Abstract 70

Introduction:

Early responses to TKI are an important predictor of long term outcome. Several approaches have been used to improve outcomes in CML-CP, including high-dose imatinib, and 2ndgeneration TKI. These induce earlier responses and improved long-term outcomes. We analyzed patterns of response and their long-term impact among pts treated with 4 TKI modalities as frontline CML CP therapy.

Methods:

489 CML CP pts (median age 48 yrs, range 15–86 yrs) receiving initial therapy with TKI at MDACC from 2000 to 2011 were included in the analysis (missing values were excluded from the analysis). Patients received imatinib 400 mg/d (IM400; n=83), imatinib 800 mg/d (IM800; n=199), nilotinib (n=105) or dasatinib (n=102) in consecutive or parallel trials. Median follow-up was 76.5 months (mo) (3-136). Cytogenetic (G-banding) and molecular responses (real-time PCR, expressed in international scale) were assessed every 3 mo for the 1styear and every 6 mo thereafter.

Results:

After 3 mo of treatment, 301 (65%) patients achieved a cytogenetic response (Ph+ ≤ 0%) 105 (23%) achieved (Ph+ ≤ 1–35 %) and 52 (11 %) (Ph+ >35 %). Molecular response (≤ 1%) was achieved in 300 pts (79%) at 3 mo, while 66 (17%) achieved BCR-ABL 1–10 % and 13 pts (3%) had poorer molecular response (>10%) at 3 mo. Disease transformation was observed in 10 pts (2%), events observed were 54 (11%) and 62 pts (12%) died.

Landmark analysis at 3-mo by molecular and cytogenetic response showed that molecular response (1, 1–10 and >10 %) after 3 mo of TKI did not discriminate for 3-year OS; cumulative proportions at 3 yr OS among each category were [BCR-ABL ≤1 % (97%), 1–10% (98%) and >10% (100%), p=0.593 by log rank test]. While cytogenetic responses (0 %, 1–35 and >35 %) after 3 mo of TKI significantly discriminated for 3-year OS [Ph+ ≤ 0% (98%), Ph+ 1–35% (95%) and Ph+ >35% (87%), p=0.002]. The 3-yr EFS in cumulative proportions by molecular response at 3 mo were (95 %) for BCR-ABL ≤1, (98%) if 1–10% and (64%) if >10% (p=0.001). Corresponding values for EFS by cytogenetic responses at 3 mo were: (97%) for Ph+ ≤ 0%, (88%) of Ph+ 1–35% and (85%) for Ph+ >35% (p=0.001). TFS 3-yr cumulative proportions for BCR-ABL ≤1% were (99%), for 1–10% it was (98%) and for >10% it was (100%) (p=0.87); corresponding rates by cytogenetic response were (99%) for Ph+ ≤ 0%, (97%) for Ph+ 1–35% and (94%) for Ph+ >35% (p=0.05). Similar results were obtained analyzing OS, EFS and TFS by the same molecular and cytogenetic response categories at 6 mo, except that the molecular response significantly predicted for a better 3 year OS at 6 month landmark analysis (p=0.02).

There were no statistically significant differences in OS, EFS and TFS for pts achieving equivalent responses with different treatment modalities. However, pts treated with dasatinib or nilotinib, and to some extent IM800 had a significantly higher probability of achieving the deepest 3-mo response. (Table 1 below).

Conclusions:

The achievement of early (3 and 6 mo) molecular and cytogenetic responses with TKI is predictive for long term EFS, TFS and OS. The impact of the response is similar regardless of TKI used. However, pts treated with dasatinib and nilotinib, and to some extent those treated with high-dose imatinib, have a better probability of achieving the deepest responses at early time points.

Table 1.

Landmark analysis at 3 and 6 months by molecular and cytogenetic response for predicted EFS, OS and TFS in response to each TKI therapy

Landmark = 3 & 6 mo survival% with response/% 3-y EFS/% 3-y OS/% 3-y TFS
IM400IM800NilotinibDasatinib
3 mo Cyto Res 34/92/100/96 62/97/97/99 81.3/97/97/99 84/99/98/100 
 35<0 32/88/88/96 29/88/96/98 13/92/100/92 13/91/100/100 
 >35 34/89/77/96 9/83/100/88 5.2/67/100/100 3/67/100/100 
3 mo Mol Res ≤1 71/82/100/92 78/98/97/99 82/96/97/99 79/100/98/100 
 >1 - 10 23/100/100/100 19/100/96/100 17/94/100/94 15/100/100/100 
 >10 6/100/100/100 3/80/100/100 1/100/100/100 6/27/100/100 
6 mo Cyto Res 41/97/100/97 85/97/99/98 97/99/100/99 91/99/99/100 
 35<0 37/88/96/94 11/80/95/100 0/NA/NA/NA 6/75/100/100 
 >35 23/82/59/95 4/83/86/100 3/67/100/67 3/100/100/100 
6 mo Mol Res ≤1 60/67/99/100 89/96/99/98 91/99/100/99 89/100/100/100 
 >1 - 10 40/100/100/100 9.7/79/94/100 6/100/100/100 8/42/100/100 
 >10 0/NA/NA/NA 1/100/100/100 3/67/100/67 3/100/100/100 
Landmark = 3 & 6 mo survival% with response/% 3-y EFS/% 3-y OS/% 3-y TFS
IM400IM800NilotinibDasatinib
3 mo Cyto Res 34/92/100/96 62/97/97/99 81.3/97/97/99 84/99/98/100 
 35<0 32/88/88/96 29/88/96/98 13/92/100/92 13/91/100/100 
 >35 34/89/77/96 9/83/100/88 5.2/67/100/100 3/67/100/100 
3 mo Mol Res ≤1 71/82/100/92 78/98/97/99 82/96/97/99 79/100/98/100 
 >1 - 10 23/100/100/100 19/100/96/100 17/94/100/94 15/100/100/100 
 >10 6/100/100/100 3/80/100/100 1/100/100/100 6/27/100/100 
6 mo Cyto Res 41/97/100/97 85/97/99/98 97/99/100/99 91/99/99/100 
 35<0 37/88/96/94 11/80/95/100 0/NA/NA/NA 6/75/100/100 
 >35 23/82/59/95 4/83/86/100 3/67/100/67 3/100/100/100 
6 mo Mol Res ≤1 60/67/99/100 89/96/99/98 91/99/100/99 89/100/100/100 
 >1 - 10 40/100/100/100 9.7/79/94/100 6/100/100/100 8/42/100/100 
 >10 0/NA/NA/NA 1/100/100/100 3/67/100/67 3/100/100/100 

NA = no data available.

Disclosures:

Kantarjian:Genzyme: Research Funding. Ravandi:Genzyme: Research Funding.

This icon denotes a clinically relevant abstract

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution