TO THE EDITOR:

The term “clonal B cell lymphocytosis of marginal zone origin” (CBL-MZ)1,2  has recently been suggested for asymptomatic individuals whose routine blood count shows a persistent modest lymphocytosis that is usually accompanied by bone marrow involvement. This immunophenotype is suggestive of marginal zone/postgerminal center derivation, but no other features of a chronic B cell lymphoproliferative disorder are found, other than a low-level paraprotein in some cases. Cases with a clonal lymphocyte count <5 × 109/L would fall within the revised World Health Organization (WHO) category of non–chronic lymphocytic leukemia-type monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis. In 3 previous series of CBL-MZ consisting of 102, 53, and 16 cases with median follow-ups (FUs) of 60, 34, and 44 months, respectively,1,3,4  the overall incidence of progression was 15.7%, with the majority (11.1%) developing splenomegaly that frequently did not require treatment. However, it remains unclear whether CBL-MZ is the precursor to 1 or several well-defined WHO entities and what factors predict disease progression. To address this, we performed a genomic analysis of a well-characterized cohort of CBL-MZ cases with long FU and provide evidence to show that CBL-MZ is not a single biological entity.

This study includes data from 37 patients with CBL-MZ diagnosed and managed at the Royal Bournemouth Hospital. Clinical, routine laboratory, morphological, immunophenotypic, immunogenetic, and cytogenetic data have been reported on 36 cases using previously described methods.1  Informed patient consent was obtained according to the Declaration of Helsinki, and the ethical aspect of the study was approved by the Somerset Research and Ethics Committee.

DNA from blood-derived tumor cells (n = 37) at diagnosis was analyzed with a bespoke HaloPlex Target Enrichment System (Agilent Technologies) that enriched 2.39 Mb of genomic DNA for the coding regions of 768 genes, as previously described.5  From this panel, the following candidate genes were selected for Sanger validation (primers and conditions are listed in supplemental Table 1) based on the high prevalence of somatic mutations in similar mature B-cell malignancies: KLF2 and NOTCH2 (splenic marginal zone lymphoma [SMZL]),5-9 CCND3 and BCOR (splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma [SDRPL]),10,11 MAP2K1 (hairy cell variant [HCL-v]),12 MYD88 (lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma [LPL]),13 BRAF V600E (hairy cell leukemia and nodal marginal zone lymphoma [MZL]),14,15  and TNFAIP3 and TP53 (not disease specific). DNA from buccal cells (n = 22) was used to confirm the somatic origin of 14 of 15 variants identified in 7 of these genes.

The study included 20 men and 17 women (1.2:1 ratio). The median age at presentation was 73.2 years (range 47.8-95.5 years). Key clinical and laboratory data and additional demographic and cytogenetic data are provided in Table 1 and supplemental Table 2, respectively. Lymphocyte morphology was heterogeneous in all cases, with a variable percentage of villous and lymphoplasmacytoid cells. No case had the typical morphological features of HCL-v or SDRPL. The immunophenotype was uniform, with expression of moderate SmIg, CD19, and CD49d and lack of CD10, CD38, and CD5, with the exception of 5 cases with weak CD5 positivity.

Table 1.

Patient immunogenetics, cytogenetics, and mutational data

CaseProgressive diseaseDiagnosis at progressionTime to progression, moOverall survival, moPresentation paraprotein, g/LIGHV gene usage% IGVH identityKey cytogenetics abnormalitiesCandidate gene mutations
Yes SLLU 147 177.48 No V5-51 89.7 del(3q) None 
Yes SMZL 65 89.49 No V3-64*01/*02 92.36 *CK inc i(17)(q10) TP53 
Yes SMZL H 66 134 Mk V3-30*03/*18/V3-30-5*01 95.49 None MYD88 
Yes SMZL 119 164.44 No V4-34*01/*02/*07 96.41 del(14q) None 
Yes SMZL 47 51.09 No V1-2*04 98.13 del(14q) KLF2, N0TCH2 
Yes MZL H 69 118.51 No V4-34*01/*02 94.14 CK TNFAIP3 
Yes SMZL H 57 45.9 No V5-51*01 96.63 dup(3q) None 
Yes LPL H 150 35.94 GK 1.0 V4-34*01/*02 93.47 CK MYD88 
Yes SLLU 175 269 ML 1.7 V3-73*02 96.6 t(2;7) MYD88 
10 No na na 171.86 No V3-66*01/*04 87.37 None None 
11 No na na 95.57 No V6-1*01 96.63 +12 None 
12 No na na 115.68 No V4-34*01/*02/*12 89.8 +12 None 
13 No na na 136.51 No V4-4*02 96.37 None CCND3 
14 No na na 29.73 GK 9.8 V3-23*01/V3-23D*01 93.4 +12 MYD88 
15 No na na 39.39 No V4-59*01 95.51 i(17)(q10) TP53, CCND3 
16 No na na 53.85 No V3-66*02 100 None None 
17 No na na 126.78 No V4-59*01 97.54 None None 
18 No na na 39.66 No V3-7*02 96.88 del(7q), +12 TP53, CCND3 
19 No na na 107.89 GK 5.2 V3-7*01 95.49 None MYD88 
20 No na na 19.88 MK 0.5 V1-2*04 100 None None 
21 No na na 105 No V4-38-2*01 92.74 None None 
22 No na na 96.16 No V6-1*01(9 bp ins), V4-59*01 98.32, 91.93 +3,+12, i(17)(q10) None 
23 No na na 90.94 No V4-34*01/*02 95.92 None None 
24 No na na 88.41 No V4-34*01/*02 92.65 None None 
25 No na na 40.77 No V1-69*01/*11/*12/V1-69D*01 89.51 None None 
26 No na na 82 ML trace V4-34*01 100 del(7q) None 
27 No na na 149.13 No V4-30-2*01 91.7 del(14q) None 
28 No na na 75.43 No V3-9*01 93.06 None MAP2K1 
29 No na na 160.72 GK trace V3-21*01/*02 94.76 del(7q) None 
30 No na na 68.34 No V1-3*01 93.85 i(17)(q10) None 
31 No na na 105.13 No V4-39*01 96.41 None None 
32 No na na 133.55 No V4-34*01 100 del(7q) None 
33 No na na 126.32 MK trace i(17)(q10) None 
34 No na na 146.92 No V4-39*01 94.07 +12 None 
35 No na na 130.83 No V5-51*01 97.98 None None 
36 No na na 5192 No V3-23*01/V3-23D*01 96.18 i(17)(q10) None 
37 No na na 153.53 GL trace V1-69-2*01 96.63 None None 
CaseProgressive diseaseDiagnosis at progressionTime to progression, moOverall survival, moPresentation paraprotein, g/LIGHV gene usage% IGVH identityKey cytogenetics abnormalitiesCandidate gene mutations
Yes SLLU 147 177.48 No V5-51 89.7 del(3q) None 
Yes SMZL 65 89.49 No V3-64*01/*02 92.36 *CK inc i(17)(q10) TP53 
Yes SMZL H 66 134 Mk V3-30*03/*18/V3-30-5*01 95.49 None MYD88 
Yes SMZL 119 164.44 No V4-34*01/*02/*07 96.41 del(14q) None 
Yes SMZL 47 51.09 No V1-2*04 98.13 del(14q) KLF2, N0TCH2 
Yes MZL H 69 118.51 No V4-34*01/*02 94.14 CK TNFAIP3 
Yes SMZL H 57 45.9 No V5-51*01 96.63 dup(3q) None 
Yes LPL H 150 35.94 GK 1.0 V4-34*01/*02 93.47 CK MYD88 
Yes SLLU 175 269 ML 1.7 V3-73*02 96.6 t(2;7) MYD88 
10 No na na 171.86 No V3-66*01/*04 87.37 None None 
11 No na na 95.57 No V6-1*01 96.63 +12 None 
12 No na na 115.68 No V4-34*01/*02/*12 89.8 +12 None 
13 No na na 136.51 No V4-4*02 96.37 None CCND3 
14 No na na 29.73 GK 9.8 V3-23*01/V3-23D*01 93.4 +12 MYD88 
15 No na na 39.39 No V4-59*01 95.51 i(17)(q10) TP53, CCND3 
16 No na na 53.85 No V3-66*02 100 None None 
17 No na na 126.78 No V4-59*01 97.54 None None 
18 No na na 39.66 No V3-7*02 96.88 del(7q), +12 TP53, CCND3 
19 No na na 107.89 GK 5.2 V3-7*01 95.49 None MYD88 
20 No na na 19.88 MK 0.5 V1-2*04 100 None None 
21 No na na 105 No V4-38-2*01 92.74 None None 
22 No na na 96.16 No V6-1*01(9 bp ins), V4-59*01 98.32, 91.93 +3,+12, i(17)(q10) None 
23 No na na 90.94 No V4-34*01/*02 95.92 None None 
24 No na na 88.41 No V4-34*01/*02 92.65 None None 
25 No na na 40.77 No V1-69*01/*11/*12/V1-69D*01 89.51 None None 
26 No na na 82 ML trace V4-34*01 100 del(7q) None 
27 No na na 149.13 No V4-30-2*01 91.7 del(14q) None 
28 No na na 75.43 No V3-9*01 93.06 None MAP2K1 
29 No na na 160.72 GK trace V3-21*01/*02 94.76 del(7q) None 
30 No na na 68.34 No V1-3*01 93.85 i(17)(q10) None 
31 No na na 105.13 No V4-39*01 96.41 None None 
32 No na na 133.55 No V4-34*01 100 del(7q) None 
33 No na na 126.32 MK trace i(17)(q10) None 
34 No na na 146.92 No V4-39*01 94.07 +12 None 
35 No na na 130.83 No V5-51*01 97.98 None None 
36 No na na 5192 No V3-23*01/V3-23D*01 96.18 i(17)(q10) None 
37 No na na 153.53 GL trace V1-69-2*01 96.63 None None 

CK, complex karyotype based on >3 G-banding aberrations; GL, G-lambda; H, histological diagnosis; MK, M-kappa; na, not applicable; SLLU, splenic B-cell lymphoma/leukemia unclassifiable.

With a median FU of 9.6 years (range 2.5-22.4), 28 of 37 cases (75.7%) remained stable of whom 11 have died after a median FU of 8.8 years (range 2.5-14.3), and 17 remained stable after a median FU of 9.7 years (range 2.9-14.6 years). Nine of 37 (24.3%) cases showed evidence of progressive disease, and 3 died. The median time to progression was 69 months (range 47-175). Seven patients (cases 1-5, 7, and 9) developed splenomegaly that was accompanied by progressive lymphocytosis in 4 cases. In 2 patients, splenic histopathology confirmed a diagnosis of SMZL. In 3 patients, lymphocyte morphology and marrow histology at progression, combined with immunogenetic and karyotypic features, were also consistent with SMZL. Two cases, classified as splenic B cell lymphoma/leukemia unclassifiable, were too frail for further investigation; 1 (case 9) had a t(2;7)(p11;q21.2) translocation at diagnosis, which has been associated with MZLs,16,17  and 1 (case 1) exhibited progressive lymphocytosis with large circulating lymphoid cells. Case 8 developed heavy marrow infiltration with small nonvillous lymphocytes in conjunction with a low-level IgGK paraprotein and cytogenetic analysis showing del(6q) and iso(18q); LPL was considered a likely diagnosis. Case 6 underwent biopsy of orbital and abdominal wall masses, both of which showed histological and immunophenotypic features of MZL.

Fifteen genomic mutations, involving all candidate genes screened, with the exception of BCOR and BRAF V600E, were identified in 12 cases (Table 1). The most frequent was MYD88 in 5 (13.5%) cases, involving L265P (n = 3) or S219C (n = 2) and indicating that screening CBL-MZ cases only for the L265P mutation is likely to miss cases with alternate MYD88 mutations. Three patients had histologically proven SMZL, 1 had a t(2;7)(p11;q21.2) translocation, and 1 had LPL. None of these cases had a mutation of CXCR4 (data not shown). Three cases (8.1%) had mutations of TP53, all accompanied by TP53 loss, and 3 had PEST domain CCND3 mutations, although none had the typical features of SDRPL, and all had stable disease. The sole case with a MAP2K1 mutation (E203K; deleterious and damaging by Mutationtaster and Polyphen2, respectively) was stable with a FU of 66 months. Extended immunophenotypic analysis showed expression of SmIgG, FMC7, CD22, and CD11c (weak) and lack of CD103 and CD25, consistent with HCL-v, splenic B cell lymphoma/leukemia unclassifiable, or SMZL. NOTCH2 and KLF2 mutations were present in a single case that used IGHV1-2*04 and progressed to SMZL. The patient with orbital lymphoma had the recently noted association of a TNFAIP3 mutation and IGHV4-34 usage in this subset of MZL.18  Three patients had repeat genomic analysis at evolution, and no new mutations were found.

Neither cytogenetic nor immunogenetic data measured at presentation correlated with the natural history of CBL-MZ. In contrast, 5 of 9 patients with progressive disease had ≥1 mutation (3 MYD88 mutations; single cases with TP53, NOTCH2, KLF2, TNFAIP3 mutations), of which TP53 and NOTCH2 mutations have been associated with disease progression in MZLs, compared with 6 of 28 patients with stable disease (P = .034). Five of 6 patients with stable disease who had mutations (3 CCND3 mutations, 2 mutations in both MYD88 and TP53) died of unrelated causes. Their median FU was considerably shorter (39 months) than that of the other stable cases, raising the question of whether their CBL-MZ would have progressed with extended FU.

In summary, our clinical outcome data indicate that CBL-MZ usually pursues a stable course, but the higher rate of progression in this study compared with previous studies probably reflects the longer FU and reinforces the need for long-term clinical management and patient education on when to seek medical advice. CBL-MZ can evolve into several well-defined WHO disorders, especially those of marginal zone origin. The genomic data are consistent with this observation because, although the genomic abnormalities in CBL-MZ overlap with those found in any of the well-defined entities into which it could evolve, the incidence of mutations is lower and does not mirror any specific disease. However, important caveats are the relatively small number of cases in the current study and the lack of concordance among genomic studies in other rare disorders, such as HCL-v19 and SDRPL.11,20,21  Further larger studies, ideally including immunogenetic, whole genomic sequencing, and epigenetic data, will be required to confirm the relationship between CBL-MZ and established WHO disorders and to identify additional drivers of progressive disease. In the interim, CBL-MZ remains a useful term to define a group of asymptomatic patients with well-defined clinical, morphological, and immunophenotypic features requiring long-term FU.

The authors gratefully acknowledge all of the patients who contributed material and clinical information to this study.

This work was funded by Bloodwise (11052, 12036), the Kay Kendall Leukaemia Fund (873, 1104), Cancer Research UK (C34999/A18087, ECMC C24563/A15581), Wessex Medical Research, and the Bournemouth Leukaemia Fund.

Contribution: H.P., N.R.M.-B., M.J.J.R.-Z., M.P., and A.X. performed the experiments; Z.A.D. performed the molecular diagnostic assays; M.J.J.R.-Z. and J.G. conducted the statistical and bioinformatics analyses; R.W. and D.G.O. contributed patient samples and data; J.C.S. and D.G.O. initiated and designed the study; D.G.O., H.P., and J.C.S. wrote the manuscript; and all authors critically reviewed the final manuscript.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: David G. Oscier, Department of Molecular Pathology, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Castle Lane East, Bournemouth BH7 7DW, United Kingdom; e-mail: david.oscier@rbch.nhs.uk; and Jonathan C. Strefford, Cancer Genomics, MP824, Somers Building, Faculty of Medicine, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Rd, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom; e-mail: jcs@soton.ac.uk.

1.
Xochelli
A
,
Kalpadakis
C
,
Gardiner
A
, et al
.
Clonal B-cell lymphocytosis exhibiting immunophenotypic features consistent with a marginal-zone origin: is this a distinct entity?
Blood
.
2014
;
123
(
8
):
1199
-
1206
.
2.
Xochelli
A
,
Oscier
D
,
Stamatopoulos
K
.
Clonal B-cell lymphocytosis of marginal zone origin
.
Best Pract Res Clin Haematol
.
2017
;
30
(
1-2
):
77
-
83
.
3.
Kalpadakis
C
,
Pangalis
GA
,
Vassilakopoulos
TP
, et al
.
Detection of L265P MYD-88 mutation in a series of clonal B-cell lymphocytosis of marginal zone origin (CBL-MZ)
.
Hematol Oncol
.
2017
;35(4):542-547.
4.
Bruscaggin
A
,
Monti
S
,
Arcaini
L
, et al
.
Molecular lesions of signalling pathway genes in clonal B-cell lymphocytosis with marginal zone features
.
Br J Haematol
.
2014
;
167
(
5
):
718
-
720
.
5.
Parry
M
,
Rose-Zerilli
MJ
,
Ljungström
V
, et al
.
Genetics and prognostication in splenic marginal zone lymphoma: revelations from deep sequencing
.
Clin Cancer Res
.
2015
;
21
(
18
):
4174
-
4183
.
6.
Piva
R
,
Deaglio
S
,
Famà
R
, et al
.
The krüppel-like factor 2 transcription factor gene is recurrently mutated in splenic marginal zone lymphoma
.
Leukemia
.
2015
;29(2):503-507.
7.
Rossi
D
,
Trifonov
V
,
Fangazio
M
, et al
.
The coding genome of splenic marginal zone lymphoma: activation of NOTCH2 and other pathways regulating marginal zone development
.
J Exp Med
.
2012
;
209
(
9
):
1537
-
1551
.
8.
Kiel
MJ
,
Velusamy
T
,
Betz
BL
, et al
.
Whole-genome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic NOTCH2 mutations in splenic marginal zone lymphoma
.
J Exp Med
.
2012
;
209
(
9
):
1553
-
1565
.
9.
Clipson
A
,
Wang
M
,
de Leval
L
, et al
.
KLF2 mutation is the most frequent somatic change in splenic marginal zone lymphoma and identifies a subset with distinct genotype
.
Leukemia
.
2015
;
29
(
5
):
1177
-
1185
.
10.
Curiel-Olmo
S
,
Mondéjar
R
,
Almaraz
C
, et al
.
Splenic diffuse red pulp small B-cell lymphoma displays increased expression of cyclin D3 and recurrent CCND3 mutations
.
Blood
.
2017
;
129
(
8
):
1042
-
1045
.
11.
Jallades
L
,
Baseggio
L
,
Sujobert
P
, et al
.
Exome sequencing identifies recurrent BCOR alterations and the absence of KLF2, TNFAIP3 and MYD88 mutations in splenic diffuse red pulp small B-cell lymphoma
.
Haematologica
.
2017
;
102
(
10
):
1758
-
1766
.
12.
Waterfall
JJ
,
Arons
E
,
Walker
RL
, et al
.
High prevalence of MAP2K1 mutations in variant and IGHV4-34-expressing hairy-cell leukemias
.
Nat Genet
.
2014
;
46
(
1
):
8
-
10
.
13.
Treon
SP
,
Xu
L
,
Yang
G
, et al
.
MYD88 L265P somatic mutation in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia
.
N Engl J Med
.
2012
;
367
(
9
):
826
-
833
.
14.
Tiacci
E
,
Trifonov
V
,
Schiavoni
G
, et al
.
BRAF mutations in hairy-cell leukemia
.
N Engl J Med
.
2011
;
364
(
24
):
2305
-
2315
.
15.
Pillonel
V
,
Juskevicius
D
,
Ng
CKY
, et al
.
High-throughput sequencing of nodal marginal zone lymphomas identifies recurrent BRAF mutations [published online ahead of 28 February 2018]
.
Leukemia
. doi:10.1038/s41375-018-0082-4.
16.
Corcoran
MM
,
Mould
SJ
,
Orchard
JA
, et al
.
Dysregulation of cyclin dependent kinase 6 expression in splenic marginal zone lymphoma through chromosome 7q translocations
.
Oncogene
.
1999
;
18
(
46
):
6271
-
6277
.
17.
Xochelli
A
,
Baliakas
P
,
Moore
S
, et al
.
Translocation t(2;7)(p11.2;q21.2): a rare genetic aberration associated with B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders of marginal-zone origin
.
Cancer Genet
.
2014
;
207
(
6
):
281
-
283
.
18.
Moody
S
,
Escudero-Ibarz
L
,
Wang
M
, et al
.
Significant association between TNFAIP3 inactivation and biased immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region 4-34 usage in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma
.
J Pathol
.
2017
;
243
(
1
):
3
-
8
.
19.
Mason
EF
,
Brown
RD
,
Szeto
DP
, et al
.
Detection of activating MAP2K1 mutations in atypical hairy cell leukemia and hairy cell leukemia variant
.
Leuk Lymphoma
.
2017
;
58
(
1
):
233
-
236
.
20.
Traverse-Glehen
A
,
Verney
A
,
Gazzo
S
, et al
.
Splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma has a distinct pattern of somatic mutations amongst B-cell malignancies
.
Leuk Lymphoma
.
2017
;
58
(
3
):
666
-
675
.
21.
Martinez
D
,
Navarro
A
,
Martinez-Trillos
A
, et al
.
NOTCH1, TP53, and MAP2K1 mutations in splenic diffuse red pulp small b-cell lymphoma are associated with progressive disease
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2016
;
40
(
2
):
192
-
201
.

Author notes

*

H.P. and N.R.M.-B. are joint first authors.

J.C.S. and D.G.O. are joint senior authors.

The full-text version of this article contains a data supplement.

Supplemental data