Comment on Perruccio et al, page 4397

Perruccio and colleagues demonstrate feasibility and efficacy of adoptive immunotherapy with donor-derived T-cell clones in controlling viral and fungal infection following haploidentical stem cell transplantation.

In spite of an increasing number of volunteer unrelated donors in the various international donor registries, there is still a significant percentage of patients for whom no human leukocyte antigen (HLA)–matched related or unrelated donor is available.

Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells from full HLA haplotype-mismatched (haploidentical) family donors is an option for these patients but requires extensive T-cell depletion of the graft, leading to a delayed immune reconstitution following transplantation. Thus, after haploidentical transplantation, patients are at very high risk of developing severe infectious complications.

Adoptive transfer of donor-derived virus-specific CD8+ T cells has been shown to be safe and effective in prophylaxis and treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection following stem cell transplantation from an HLA-identical related and unrelated donor.1-3  Due to the high degree of mismatching between donor and patient in haploidentical transplantation, transfer of donor T cells to improve immune reconstitution in these patients is associated with a high risk of severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). But immunotherapy with highly enriched polyclonal virus-specific CD4+ T cells has been reported to be safe and effective in a small cohort of patients, including one recipient of a haploidentical transplant.4  Here, Perruccio and colleagues report the safe and effective transfer of donor-derived pathogen-specific T cells to recipients of a haploidentical transplant.

There are 2 important messages. No infusion-related toxicity nor induction of GvHD were reported in any of the previous studies using adoptive transfer of donor-derived T cells and even more important in none of the 35 recipients of a haploidentical transplant in the study by Perruccio et al when less than 106 donor CD4+ T cells/m2 were transferred. Thus, transfer of highly enriched pathogen-specific T cells even from haploidentical donors is safe. In spite of the fact that only a small number of pathogen-specific T cells was administered, specific T-cell responses could be detected in most of the patients in the previous studies and all patients in the trial reported here. All of the patients in this study showed a surprisingly prompt increase in CD4+ as well as CD8+ T-cell responses to CMV as soon as 3 weeks after transfer. Obviously, even extensively in vitro–cultured T cells were able to rapidly expand in vivo when administered to lymphopenic patients not receiving immunosuppressive medication for GvHD prophylaxis. When compared with a control group, patients receiving CMV-directed immunotherapy had a lower risk of CMV reactivation and disease.

It has been shown before that patients with Aspergillus-specific T helper 1 (Th1) responses have a better chance to survive invasive aspergillosis.5  But this is the first study that describes adoptive T-cell therapy not only for viral but also for invasive fungal infection. Aspergillus-directed CD4+ Th1 responses were detected in all recipients as soon as 3 weeks after the transfer, and 9 of 10 treated patients showed a decrease in their galactomannan antigenemia and resolution of pulmonary infiltrates. Thus, Perruccio and colleagues for the first time also document antifungal efficacy of T-cell therapy.

There are several issues to be resolved before adoptive transfer of pathogen-specific T cells will become routine therapy in recipients of an allogeneic stem cell graft. First, more efficient culture and stimulation techniques or improved selection devices are needed to reduce long-term in vitro culture and to allow enrichment of pathogen-specific T cells under GMP (Good Medical Practice) conditions. Only then will it be possible to conduct clinical trials with highly enriched pathogenspecific T cells that contain not only terminally differentiated effector cells, but also central memory T cells, which are essential to build up a memory T-cell response in the recipient. If so, adoptive immunotherapy will be increasingly used to prevent or control various infectious complications after transplantation. ▪

1
Riddell SR, Watanabe KS, Goodrich JM, Li CR, Agha ME, Greenberg PD. Restoration of viral immunity in immunodeficient humans by the adoptive transfer of T cell clones.
Science
.
1992
;
257
:
238
-241.
2
Rooney CM, Smith CA, Ng CY, et al. Use of gene-modified virus-specific T lymphocytes to control Epstein-Barr-virus-related lymphoproliferation.
Lancet
.
1995
;
345
:
9
-13.
3
Peggs KS, Verfuerth S, Pizzey A, et al. Adoptive cellular therapy for early cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation with virus-specific T-cell lines.
Lancet
.
2003
;
362
:
1375
-1377.
4
Einsele H, Roosnek E, Rufer N, et al. Infusion of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T cells for the treatment of CMV infection not responding to antiviral chemotherapy.
Blood
.
2002
;
99
:
3916
-3922.
5
Hebart H, Bollinger C, Fisch P, et al. Analysis of T-cell responses to Aspergillus fumigatus antigens in healthy individuals and patients with hematologic malignancies.
Blood
.
2002
;
100
:
4521
-4528.
Sign in via your Institution