Abstract 1015

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) disproportionately affect older patients. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with non-ablative conditioning regimens is increasingly used to treat this population. We analyzed data reported to the CIBMTR on 1248 patients receiving either non-myeloablative (NMA) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) HCT from 2001–2007 for both aggressive (n=668) and indolent (n=580) NHL testing the association of age on transplant-related mortality (TRM), relapse, engraftment, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients were stratified into 3 age cohorts: 40–54, 55–64, and ≥65 years. Clinical characteristics were mostly well-matched across age cohorts, but more frequent aggressive NHL histologies occurred in the oldest age group [67% vs. 49% (age 40–54) and 57% (age 55–64); p=0.0008] and fewer patients ≥65 years had prior autografts (9% vs. 26% and 24% in the younger groups; p=0.002); 30% of those ≥65 had resistant disease at HCT (vs. 25% and 23% in younger cohorts; p=0.79). Univariate analysis demonstrated no statistically significant differences in the incidence of relapse, acute or chronic GVHD across age cohorts (Table 1). We observed lower 1 year TRM for the youngest group, but TRM was similar in the two older cohorts. PFS and OS were also inferior in the two older cohorts, but no differences between those aged 55–64 and ≥65 were noted. Multivariate analysis (Table 2) revealed no independently significant impact of age on the incidence of acute (p=0.91) or chronic GVHD (p=0.66), or on relapse (p=0.06). Older age ≥55 years, lower Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match disparity adversely impacted TRM, PFS, and OS. Advanced disease status (CR1/2 vs. PR1/2, or resistant) at HCT also significantly worsened TRM, relapse (p<0.0001), PFS and OS. Histology (aggressive vs. indolent) did not impact any multivariate model of outcomes. Compared to NMA regimens RIC worsened acute (p=0.007) and chronic (p=0.002) GVHD and OS (p=0.03), but not TRM or PFS. We conclude that patients ≥55 receiving non-ablative HCT for NHL have only modestly worse outcomes with no further decrement in those ≥65 years. These results are, however, influenced by KPS and disease status at time of HCT, and by HLA donor/recipient mismatch. Despite higher risk characteristics, 3 year survival still approached 40% for even the oldest groups making HCT a worthwhile option for these patients. Future work should focus on refining techniques for patient selection and optimizing conditioning regimens to improve these already encouraging results.

Table 1.

Univariate probabilities of patients receiving HCT for NHL

N40–54N55–64N≥ 65P
 614  552  82   
TRM, 1 year  22 (19–26)%  27 (23–31)%  34 (24–44)% 0.05 
Relapse, 3 years  28 (24–32)%  33 (29–37)%  33 (23–44)% 0.22 
PFS, 3 years  44 (39–48)%  32 (28–36)%  27 (17–37)% <0.0001 
OS, 3 years  54 (50–58)%  40 (36–44)%  39 (28–50)% <0.0001 
Follow-up, median (months)  56 (3–111)  47 (2–111)  47 (2–96)  
N40–54N55–64N≥ 65P
 614  552  82   
TRM, 1 year  22 (19–26)%  27 (23–31)%  34 (24–44)% 0.05 
Relapse, 3 years  28 (24–32)%  33 (29–37)%  33 (23–44)% 0.22 
PFS, 3 years  44 (39–48)%  32 (28–36)%  27 (17–37)% <0.0001 
OS, 3 years  54 (50–58)%  40 (36–44)%  39 (28–50)% <0.0001 
Follow-up, median (months)  56 (3–111)  47 (2–111)  47 (2–96)  
Table 2.

Factors affecting multivariate analysis in patients receiving HCT for NHL

AgeTRMPFSOS
HRPHRPHRP
    40–54 1.0  1.0  1.0  
    55–64 1.52 <0.0001 1.37 <0.0001 1.47 <0.0001 
    65+ 1.57 0.02 1.33 0.04 1.47 0.01 
KPS       
    ≥ 80 1.0  1.0  1.0  
    < 80 1.87 <0.0001 1.63 <0.0001 1.87 <0.0001 
HLA match       
    Identical sib 1.0  1.0  1.0  
    URD well matched 1.36 <0.01 1.13 0.15 1.30 0.004 
    URD partial match 2.30 <0.0001 1.39 0.003 1.90 <0.0001 
    URD mismatch 2.9 <0.0001 2.28 <0.0001 2.21 0.0001 
Disease Status       
    CR1/CR2 1.0  1.0  1.0  
    PR1/PR2 1.27 0.06 1.45 <0.0001 1.29 0.01 
    Resistant 1.90 <0.0001 2.28 <0.0001 1.97 <0.0001 
AgeTRMPFSOS
HRPHRPHRP
    40–54 1.0  1.0  1.0  
    55–64 1.52 <0.0001 1.37 <0.0001 1.47 <0.0001 
    65+ 1.57 0.02 1.33 0.04 1.47 0.01 
KPS       
    ≥ 80 1.0  1.0  1.0  
    < 80 1.87 <0.0001 1.63 <0.0001 1.87 <0.0001 
HLA match       
    Identical sib 1.0  1.0  1.0  
    URD well matched 1.36 <0.01 1.13 0.15 1.30 0.004 
    URD partial match 2.30 <0.0001 1.39 0.003 1.90 <0.0001 
    URD mismatch 2.9 <0.0001 2.28 <0.0001 2.21 0.0001 
Disease Status       
    CR1/CR2 1.0  1.0  1.0  
    PR1/PR2 1.27 0.06 1.45 <0.0001 1.29 0.01 
    Resistant 1.90 <0.0001 2.28 <0.0001 1.97 <0.0001 

Disclosures:

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution