In this issue of Blood, Agostinis et al provide evidence for a dominant role of the complement system in the pathology of the antiphospholipid syndrome by showing that a CH2-deleted antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) prevented and reversed aPL-induced thrombosis and pregnancy failure in rats.1 

The mechanism suggested by Agostinis et al. aPL recognizes domain I of β2GPI and stabilizes on the cell surface. This is followed by binding of complement factor C1q resulting in the activation of the complement system. The formed anaphylatoxins will cause cell damage and induce a prothrombotic phenotype, leading to both thrombosis and pregnancy failure. Deleting the CH2 part, responsible for binding C1q, prevents complement activation by competing with aPL for binding domain I of β2GPI. Professional illustration by Paulette Dennis.

The mechanism suggested by Agostinis et al. aPL recognizes domain I of β2GPI and stabilizes on the cell surface. This is followed by binding of complement factor C1q resulting in the activation of the complement system. The formed anaphylatoxins will cause cell damage and induce a prothrombotic phenotype, leading to both thrombosis and pregnancy failure. Deleting the CH2 part, responsible for binding C1q, prevents complement activation by competing with aPL for binding domain I of β2GPI. Professional illustration by Paulette Dennis.

Close modal

With >11 000 PubMed hits and still counting, antiphospholipid syndrome is truly one of the most studied thrombotic diseases both by clinicians and basic scientists. Patients diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome suffer from thrombotic episodes and/or pregnancy morbidity in combination with detectable aPLs in their blood.2  Besides thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity, patients with antiphospholipid syndrome can have additional clinical symptoms belonging to different fields of medicine. Therefore, antiphospholipid patients cannot be defined to 1 medical specialty but are treated by different clinicians such as a hematologist, gynecologist, or rheumatologist. This clinical diversity within the syndrome resulted in studies executed by researchers and clinicians from different fields, resulting in a variety of explanations for the higher occurrence of both thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity.3  The main questions currently asked are as follows: which antibodies are involved and how do these antibodies cause thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity.

Despite their name, “antiphospholipid antibody,” these antibodies are strangely enough not directed against phospholipids but phospholipid-binding proteins. β2-Glycoprotein I (β2GPI), a plasma protein probably involved in the clearance of pathogens, has been accepted as the major antigen for aPLs.4  However, not all patients with anti-β2GPI antibodies suffer from either thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity, which has resulted in a long debate about the clinical significance of detecting these antibodies. The last few years, there have been several studies published showing the importance of detecting antibodies directed specifically against the first domain of β2GPI.5  A recent multicenter study, including >400 patients positive for anti-β2GPI antibodies, showed that anti-domain I immunoglobin G (IgG) antibodies have a 3 to 4 times better association with thrombosis than anti-β2GPI IgG antibodies, irrespective of specificity.6  Whether anti-domain I antibodies are also related to pregnancy failure remains to be studied. Therefore, the study by Agostinis et al is of great interest. They used an anti-domain I antibody in their studies and were able to show that this antibody induced both thrombosis and pregnancy failure in rats, thereby linking both thrombosis and pregnancy failure to 1 type of antibody.

An attractive mechanism involved in the disease process of antiphospholipid syndrome that has recently gained interest from clinicians and basic scientists working in different fields such as hemostasis and immunology is activation of the complement system.7  The complement system is part of the immune system responsible for removing pathogens from the human body under physiological conditions. Under pathological situations, such as autoimmune diseases, activation of the complement system can occur without an obvious trigger. In the current study, Agostinis et al show that an aPL with reactivity toward the first domain I of β2-GPI induced both complement-mediated thrombosis and pregnancy failure in rats, linking 2 apparently different clinical symptoms to 1 mechanism.

The complement system consists of 3 pathways: the classical, lectin, and alternate pathways (see figure). The classical pathway has been associated most with antiphospholipid syndrome, indicating an essential role for C1q of the complement system.1  C1q is able to further initiate the formation of anaphylatoxin C5a, which is known to cause placental damage and promote tissue factor expression on neutrophils and platelet-neutrophil complexes. To study this supposed role for C1q, Agostinis et al elegantly deleted the CH2 part of the anti-domain I antibody, which is responsible for binding to the C1q complement factor. Deletion of the CH2 part of the antibody resulted in significantly less thrombosis and pregnancy failure in rats compared with the antibody in which the CH2 part was still present.

Treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome is difficult with different strategies for patients suffering from either thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity.8,9  Current treatment strategies involve several different antithrombotic agents such as vitamin K antagonists, platelet inhibitors, and heparin, which are obviously associated with an increased bleeding risk. Increasing efforts are being made to find more specific ways to prevent aPL-induced thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity with limited bleeding risk. An option to specifically target the binding of the antigen-antibody complex to cells is to prevent the binding of this complex. As a final experiment, Agostinis et al show that the addition of the CH2-deleted antibody to mice already injected with a complete aPL prevented and reversed thrombosis and pregnancy failure in rats. This indicates that in their model, the injected CH2-deleted antibody replaced the injected aPL, thereby preventing complement activation. Although this is not a novel strategy, it is tested for the first time in an antiphospholipid syndrome-mediated setting with apparently great potential.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: B.d.L. is an advisor for Diagnostica STAGO.

1
Agostinis
 
C
Durigutto
 
P
Sblattero
 
D
, et al. 
A non–complement-fixing antibody to β2 glycoprotein I as a novel therapy for antiphospholipid syndrome.
Blood
2014
, vol. 
123
 
22
(pg. 
3478
-
3487
)
2
Miyakis
 
S
Lockshin
 
MD
Atsumi
 
T
, et al. 
International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).
J Thromb Haemost
2006
, vol. 
4
 
2
(pg. 
295
-
306
)
3
Meroni
 
PL
Borghi
 
MO
Raschi
 
E
Tedesco
 
F
Pathogenesis of antiphospholipid syndrome: understanding the antibodies.
Nat Rev Rheumatol
2011
, vol. 
7
 
6
(pg. 
330
-
339
)
4
Agar
 
C
de Groot
 
PG
Mörgelin
 
M
, et al. 
β₂-glycoprotein I: a novel component of innate immunity.
Blood
2011
, vol. 
117
 
25
(pg. 
6939
-
6947
)
5
Mahler
 
M
Norman
 
GL
Meroni
 
PL
Khamashta
 
M
Autoantibodies to domain 1 of beta 2 glycoprotein 1: a promising candidate biomarker for risk management in antiphospholipid syndrome.
Autoimmun Rev
2012
, vol. 
12
 
2
(pg. 
313
-
317
)
6
de Laat
 
B
Pengo
 
V
Pabinger
 
I
, et al. 
The association between circulating antibodies against domain I of beta2-glycoprotein I and thrombosis: an international multicenter study.
J Thromb Haemost
2009
, vol. 
7
 
11
(pg. 
1767
-
1773
)
7
Samarkos
 
M
Mylona
 
E
Kapsimali
 
V
The role of complement in the antiphospholipid syndrome: a novel mechanism for pregnancy morbidity.
Semin Arthritis Rheum
2012
, vol. 
42
 
1
(pg. 
66
-
69
)
8
Lim
 
W
Crowther
 
MA
Eikelboom
 
JW
Management of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome: a systematic review.
JAMA
2006
, vol. 
295
 
9
(pg. 
1050
-
1057
)
9
Connors
 
JM
Preventing pregnancy loss.
Blood
2014
, vol. 
123
 
3
(pg. 
308
-
310
)
Sign in via your Institution