There are errors in the cytokine release syndrome (“CRS”) section of Table 2 on page 5417. In the “ELIANA” column, the median number of days to onset should read “3,” the range of days to onset should read “1-22,” the median number of days of duration should read “8,” and the range of days of duration should read “1-36.” In the “JULIET” column, the range of days to onset should read “1-51,” the median number of days of duration should read “7,” and the range of days of duration should read “2-30.”

In the “MRD” row of the “Pivotal trial, % (95% CI)” column of Table 3 on page 5419, “100.0 (n = 64/64)” should read “98.5 (n = 64/65).”

The corrected Tables 2 and 3 are shown below. The errors have been corrected in the published article.

Table 2.

Comparison of safety outcomes of CIBMTR with those of ELIANA and JULIET trials

ALLNHL
End pointCIBMTR (n = 255)ELIANA (n = 79)CIBMTR (n = 155)JULIET (n = 115)
CRS     
 Any, n (%) 140 (54.9) 61 (77.2) 70 (45.2) 66 (57.4) 
 Grade ≥3, n (%) 41 (16.1) 38 (48.1) 7 (4.5) 26 (22.6) 
 Time to onset, d     
  Median 
  Range 1-27 1-22 1-14 1-51 
 Duration, d     
  Median 
  Range 1-76 1-36 1-33 2-30 
Neurotoxicity     
 Any, n (%) 69 (27.1) 31 (39.2) 28 (18.1) 23 (20.0) 
 Grade ≥3, n (%) 23 (9.0) 10 (12.7) 8 (5.1) 13 (11.3) 
 Time to onset, d     
  Median 
  Range 1-80 2-489 2-33 1-323 
 Duration, d     
  Median 6.5 13 
  Range 1-94  1-50  
ALLNHL
End pointCIBMTR (n = 255)ELIANA (n = 79)CIBMTR (n = 155)JULIET (n = 115)
CRS     
 Any, n (%) 140 (54.9) 61 (77.2) 70 (45.2) 66 (57.4) 
 Grade ≥3, n (%) 41 (16.1) 38 (48.1) 7 (4.5) 26 (22.6) 
 Time to onset, d     
  Median 
  Range 1-27 1-22 1-14 1-51 
 Duration, d     
  Median 
  Range 1-76 1-36 1-33 2-30 
Neurotoxicity     
 Any, n (%) 69 (27.1) 31 (39.2) 28 (18.1) 23 (20.0) 
 Grade ≥3, n (%) 23 (9.0) 10 (12.7) 8 (5.1) 13 (11.3) 
 Time to onset, d     
  Median 
  Range 1-80 2-489 2-33 1-323 
 Duration, d     
  Median 6.5 13 
  Range 1-94  1-50  
Table 3.

Comparison of efficacy outcomes of CIBMTR with those of ELIANA and JULIET trials

End pointCIBMTR, % (95% CI)Pivotal trial, % (95% CI)
CIBMTR vs ELIANA (n = 249) (n = 79) 
 BOR of CR 85.5 (80.6-89.7) 82.3 (72.1-90.0) 
 MRD 99.1 (n = 115/116)
(95.3-100) 
98.5 (n = 64/65)
(94.4-100) 
 DOR   
  At 6 mo 78.1 (70.5-84.0) 80.8 (68.0-88.9) 
  At 12 mo 60.9 (49.4-70.5) 67.4 (53.2-78.1) 
 EFS   
  At 6 mo 68.6 (62.0-74.4) 71.7 (59.8-80.6) 
  At 12 mo 52.4 (43.4-60.7) 57.2 (44.5-68.0) 
 OS   
  At 6 mo 88.5 (83.6-92.0) 88.6 (79.3-93.9) 
  At 12 mo 77.2 (69.8-83.1) 77.1 (66.1-84.9) 
CIBMTR vs JULIET (n = 152) (n = 115) 
 ORR (CR + PR) 61.8 (53.6-69.6) 52.2 (42.7-61.6) 
 BOR of CR 39.5 (31.6-47.7) 38.3 (29.4-47.8) 
 DOR   
  At 6 mo 55.3 (42.2-66.6) 66.6 (52.8-77.3) 
  At 12 mo 48.4* (33.9-61.5) 62.7 (48.7-73.9) 
 PFS   
  At 6 mo 38.7 (30.5-46.9) 39.0 (29.7-48.2) 
  At 12 mo 26.4* (17.2-36.6) 34.7 (25.7-43.9) 
 OS   
  At 6 mo 70.7 (62.2-77.6) 61.2 (51.6-69.5) 
  At 12 mo 56.3 (44.2-66.8) 48.2 (38.6-57.1) 
End pointCIBMTR, % (95% CI)Pivotal trial, % (95% CI)
CIBMTR vs ELIANA (n = 249) (n = 79) 
 BOR of CR 85.5 (80.6-89.7) 82.3 (72.1-90.0) 
 MRD 99.1 (n = 115/116)
(95.3-100) 
98.5 (n = 64/65)
(94.4-100) 
 DOR   
  At 6 mo 78.1 (70.5-84.0) 80.8 (68.0-88.9) 
  At 12 mo 60.9 (49.4-70.5) 67.4 (53.2-78.1) 
 EFS   
  At 6 mo 68.6 (62.0-74.4) 71.7 (59.8-80.6) 
  At 12 mo 52.4 (43.4-60.7) 57.2 (44.5-68.0) 
 OS   
  At 6 mo 88.5 (83.6-92.0) 88.6 (79.3-93.9) 
  At 12 mo 77.2 (69.8-83.1) 77.1 (66.1-84.9) 
CIBMTR vs JULIET (n = 152) (n = 115) 
 ORR (CR + PR) 61.8 (53.6-69.6) 52.2 (42.7-61.6) 
 BOR of CR 39.5 (31.6-47.7) 38.3 (29.4-47.8) 
 DOR   
  At 6 mo 55.3 (42.2-66.6) 66.6 (52.8-77.3) 
  At 12 mo 48.4* (33.9-61.5) 62.7 (48.7-73.9) 
 PFS   
  At 6 mo 38.7 (30.5-46.9) 39.0 (29.7-48.2) 
  At 12 mo 26.4* (17.2-36.6) 34.7 (25.7-43.9) 
 OS   
  At 6 mo 70.7 (62.2-77.6) 61.2 (51.6-69.5) 
  At 12 mo 56.3 (44.2-66.8) 48.2 (38.6-57.1) 
*

Less than 10 patients at risk at this time point.