We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis with rVWF versus with pdVWF for patients with severe VWD. We found that rVWF is a cost-saving factor replacement compared to pdVWF across all willingness-to-pay thresholds in the United States.
Subjects:
Thrombosis and Hemostasis
This content is only available as a PDF.
Copyright © 2024 American Society of Hematology
2024
You do not currently have access to this content.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal