on APL cell maturation, involving As₂O₃-induced degradation of oncoprotein PML-RARα, and cAMP-mediated inhibition of cell cycling.

The NB4 and NB4-R1 cells27 were cultured in RPMI-1640, supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD), 2 mM l-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. COS-7 cells were cultured in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10% bovine serum, 2 mMl-glutamine. Fresh bone marrow cells were obtained with informed consent from 2 patients with de novo APL, who were diagnosed as M3 by the French-American-British criteria and showed an initial percentage of circulating blasts over 90%. Confirmation of the presence of t(15;17) and PML-RARA transcripts was performed by karyotype and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. Leukemia cells were isolated and enriched on Ficoll solution. All cell cultures were incubated at 37°C in humidified air with 5% CO₂. As₂O₃ (Sigma, St Louis, MO) was dissolved in 1 N NaOH and further diluted to 5 mM in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as stock solution. 8-CPT-cAMP, ATRA, and TSA (Sigma) were dissolved in PBS, ethanol, and dimethyl sulfoxide as stock solution at 10 mM, 1 mM, and 50 μg/mL, respectively. H-89 (N-(2-[p-bromocinnamylamino]ethyl)-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide) purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA) was dissolved in 50% ethanol as stock solution at 10 mM.

The NB4 and NB4-R1 cells were grown in the presence of As₂O₃ (0.25 μM), ATRA (1 nM to 1 μM), TSA (10-50 ng/mL), 8-CPT-cAMP (200 μM), or their combination for 4 to 6 days. Cell maturation was evaluated on the basis of cellular morphology, changes in cell surface antigen, and nitroblue-tetrazolium (NBT; Sigma) assay. Briefly, cytospin slides stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa stain were analyzed for cell morphology by means of light microscopy. Analysis of cell surface myeloid-specific antigen CD11b (Coulter, Marseilles, France) was performed by flow cytometry (EPICS XL, Coulter, Hialeah, FL). For NBT assay, 1 × 10⁶cells were centrifuged, suspended in 500 μL PBS, and incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes with 1 mg/mL NBT and 30 ng/mL 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (Sigma). The percentage of NBT⁺ cells with formazan deposits in the cytoplasm was determined by microscopically counting at least 300 cells per experimental condition.

Briefly, cells were collected, washed, and fixed overnight in 70% cold ethanol. After washing with PBS, cells were treated by Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4) supplemented with 1% RNase. Cell cycle distribution was then analyzed by staining the cells with 50 μg/mL propidium iodine (PI; Sigma) and evaluated in a flow cytometer. All data were collected, stored, and analyzed by Multicycle software (Coulter, Miami, FL).

For immunofluorescence analysis, the cells were smeared onto histologic slides by using cytospin centrifugation (Shandon, Astmoor, Runcorn, Cheshire, United Kingdom). After drying, the cells were fixed in acetone at 4°C for 10 minutes and allowed to air dry for 20 minutes. The slides were preincubated for 15 minutes with PBS. PML-RARα and PML were detected with the monoclonal antiserum directed against PML (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)–coupled antimouse antibody (Biosys, Compiègne, France) was used as a second antibody. All incubations were carried out at room temperature and followed by 3 washes in PBS; slides were finally mounted with 5 μL fluorescent mounting medium (Dako, Kyoto, Japan). Preparations were examined by confocal laser scanning microscopy (MRC-600 Confocal Imaging System; Bio-Rad Microscience, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom), mounted on an Optiphot II Nikon microscope. Images were collected using an oil immersion lens (× 60, NA I.4 plan Apochromat) and using excitation wavelength of 488 nm for FITC.

Whole cell protein extracts were prepared from 2 × 10⁶ cells. Briefly, cultured cells were washed in PBS, then the pellets were immediately lysed by 100 μL of a boiling Laemmli solution containing β-mercaptoethanol and disrupted with a pestle. Samples were then boiled for 5 minutes and insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 13 000 rpm for 5 minutes. The quality and the quantity of all samples were detected with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)–polyacrylamide gels. The protein loading volume was adjusted according to Coomassie blue staining. For Western analysis, 10 μg protein extracts were loaded on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, subjected to electrophoresis, and blotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). To ensure that the protein loading was as equal as possible, we generally performed 2 gels in parallel, one for transfer, another for staining with Coomassie blue as a loading control. After transfer, membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk in PBS pH 7.6, 0.1% Tween-20 (PBS-T), then incubated with a specific antiserum raised against the indicated protein in PBS-T/3% milk for 18 hours at 4°C. Subsequently, membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–conjugated antirabbit or antimouse secondary antibody (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME) for 30 minutes at 25°C. Each step was followed by three 10-minute washes in PBS-T. Detection was performed by using an enhanced chemoluminescence kit (Amersham) according to the manufacturer's instruction. All antibodies used in the present work (CDK4, cyclin D1, E2F, p21, p27, p53) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.

The PML-RARα expression plasmid was subcloned in pSG5 vector as described.28 RARE-TK-luciferase reporter plasmid contains the DR5-RARE retinoic acid response element of the RARβ upstream of thymidine kinase promoter.29 For luciferase assay, COS-7 cells were cotransfected with 1.0 μg PML-RARα expression plasmid and 0.1 μg RARE-TK-luciferase reporter plasmid by using LipofectAmine reagent (Gibco BRL) according to the manufacturer's procedure. The total amount of plasmid was adjusted to 1.1 μg using empty vector to maintain constant in all transfection assays. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were respectively treated without or with ATRA (10 nM), As₂O₃(0.25 μM), or 8-CPT-cAMP (200 μM) alone or their combination for 24 hours followed by transcriptional activity assay using the luciferase assay system (Promega, Madison, WI).

Previous work showed that As₂O₃ at low concentration (0.1-0.25 μM) could induce a certain degree of maturation of NB4 cells. However, this differentiation is far from terminal because most cells could not mature beyond the myelocyte-metamyelocyte stage and the NBT reduction test remained negative.15 Moreover, this partial differentiation could be observed only after long (> 10 days) exposure of the cells to the drug. As shown in the Figure 1A of this work, assessed by morphologic criteria, no obvious maturation was observed in NB4 cells after treatment with arsenic alone for 4 days, except an increased number of cytoplasmic granules and vacuoles (Figure1A). The expression of CD11b was only slightly increased (Figure 1C). Further mechanism studies showed that 0.25 μM arsenic exerted no direct effect on modulating the interaction between SMRT and the wild-type RARα/retinoid X receptor (RXR) or PML-RARα (data not shown), although it caused increased acetylation of histones H3 and H4 in favor of opening chromatin structure.30 It is thus unlikely that the low-dose effect of As₂O₃ on APL cells is mediated directly through RARα pathway, although the integrity of the latter seems to be important for granulocytic differentiation at promyelocyte stage.16 To test possible synergistic effects between As₂O₃ and other differentiation pathways, we added to the culture system different concentrations of other inducers such as ATRA, TSA, and cAMP. Consistent with a recent report,20 the As₂O₃-induced CD11b elevation in NB4 cells could be slightly enhanced by a physiologic concentration (10⁻⁹ M) of ATRA and low-dose (10 ng/mL) TSA (Z.C. et al, in preparation). However, the 2 above combinations showed a limited effect in triggering morphologic maturation of NB4 cells and they could not significantly induce differentiation in ATRA-induced maturation-resistant NB4 sublines such as NB4-R1 and MR2. To our surprise, arsenic could induce an almost terminal maturation of NB4 cells in the presence of 8-CPT-cAMP, which on its own exhibit little differentiating effect.

During a 4-day dual treatment of NB4 cells with 0.25 μM As₂O₃ and 200 μM 8-CPT-cAMP, an increasing proportion of cells presented lobed or multiple nuclei, a reduced nucleus-cytoplasm ratio, more neutrophilic granules and vacuoles, as well as a smaller cell size and less basophilic cytoplasm (Figure 1A). Similar morphologic changes also were observed in NB4-R1 cells (Figure1B), which have no maturation in the presence of ATRA. This situation is reminiscent of the previous report that addition of cAMP-elevating agents could trigger retinoid-primed NB4-R1 cells to undergo terminal differentiation.24,31 Our morphologic data on the cooperation between arsenic and cAMP were further supported by the results of NBT test and CD11b expression detection (Figure 1C-F). A gradual increasing of CD11b expression and of NBT⁺ cells was observed in both NB4 and NB4-R1 cells during the treatment by 0.25 μM As₂O₃ and 200 μM 8-CPT-cAMP in combination, whereas there was no prominent change in the presence of each of the inducers alone. Notably, cell maturation seemed to proceed faster in NB4-R1 cells than in NB4 cells. In line with these observations, similar synergic effects of As₂O₃and cAMP were also seen in fresh cells from 2 de novo APL patients (Figure 2A-C).

Because protein kinase A (PKA) represents a major regulator in cAMP signal transduction pathway, H89, a specific PKA inhibitor, was further used to examine the possible role of PKA pathway in the differentiation of NB4 and NB4-R1 cells induced by As₂O₃ or cAMP or both. Indeed, H89 was able to decrease the As₂O₃-triggered CD11b expression of NB4 cells in a weak but significant way (Figure 1G). Moreover, this PKA inhibitor could dramatically inhibit the differentiation of NB4 and NB4-R1 cells induced by the combination of As₂O₃ and cAMP judging from CD11b expression (Figure 1G), NBT reduction activity (Figure 1H), and morphologic change (data not shown). These observations suggested that the synergism effect of As₂O₃ and cAMP in inducing differentiation of APL cells might reside at the PKA level.

Next, the effects of As₂O₃, 8-CPT-cAMP or their combination on the growth of NB4 and NB4-R1 cells were examined. Only a slight decrease in cell growth was observed in NB4 and NB4-R1 cells treated with arsenic alone (Figures3A and 4A). In contrast, the growth of both cells could be dramatically inhibited by 8-CPT-cAMP alone or As₂O₃ combined with cAMP, particularly in NB4-R1 cells. The proliferation of NB4-R1 cells was almost completely inhibited within 2 days (Figure 4A). In agreement with this, analysis of the cell cycle distribution showed that NB4 and NB4-R1 cells significantly accumulated at the G₀/G₁ phase under 8-CPT-cAMP treatment alone or when As₂O₃and 8-CPT-cAMP treatments were combined, but not in the presence of As₂O₃ alone (Figures 3B and 4B). These data suggest that the cAMP pathway should play an important role in the inhibition of cell cycle.

To further understand the G₁ phase arrest of NB4 and NB4-R1 cells in the presence of 8-CPT-cAMP alone or in combination with As₂O₃, we examined the expression level of several G₁/S transition-related proteins. Although some positive regulatory proteins for the cell cycle, such as CDK4 and cyclin D1, seemed unchangeable during the treatment, E2F, a protein necessary for the progression of the cell into S phase, was greatly down-regulated in both cells treated by 8-CPT-cAMP. It has been well known that p21 and p27, 2 important cyclin kinase inhibitors, negatively regulate the progression from G₁ into S phase.32-34 Here we showed a dramatic increase of p21 during 8-CPT-cAMP treatment of NB4 and NB4-R1 cells, whereas p27 showed little change (Figures 3C and 4C). Furthermore, we demonstrated that this up-regulation of p21 was p53 independent despite the existence of transcriptional targets of p53 in the promoter of the p21gene.35-37 Noteworthy, all the above proteins showed no variations when the cells were treated with arsenic alone. These observations supported the notion that cAMP may play a major role in inducing G₁ arrest and cell cycle exit of NB4 and NB4-R1 cells.

It was reported that in APL cells, 0.1 to 1 μM arsenic targets PML and PML-RARα onto nuclear bodies (NBs) and induces their degradation.14,15,19 In the present work, confocal microscopy was used to analyze intracellular distribution of PML and PML-RARα in NB4 and NB4-R1 cells in the context of arsenic and cAMP synergism. As shown in Figure 5A, the abnormally organized fine and numerous labeled micro-PML-NBs in these 2 cell lines were modified by 0.25 μM As₂O₃, with the number of NBs gradually decreased, and the size of these structures increased. Moreover, this process was accelerated by the addition of 8-CPT-cAMP which, on its own, failed to cause NB reorganization. In accordance with this, Western blot analysis with anti-RARα antibodies showed that in the presence of 8-CPT-cAMP, As₂O₃ caused a near total degradation of PML-RARα (Figure 5B) as well as the wild-type PMLs (data not shown), whereas 8-CPT-cAMP alone did not cleave the chimeric protein (Figure5B). These observations suggested that the PML-RARα differentiation block in NB4 and NB4-R1 cells can be, to some degrees, partially released by As₂O₃-induced degradation, diminishing the dominant effect of PML-RARα. This conclusion was further supported by data from in vitro transient transactivation on a DR5 reporter (Figure 5C). We showed that PML-RARα inhibited the endogenous transcriptional activity of RARα and that this dominant-negative effect was abrogated by As₂O₃alone or combined with 8-CPT-cAMP, but not by 8-CPT-cAMP alone.

Currently, ATRA and arsenic are specific drugs available for the treatment of patients with APL. It has been known that ATRA, under both in vitro and in vivo conditions, induces terminal differentiation (followed by natural apoptosis) of malignant cells. The underlying molecular mechanisms include the modulation of PML-RARα homodimer and activation of the wild-type RAR/RXR pathway, both depending on specific ligand binding to the appropriate domain of the receptors and resulting in the relief of transcriptional repression.12,13 On the contrary, the mechanisms of action of As₂O₃ seem to be much more complex, because the compound is pleiotropic and the mode of action shows dose dependency. Several recent studies suggested that the in vivo therapeutic effect of As₂O₃ could be primarily ascribed to the induction of differentiation.15,17Clinically, it was reported that after 2 to 3 weeks of either standard-dose (0.16 mg/kg daily) or low-dose (0.08 mg/kg daily) As₂O₃ treatment, not only the differentiated granulocytes at the stage of myelocytes and metamyelocytes increased significantly in the bone marrow, but also hyperleukocytosis developed in the majority of patients.4,38 The apoptotic cells increased in marrow usually after this “wave” of differentiation, sometimes even giving rise to a clinical setting mimicking the “retinoic acid syndrome,” most likely representing an event secondary to myeloid maturation. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that, during the standard treatment course, the plasma concentrations of arsenic fluctuated over most time between 0.1 and 0.5 μM, except a short peak level superior to 1 μM caused by intravenous drip. Interestingly, the arsenic concentration was around 0.2 μM in the plasma 20 hours after intravenous administration in a group of patients treated with low-dose arsenic.38 It can thus be speculated that in vivo, APL cells are primarily exposed to a drug concentration in favor of differentiation rather than apoptosis. Moreover, it becomes now clear that the apoptotic effect of arsenic can be observed in many cell types, whereas the differentiating one is relatively selective to APL.

However, a number of issues should be clarified and further addressed. First, the differentiation of APL cells induced by arsenic is by no means a complete one, in that most cells are blocked at the metamyelocyte stage in both in vivo and in vitro settings. Second, the mechanisms underlying this incomplete or partial differentiation are still obscure. Third, the differentiation phenomenon observed in vitro may not really reflect that in vivo, because many naturally existing differentiation regulators, including the physiologic concentrations of retinoids, could be cooperating with the therapeutic effect of arsenic in patients. To this end, it is noteworthy that in a mice APL model, the induced leukemia could be cured by the association of ATRA with arsenic through enhanced differentiation and apoptosis, whereas the use of one of the drugs on its own only prolonged survival but did not produce complete cure.17 In this study, we found that not only ATRA and the histone deacetylase inhibitor TSA, but particularly cAMP, synergized with arsenic and triggered maturation of APL cells. It has been well known that, as a ubiquitous second messenger, cAMP plays a pivotal role in the proliferation and differentiation of human myeloid, lymphoid, and erythroid progenitor cells. Strikingly, cAMP can substantially enhance the differentiating effect of As₂O₃ not only on ATRA-sensitive NB4 parental cells, but also on NB4-R1 cells characterized by resistance to the ATRA-induced maturation, as shown by morphologic criteria (Figure1A,B), expression of CD11b integrin (Figure 1C,D), and the NBT test (Figure 1E,F). Moreover, this ability of cAMP was also observed in fresh APL cells (Figure 2A-C). Thus, investigation of the mechanisms underlying the synergy between cAMP and As₂O₃may shed new light on the differentiation therapy.

It has long been recognized that signals that stimulate cell cycle progression usually produce a block in differentiation, whereas interventions that produce a cell cycle arrest sensitize cells to the induction of differentiation.39,40 In fact, many pharmacologic differentiating agents, including phorbol esters, phenylbutyrate, and retinoids, share a common biologic activity to inhibit cell cycling.41-43 Our data showed that cAMP could cause a marked inhibition of NB4 and NB4-R1 cell proliferation by preventing these cells from entering into S phase (Figures 3B and 4B). Furthermore, we found that in the presence of cAMP, the mitotic inhibitor p21 was dramatically up-regulated in both NB4 and NB4-R1 cells, whereas the cellular transcription factor E2F greatly down-regulated (Figures 3C and 4C). p21 has been considered to best inhibit cyclin/cdk (cyclin-dependent kinase) complexes involving cdk2 and cdk4 at the G₁, G₁/S, and S phases and transitions in the cell cycle,32,33 and E2F has been shown to be able to regulate a number of genes that encode proteins with putative functions in the G₁ to S phases of the cell cycle.44 These results strongly indicated that cAMP could exert an antiproliferative effect on myeloid cells. In contrast, no expression modulation of these cell cycle regulatory proteins was observed in the presence of arsenic alone. Nevertheless, the fact that cAMP alone was unable to induce differentiation in both NB4 and NB4-R1 cells suggested that full induction of terminal differentiation after induction of cell cycle arrest required additional lineage-specific signals.

In the case of APL, the fusion protein PML-RARα due to a specific chromosome translocation t(15;17) has been considered as a dominant-negative receptor that blocks myeloid differentiation most likely through the impairment of retinoid response.10Thus, one requisite for APL cell maturation is to restore retinoid signaling pathways. Two strategies may be taken into account: (1) a targeted degradation or inactivation of PML-RARα and (2) or an activation of alternative signaling pathways bypassing PML-RARα, such as recently demonstrated by Benoit et al.26Indeed, a RAR-independent RXR signaling, which requires cooperation with cAMP signaling, can trigger APL cells maturation.26,45 In this study, we showed that arsenic could induce PML-RARα degradation in both NB4 and NB4-R1 cells (Figure 5A,B) and circumvent the dominant-negative effect of PML-RARα on RAR-dependent gene expression (Figure 5C). Moreover, we observed that cAMP could cooperate with arsenic to accelerate the degradation of PML-RARα/PML. We also found that PKA inhibitor could significantly abrogate the granulocytic differentiation induced by As₂O₃ and cAMP (Figure 1G,H). It is possible that the actions of As₂O₃ and cAMP converge at the level of PKA pathway. Further study on arsenic- and cAMP-modulated gene expression profiles may be conducive to reveal the cross-talk point between these 2 agents.

Based on the above data, we may propose the following scenario. Although neither arsenic nor cAMP is sufficient alone in promoting terminal differentiation, these 2 signals cooperated to induce the maturation of APL cells. The cooperation might result from the concomitant degradation of fusion protein PML-RARα induced by As₂O₃ and the cell growth inhibition by cAMP. These findings are in line with the capacity of pharmacologic levels of ATRA to induce NB4 cell maturation. In this case also the relief of the differentiation block could be the result of both PML-RARα modulation/degradation induced by ATRA associated with a quick increase in intracellular cAMP level following ATRA stimulation.46In addition, the fact that an antagonist of cAMP can block ATRA-induced NB4 cell maturation supports that retinoid-induced maturation of NB4 cells needs also cooperation with cAMP signaling.24,25This idea could be further substantiated by the evidence that cAMP solely suffices to induce the differentiation of HL60, another myeloid leukemia cell line that lacks t(15;17) translocation.23,47 

In summary, our study demonstrated the existence of synergism between arsenic and cAMP that triggers maturation pathway for APL cells. It is suggested that differentiation of arsenic-induced APL cells in vivo may probably result from cooperative effects of arsenic with other factors present in the cellular microenvironment of patients with APL. In addition, the demonstration that the combined treatment of arsenic with cAMP induces the maturation not only in NB4 but also in NB4-R1 cells might to some extent account for the effective improvement in the arsenic treatment of patients with relapsed APL who are resistant to ATRA and conventional chemotherapy. Finally, consideration of the facts that chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity of As₂O₃ has been reported and that the toxic and cumulative effect of As₂O₃ is dose dependent, our work may encourage the trials of new treatment protocols for the differentiation therapy of cancer.

The authors are grateful to Dr E. Ségal-Bendirdjian for help in reviewing the manuscript. The authors acknowledge Prof Zhen-yi Wang and Prof Ting-dong Zhang for their continuous support and all members of SIH for their encouragement and constructive discussion.