We report the results of unrelated cord blood transplantation (CBT) for 18 adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The median age was 43 years, the median weight was 55.2 kg, and the median number of cryopreserved nucleated cells was 2.51 × 107/kg. Seventeen patients had myeloid reconstitution and the median time to more than 0.5 × 109/L absolute neutrophil count was 23 days. A self-sustained platelet count more than 50 × 109/L was achieved in 16 patients at a median time of 49 days. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) above grade II occurred in 11 of 17 evaluable patients and chronic GVHD occurred in 14 of 17 evaluable patients. Fourteen patients are alive and free of disease at between 185 and 1332 days after transplantation. The probability of disease-free survival at 2 years was 76.6%. These results suggest that adult AML patients without suitable related or unrelated bone marrow donors should be considered as candidates for CBT.

Although allogeneic stem cell transplantation from a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)–identical related donor offers a potential cure for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a suitably matched related donor is unavailable for approximately two thirds of patients. Recently, umbilical cord blood from unrelated donors has been used as an alternative stem cell source for adult patients with hematologic disorder.1-5  Also, we have previously reported the results of a group of 13 adult patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), including 11 MDS-related secondary AML patients who received unrelated cord blood transplants (CBT).6  However, there have been no reports detailing the results of adult de novo AML patients treated with CBT. Therefore the role of unrelated CBT is not well defined in adult patients with de novo AML. Here, we report our clinical results for a group of 18 adult patients with de novo AML treated with unrelated CBT.

Between January 1999 and November 2002, 18 adult patients with de novo AML were treated with unrelated CBT at The Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo. The diagnosis of AML was made for all patients according to the French-American-British (FAB) Cooperative Group criteria.7,8  Analyses of data were performed on June 1, 2003. All but one patient received 4 fractionated 12 Gy total body irradiation (TBI) on days –9 and –8 or on days –8 and –7. Cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) was administered intravenously over 2 hours at a dose of 3 g/m2 every 12 hours on days –6 and –5 or days –5 and –4 (total dose 12 g/m2). Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was administered by continuous infusion at a dose of 5 μg/kg/day. Infusion of G-CSF was started 12 hours before the first dose of Ara-C and stopped at the completion of the last dose. Cyclophosphamide (CY) was administered intravenously over 2 hours at a dose of 60 mg/kg once daily on days –4 and –3 or days –3 and –2 (total dose 120 mg/kg). One patient (case 15), who had cardiac damage as a result of extensive prior therapies, received 4 fractionated 12 Gy TBI on days –9 and –8, G-CSF combined Ara-C 3 g/m2 every 12 hours on days –6 to –3 (total dose 24 g/m2), and fludarabine 50 mg/body once daily on days –6 to –4. Two days or 3 days after the completion of conditioning, patients received a cord blood transplant. Sixteen patients received standard cyclosporine A (CyA) and methotrexate (MTX), and 2 patients (cases 1 and 2) received CyA only as a graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. CyA was given every day starting on day –1 at a dose of 3 mg/kg/day. MTX (15 mg/m2 intravenously) was given on day 1 and 10 mg/m2 on days 3 and 6. Both acute and chronic GVHD were graded according to the previously published criteria.9-11  All patients received G-CSF by intravenous infusion starting on day 1 until durable granulocyte recovery was achieved. Cord blood unit was selected according to the number of nucleated cells per recipient's weight and HLA compatibility (HLA-A and -B by serology and HLA-DRB1 high-resolution DNA typing). The chimerism status after CBT was determined either by fluorescence in situ hybridization with a Y chromosome probe for sex-mismatched CBT or by polymerase chain reaction DNA typing of HLA antigen for HLA-mismatched CBT. Five patients with AML in complete remission (CR) included in our previous study were also included (cases 3, 4, 7, 8, and 10).4  No patients had a related or unrelated bone marrow donor available at the time of transplantation. Written informed consent for treatment was obtained from all patients. The probability of disease-free survival (DFS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

The characteristics of the 18 patients and cord blood units are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Among the patients the median age was 43 years (range, 21-52 years), the median weight was 55.2 kg (range, 36.2-76.2 kg), and the median number of cryopreserved nucleated cells was 2.51 × 107/kg (range, 1.16-5.29 × 107/kg). Among the 18 patients 14 were beyond first remission at transplantation. All but 1 patient had myeloid reconstitution and median time to more than 0.5 × 109/L absolute neutrophil count was 23 days (range, 16-41 days). A self-sustained hemoglobin level of more than 85.0 g/L (8.5 g/dL) was achieved in 16 patients at a median time of 65 days (range, 16-308 days). A self-sustained platelet count more than 50 × 109/L was achieved in 16 patients at a median time of 49 days (range, 31-263 days). All patients with myeloid reconstitution showed full donor chimerism at the time of first bone marrow examination after CBT. Acute GVHD occurred in 16 of 17 evaluable patients. The grading of acute GVHD was grade I in 5 patients, grade II in 10 patients, and grade III in 1 patient. Chronic GVHD occurred in 14 of 17 evaluable patients. Among 14 chronic GVHD patients, 3 patients were extensive type. One patient died of multiple organ failure on day 27. Three patients died of relapse on days 260, 648, and 202. Fourteen patients are alive and free of disease at between 185 and 1332 days after transplantation (Table 2). The probability of disease-free survival at 2 years was 76.6%.

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients


Case

FAB

Age, y/sex

Body weight, kg

Recipient CMV status

Mo from diagnosis to transplantation

Disease status at transplantation

Cytogenetics at diagnosis
1   M1   45/F   54.9   Positive   18   Relapse   Normal  
2   M5   26/M   56.4   Positive   17   Relapse   11q23  
3   M0   41/M   55.4   Negative   10   CR1   Normal  
4   M2   45/F   46.2   Positive   38   CR2   Normal  
5   M2   51/F   45.8   Positive   22   Relapse   Normal  
6   M5   33/F   36.2   Positive   7   PIF   11q23  
7   M0   21/F   56.0   Positive   29   CR2   Normal  
8   M2   51/M   65.4   Positive   11   CR1   Normal  
9   M2   46/M   55.4   Positive   87   Relapse   t(8;21)  
10   M1   40/M   72.8   Positive   32   CR2   Normal  
11   M1   24/M   51.2   Negative   20   Relapse   Normal  
12   M2   48/M   54.8   Negative   85   CR4   Normal  
13   M5   48/M   62.2   Positive   20   CR1   Normal  
14   M0   27/F   46.8   Positive   8   CR1   Normal  
15   M2   46/M   76.2   Positive   51   Relapse   Normal  
16   M4   24/M   56.4   Positive   31   CR2   inv(16)  
17   M3   52/F   43.6   Positive   27   CR2   t(15;17)  
18
 
M0
 
22/F
 
37.6
 
Positive
 
9
 
PIF
 
8
 

Case

FAB

Age, y/sex

Body weight, kg

Recipient CMV status

Mo from diagnosis to transplantation

Disease status at transplantation

Cytogenetics at diagnosis
1   M1   45/F   54.9   Positive   18   Relapse   Normal  
2   M5   26/M   56.4   Positive   17   Relapse   11q23  
3   M0   41/M   55.4   Negative   10   CR1   Normal  
4   M2   45/F   46.2   Positive   38   CR2   Normal  
5   M2   51/F   45.8   Positive   22   Relapse   Normal  
6   M5   33/F   36.2   Positive   7   PIF   11q23  
7   M0   21/F   56.0   Positive   29   CR2   Normal  
8   M2   51/M   65.4   Positive   11   CR1   Normal  
9   M2   46/M   55.4   Positive   87   Relapse   t(8;21)  
10   M1   40/M   72.8   Positive   32   CR2   Normal  
11   M1   24/M   51.2   Negative   20   Relapse   Normal  
12   M2   48/M   54.8   Negative   85   CR4   Normal  
13   M5   48/M   62.2   Positive   20   CR1   Normal  
14   M0   27/F   46.8   Positive   8   CR1   Normal  
15   M2   46/M   76.2   Positive   51   Relapse   Normal  
16   M4   24/M   56.4   Positive   31   CR2   inv(16)  
17   M3   52/F   43.6   Positive   27   CR2   t(15;17)  
18
 
M0
 
22/F
 
37.6
 
Positive
 
9
 
PIF
 
8
 

FAB indicates French-American-British; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CR1, first complete remission; and PIF, primary induction failure.

Table 2.

Characteristics of cord blood units and transplantation outcomes


Case

Cord blood cell dose × 107/kg, cryopreserved

No. of HLA-A, -B, -DRB1 mismatches

Neutrophil count more than 0.5 × 109/L, d

Reticulocyte count more than 1%, d

Hemoglobin level more than 8.5 g/dL, d

Platelet count more than 50 × 109/L, d

Acute GVHD grade (organ involvement and stage)

Chronic GVHD

Survival, d*
1   1.63   1 (DRB1)   NE   NE   NE   NE   NE   NE   27  
2   1.16   2 (A, B)   41   67   NE   NE   II (skin 3, liver 1, gut 0)   Extensive   260  
3   2.04   3 (A, DRB1, DRB1)   25   33   38   56   II (skin 3, liver 0, gut 1)   Limited   1332+  
4   2.25   2 (B, DRB1)   20   24   59   31   II (skin 1, liver 0, gut 1)   Limited   1318+  
5   3.3   2 (DRB1, DRB1)   21   28   33   52   I (skin 2, liver 0, gut 0)   Limited   1130+  
6   5.29   1 (DRB1)   28   33   67   53   II (skin 3, liver 0, gut 1)   None   648  
7   3   2 (B, DRB1)   24   34   97   46   I (skin 1, liver 0, gut 0)   Limited   926+  
8   2.57   3 (B, B, DRB1)   20   34   22   39   II (skin 3, liver 0, gut 0)   Extensive   919+  
9   3.71   1 (DRB1)   26   46   63   81   II (skin 3, liver 0, gut 0)   None   202  
10   2.21   2 (B, DRB1)   23   32   76   44   I (skin 1, liver 0, gut 0)   None   815+  
11   3.31   2 (B, DRB1)   20   26   16   36   II (skin 3, liver 0, gut 1)   Limited   640+  
12   2.44   2 (A, DRB1)   21   32   308   130   I (skin 2, liver 0, gut 0)   Limited   542+  
13   2.34   2 (B, DRB1)   26   43   270   263   II (skin 3, liver 0, gut 1)   Extensive   535+  
14   2.6   3 (B, B, DRB1)   34   96   111   109   II (skin 2, liver 0, gut 1)   Limited   493+  
15   2.23   4 (A, B, DRB1, DRB1)   22   28   22   35   I (skin 2, liver 0, gut 0)   Limited   436+  
16   3.93   2 (B, DRB1)   16   21   24   37   II (skin 1, liver 0, gut 1)   Limited   430+  
17   2.23   1 (DRB1)   24   35   76   46   0   Limited   381+  
18
 
3.33
 
3 (B, DRB1, DRB1)
 
23
 
41
 
69
 
116
 
III (skin 3, liver 0, gut 3)
 
Limited
 
185+
 

Case

Cord blood cell dose × 107/kg, cryopreserved

No. of HLA-A, -B, -DRB1 mismatches

Neutrophil count more than 0.5 × 109/L, d

Reticulocyte count more than 1%, d

Hemoglobin level more than 8.5 g/dL, d

Platelet count more than 50 × 109/L, d

Acute GVHD grade (organ involvement and stage)

Chronic GVHD

Survival, d*
1   1.63   1 (DRB1)   NE   NE   NE   NE   NE   NE   27  
2   1.16   2 (A, B)   41   67   NE   NE   II (skin 3, liver 1, gut 0)   Extensive   260  
3   2.04   3 (A, DRB1, DRB1)   25   33   38   56   II (skin 3, liver 0, gut 1)   Limited   1332+  
4   2.25   2 (B, DRB1)   20   24   59   31   II (skin 1, liver 0, gut 1)   Limited   1318+  
5   3.3   2 (DRB1, DRB1)   21   28   33   52   I (skin 2, liver 0, gut 0)   Limited   1130+  
6   5.29   1 (DRB1)   28   33   67   53   II (skin 3, liver 0, gut 1)   None   648  
7   3   2 (B, DRB1)   24   34   97   46   I (skin 1, liver 0, gut 0)   Limited   926+  
8   2.57   3 (B, B, DRB1)   20   34   22   39   II (skin 3, liver 0, gut 0)   Extensive   919+  
9   3.71   1 (DRB1)   26   46   63   81   II (skin 3, liver 0, gut 0)   None   202  
10   2.21   2 (B, DRB1)   23   32   76   44   I (skin 1, liver 0, gut 0)   None   815+  
11   3.31   2 (B, DRB1)   20   26   16   36   II (skin 3, liver 0, gut 1)   Limited   640+  
12   2.44   2 (A, DRB1)   21   32   308   130   I (skin 2, liver 0, gut 0)   Limited   542+  
13   2.34   2 (B, DRB1)   26   43   270   263   II (skin 3, liver 0, gut 1)   Extensive   535+  
14   2.6   3 (B, B, DRB1)   34   96   111   109   II (skin 2, liver 0, gut 1)   Limited   493+  
15   2.23   4 (A, B, DRB1, DRB1)   22   28   22   35   I (skin 2, liver 0, gut 0)   Limited   436+  
16   3.93   2 (B, DRB1)   16   21   24   37   II (skin 1, liver 0, gut 1)   Limited   430+  
17   2.23   1 (DRB1)   24   35   76   46   0   Limited   381+  
18
 
3.33
 
3 (B, DRB1, DRB1)
 
23
 
41
 
69
 
116
 
III (skin 3, liver 0, gut 3)
 
Limited
 
185+
 

Cases 2, 6, and 9 relapsed on day 249, day 406, and day 175. GVHD indicates graft-versus-host disease; and NE, not evaluable.

*

Fourteen patients are alive in complete remission at the time of writing.

Several studies have suggested the promising results of unrelated CBT for adult patients.1-6  In the report of Laughlin et al,1  68 adult patients received CBT. Among the 68 patients, 19 had AML. In the report of the Eurocord group,2  108 adult patients received CBT. Among the 108 patients, 23 had AML. However, these 2 reports did not detail the preparative regimens and prophylaxis against GVHD and the results of transplantation for AML patients. Sanz et al3  reported the results of 22 adult patients who received CBT following a standardized preparative and GVHD regimen. Among the 22 patients, however, only 3 had AML. Recently, Barker et al5  reported the results of 43 adult patients who received CBT after reduced-intensity preparative regimens. Although among the 43 patients 18 had AML, all patients were not eligible for conventional conditioning regimens and some patients received 2 units of cord blood and the follow-up duration after CBT was short. Although 3 recent reports showed comparative data of unrelated CBT and unrelated bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in children12,13  and adults,4  there have been no larger comparative studies of unrelated CBT and unrelated BMT in adult AML patients. At present, therefore, the role of unrelated cord blood as an alternative stem cell source is not well defined in adult AML patients eligible for conventional conditioning regimens.

As well as our previous report,6  which included 11 patients with MDS-related secondary AML (sAML), the DFS rate of our 18 patients in this study was high (76.6% at 2 years). In addition, 29 total adult patients with AML (11 with sAML,6  18 with de novo AML in this study) received unrelated CBT in our hospital. Among the 29 patients, 22 are alive and free of disease at the time of writing. As previously described,6  relatively higher incidence of chronic GVHD and the use of G-CSF–combined preparative regimen, which was capable of reducing the posttransplantation relapse rate in refractory myeloid malignancies,14  may be associated with a high DFS rate in this study. Also, all patients who are alive and free of disease in our study received more than 2 × 107 nucleated cells per weight, perhaps due to the smaller size of our patients. This may be one of the possible reasons for our favorable result.

These results suggest that adult AML patients without suitable related or unrelated bone marrow donors should be considered as candidates for CBT and provide the rationale for a larger clinical study of CBT.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.

Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, August 21, 2003; DOI 10.1182/blood-2003-07-2420.

The authors would like to thank the physicians and nurses who cared for patients in this study.

1
Laughlin MJ, Barker J, Bambach B, et al. Hematopoietic engraftment and survival in adult recipients of umbilical-cord blood from unrelated donors.
N Engl J Med
.
2001
;
344
:
1815
-1822.
2
Gluckman E. Current status of umbilical cord blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Exp Hematol
.
2000
;
28
:
1197
-1205.
3
Sanz GF, Saavedra S, Planelles D, et al. Standardized, unrelated donor cord blood transplantation in adults with hematologic malignancies.
Blood
.
2001
;
98
:
2332
-2338.
4
Ooi J, Iseki T, Takahashi S, et al. A clinical comparison of unrelated cord blood transplantation and unrelated bone marrow transplantation for adult patients with acute leukaemia in complete remission.
Br J Haematol
.
2002
;
118
:
140
-143.
5
Barker JN, Weisdorf DJ, DeFor TE, et al. Rapid and complete donor chimerism in adult recipients of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning.
Blood
.
2003
;
102
:
1915
-1919.
6
Ooi J, Iseki T, Takahashi S, et al. Unrelated cord blood transplantation for adult patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome.
Blood
.
2003
;
101
:
4711
-4713.
7
Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia: a report of the French-American-British Cooperative Group.
Ann Intern Med
.
1985
;
103
:
620
-625.
8
Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. Proposal for the recognition of minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML-MO).
Br J Haematol
.
1991
;
78
:
325
-329.
9
Glucksberg H, Storb R, Fefer A, et al. Clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of marrow from HL-A-matched sibling donors.
Transplantation
.
1974
;
18
:
295
-304.
10
Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, et al. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading.
Bone Marrow Transplant
.
1995
;
15
:
825
-828.
11
Shulman HM, Sullivan KM, Weiden PL, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host syndrome in man: a long-term clinicopathologic study of 20 Seattle patients.
Am J Med
.
1980
;
69
:
204
-217.
12
Barker JN, Davies SM, DeFor T, Ramsay NK, Weisdorf DJ, Wagner JE. Survival after transplantation of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood is comparable to that of human leukocyte antigen-matched unrelated donor bone marrow: results of a matched-pair analysis.
Blood
.
2001
;
97
:
2957
-2961.
13
Rocha V, Cornish J, Sievers EL, et al. Comparison of outcomes of unrelated bone marrow and umbilical cord blood transplants in children with acute leukemia.
Blood
.
2001
;
97
:
2962
-2971.
14
Takahashi S, Okamoto SI, Shirafuji N, et al. Recombinant human glycosylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF)-combined regimen for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in refractory acute myeloid leukemia.
Bone Marrow Transplant
.
1994
;
13
:
239
-245.
Sign in via your Institution