KSHV- and EBV-associated germinotropic lymphoproliferative disorder

Kaposi sarcoma–associated herpesvirus (KSHV) was initially identified from Kaposi sarcoma and plays a causative role in the genesis of this disease.1 KSHV is distantly related to another human γ herpesvirus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and is also known as human herpesvirus 8 (HHV8).1 Like EBV, KSHV is lymphotropic and has been shown to be associated with 3 distinct lymphoproliferative disorders: primary effusion lymphoma (PEL), multicentric Castleman disease (MCD), and MCD-associated plasmablastic lymphoma.2 

PEL occurs in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and involves primarily body cavities and occasionally extranodal sites.3 The lymphoma is composed of KSHV-positive immunoblasts with plasmacytoid cytoplasm, which are also commonly coinfected by EBV. The tumor cells usually do not express immunoglobulin (Ig) and B-cell markers but express syndecan-1 (CD138) and harbor hypermutated rearranged immunoglobulin genes, suggesting that they originate from germinal center or postgerminal center B cells.3-5 In contrast, KSHV-associated MCD occurs in patients with and without HIV infection and mainly involves lymph nodes and spleen.6,7 In patients with MCD, KSHV induces a range of lymphoproliferative lesions—from polyclonal isolated plasmablasts in the mantle zone of B-cell follicles and microlymphoma to monoclonal microlymphoma and frank plasmablastic lymphoma.7Irrespective of these different lesions, KSHV-positive plasmablasts are monotypic, expressing exclusively IgMλ.6,7 They express high levels of cytoplasmic Ig and surface CD27, therefore resembling mature B cells. However, they originate from naive B cells: Their rearranged Ig genes lack somatic mutation.7 Both KSHV-associated PEL and MCD usually pursue an aggressive clinical course.3 8 

This report describes 3 cases of a previously undescribed KSHV-associated lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by plasmablasts that are coinfected by KSHV and EBV and preferentially involving the germinal centers of B-cell follicles.

The clinical features are summarized in Table1. The patients presented with localized lymphadenopathy and were otherwise healthy. Two patients tested negative for HIV, and they showed a favorable response to chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

Histologic sections of the lymph node biopsies were reviewed. Immunostaining for KSHV LNA-1 (LANA) encoded by viral open reading frame (ORF) 73 and viral interleukin-6 (vIL-6) was carried out with rat monoclonal antibody LN53 and a rabbit polyclonal antibody, respectively (Advanced Biotechnologies, Columbia, MD) as described previously.6 7 Consecutive sections were stained with antibodies to Ig heavy chains α, δ, γ, and μ; light chains κ and λ; and CD10, CD20, CD21, CD27, CD30, CD38, CD79a, CD138 (Dako, High Wycombe, United Kingdom), BCL2, BCL6 (PharMingen, San Diego, CA), and Ki67 (Dako, Cambridge, United Kingdom).

DNA samples were prepared from whole sections of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues. To study KSHV-positive cells, sections of lymph nodes were first stained for LNA-1. Confluent KSHV-positive cells (1000-4000) from the same focus of consecutive sections were microdissected and pooled together. DNA was extracted as described previously.7 9 

To assess clonality, the rearranged Ig heavy chain and light chain (both κ and λ) genes were amplified from the framework 3 (FR3) to the joining (J) regions by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as described previously.7,10 For analysis of somatic hypermutation in the rearranged Ig genes, the region from FR2 to the J segment was amplified.10 FR2-J_H PCR products were analyzed on 6% polyacrylamide gels, while FR3-J_Hproducts were examined on 10% polyacrylamide gels.

To study somatic mutation of the rearranged Ig genes, FR2-J_H PCR products were cloned and sequenced.7 The variable (V), diversity (D), and joining (J) segments were identified by sequence comparison to the V BASE using online DNAPLOT (MRC Center for Protein Engineering).

In situ hybridization was carried out with a PCR-generated DNA probe labeled with digoxigenin, followed by incubation with antidigoxingenin conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (Roche Diagnostics, East Sussex, United Kingdom) and visualization with BCIP (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoyl phosphate p-toluidine salt) and nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT).11 

All 3 cases presented as localized lymphadenopathy, and none had a history of Kaposi sarcoma, immunodeficiency, or immunosuppression. Two cases were treated by chemotherapy or radiotherapy and responded favorably, one in complete remission for 7 years and the other for 15 years.

Lymph node biopsies from all 3 cases showed similar histologic features. Overall architecture of the lymph node was preserved. In some of the follicles, the germinal centers were replaced partially or completely by large cells with a moderate amount of amphophilic cytoplasm and large eccentric vesicular nuclei containing 1 or 2 prominent nucleoli. Most of them were similar to the plasmablasts described in KSHV-associated MCD; others showed more bizarre anaplastic features (Figure 1A). These plasmablasts occurred as clusters and often coalesced to form confluent aggregates, comparable to the KSHV-positive microlymphomas in MCD. Clusters of CD10⁺CD20⁺ residual follicle center cells were identified in some of the involved follicles. Plasmablasts were found neither in the mantle zones, which appeared to be normal, nor in the interfollicular zone. However, mantle zone B cells were seen encroaching into the follicle centers in the involved follicles, reminiscent of progressive transformation of the germinal center. Uninvolved lymphoid follicles had reactive follicle centers and did not exhibit features of Castleman disease. The interfollicular zone showed prominent plasmacytosis.

All plasmablasts showed stippled nuclear staining for KSHV LNA-1 and were coinfected by EBV as revealed by EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) in situ hybridization (Figure 1A). Most KSHV-positive plasmablasts expressed vIL-6. They were CD20⁻, CD27⁻, CD30^+/−, CD38^+/−, CD79a⁻, CD138⁻, BCL6⁻, CD10⁻, BCL2⁻ and expressed monotypic Ig light chain, λ in 2 cases and κ in 1 (Figure 1A). Plasmablasts in cases 1 and 2 expressed IgM/D and IgA, respectively (Figure 1A), while case 3 failed to show immunostaining for heavy chains. Most KSHV-positive plasmablasts were Ki67⁺, indicating that they were in cell cycle. CD21 staining showed that KSHV-positive cells occurred within meshworks of follicular dendritic cells (Figure 1A).

Despite the expression of monotypic Ig light chain by KSHV-positive plasmablasts, FR3-J_H, FR3-J_κ, and FR3-J_λ PCR of DNA samples from whole tissue sections showed a weak dominant band in a polyclonal background in case 1 but a polyclonal pattern in case 3 (Figure 1B). On both Ig heavy and light chain gene PCR analysis of microdissected KSHV-positive cell aggregates, an oligoclonal pattern was observed in case 1 and a polyclonal pattern was observed in case 3 (Figure 1A). Thus, despite being monotypic in terms of Ig light chain expression, these KSHV-positive plasmablasts are genotypically polyclonal. PCR analysis of case 2 failed because of poor DNA quality.

To understand the cell of origin of KSHV-positive plasmablasts, the microdissected KSHV-positive cells were subjected to FR2-J_H PCR to analyze somatic mutation of the rearranged V_H gene. Successful PCR was achieved only in case 1 and showed 2 to 3 dominant bands. Cloning and sequencing of the PCR products confirmed the presence of oligoclonal B cells in each of the 2 foci examined and showed that different foci contained distinct clones despite being from the same tissue section and showing identical light chain restriction (Table 2). Furthermore, the rearranged V_H region in all clones harbored somatic hypermutation, and clone DP88 from focus 1 showed intraclonal variation. Thus, although the KSHV-positive plasmablasts in this case express both IgM and IgD, they most likely originated from germinal center B cells. This may represent a general feature of this lymphoma entity because case 2 expressed IgA, indicating the plasmablasts had undergone switch recombination, which occurs after somatic mutation during the germinal center reaction.

Based on the above findings, we propose calling this lymphoproliferative disorder “KSHV-associated germinotropic lymphoproliferative disorder” (GLD). We selected this term because the lymphoproliferation is polyclonal and individual KSHV-positive foci have potential to develop into monoclonal microlymphoma or even frank lymphoma, reminiscent of EBV-associated posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder12 and KSHV-related MCD.6,7 Lymphoma with marked tropism for germinal centers has been previously described in 3 cases of large B-cell lymphoma of the mediastinum.13 These lymphomas show similar clinical presentation and histologic features to those of KSHV-associated GLD but express CD20 and are therefore unlikely to be KSHV-associated GLD, although KSHV and EBV infection were not investigated.13 

There are similarities as well as important differences between KSHV-associated GLD, PEL, and MCD-associated plasmablastic lymphoma (Table 3). KSHV-associated GLD occurs in immunocompetent individuals, presents as localized lymphadenopathy, and responds favorably to therapy. In contrast, PEL and MCD predominantly occur in immunodeficient patients, commonly pursue an aggressive clinical course, and respond poorly to current treatments. KSHV-associated GLD differs from MCD in that the plasmablasts are coinfected by EBV, may express any heavy or light chain, preferentially invade germinal centers, and harbor mutated Ig gene.

Although the exact role of viral infection in the pathogenesis of KSHV-associated GLD is unclear, it is noteworthy that vIL-6 is expressed by most of the KSHV-positive cells, which is much higher than that in PEL and KSHV-associated MCD (10%-20%).7,14Activation of IL-6 receptor signaling through vIL-6 and human IL-6 may play an important role in this disease as in PEL and KSHV-associated MCD.7,15 16 Nonetheless, the pathogenic potential seems to be constrained by a competent immune system. Despite the coinfection by EBV and KSHV, the GLD presents as a localized disease and responds favorably to conventional therapy.