Comparison of CAR T-cell vs. bispecific antibody as third- or later-line large B-cell lymphoma therapy: A Meta-analysis

• CAR-T cell therapy demonstrates superior efficacy to bispecific antibody in DLBCL treatment, with higher complete response rates.

• CAR-T cell therapy exhibits higher incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events compared to bispecific antibody.

This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases until July 2023 for trials assessing CAR T-cell therapies and CD20×CD3 bispecific antibodies as third- or subsequent-line in R/R DLBCL. Random effects models estimated the complete response (CR) rate and secondary outcomes, with meta-regressions adjusting for relevant covariates. Sixteen studies comprising 1,347 patients were included in the pooled analysis. The pooled CR rate for bispecific antibodies was 0.36 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.43), compared to 0.51 (0.46 to 0.56) for CAR T-cell therapy (p<0.01). This superiority persisted when comparing the CAR-T naïve patients within the bispecific antibody group, CR rate of 0.37 (0.32 to 0.43). Multivariable meta-regression also revealed better efficacy of CAR-T with adjustment for the proportion of double-hit lymphoma. The pooled one-year progression-free survival rate mirrored these findings (0.32 [0.26 to 0.38] vs 0.44 [0.41 to 0.48], p<0.01). For adverse events of ≥ grade 3, the bispecific antibody had incidences of 0.02 (0.01 to 0.04) for cytokine release syndrome, 0.01 (0.00 to 0.01) for neurotoxicity, and 0.10 (0.03 to 0.16) for infections. The CAR-T cell had rates of 0.08 (0.03 to 0.12), 0.11 (0.06 to 0.17), and 0.17 (0.11 to 0.22), respectively, with significant differences observed in the first two categories. In summary, CAR-T cell therapy outperformed bispecific antibody in achieving higher CR rates, though with an increase in severe adverse events.