We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis with rVWF versus with pdVWF for patients with severe VWD. We found that rVWF is a cost-saving factor replacement compared to pdVWF across all willingness-to-pay thresholds in the United States.

This content is only available as a PDF.

Article PDF first page preview

Article PDF first page preview
You do not currently have access to this content.
Sign in via your Institution