R115777 is a nonpeptidomimetic enzyme-specific inhibitor of farnesyl protein transferase (FT) that was developed as a potential inhibitor of Ras protein signaling, with antitumor activity in preclinical models. This study was a phase 1 trial of orally administered R115777 in 35 adults with poor-risk acute leukemias. Cohorts of patients received R115777 at doses ranging from 100 mg twice daily (bid) to 1200 mg bid for up to 21 days. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred at 1200 mg bid, with central neurotoxicity evidenced by ataxia, confusion, and dysarthria. Non–dose-limiting toxicities included reversible nausea, renal insufficiency, polydipsia, paresthesias, and myelosuppression. R115777 inhibited FT activity at 300 mg bid and farnesylation of FT substrates lamin A and HDJ-2 at 600 mg bid. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), an effector enzyme of Ras-mediated signaling, was detected in its phosphorylated (activated) form in 8 (36.4%) of 22 pretreatment marrows and became undetectable in 4 of those 8 after one cycle of treatment. Pharmacokinetics revealed a linear relationship between dose and maximum plasma concentration or area under the curve over 12 hours at all dose levels. Weekly marrow samples demonstrated that R115777 accumulated in bone marrow in a dose-dependent fashion, with large increases in marrow drug levels beginning at 600 mg bid and with sustained levels throughout drug administration. Clinical responses occurred in 10 (29%) of the 34 evaluable patients, including 2 complete remissions. Genomic analyses failed to detect N-ras gene mutations in any of the 35 leukemias. The results of this first clinical trial of a signal transduction inhibitor in patients with acute leukemias suggest that inhibitors of FT may have important clinical antileukemic activity.

Adult acute leukemias remain formidable therapeutic challenge. Only 70% of adults with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemias (AMLs) achieve complete remission (CR) after cytotoxic induction chemotherapy. Although these CRs may be prolonged in 35% to 40% of younger adults (age < 60),1-5 the remainder have a relapse and die. Certain subgroups, including older adults,3,5,6 patients with AMLs linked to environmental or occupational exposures (including therapy-induced AMLs), and patients with previous myelodysplasia (MDS) or other antecedent hematologic disorders,7,8 have extremely poor outcomes, with CR rates of 40% or less, CR durations less than 12 months, and cure rates less than 10% to 15%.3,5,6 The overall outlook for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemias (ALLs) is similar,9-11 with a particularly poor prognosis in Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+) disease.9 12 Thus, new approaches are needed to improve the outcome for adults with refractory leukemias.

Improved understanding of signal transduction pathways has resulted in identification of a panoply of potential therapeutic targets.13-16 Among these are the membrane-associated G proteins encoded by the ras family of proto-oncogenes. Ras proteins are activated downstream of protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs, eg, growth factor receptors) and, in turn, trigger a cascade of phosphorylation events through sequential activation of Raf, MEK-1, and ERKs (extracellular signal-related kinases). These events are critical to survival of hematopoietic cells.16-19 

The Ras proteins are synthesized as cytosolic precursors that must attach to the cell membrane to transmit signals. Membrane attachment depends on the addition of a 15-carbon farnesyl group to Ras, a reaction that is catalyzed by the enzyme farnesyltransferase (FT).20-22 FT inhibitors (FTIs) were developed on the premise that FT inhibition would prevent Ras processing and, therefore, transduction of proliferative signals.22-24 Subsequent studies, however, have suggested that the cytotoxic actions of FTIs might also involve other farnesylated polypeptides, including RhoB25,26 and components of the phosphoinositide 3-OH kinase (PI3K)/AKT-2 pathway.27 

Mutations and abnormal expression of ras genes, especially N-ras, are detected in roughly 10% to 15% of MDS (especially those transforming to AML)28,29 and in 15% to 25% of AMLs studied to date.30-33 In addition, the coupling of Ras proteins to PTKs raises the possibility that PTK-driven malignancies might be susceptible to FTIs.34 35 

R115777, a potent and selective nonpeptidomimetic competitive FT inhibitor,22 decreases proliferation of T24H-ras–transfected NIH 3T3 cells as well asK-ras–transformed CAPAN-2 pancreatic cancer cells and several human colon cancer lines in vitro.22,36Phase 1 trials of R115777 in adults with solid tumors37demonstrated oral bioavailability, with a linear relationship between dose and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) or area under the concentration curve at over 12 hours (AUC0-12h) at doses up to 500 mg twice daily (bid). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) on various schedules included reversible myelosuppression, neuropathy, fatigue, and serum creatinine elevations.36 37 

To test the potential molecular, biologic, and clinical effects of R115777 in adults with refractory and relapsed acute leukemias, we conducted a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Results of this trial provide the first evidence for successful inhibition of FT in neoplastic cells in vivo as well as promising antileukemic activity.

Patient eligibility and selection

Adults, aged 18 years or older, with pathologically confirmed acute leukemia that was unlikely to be cured by existing therapies, including AML or ALL resistant to or relapsed after 2 prior induction regimens (or fewer); newly diagnosed AML in adults over age 60 with poor-risk features (antecedent hematologic disorder, adverse cytogenetics); AML arising from MDS or secondary AML; and chronic myelogenous leuekmia in blast crisis (CML-BC) were eligible for study entry provided they met the following criteria: Zubrod performance status 0 to 2; normal bilirubin; hepatic enzymes twice normal or less; serum creatinine 1.5 times normal or less; and left ventricular ejection fraction 45% or higher. Complete recovery from toxicities of previous treatment, an interval of 3 weeks or more from previous chemotherapy, and an interval of 1 week or more from any growth factor therapy was required before beginning R115777.

Patients were ineligible if they had a peripheral blast count of 50 000/μL or higher; disseminated intravascular coagulation; active central nervous system leukemia; prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation; prior radiation up to more than 25% of bone marrow; concomitant radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy; coexisting medical or psychiatric conditions that could interfere with study procedures; or known allergy to imidazoles. Pregnant or lactating women were ineligible. All patients provided written informed consent according to respective University of Maryland, Baltimore institutional review board guidelines.

Complete history and physical examination were performed within 3 days of study entry. Because cataract development was noted in Wistar rats with prolonged exposure at high doses of R115777,22 28 all patients underwent visual acuity testing at baseline and at the end of R115777 administration. The following laboratory parameters were obtained at 3 days or less before entry: complete blood count with differential; electrolyte panel, magnesium, calcium, phosphate, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, glucose, uric acid, amylase, cholesterol, total protein and albumin, hepatic transaminases, bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase; coagulation profile (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, fibrin degradation products); urinalysis; bone marrow aspirate (biopsy when indicated) with histochemical, cytogenetic and immunophenotypic analysis; chest x-ray; electrocardiogram; bacterial, fungal, and viral cultures of throat, stool, and urine; and, for women of childbearing potential, a pregnancy test. Additional studies (lumbar puncture with cerebrospinal fluid cytospin, computed tomography scans, gallium scans, multiple gated acquisition, or echocardiogram) were performed when clinically indicated.

Treatment schema

Patients received R115777 capsules by mouth every 12 hours with food for 21 days unless otherwise indicated. The drug was discontinued after 7 days if there was less than a 25% decrease in circulating blasts or if severe nausea and vomiting occurred despite adequate antiemetic treatment (≥ 5 episodes in 24 hours). Drug was discontinued at any time for other grade 3 or higher nonhematologic side effects. Using a modified dose-escalation schema, the first 6 patients enrolled received 100 mg bid. Dose escalation could proceed if no more than one of 3 patients experienced DLT, defined as either grade 3 or higher nonhematologic toxicity or grade 4 bone marrow aplasia with myelosuppression lasting 40 days or more. Following completion of the first dose level, cohorts of 4 to 6 patients were treated with the following doses: 300 mg bid, 600 mg bid, 900 mg bid, and 1200 mg bid. The occurrence of any DLT in 33% of a patient cohort defined the maximal tolerated dose (MTD). Once MTD was reached, an expanded cohort of patients was treated at the dose level below MTD and observed for DLT. Patients with evidence of response or without disease progression after the first 21 days were eligible to receive up to 3 more 21-day cycles of R115777, with a 7-day drug-free hiatus between each cycle.

Definitions of response

To assess response to therapy, a bone marrow aspiration was performed weekly during the first 21-day cycle and at the end of each subsequent cycle or at any time that leukemia regrowth was suspected. Hematologic recovery was defined as an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of at least 500/μL and a transfusion-independent platelet count of 50 000/μL. CR required a normal bone marrow aspirate with absence of identifiable leukemia, ANC of 1000/μL or higher, platelet count of 100 000/μL or higher, and absence of blasts in peripheral blood.38 Clearance of cytogenetic abnormalities was not required for CR, but was noted and described separately. Partial response (PR) was defined as the presence of trilineage hematopoiesis in the marrow with normalization of peripheral counts but with 5% to 25% blasts in the marrow.38 No response (NR) was defined as persistent leukemia in marrow or blood or both without significant decrease from pretreatment levels and without improvement in peripheral counts.

The ras gene mutations

Bone marrow cells obtained before treatment were analyzed for the presence of N-ras gene mutations using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified genomic DNA. Primers were designed to amplify 2 DNA fragments of approximately 100 base pairs each, one containing codons 12 and 13 and the other containing codon 61,28which were screened for mutations using single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) and heteroduplex analysis. Mutations were identified by comparing banding patterns with specimens containing known N-ras mutations or by direct sequencing of the PCR product. Mutations in N-ras codons 12, 13, and 61 were also analyzed by a nested PCR method in which wild-type sequence is digested by restriction enzyme followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Samples were also analyzed for K-ras mutations as determined by restriction endonuclease-mediated selective PCR (REMS-PCR)39 and gel analysis.

Measures of intracellular FT activity

To determine whether leukemic cell FT activity is inhibited in vivo by R115777, we examined serial marrow samples obtained at weekly intervals for R115777-related changes in FT activity.

FT enzyme inhibition.

40 

Bone marrow cells were isolated by centrifugation in Accuspin-Histopaque tubes, depleted of red blood cells by distilled water lysis, pelleted, and frozen for subsequent analysis. All samples from each individual were run simultaneously. Frozen cell pellets were processed by adding 0.2 mL sonication buffer (20 mM Tris HCl, pH 7.5, plus 1 mM dithiothreitol and 20 μM ZnCl2, supplemented with 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and Calbiochem Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, San Diego, CA), sonicated for 20 seconds, and centrifuged at 300 000g for 20 minutes in a Beckman microultracentrifuge (Palo Alto, CA). Aliquots of supernate were assayed for protein41 and adjusted to 0.5 mg/mL (10 μg/20 μL). FT activity was measured using a scintillation proximity assay (SPA) kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotechnology, Piscataway, NJ). In brief, triplicate 20 μL samples were incubated for 60 minutes at 37°C with the lamin B peptide substrate (Biotin-YRASNRSCAIM) and [1-3H(n)]farnesyl-pyrophosphate.40 The resulting farnseylated peptide was recovered using streptavidin-conjugated scintillant-containing beads and quantitated as described by the supplier. Geranylgeranyltransferase (GGT) type 1 assays were performed using an SPA modification that involved incubating biotin-YRASNRSCAIL peptide substrate with [1-3H(n)] geranylgeranylphosphate for 120 minutes at 37°C.40 

Farnesylation of lamin A and HDJ-2.

The intranuclear intermediate filament protein lamin A42and the chaperone protein HDJ-243 are polypeptides that undergo farnesylation-dependent processing and, therefore, undergo mobility shifts when FT is inhibited.44,45 Thus, serial measurement of farnesylated and unfarnesylated lamin A and HDJ-2 in leukemic bone marrow cells before and during R115777 administration might serve as useful markers of FT inhibition.46,47 To assess the feasibility of this approach, heparinized bone marrow aspirates were cooled to 4°C and shipped by overnight courier to one of the authors (S.H.K.). Bone marrow mononuclear cells were isolated by Ficoll-Hypaque sedimentation and washed with buffer A (RPMI 1640 medium containing 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, at 4°C). Aliquots were removed for cell counts and preparation of Wright-stained cytospins for morphologic examination. Cell lysates were then prepared as previously described in detail.46 Aliquots containing total cellular protein from 5 × 105 marrow mononuclear cells were subjected to electrophoresis on sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)–polyacrylamide gels containing 8% (vol/vol) acrylamide, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed48,49 with immunologic agents that react to a polypeptide that is uniquely present in prelamin A,46,50monoclonal antibody against mature lamin A,51 anti–HDJ-2 or antihistone H1 using techniques previously described in detail.46 Log phase K562 human leukemia cells (American Tissue Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) incubated for 24 hours in RPMI 1640 medium containing 5% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/mL penicillin G, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 2 mM glutamine, and 0.1% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) or the indicated concentration of R115777 (added from a 1000 × stock in DMSO) served as negative and positive controls, respectively.

Phosphorylation of signaling intermediates ERK1/ERK2.

To assess ERK1/ERK2 phosphorylation, bone marrow aspirates were subjected to Ficoll-Hypaque gradient sedimentation followed by extraction with Tris-buffered salt solution containing nonionic detergent and protease inhibitors. After SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, extracts were transferred to Immobilin-P membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA), probed with anti-ERK1/ERK2 antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), and visualized by enhanced chemoluminescence (Amersham). Phosphorylated forms were identified by their slowed gel migration. Repeat probing with phosphotyrosine-specific antibody identified the presence or absence of tyrosine phosphorylation. Band intensity was quantitated by phosphorimage analysis using ImageQuant software.

Pharmacokinetics

Blood samples for pharmacokinetic studies were obtained immediately before administration of R115777 and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, and 12 hours thereafter on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; immediately prior to the morning dose of R115777 on days 3 through 5; and at 24, 36, 48, and 72 hours after the last dose if dosing was stopped on day 8, 15, or 22. At each time point, 6 mL heparinized blood was transported on ice and centrifuged within 2 hours (1000g for 10 minutes). Separated plasma was immediately frozen on dry ice, stored at −70°C, and shipped in batches to Janssen Research Foundation (JRF, Beerse, Belgium), where levels were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay.37Plasma concentration-time profiles of R115777 were analyzed by standard noncompartmental methods using the software package WinNonlin (Pharsight, Mountain View, CA). The following pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated: maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to maximum plasma concentration (tmax), trough plasma concentration (C0h), and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve over a 12-hour dosing interval calculated by trapezoidal summation (AUC12h). Because the pharmacokinetic profile of R115777 is biphasic,37 initial (T1/2 dominant) and terminal half-lives (T1/2 terminal) were estimated by linear regression of the log-transformed concentration versus time data. The accumulation ratio was calculated by dividing the AUC12h determined on day 8 or 15 by that of day 1.

To assess R115777 levels in the target organ, bone marrow aspirates were obtained concomitantly with morning predose plasma samples on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (when feasible). Cells were sedimented from heparinized marrow, frozen at −70°C, and extracted prior to HPLC analysis at JRF.

Patient characteristics

A total of 35 patients with leukemia were entered into this phase 1 study of R115777. One patient failed to take drug as instructed and was not evaluable. The remaining 34 patients were evaluable for toxicity or response to R115777. Their demographic and disease characteristics are detailed in Table 1. Median age was 65 (range 24-77), and 67.6% (23 of 34) were men. Twenty-five (74%) had AML (6 newly diagnosed, 9 relapsed, 10 refractory to induction or reinduction therapies). Cytogenetic analyses were evaluable in 21 and abnormal in 12 (57%), with chromosome 7 abnormalities detected in 4. Of 6 patients with ALL, 3 were Ph+; all 3 patients with CML-BC had cytogenetic aberrations (2 complex, 1 Ph). None of the leukemic marrow populations from the 35 patients harbored detectable N-rasmutations despite the reported incidence of N-ras mutations in AMLs and MDS.28-33 

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

R115777 dose (mg)Patient no.Age/SexDiagnosisStage of diseaseCytogeneticsPoor-risk markers
100 59 M AML, M5 Relapse 2 46 XY CD34  
 51 M AML, M1 Relapse 2 46 XY CD34, 7  
 68 F CML-BC Refractory 46 XY, Ph- CD34  
 75 M AML, M7 Refractory 46 XY CD34  
 47 M AML, M1 Relapse 46 XY CD34 
 72 M AML, M1 New 46 XY None 
300 69 M CML-BC Refractory t (9; 22;16) CD34, 7, 20  
 52 F ALL, L2 Refractory t (9; 22) CD13 
 71 M ALL, L2 Relapse 1 No growth CD13 
 10 75 M AML, M4 New 46 XY CD34 
 11 67 M AML, M7 New 47 XY, +8 CD34 
600 12 55 M AML, M1 (2°) Relapse 46 XY, 20q- CD34, 7, 2  
 13 65 M AML, M4 Refractory 46 XY None  
 14 24 F ALL, L2 Relapse 1 46 XX None 
 15 61 M AML, M0 Refractory t (4;12) CD34, 7 
 16 73 M AML, M2 Relapse inv (18) CD34 
 17 54 F AML, M4 Refractory 47 XX, +15 CD34 
 18 72 F AML, M1 Refractory T (2;7), t (x;1) CD34  
 19 73 M AML, M1 New Not done Not done  
900 20 73 M AML, M1 Relapse 2 t (7;14) CD34, 7  
 21 60 M ALL, L2 Refractory t (9; 22) CD33  
 22 42 M AML, M5 Refractory No growth CD34  
 23 38 F CML, BC Refractory t (9; 22) Not done  
 24 69 M AML, M2 New 46 XY CD34, 7  
 25 60 F ALL, L2 New t (9; 22) None 
 26 39 M AML, M5 Relapse 1 inv (11) None 
 27 26 F AML, M4 Refractory 45 XX, −7 CD34, 7, 20  
 28 75 F AML, M0 Refractory No growth CD34 
 29 75 M AML, M0 Refractory 46 XY CD34 
 30 77 M AML, M1 Refractory −7q, iso (17) CD34 
1200 31 24 F AML, M4 Relapse 2 47 XX, +8 CD34, 7 
     Subpop t (8; 11)  
 32 72 M AML, M4 Relapse 1 −1q, der (2) None  
     t (p21; ?)  
 33 59 M AML, M0 Relapse 2 46 XY CD34  
 34 22 F ALL, L2 Relapse 1 46 X Y None 
R115777 dose (mg)Patient no.Age/SexDiagnosisStage of diseaseCytogeneticsPoor-risk markers
100 59 M AML, M5 Relapse 2 46 XY CD34  
 51 M AML, M1 Relapse 2 46 XY CD34, 7  
 68 F CML-BC Refractory 46 XY, Ph- CD34  
 75 M AML, M7 Refractory 46 XY CD34  
 47 M AML, M1 Relapse 46 XY CD34 
 72 M AML, M1 New 46 XY None 
300 69 M CML-BC Refractory t (9; 22;16) CD34, 7, 20  
 52 F ALL, L2 Refractory t (9; 22) CD13 
 71 M ALL, L2 Relapse 1 No growth CD13 
 10 75 M AML, M4 New 46 XY CD34 
 11 67 M AML, M7 New 47 XY, +8 CD34 
600 12 55 M AML, M1 (2°) Relapse 46 XY, 20q- CD34, 7, 2  
 13 65 M AML, M4 Refractory 46 XY None  
 14 24 F ALL, L2 Relapse 1 46 XX None 
 15 61 M AML, M0 Refractory t (4;12) CD34, 7 
 16 73 M AML, M2 Relapse inv (18) CD34 
 17 54 F AML, M4 Refractory 47 XX, +15 CD34 
 18 72 F AML, M1 Refractory T (2;7), t (x;1) CD34  
 19 73 M AML, M1 New Not done Not done  
900 20 73 M AML, M1 Relapse 2 t (7;14) CD34, 7  
 21 60 M ALL, L2 Refractory t (9; 22) CD33  
 22 42 M AML, M5 Refractory No growth CD34  
 23 38 F CML, BC Refractory t (9; 22) Not done  
 24 69 M AML, M2 New 46 XY CD34, 7  
 25 60 F ALL, L2 New t (9; 22) None 
 26 39 M AML, M5 Relapse 1 inv (11) None 
 27 26 F AML, M4 Refractory 45 XX, −7 CD34, 7, 20  
 28 75 F AML, M0 Refractory No growth CD34 
 29 75 M AML, M0 Refractory 46 XY CD34 
 30 77 M AML, M1 Refractory −7q, iso (17) CD34 
1200 31 24 F AML, M4 Relapse 2 47 XX, +8 CD34, 7 
     Subpop t (8; 11)  
 32 72 M AML, M4 Relapse 1 −1q, der (2) None  
     t (p21; ?)  
 33 59 M AML, M0 Relapse 2 46 XY CD34  
 34 22 F ALL, L2 Relapse 1 46 X Y None 

AML indicates acute myelogenous leukemia; CML-BC, chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast crisis; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Toxicities

As depicted in Table 2, no significant toxicity occurred in patients receiving the first 2 dose levels of R115777. At 600 mg bid, 3 of 8 (37.5%) developed one or more grade 1 to 2 toxicities without DLT. All were older than age 55, and 2 of 3 were older than age 65. One patient developed grade 1 fatigue that began by day 6 and resolved within 2 days of discontinuing the drug on day 21. Two patients developed transient serum creatinine elevations (≤ 2.7 mg/dL, onset days 8 and 23) that resolved without intervention within 72 hours.

Table 2.

Toxicities of R115777 related to dose level

Dose (no. patients)100 mg (6)300 mg (5)600 mg (8)900 mg (11)1200 mg (4)
Fatigue 2 (grade 1)  1 (grade 1) 2 (grade 1-2) 2 (grade 2) 
Neurologic      
 Visual     1 (grade 1) 
 Confusion   2 (grade 1)  2 (grade 3) 
 Ataxia     1 (grade 3) 
 Neuropathy    2 (grade 1)  
 Headache   2 (grade 1)   
Renal/endocrine      
 Polydipsia   2 (grade 1) 4 (grade 2)  
 Creatinine   2 (grade 1) 4 (grade 1-2)  
Gastrointestinal      
 Nausea 1 (grade 1)  2 (grade 1) 3 (grade 2) 3 (grade 2) 
 Vomiting    2 (grade 1) 1 (grade 2) 
Neutropenia
< 500/mm3 
   
Fever/infection   1 (grade 2) 3 (grade 2)  
Dose (no. patients)100 mg (6)300 mg (5)600 mg (8)900 mg (11)1200 mg (4)
Fatigue 2 (grade 1)  1 (grade 1) 2 (grade 1-2) 2 (grade 2) 
Neurologic      
 Visual     1 (grade 1) 
 Confusion   2 (grade 1)  2 (grade 3) 
 Ataxia     1 (grade 3) 
 Neuropathy    2 (grade 1)  
 Headache   2 (grade 1)   
Renal/endocrine      
 Polydipsia   2 (grade 1) 4 (grade 2)  
 Creatinine   2 (grade 1) 4 (grade 1-2)  
Gastrointestinal      
 Nausea 1 (grade 1)  2 (grade 1) 3 (grade 2) 3 (grade 2) 
 Vomiting    2 (grade 1) 1 (grade 2) 
Neutropenia
< 500/mm3 
   
Fever/infection   1 (grade 2) 3 (grade 2)  

At 900 mg bid, 6 (55%) of 11 patients experienced one or more grade 1 to 2 toxicities without formal DLT. Grade 1 to 2 polydipsia was detected in 4 (36%) of 11, began by day 3, abated within 5 to 10 days without specific intervention or drug discontinuation, and was not accompanied by hypernatremia, serum hyperosmolality, hyperglycemia, or intravascular collapse. One patient (aged 75) with polydipsia received concomitant antihypertensive treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and developed creatinine elevation (baseline 1.3 mg/dL; peak 2.8 mg/dL) that improved within 2 days of discontinuing both R115777 and the ACE inhibitor. An additional 3 patients, all over age 70, developed transient, nonoliguric renal dysfunction of 5 days' duration or less. In addition, grade 1, nonprogressive fingertip paresthesias occurred on day 15 in one patient who had previous vincristine-related neuropathy and during the third cycle in one patient, who had no previous neuropathy. Although the toxicities encountered at 900 mg bid were reversible and were not dose limiting by strict definitions, their occurrences led to temporary (≤ 4 days) drug discontinuation in 3 patients (27%), all of whom were aged 70 or older.

When the dose of R115777 was increased to 1200 mg bid, 3 of 4 patients experienced grade 2 to 3 central neurotoxicities, including confusion, ataxia, and visual disturbances, that were dose limiting. These toxicities occurred by day 4 and necessitated immediate drug discontinuation. All symptoms resolved completely within 72 hours, but drug was not reinstituted. Thus, these patients did not complete the first course of therapy.

Drug-induced myelosuppression was not detected consistently at lower dose levels, but occurred frequently at 600 mg and 900 mg bid. At these dose levels, white blood cell (WBC) count nadir occurred on median day 16 (range, 3-22), with 2 of 8 patients at 600 mg bid and 5 of 8 patients at 900 mg bid reaching WBC nadir of 500/μL or less and an ANC of 100/μL or less.

Clinical outcome

Table 3 depicts the clinical outcome for the 34 evaluable patients. Measurable responses (CR and PR) occurred at all dose levels where drug administration was adequate for evaluation (100-900 mg bid), without a clear dose-response relationship. Overall response rate was 10 (29%) of 34, with 8 PRs (6 AML, 2 CML-BC) and 2 hematologic CRs (both AML). The response rate in AML was 32% (8 of 25), including 3 (50%) of 6 newly diagnosed, 3 (33%) of 9 relapsed, and 2 of 10 (20%) refractory. Both CRs occurred in patients with relapsed AML. The first (patient 2) entered CR in the course of receiving 3 cycles of R115777 100 mg bid, with the unmaintained CR duration being 7 months. At relapse, he was retreated into second CR with R115777, with the current duration of the second CR being 3+ months. The second (patient 16) entered CR following a 15-day course of R115777 600 mg bid; R115777 was discontinued because of profound neutropenia (ANC ≤ 100/μL). He remained in an unmaintained CR of 3 months' duration and did not undergo retreatment. The 2 patients with refractory AML who responded to R115777 exhibited deletions of all or part of chromosome 7, a genetic lesion known to be associated with aberrant ras expression or signaling, as exemplified by AML associated with defects in the neurofibomatosis (NF-1) gene.52 Two of the 3 patients with CML-BC (both Ph+ with complex cytogenetics) achieved PR, as evidenced by decreasing peripheral WBC counts, normalization of platelet count, and decreases in peripheral and bone marrow blasts. In contrast, none of the patients with ALL (including Ph+) responded and all demonstrated disease progression within 7 to 21 days of starting R115777.

Table 3.

Clinical outcome

R115777 dose (mg)Patient no.Diagnosis% Marrow blastsTotal no. coursesClinical outcomeSurvival from R115777 (mo)
Pre-RxEnd
100 M5 95 95  NR 2.5 
 M1 37 4  CR 7 mo 15 + 
 CML-BC 37 51  NR 6  
 M7 ? NE NE NR 
 M1 100 100  NR 
 M1 20 8  PR 14 + 
300 CML-BC 39 7  PR 14.5 + 
 Ph + L2 80 > 95  NR 
 L2 39 86  NR 1.5 
 10 M4 25 8  PR 
 11 M7 25 25  NR 5.5 
600 12 M1 36 88  NR 0.5 
 13 M4 83 64  NR 
 14 L2 90 80  NR 
 15 M0 75 > 95  NR 
 16 M2 18 3  CR 3 mo 10 
 17 M4 75 > 95  NR 11.5 
 18 M1 85 90  NR 
 19 M1 80 20  PR 12.5 + 
900 20 M1 60 25  PR 11 + 
 21 Ph + ALL 70 > 95  NR 
 22 M5 > 95 > 95  NR 
 23 CML-BC 27 14  PR 11 + 
 24 M2 25 25  NR 10.5 + 
 25 Ph + ALL 90 90  NR 0.5 
 26 M5 35 35  NR 7.5 
 27 M4 27 8.5 PR 
 28 M0 NE NE NR 1.5 
 29 M0 75 95  NR 
 30 M1 50 25   PR 
1200 31 M4 85 — Neurotoxicity 
 32 M4 60 — Neurotoxicity 
 33 M0 90 — Neurotoxicity 9.5 + 
 34 L2 90 100  NR 
R115777 dose (mg)Patient no.Diagnosis% Marrow blastsTotal no. coursesClinical outcomeSurvival from R115777 (mo)
Pre-RxEnd
100 M5 95 95  NR 2.5 
 M1 37 4  CR 7 mo 15 + 
 CML-BC 37 51  NR 6  
 M7 ? NE NE NR 
 M1 100 100  NR 
 M1 20 8  PR 14 + 
300 CML-BC 39 7  PR 14.5 + 
 Ph + L2 80 > 95  NR 
 L2 39 86  NR 1.5 
 10 M4 25 8  PR 
 11 M7 25 25  NR 5.5 
600 12 M1 36 88  NR 0.5 
 13 M4 83 64  NR 
 14 L2 90 80  NR 
 15 M0 75 > 95  NR 
 16 M2 18 3  CR 3 mo 10 
 17 M4 75 > 95  NR 11.5 
 18 M1 85 90  NR 
 19 M1 80 20  PR 12.5 + 
900 20 M1 60 25  PR 11 + 
 21 Ph + ALL 70 > 95  NR 
 22 M5 > 95 > 95  NR 
 23 CML-BC 27 14  PR 11 + 
 24 M2 25 25  NR 10.5 + 
 25 Ph + ALL 90 90  NR 0.5 
 26 M5 35 35  NR 7.5 
 27 M4 27 8.5 PR 
 28 M0 NE NE NR 1.5 
 29 M0 75 95  NR 
 30 M1 50 25   PR 
1200 31 M4 85 — Neurotoxicity 
 32 M4 60 — Neurotoxicity 
 33 M0 90 — Neurotoxicity 9.5 + 
 34 L2 90 100  NR 

For abbreviations, see Table 1.

F3-150

As of 10/15/2000.

FT enzyme inhibition

The activity of FT was compared in paired marrow samples obtained before treatment on days 1 and 8 from 21 of the 30 evaluable patients who received 100 to 900 mg bid R115777. Samples were obtained immediately prior to the morning dose of R115777 and, therefore, reflected nadir levels of FT inhibition. Relative to pretreatment values, the enzyme was not inhibited consistently in patients receiving 100 mg bid. Beginning at 300 mg bid, however, R115777 suppressed marrow cell FT activity in all patients by a mean of 75% (range 50%-95%) (Figure 1) without clear dose-related increases. There was no apparent relationship between the depth of FT inhibition and clinical response.

Fig. 1.

Inhibition of FT enzyme activity in leukemic bone marrow samples by day 8 of R115777 administration.

Results are expressed as percent residual FT activity relative to day 0 (baseline) values. FT enzyme activity was not reproducibly inhibited in patients receiving R115777 100 mg bid. Beginning at 300 mg bid, however, R115777 suppressed FT activity relative to baseline values in all marrow samples studied.

Fig. 1.

Inhibition of FT enzyme activity in leukemic bone marrow samples by day 8 of R115777 administration.

Results are expressed as percent residual FT activity relative to day 0 (baseline) values. FT enzyme activity was not reproducibly inhibited in patients receiving R115777 100 mg bid. Beginning at 300 mg bid, however, R115777 suppressed FT activity relative to baseline values in all marrow samples studied.

Close modal

Inhibtion of protein farnesylation

Data summarized in Figure 2and Table 4 indicate that R115777 blocked protein farnesylation in marrow cells obtained on days 8 through 21 as detected by accumulation of prelamin A and pre–HDJ-2. This effect was detected consistently in marrow cells obtained from patients treated with 600 mg R115777 bid, but not at lower doses. At 900 mg bid, an unexpected decrease in lamin A following R115777 made interpretation of prelamin A results problematic even though 7 of 10 pretreatment marrows studied expressed lamin A. On the other hand, pre–HDJ-2 appeared or increased in at least 6 (86%) of 7 patients by day 8 of R115777 treatment at this dose level.

Fig. 2.

Effect of R115777 on FT-dependent processing of prelamin A and HDJ-2 in K562 cells in vitro and in leukemic bone marrow samples in situ.

(A) Log-phase K562 cells were incubated for 24 hours with diluent (lane 1) or concentrations of R115777 ranging from 0.78 to 100 nM in 2-fold increments (lanes 2-11). At the completion of the incubation, samples were sedimented at 200g, washed once in serum-free RPMI 1640, and prepared for analysis as described in “Patients, materials, and methods.” R115777 causes a dose-dependent increase in signals for prelamin A and HDJ-2. (B) Bone marrow samples harvested before therapy (day 0) or at weekly intervals during therapy with the indicated dose of R115777 were prepared for immunoblotting as described in “Patients, materials, and methods.” Inhibition of prelamin A and pre–HDJ-2 processing at the 100 and 300 mg bid doses was not detected. Prelamin A appeared in some samples obtained from patients during treatment with 600 and 900 mg (eg, LO and MH, lanes 8-13). In samples from other patients, lamin A was undetectable before treatment (MIT, lanes 14-17) or disappeared during the course of treatment (eg, MIR, lanes 18-21), making it impossible to use prelamin A as a marker of FT inhibition. In contrast, an increase in pre–HDJ-2 was detectable in many of these same samples, as illustrated in lanes 14-21 and summarized in Table 4. The median blast count for the day 1 samples shown in this figure was 90%.

Fig. 2.

Effect of R115777 on FT-dependent processing of prelamin A and HDJ-2 in K562 cells in vitro and in leukemic bone marrow samples in situ.

(A) Log-phase K562 cells were incubated for 24 hours with diluent (lane 1) or concentrations of R115777 ranging from 0.78 to 100 nM in 2-fold increments (lanes 2-11). At the completion of the incubation, samples were sedimented at 200g, washed once in serum-free RPMI 1640, and prepared for analysis as described in “Patients, materials, and methods.” R115777 causes a dose-dependent increase in signals for prelamin A and HDJ-2. (B) Bone marrow samples harvested before therapy (day 0) or at weekly intervals during therapy with the indicated dose of R115777 were prepared for immunoblotting as described in “Patients, materials, and methods.” Inhibition of prelamin A and pre–HDJ-2 processing at the 100 and 300 mg bid doses was not detected. Prelamin A appeared in some samples obtained from patients during treatment with 600 and 900 mg (eg, LO and MH, lanes 8-13). In samples from other patients, lamin A was undetectable before treatment (MIT, lanes 14-17) or disappeared during the course of treatment (eg, MIR, lanes 18-21), making it impossible to use prelamin A as a marker of FT inhibition. In contrast, an increase in pre–HDJ-2 was detectable in many of these same samples, as illustrated in lanes 14-21 and summarized in Table 4. The median blast count for the day 1 samples shown in this figure was 90%.

Close modal
Table 4.

Inhibition of lamin A and HDJ-2 processing in leukemia marrow blasts

R115777 dose (mg bid)No. positive for
Pre–HDJ-2Prelamin A4-150
100 0/4 0/2 
300 0/5 0/1  
600 5/6 4/4 
900 6/7 0/1 
R115777 dose (mg bid)No. positive for
Pre–HDJ-2Prelamin A4-150
100 0/4 0/2 
300 0/5 0/1  
600 5/6 4/4 
900 6/7 0/1 
F4-150

Number positive for pre–HDJ-2 or prelamin A/number of assays interpretable. Reasons for uninterpretable prelamin A assays included lack of expression of lamin A (eg, Figure 2B, lanes 14-17) or a decrease in lamin A content during treatment (eg, Figure 2B, lanes 18-21).

Effects on inhibition of ERK activation

The ERK kinases are phosphorylated at the end of a signal transduction pathway that starts with activated PTKs or activated Ras and progresses through Raf and MEK-1 kinases.15,16 53 To determine whether this pathway was inhibited by R115777, serial measurements of unphosphorylated and phosphorylated ERK were performed on bone marrow samples from 22 patients, 8 (36.4%) of which displayed constitutive ERK phosphorylation at baseline (Figure3). Following R115777, phospho-ERK became undetectable in 4 (50%) of the 8 patients in whom activated ERK was detectable in pretreatment samples.

Fig. 3.

Detection of ERK and phospho-ERK in leukemic marrow samples from 4 selected patients obtained before therapy (baseline) and at weekly intervals during R115777 administration.

ERK expression was detected before and after treatment in marrow samples from all 4 patients, and phospho-ERK as detected in 3 samples at baseline. Of note, phospho-ERK disappeared following R115777 treatment in samples from 2 of the 3 patients whose marrow populations exhibited baseline phospho-ERK expression.

Fig. 3.

Detection of ERK and phospho-ERK in leukemic marrow samples from 4 selected patients obtained before therapy (baseline) and at weekly intervals during R115777 administration.

ERK expression was detected before and after treatment in marrow samples from all 4 patients, and phospho-ERK as detected in 3 samples at baseline. Of note, phospho-ERK disappeared following R115777 treatment in samples from 2 of the 3 patients whose marrow populations exhibited baseline phospho-ERK expression.

Close modal

Pharmacokinetics

Plasma pharmacokinetics were obtained during the first cycle of R115777 in 32 of the 35 patients entered on study. The data demonstrated a linear relationship between dose and Cmax or AUC12h for all dose levels tested, including 1200 mg bid (Figure 4). R115777 was rapidly absorbed with peak plasma concentrations reached within 2 to 3 hours. Pharmacokinetic parameters are shown in Table5. The T1/2 associated with the first phase of elimination, as determined on day 1, appeared to be independent of dose and ranged from 1.7 to 4.2 hours. The terminal T1/2 associated with the second phase of elimination, as determined on day 22, varied with the ability to quantify R115777 in plasma and ranged form 14.1 to 61.7 hours, with a median of approximately 20 hours. These data are consistent with a biphasic elimination curve, as described in the previous phase 1 study.37 Steady-state conditions were obtained within 3 days of bid dosing. The accumulation ratio was independent of dose and duration of administration, with an overall mean ratio (± SD) of 1.24 ± 0.69 on day 8 and 1.10 ± 0.83 on day 15, indicating little accumulation of R115777 following a bid dosing schedule.

Fig. 4.

Relationship between dose and AUC12h.

Day 1 individual (0) and mean (●) AUC12h achieved following oral administration of R115777 at dose levels 100 to 1200 mg bid. There is a dose-proportional relationship between R115777 dose and AUC12h for all doses from 100 to 1200 mg bid.

Fig. 4.

Relationship between dose and AUC12h.

Day 1 individual (0) and mean (●) AUC12h achieved following oral administration of R115777 at dose levels 100 to 1200 mg bid. There is a dose-proportional relationship between R115777 dose and AUC12h for all doses from 100 to 1200 mg bid.

Close modal
Table 5.

Pharmacokinetics dose of R115777 (mg bid)

100 mg
Mean ± SD
300 mg
Mean ± SD
600 mg
Mean ± SD
900 mg
Mean ± SD
1 200 mg
Mean ± SD
Day 1      
 Tmax, h 3.2 ± 1.5 2.5 ± 1.0 2.9 ± 1.1 3.9 ± 2.0 3.3 ± 1.5 
 Cmax, ng/mL 282 ± 221 882 ± 224 1 728 ± 938 1 893 ± 1 549 2 615 ± 508 
 AUC12h, ng · h/mL 1 573 ± 1 489 3 763 ± 810 8 898 ± 4 493 9 080 ± 9 934 14 587 ± 603 
 T1/2dom, h 2.4 ± 0.7 2.4 ± 0.5 3.3 ± 0.7 2.9 ± 0.8 2.9 
 No. patients tested 
Day 8      
 C0h, ng/mL 46.0 ± 35.6 88.8 ± 45.8 573 ± 488 430 ± 578 ND 
 Tmax, h 2.0 ± 0.9 1.7 ± 0.6 2.6 ± 1.2 2.7 ± 1.3 ND 
 Cmax, ng/mL 271 ± 165 811 ± 305 1 840 ± 875 1 680 ± 885 ND 
 AUC12h, ng · h/mL 1 459 ± 932 3 525 ± 1 306 10 274 ± 6 440 9 056 ± 6 490 ND 
 Ratio AUC12h 1.23 ± 0.66 0.96 ± 0.19 1.4 ± 0.79 1.26 ± 0.87 ND 
 No. patients tested 
Day 15      
 C0h, ng/mL 60.7 ± 53.8 123 ± 103 245 ± 116 257 ± 443 ND 
 Tmax, h 1.6 ± 1.3 2.0 ± 0.0 2.3 ± 1.0 2.3 ± 1.0 ND 
 Cmax, ng/mL 266 ± 208 1 048 ± 708 1 192 ± 522 2 004 ± 1 151 ND 
 AUC12h, ng · h/mL 1 235 ± 466 4 330 ± 2 792 8 079 ± 3 419 7 154 ± 3 659 ND 
 Ratio AUC12h 1.00 ± 0.61 0.87 ± 0.41 0.85 ± 0.26 1.6 ± 1.46 ND 
 No. patients tested 
Day 22      
 T1/2term, h 35.2 ± 23.0 16.4 20.3 ± 2.5 19.0 ± 5.4 ND 
 No. patients tested 
100 mg
Mean ± SD
300 mg
Mean ± SD
600 mg
Mean ± SD
900 mg
Mean ± SD
1 200 mg
Mean ± SD
Day 1      
 Tmax, h 3.2 ± 1.5 2.5 ± 1.0 2.9 ± 1.1 3.9 ± 2.0 3.3 ± 1.5 
 Cmax, ng/mL 282 ± 221 882 ± 224 1 728 ± 938 1 893 ± 1 549 2 615 ± 508 
 AUC12h, ng · h/mL 1 573 ± 1 489 3 763 ± 810 8 898 ± 4 493 9 080 ± 9 934 14 587 ± 603 
 T1/2dom, h 2.4 ± 0.7 2.4 ± 0.5 3.3 ± 0.7 2.9 ± 0.8 2.9 
 No. patients tested 
Day 8      
 C0h, ng/mL 46.0 ± 35.6 88.8 ± 45.8 573 ± 488 430 ± 578 ND 
 Tmax, h 2.0 ± 0.9 1.7 ± 0.6 2.6 ± 1.2 2.7 ± 1.3 ND 
 Cmax, ng/mL 271 ± 165 811 ± 305 1 840 ± 875 1 680 ± 885 ND 
 AUC12h, ng · h/mL 1 459 ± 932 3 525 ± 1 306 10 274 ± 6 440 9 056 ± 6 490 ND 
 Ratio AUC12h 1.23 ± 0.66 0.96 ± 0.19 1.4 ± 0.79 1.26 ± 0.87 ND 
 No. patients tested 
Day 15      
 C0h, ng/mL 60.7 ± 53.8 123 ± 103 245 ± 116 257 ± 443 ND 
 Tmax, h 1.6 ± 1.3 2.0 ± 0.0 2.3 ± 1.0 2.3 ± 1.0 ND 
 Cmax, ng/mL 266 ± 208 1 048 ± 708 1 192 ± 522 2 004 ± 1 151 ND 
 AUC12h, ng · h/mL 1 235 ± 466 4 330 ± 2 792 8 079 ± 3 419 7 154 ± 3 659 ND 
 Ratio AUC12h 1.00 ± 0.61 0.87 ± 0.41 0.85 ± 0.26 1.6 ± 1.46 ND 
 No. patients tested 
Day 22      
 T1/2term, h 35.2 ± 23.0 16.4 20.3 ± 2.5 19.0 ± 5.4 ND 
 No. patients tested 

tmax indicates time to maximum plasma concentration; Cmax, maximum plasma concentration; AUC12h, area under the concentration curve at over 12 hours; T1/2dom, T1/2 dominant; C0h, trough plasma concentration; ND not done; T1/2term, T1/2 terminal.

Oral administration resulted in accumulation of R115777 in bone marrow cells in a dose-dependent manner. Whereas doses of 100 and 300 mg bid yielded mean day 8 drug levels of 160 ng/g cell pellet (range, 78-264), major increases in marrow R115777 levels were noted at 600 mg bid (mean day 8 level, 1723 ng/g cell pellet; range, 823-3920) and 900 mg bid (mean, 2942 ng/g cell pellet; range, 2032-3642). Comparison of bone marrow levels with the plasma Cmin obtained on day 8 for this subset of patients revealed that marrow levels were 2.5- to 3.5-fold higher than concomitant plasma levels (Cmin) at all dose levels (Table 6). Serial measurements indicated that marrow R115777 levels were relatively steady for all patients at each dose level from week to week administration (data not shown).

Table 6.

Comparison of day 8 bone marrow and plasma R115777 levels

R115777 dose (mg bid)Marrow level (ng/g cell pellet)6-150Plasma Cmin (ng/mL plasma)6-150Marrow/plasma ratio6-150
100-300 (5)6-151 153 (129-202) 53 (25-109) 2.9 (1.4-6.2) 
600 (7) 1742 (812-3920) 655 (322-1544) 2.7 (2.0-3.7) 
900 (3) 2942 (2032-3642) 799 (171-1841) 3.7 (1.7, 11.2, 11.9) 
R115777 dose (mg bid)Marrow level (ng/g cell pellet)6-150Plasma Cmin (ng/mL plasma)6-150Marrow/plasma ratio6-150
100-300 (5)6-151 153 (129-202) 53 (25-109) 2.9 (1.4-6.2) 
600 (7) 1742 (812-3920) 655 (322-1544) 2.7 (2.0-3.7) 
900 (3) 2942 (2032-3642) 799 (171-1841) 3.7 (1.7, 11.2, 11.9) 
F6-150

Mean (range).

F6-151

Number of patients with both marrow and plasma levels determined.

The present phase 1 study represents the first clinical trial of a signal transduction inhibitor in patients with AML and ALL. In this cohort of patients, we found the toxicities of R115777 to be dose related and to consist of reversible renal toxicity, transient myelosuppression, and dose-limiting neurotoxicity. The observed neurotoxicity is consistent with the pivotal role that Ras plays in neuronal development and survival, particularly in response to nerve growth factor,54 where Ras participates through activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway.55 The etiology of the polydipsia, which occurred in the absence of osmotic diuresis (eg, diabetes), defects in pituitary function, or primary metabolic disturbances, is unclear at this time. Transient and reversible renal dysfunction was preceded by polydipsia in patients over 60 years old, but otherwise there was no clear link between the 2 disorders. Renal dysfunction, which has also been noted in previous phase 1 studies of the nonpeptidomimetic FTI SCH6633647 as well as R115777,37 might reflect a role for farnesylated proteins in maintaining normal glomerular and tubular functions.

Our studies demonstrate that R115777 accumulates in the bone marrow in a dose-dependent manner, reaches concentrations that equal or exceed Cmax, and remains present at sustained levels throughout the duration of administration. Overall, the pharmacokinetic studies support the notion that the twice-daily administration of R115777 over 7 to 21 days achieves steady-state drug concentrations in both plasma and marrow that are sufficient to inhibit FT activity in target leukemic marrow cells in a dose-dependent fashion. This inhibition was subsequently demonstrated using direct measurements of FT activity as well as assays for accumulation of prelamin A and especially pre–HDJ-2, 2 polypeptides whose processing is FT dependent. The ability to detect processed HDJ-2 in the majority of pretreatment marrow populations and the reproducible increase in unfarnesylated protein (pre–HDJ-2) detected in marrow samples from patients treated with at least 600 mg bid for at least 7 days suggests that this assay provides a consistent marker of functional enzyme inhibition. As such, this assay may be useful in monitoring R115777 therapy to ensure achievement of intracellular FTI levels that, in turn, translate into functional enzyme blockade. In contrast, lamin A was not expressed consistently in these marrow samples (Table 4),48 making assays for prelamin A less informative in these diseases.

In this phase 1 study, we were not able to discern a quantitative relationship between FT enzyme inhibition, the accumulation of pre–HDJ-2, and clinical response. Such correlations can be uncovered only with larger numbers of patients receiving a dose of R115777 that has been determined to be effective at least on the basis of intracellular biochemical activities. Phase 2 studies of R115777 in patients with AML receiving a more uniform dose are needed to address this important issue.

Multiple downstream targets appear to be affected by FT inhibition. The observation that R115777 results in ERK dephosphorylation raises the possibility that one target in these leukemic marrow cells might be the Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK pathway. Even though ERK phosphorylation was detected in only 36.4% of the leukemic marrow populations obtained prior to R115777, it disappeared in half of the leukemias where it was initially demonstrated. Likewise, the finding that 3 of the 5 patients with AML with chromosome 7 abnormalities, which are associated with aberrant Ras expression,52responded to R115777 also suggests that R115777 might exert its antileukemic effects, at least in part, by interrupting Ras function. On the other hand, the occurrence of clinical responses in the absence of detectable ras mutations is also noteworthy. Although this result might reflect inhibition of growth factor-driven Ras activation,15,17-19 the possibility that the antileukemic effects of R115777 are partially or completely Ras-independent cannot be ruled out. Recent studies have demonstrated that FTIs interfere with farnesylation and function of other proteins, including RhoB24-26 and possibly other intermediates in cell survival pathways.27 Unfortunately, RhoB is expressed in such limited amounts that it could not be analyzed in the present study.46 Thus, further studies are required to determine which FT substrate(s) is critical to the antileukemic effects of R115777 in the clinical setting.

Our results indicate that R115777 produces responses in roughly 30% of patients. The entry criteria were designed to include only patients who were likely to do poorly with traditional cytotoxic chemotherapies. In this small cohort of patients, the effects of R115777 were detected in AML variants and in myeloid CML-BC, but not in ALLs (including Ph+ variants). The observation that responsive patients tended to have a lower percentage of marrow blasts (< 40%) than nonresponders (> 70%) raises the possibility that responsive leukemic clones may be those with some residual capacity to differentiate. Consistent with this possibility, many patients achieved CR or PR without the profound marrow aplasia typically associated with induction chemotherapy. If R115777 is truly able to facilitate some differentiation of blasts, FTIs might find application in disease states such as high-risk MDS, where some capacity for differentiation still persists, or in minimal residual disease states, that is, after cytoreductive induction chemotherapy.

Multiple assays of farnesylation demonstrated that FT enzyme activity was reproducibly inhibited at doses of 600 mg bid. At this dose level, clinical responses were detected in 2 (29%) of 7 AMLs, nonhematologic toxicities were acceptable to patients and myelosuppression was transient (< 7 days). At the next higher dose level (900 mg bid), the nonhematologic toxicities were troublesome enough that 3 (27%) of that patient cohort were unable to receive 21 days of treatment. Based on the clinical and molecular data from this phase 1 study, it is reasonable to suggest a dose of 600 mg R115777 bid for phase 1I trials in hematologic malignancies, with possible dose escalation in selected cohorts of younger patients. Based on the promising results presented above, additional trials are needed to address several issues, including optimal duration of dosing to achieve CR or maximal clinical responses, duration of responses, and the effects of combining R115777 with traditional cytotoxic agents.

We wish to thank Chris Bowden for thoughtful advice; Maureen Craig, Kim Altobelli, Patrician Engelen, and Jacqueline Toner for technical expertise and assistance; and Veronica Greenidge for secretarial expertise.

Supported by National Cancer Institute Cooperative Agreement U01 CA69854 (J.E.K.) and by a grant from Janssen Research Foundation (J.R. and J.E.K.). J.L. is a Scholar in Clinical Research of the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.

1
Buchner
 
T
Hiddeman
 
W
Wormann
 
B
et al
Double induction strategy for acute myeloid leukemia: the effect of high-dose cytarabine with mitoxantrone instead of standard-dose cytarabine with daunorubicin and 6-thioguanine: a randomized trial by the German AML Cooperative Group.
Blood.
93
1999
4116
4124
2
Cassileth
 
PA
Harrington
 
DP
Appelbaum
 
FR
et al
Chemotherapy compared with autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in the managemenet of acute myeloid leukemia in first remission.
N Engl J Med.
339
1998
1649
1656
3
Geller
 
RB
Burke
 
PJ
Karp
 
JE
et al
A two-step timed sequential treatment for acute myelogenous leukemia.
Blood.
74
1989
1499
1506
4
Weick
 
JK
Kopecky
 
KJ
Appelbaum
 
FR
et al
A randomized investigation of high-dose versus standard-dose cytosine arabinoside with daunorubicin in patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study.
Blood.
88
1996
2841
2851
5
Baudard
 
M
Beauchamp-Nicoud
 
A
Delmer
 
A
et al
Has the prognosis of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia improved over years? A single institution experience of 784 consecutive patients over a 16-year period.
Leukemia.
13
1999
1481
1490
6
Hiddemann
 
W
Kern
 
W
Schoch
 
C
et al
Management of acute myeloid leukemia in elderly patients.
J Clin Oncol.
17
1999
3569
3576
7
Karp
 
JE
Smith
 
MA
The molecular pathogenesis of treatment-induced (secondary) leukemias: foundations for treatment and prevention.
Semin Oncol.
24
1997
103
113
8
Levine
 
E
Bloomfield
 
C
Leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes secondary to drug, radiation and environmental exposure.
Semin Oncol.
19
1992
47
84
9
Copelan
 
EA
McGuire
 
EA
The biology and treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults.
Blood.
85
1995
1151
1168
10
Hoelzer
 
D
Ludwig
 
WD
Thiel
 
E
et al
Improved outcome in adult B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Blood.
87
1996
495
508
11
Kantarjian
 
HM
O'Brien
 
S
Smith
 
TL
et al
Results of treatment with Hyper-CVAD, a dose-intensive regimen, in adult acute lympyhocytic leukemia.
J Clin Oncol.
18
2000
547
561
12
Westbrook
 
CA
Hooberman
 
AL
Spino
 
C
et al
Clinical significance of the BCR-ABL fusion gene in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study (8762).
Blood.
80
1992
2983
2990
13
Ito
 
T
May
 
WS
Drug development train gathering steam.
Nat Med.
2
1996
403
404
14
Karp
 
JE
Acute leukemia: mechanisms of cell survival as targets for therapy (review).
Int J Oncol.
11
1997
657
674
15
McCubrey
 
JA
May
 
WS
Duronio
 
V
Mufson
 
A
Serine/threonine phosphorylation in cytokine signal transduction.
Leukemia.
14
2000
9
21
16
Rebollo
 
A
Martinez-A
 
C
Ras proteins: recent advances and new functions.
Blood.
94
1999
2971
2980
17
Egan
 
SE
Giddings
 
BW
Brooks
 
MW
Buday
 
L
Sizeland
 
AM
Weinberg
 
RA
Association of Sos Ras exchange protein with Grb2 is implicated in tyrosine kinase signal transduction and transformation.
Nature.
363
1993
45
51
18
Li
 
N
Batzer
 
A
Daly
 
R
et al
Guanine nucleotide-releasing factor hSos1 binds to Grb2 and links tyrosine kinases to Ras signalling.
Nature.
363
1993
85
88
19
Sasaoka
 
T
Langlois
 
W
Leitner
 
JW
Draznin
 
B
Olefsky
 
JM
The signalling pathway coupling epidermal growth factor receptors to activation of p21ras.
J Biol Chem.
51
1994
32621
23625
20
Gelb
 
MH
Protein prenylation, et cetera: signal transduction in two dimensions.
Science.
27
1997
1750
1751
21
Khosvari-Far
 
R
Cox
 
AD
Kato
 
K
Der
 
CJ
Protein prenylation: key to ras function and cancer intervention.
Cell Growth Diff.
3
1992
461
469
22
End
 
DW
Farnesyl protein transferase inhibitors and other therapies targeting the Ras signal transduction pathway.
Invest New Drugs.
17
1999
241
258
23
Beaurpe
 
DM
Kurzrock
 
RA
RAS and leukemia: from basic mechanisms to gene-directed therapy.
J Clin Oncol.
17
1999
1071
1079
24
Du
 
W
Lebowitz
 
PF
Prendergast
 
GC
Cell growth inhibition by farnesyltransferase inhibitors is mediated by a gain of granylgeranylated Rho B.
Mol Cell Biol.
19
1999
1831
1840
25
Reuter
 
CWM
Morgan
 
MA
Bergmann
 
L
Targeting the Ras signaling pathway: a rational, mechanism-based treatment for hematologic malignancies.
Blood.
96
2000
1655
1669
26
Lebowitz
 
PF
Prendergast
 
GC
Non-Ras tragets of farnesyltransferase inhibitors: focus on Rho.
Oncogene.
17
1998
1439
1445
27
Jiang
 
K
Coppola
 
D
Crespo
 
NC
et al
The phosphoinositide 3-OH kinase/AKT2 pathway as a critical target for farnesyltransferase inhibitor-induced apoptosis.
Mol Cel Biol.
20
2000
139
148
28
Hirsch-Ginsberg
 
C
LeMaistre
 
AC
Kantarjian
 
H
et al
RAS mutations are rare events in Philadelphia chromosome-negative/bcr gene rearrangement-negative chronic myelogenous leukemia, but are prevalent in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.
Blood.
76
1990
1214
1219
29
Paquette
 
RL
Landaw
 
EM
Pierre
 
RV
et al
N-ras mutations are associated with poor prognosis and increased risk of leukemia in myelodysplastic syndrome.
Blood.
82
1993
590
599
30
Taylor
 
JA
Sandler
 
DP
Bloomfield
 
CD
et al
Ras oncogene activation and occupational exposures in acute myeloid leukemia.
J Natl Cancer Inst.
84
1992
1626
1632
31
Bos
 
JL
Verlaan-de Vries
 
M
van der Eb
 
AJ
et al
Mutations in N-ras predominate in acute myeloid leukemia.
Blood.
69
1987
1237
1241
32
Neubauer
 
A
Dodge
 
RK
George
 
SL
et al
Prognostic importance of mutations in the ras proto-oncogenes in de novo acute myeloid leukemia.
Blood.
83
1994
1603
1611
33
Thorn
 
J
Molloy
 
P
Iland
 
H
SSCP detection of N-ras promoter mutations in AML patients.
Exp Hematol.
23
1995
1098
1103
34
Pendergast
 
AM
Quilliam
 
LA
Cripe
 
LD
et al
BCR-ABL-induced oncogenesis is mediated by direct interaction with the SH2 domain of the GRB-2 adaptor protein.
Cell.
75
1993
175
185
35
Puil
 
L
Liu
 
J
Gish
 
G
et al
Bcr-Abl oncoproteins bind directly to activators of the Ras signalling pathway.
EMBO J.
13
1994
764
773
36
Rowinsky
 
EK
Windle
 
JJ
Von Hoff
 
DD
Ras protein farnesyltransferase: a strategic target for anticancer therapeutic development.
J Clin Oncol.
17
1999
3631
3652
37
Zujewski
 
J
Horak
 
ID
Bol
 
CJ
et al
Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor R115777 in advanced cancer.
J Clin Oncol.
18
2000
927
941
38
Cheson
 
BD
Cassileth
 
PA
Head
 
DR
et al
Report of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored workshop on definitions of diagnosis and response in acute myeloid leukemia.
J Clin Oncol.
8
1990
813
819
39
Fuery
 
CJ
Impey
 
HL
Roberts
 
et al
Detection of rare mutant alleles by restriction endonuclease-mediated selective-PCR: assay design and optimization.
Clin Chem.
46
2000
620
624
40
End
 
DW
Chevalier
 
K
Fanelli
 
L
Kontoyianni
 
M
Skrzat
 
S
Wouters
 
W
Unusual tight binding of R115777 to farnesyl protein transferase (FPT) allows for ex vivo measurement of FPT inhibition
Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research; April 1-5
1404
CA. Abstract
San Francisco
41
Bradford
 
MM
A rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantitites of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.
Anal Biochem.
72
1976
248
254
42
Shibasaki
 
F
Price
 
ER
Milan
 
D
McKeon
 
F
Role of kinases and the phosphates calcineurin in the nuclear shuttling of transcription factor NF-AT4.
Nature.
382
1996
370
373
43
Neckers
 
L
Mimnaugh
 
E
Schulte
 
TW
The Hsp90 chaperone family
Latchman DS eds, Stress Proteins.
1999
9
42
Springer-Verlag
New York, NY
44
Beck
 
LA
Hosick
 
TJ
Sinensky
 
M
Isoprenylation is required for the processing of the lamin A precursor.
J Cell Biol.
110
1990
1489
1499
45
Britten CD, Rowinsky E, Yao SL, et al. The farnesyl protein transferase (FPTase) inhibitor L-778,123 in patients with solid cancers. In: Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology; May 15-18, 1999; Atlanta, GA. Abstract 155a.
46
Adjei
 
AA
Davis
 
JN
Ehrlichman
 
C
Svingen
 
PA
Kaufmann
 
SH
Comparison of potential markers of farnesyltransferase inhibition.
Clin Cancer Res.
6
2000
2318
2325
47
Adjei
 
AA
Erlichman
 
C
Davis
 
JN
et al
A phase 1 trial of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor SCH66336: evidence for biological and clinical activity.
Cancer Res.
60
2000
1871
1877
48
Kaufmann
 
SH
Expression of nuclear envelope lamins A and C in human myeloid leukemias.
Cancer Res.
52
1992
2847
2853
49
Kaufmann
 
SH
Svingen
 
PA
Gore
 
SD
Armstrong
 
DK
Cheng
 
YC
Rowinsky
 
EK
Altered formation of topotecan-stabilized topoisomerase I-DNA adducts in human leukemia cells.
Blood.
89
1997
2098
2104
50
Sinensky
 
M
Fantle
 
K
Dalton
 
M
An antibody which specifically recognizes prelamin A but not mature lamin A: application to detection of blocks in farnesylation-dependent protein processing.
Cancer Res.
54
1994
3229
3232
51
Loewinger
 
L
McKeon
 
F
Mutations in the nuclear lamin proteins resulting in their aberrant assembly in the cytoplasm.
EMBO J.
7
1988
2301
2309
52
Luna-Fineman
 
S
Shannon
 
KM
Lange
 
BJ
Childhood monosomy 7: epidemiology, biology, and mechanistic implications.
Blood.
85
1995
1985
1999
53
Kinoshita
 
T
Shirouza
 
M
Kamiya
 
A
Hashimoto
 
K
Yokoyama
 
S
Miyajima
 
A
Raf/MAPK and rapamycin-sensitive pathways mediate the anti-apoptotic function of p21 Ras in IL-3 dependent hematopoietic cells.
Oncogene.
15
1997
619
627
54
Li
 
BQ
Kaplan
 
D
Kung
 
HF
Kamata
 
T
Nerve growth factor stimulation of the Ras-guanine nucleotide exchange factor and GAP activties.
Science.
256
1992
1456
1459
55
Virdee
 
K
Vue
 
L
Hemmings
 
BA
Goemans
 
C
Heumann
 
R
Tolkovsky
 
AM
Nerve growth factor-induced PKB/Akt activity is sustained by phosphoinositide 3-kinase dependent and independent signals in sympathetic neurons.
Brain Res.
837
1999
127
142

Author notes

Judith E. Karp, University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, 22 S Greene St, Rm S9D07, Baltimore, MD 21201; e-mail:jkarp@umm.edu.

Sign in via your Institution