Primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) is a plasma cell (PC) dyscrasia with clinical similarities to multiple myeloma (MM) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), but its molecular basis is poorly understood. Translocations at the immunoglobulin heavy-chain (IgH) locus, 14q32, are likely early genetic events in both MM and MGUS and involve several nonrandom, recurrent, partner chromosomes such as 11q13, 16q23, and 4p16.3. Given the similarities between MM, MGUS, and AL, bone marrow clonal PCs were evaluated in 29 patients with AL using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) combined with immunofluorescence detection of the cytoplasmic light-chain (cIg-FISH) for the presence of 14q32 translocations and the t(11;14)(q13;q32). Of 29 patients studied, 21 (72.4%) showed results compatible with the presence of a 14q32 translocation, and 16 (76.2%) of those had translocation (11;14)(q13;q32) for an overall prevalence of the abnormality of 55%. IgH translocations are common in AL, especially the t(11;14)(q13;q32).

Amyloidosis (AL) is a plasma cell (PC) dyscrasia, similar to multiple myeloma (MM) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS),1,2 characterized by the presence of clonal PCs in the bone marrow (BM) and extracellular deposition of amyloidogenic light chains with resultant organ dysfunction and an overall median survival of 1.5 years.1 2 The usually fatal outcome of the disease does not permit long-term observations of clonal growth.

Chromosomal translocations involving the immunoglobulin heavy-chain (IgH) locus may be initiating events in the development of several B-cell malignancies,3,4 including MGUS and MM.5 IgH translocations in MM involve a number of recurrent, nonrandom partner chromosomes including 11q13 and 4p16.3.14-16 Using the cytoplasmic light-chain (cIg)–fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique, we examined 29 patients with AL for the presence of IgH translocations, including t(11;14)(q13;q32).

Patient samples

Twenty-nine patients (10 women, 19 men; median age, 62 years) were studied. Institutional review board approval was obtained, and all patients gave written, informed consent for a research BM sample to be collected at the time of routine clinical procurement. Diagnostic criteria for AL included histologic proof of amyloid deposition in addition to the presence of a monoclonal protein or demonstration of monoclonal PCs. Five of the 29 patients had previously been treated with alkylating agents. None of the patients had clinical evidence of MM.

Cell enrichment and cIg-FISH

PCs were selected with CD 138 magnetic microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Sunnyvale, CA) after enrichment for mononuclear cells through centrifugation on a Ficoll-Hypaque gradient, density 1.076 (Pharmacia-Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). Cytospin preparations were prepared according to a slight modification of our previously published cIg-FISH technique.6 We scored 100 PCs in all but 2 cases. One repeatedly failed to hybridize; in the other, we could only score 50 cells for t(11;14)(q13;q32), respectively. Each sample was scored by 2 independent examiners who had a high degree of agreement (r2 = 0.795).

FISH probes

Break-apart strategy.

Probes that hybridize to the variable (VH; cosmid clone) and constant regions (CH; BAC clone) of the IgH locus7 were directly labeled with SpectrumRed and SpectrumGreen, respectively (Vysis, Downers Grove, IL). The presence of a 14q32 translocation was demonstrated by segregation of the signals (break-apart strategy; Figure 1). A normal pattern consisted of 2 pairs of closely associated red and green signals. An abnormal pattern was defined as a distance greater than 3 signal widths between probe pairs. An equivocal pattern was one in which there was loss of a probe signal (1 red-green pair/1 red or 1 red-green pair/1 green), representing deletion, an unbalanced translocation, or technical inability to discern the presence of a signal because of small size or background staining.

Fig. 1.

Normal and abnormal patterns of hybridization with both strategies.

(A) Hybridization of the VH and CH probes to the correct location at band 14q32 on normal human male metaphases. (B) Normal pattern for the VHCH probes with 2 pairs of closely associated signals. Note the intense blue fluorescence of the cytoplasmic light chain. (C) Cellular signal pattern indicative of a 14q32 translocation. The segregation of a pair of signals (break-apart) in a large percentage of cells allows for the identification of a patient with an IgH translocation. (D) Hybridization of the 14q32 and 11q13 probes to the correct locations on chromosomes 14 and 11, respectively, on normal human male metaphases. (E) Normal pattern for the 14q32/11q13 fusion strategy. There are no fusion signals observed, and there are 2 pairs of nonassociated green (14q32) and red (11q13) signals. (F) Abnormal comigration (fusion) of signals indicative of a t(11;14)(q13;q32). Because of the small signal size arising from the VHportion of the IgH probe (owing to the V/D/J recombination and DNA excision), the pattern most frequently observed is presumed to be that of fusions in the der14 and less commonly in the der11.

Fig. 1.

Normal and abnormal patterns of hybridization with both strategies.

(A) Hybridization of the VH and CH probes to the correct location at band 14q32 on normal human male metaphases. (B) Normal pattern for the VHCH probes with 2 pairs of closely associated signals. Note the intense blue fluorescence of the cytoplasmic light chain. (C) Cellular signal pattern indicative of a 14q32 translocation. The segregation of a pair of signals (break-apart) in a large percentage of cells allows for the identification of a patient with an IgH translocation. (D) Hybridization of the 14q32 and 11q13 probes to the correct locations on chromosomes 14 and 11, respectively, on normal human male metaphases. (E) Normal pattern for the 14q32/11q13 fusion strategy. There are no fusion signals observed, and there are 2 pairs of nonassociated green (14q32) and red (11q13) signals. (F) Abnormal comigration (fusion) of signals indicative of a t(11;14)(q13;q32). Because of the small signal size arising from the VHportion of the IgH probe (owing to the V/D/J recombination and DNA excision), the pattern most frequently observed is presumed to be that of fusions in the der14 and less commonly in the der11.

Close modal

Fusion strategy.

For the detection of the t(11;14)(q13;q32), on separate experiments, we used the same IgH probes (labeled with SpectrumGreen) and a pool of cosmid and P1 clones encompassing all reported breakpoints in human MM cell lines with the t(11;14)(q13;q32)8-10 (labeled with SpectrumRed). The normal pattern was that of 2 pairs of nonassociated signals (2 red/2 green). Fusion of 2 signals in a cell was considered indicative of the translocation.

Statistical considerations

The normal range of PC patterns was documented previously using cIg-negative cells derived from patient samples and polyclonal PCs from BM donors. A patient was said to have an IgH translocation if the percentage of PCs exceeded the mean ± 3 SD.11 The upper limit of normal for the break-apart and fusion strategies was less than 10% for both. We arbitrarily chose an upper limit of normal of 25% for greater specificity.

Break-apart strategy (VH/CHprobes)

Of these 29 patients, 16 (55%) had definitive evidence of an IgH translocation using the VH/CH strategy (Table 1). The median percentage of abnormal PCs (MAPC) was 55% (range, 27%-89%). Additionally, 5 (17%) patients had an equivocal pattern compatible with a possible IgH translocation (MAPC, 66%; range, 64%-83%). In total, 21 of 29 (72%) patients had evidence of an IgH translocation by the VH/CH probe patterns.

Table 1.

Patient clinical and laboratory features and associated FISH results

No.SexAgeIgH statusBM PC (%)κ:λ ratioHeavy chainSerum M spike (g/dL)Urine M spike (g/24 h)VH/CHt(11;14)(q13;q32)
PatternPositive (%)Equivocal (%)Positive and equivocalPatternPositive (%)
Newly diagnosed patients 
63 t(11;14) 19 < 1:99 ND IF 1.5 1F1R1G 89 11 100 2F1G2R 100 
78 t(11;14) 1:40 IgG 0.6 0.9 1F1R1G 84 92 1F1G2R 86 
51 t(11;14) 33 < 1:99 ND IF IF 1F1R1G 79 87 1F1G2R 89 
62 t(11;14) 12 1:2 IgG 0.4 IF 1F1R1G 75 81 1F2R 100 
71 t(11;14) 1:4 ND ND IF 1F1R1G 66 10 76 1F1R1G 68 
62 t(11;14) 13 1:54 IgG 0.8 ND 1F1R1G 57 30 87 1F1R1G 95 
53 t(11;14) 22 > 99:1 ND ND IF 1F1R1G 55 31 86 1F1G2R 85 
57 t(11;14) 26 > 99:1 IgA IF IF 1F1R1G 54 36 90 1F2R 85 
77 t(11;14) 1:1 IgG ND 0.7 (λ) 1F1R1G 53 19 72 1F1G1R 71 
10 65 t(11;14) 10 1:4 ND ND ND 1F1R1G 38 30 68 1F1G1R 95 
11 63 t(11;14) < 1:99 ND IF 1F1R1G 30 59 89 1F1G3R 93 
12 75 t(11;14) 25 > 99:1 IgG 1.6 1.5 1F1R1G 28 68 96 1F2R1G 72 
13 40 t(11;14) 8.8 1:44 ND IF IF 1F1G 21 69 90 1F2R 68 
14 41 t(11;14) 1:25 ND ND 0.5 1F1G 19 66 85 1F2R1G 96 
15 74 14q32+ 10 1:60 IgA 0.7 1.2 1F1R1G 41 35 76 2G2R 15 
16 67 14q32+ 1:1 ND IF IF (λ) 1F1R1G 38 14 52 2G2R 19 
17 57 14q32+ < 1:99 ND ND IF 1F1R1G 27 17 44 2G2R 18 
18 58 Equivocal* 1:13 IgG 1.7 IF 2F1G 83 90 2G2R 10 
19 67 Negative 4.6 < 1:99 IgA ND IF 2F 18 14 32 Fail — 
20 64 Negative 1:23 IgG 0.9 IF 2F 18 27 2G2R 16 
21 37 Negative 15 18:1 ND ND IF 2F 23 19 42 2G2R 15 
22 65 Negative 13 1:13 ND ND ND 2F 20 20 40 Fail — 
23 60 Negative 38 > 99:1 IgA 2.5 ND 2F 19 24 43 2G2R 13 
24 70 Negative 34 < 1:99 IgA 1.2 IF 2F 14 11 25 2G2R 23 
Patients with previous alkylator chemotherapy 
25 74 t(11;14) 4:1 ND ND ND 1F1G 25 65 90 1F1G2R 72 
26 45 t(11;14) 17 < 1:99 IgG IF 0.05 2F1G 12 64 76 1F1G2R 80 
27 55 14q32+ < 1:99 IgA 0.5 ND 1F1R1G 75 16 91 2G2R 15 
28 54 Negative 10 1:1 IgM 0.8 0.07 (λ) 2F 15 19 34 2G2R 23 
29 54 Negative 22 > 99:1 IgG 0.2 2F 16 Fail — 
No.SexAgeIgH statusBM PC (%)κ:λ ratioHeavy chainSerum M spike (g/dL)Urine M spike (g/24 h)VH/CHt(11;14)(q13;q32)
PatternPositive (%)Equivocal (%)Positive and equivocalPatternPositive (%)
Newly diagnosed patients 
63 t(11;14) 19 < 1:99 ND IF 1.5 1F1R1G 89 11 100 2F1G2R 100 
78 t(11;14) 1:40 IgG 0.6 0.9 1F1R1G 84 92 1F1G2R 86 
51 t(11;14) 33 < 1:99 ND IF IF 1F1R1G 79 87 1F1G2R 89 
62 t(11;14) 12 1:2 IgG 0.4 IF 1F1R1G 75 81 1F2R 100 
71 t(11;14) 1:4 ND ND IF 1F1R1G 66 10 76 1F1R1G 68 
62 t(11;14) 13 1:54 IgG 0.8 ND 1F1R1G 57 30 87 1F1R1G 95 
53 t(11;14) 22 > 99:1 ND ND IF 1F1R1G 55 31 86 1F1G2R 85 
57 t(11;14) 26 > 99:1 IgA IF IF 1F1R1G 54 36 90 1F2R 85 
77 t(11;14) 1:1 IgG ND 0.7 (λ) 1F1R1G 53 19 72 1F1G1R 71 
10 65 t(11;14) 10 1:4 ND ND ND 1F1R1G 38 30 68 1F1G1R 95 
11 63 t(11;14) < 1:99 ND IF 1F1R1G 30 59 89 1F1G3R 93 
12 75 t(11;14) 25 > 99:1 IgG 1.6 1.5 1F1R1G 28 68 96 1F2R1G 72 
13 40 t(11;14) 8.8 1:44 ND IF IF 1F1G 21 69 90 1F2R 68 
14 41 t(11;14) 1:25 ND ND 0.5 1F1G 19 66 85 1F2R1G 96 
15 74 14q32+ 10 1:60 IgA 0.7 1.2 1F1R1G 41 35 76 2G2R 15 
16 67 14q32+ 1:1 ND IF IF (λ) 1F1R1G 38 14 52 2G2R 19 
17 57 14q32+ < 1:99 ND ND IF 1F1R1G 27 17 44 2G2R 18 
18 58 Equivocal* 1:13 IgG 1.7 IF 2F1G 83 90 2G2R 10 
19 67 Negative 4.6 < 1:99 IgA ND IF 2F 18 14 32 Fail — 
20 64 Negative 1:23 IgG 0.9 IF 2F 18 27 2G2R 16 
21 37 Negative 15 18:1 ND ND IF 2F 23 19 42 2G2R 15 
22 65 Negative 13 1:13 ND ND ND 2F 20 20 40 Fail — 
23 60 Negative 38 > 99:1 IgA 2.5 ND 2F 19 24 43 2G2R 13 
24 70 Negative 34 < 1:99 IgA 1.2 IF 2F 14 11 25 2G2R 23 
Patients with previous alkylator chemotherapy 
25 74 t(11;14) 4:1 ND ND ND 1F1G 25 65 90 1F1G2R 72 
26 45 t(11;14) 17 < 1:99 IgG IF 0.05 2F1G 12 64 76 1F1G2R 80 
27 55 14q32+ < 1:99 IgA 0.5 ND 1F1R1G 75 16 91 2G2R 15 
28 54 Negative 10 1:1 IgM 0.8 0.07 (λ) 2F 15 19 34 2G2R 23 
29 54 Negative 22 > 99:1 IgG 0.2 2F 16 Fail — 

F indicates fusion; G, green; R, red; 14q32+, IgH translocation without partner identified; IF, immunofixation; ND, not detected.

*

Equivocal for 14q32 and negative for t(11;14).

Patient with monosomy of chromosome 14 in 55% of PCs.

Patient with monosomy of chromosome 14 in 76% of PCs.

t(11;14)(q13;q32)

Twelve of 16 (75%) patients with definitive IgH translocations by the VH/CH strategy had a t(11;14)(q13;q32) (MAPC, 87.5%; range, 68%-100%). In addition, 4 of the 5 (80%) patients with an equivocal pattern using the VH/CH strategy also had a t(11;14)(q13;q32) (MAPC, 76%; range, 68%-96%). Altogether, 16 of the 29 (55%) patients had evidence of a t(11;14)(q13;q32), accounting for 76% of all IgH translocations detected (16 of 21 patients). There was no statistically significant difference in the BM percentage PC between patients with and without the abnormality detected by either strategy (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P > .2)

Other

Four patients had definitive evidence of an IgH translocation by the break-apart strategy that did not involve the 11q13 locus (MAPC, 64%; range, 44%-91%). One patient had a possible IgH translocation with an equivocal pattern by the VH/CH in 90% of PCs (not involving 11q13). Eight patients did not have evidence of IgH translocations, and 2 of those patients had only 1 pair of VH/CH probes in 55% and 76% of their cells, respectively, reflecting monosomy 14 or deletion of 14q32.

We have shown here that most patients with AL harbor IgH translocations in clonal PCs. In AL, the deposition of monoclonal light chains is the cause of the sickness and death associated with the disease, whereas clonal progression is usually not observed.12 Our results support the hypothesis that AL is the same disease entity as MGUS/SMM (at the clonal level), with the clinical differences (phenotype) arising from the amyloidogenic potential of the monoclonal light chain. Most patients with AL have a low degree of BM involvement and rarely have overt MM.13 We speculate the occasional patient with AL (approximately 5%), who also has coexistent MM, may have a lesser amyloidogenic variant of the light chain or a more rapid clonal progression.14 The frequency of t(11;14)(q13;q32) is much greater in AL than has been noted for MM15 or MGUS16-18 in some series but not in others.19Several facts allow us to conclude that the prevalence of the t(11;14)(q13;q32) we report in AL is correct. We used 2 independent scorers, and both concurred in the scoring of abnormal PCs in each sample with a high degree of agreement. The percentages of abnormal PCs by the break-apart and fusion strategies were similar in each patient, and the abnormalities were usually seen in most of the clonal PC. Finally, we also observed a higher proportion of t(11;14)(q13;q32) in patients with MGUS than in patients with MM.19 The frequencies of other partner chromosomes are being studied to assess the pathogenetic potential of these abnormalities, and we speculate that other partner chromosomes will also be involved.20-22 

The results of our study identify cytogenetic lesions in the clonal PCs of patients with AL, similar to those observed in MGUS and MM. In addition, previous work has shown that VL gene sequences are highly somatically mutated, suggesting commonality among these dyscrasias.23 We have previously shown that aneuploidy is equally present in AL, MGUS, smoldering MM, and MM.24 Hallek3 proposes a step-wise transformation model for the development of MM from MGUS, and we propose the inclusion of AL in the model where AL is similar to MGUS and smoldering MM, albeit with an “unlucky” protein.

Supported in part by Public Health Service grant R01 CA83724-01 from the National Cancer Institute. P.R.G. is supported in part by research grant P01 CA62242 from the National Cancer Institute and by ECOG grant CA21115-25C from the National Cancer Institute. R.F. is a Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Translational Research Awardee. R.F. and P.R.G. are also supported by the Mayo Foundation and the CI-5 Cancer Research Fund, Lilly Clinical Investigator Award of the Damon Runyon-Walter Winchell Foundation.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.

1
Gertz
 
MA
Lacy
 
MQ
Dispenzieri
 
A
Amyloidosis: recognition, confirmation, prognosis, and therapy [review].
Mayo Clin Proc.
74
1999
490
494
2
Kyle
 
RA
Greipp
 
PR
Amyloidosis (AL): Clinical and laboratory features in 229 cases [review].
Mayo Clin Proc.
58
1983
665
683
3
Hallek
 
M
Leif Bergsagel
 
P
Anderson
 
KC
Multiple myeloma: increasing evidence for a multistep transformation process [review].
Blood.
91
1998
3
21
4
Willis
 
TG
Dyer
 
MJS
The role of immunoglobulin translocations in the pathogenesis of B-cell malignancies.
Blood.
96
2000
808
822
5
Bergsagel
 
PL
Chesi
 
M
Nardini
 
E
Brents
 
LA
Kirby
 
SL
Kuehl
 
WM
Promiscuous translocations into immunoglobulin heavy chain switch regions in multiple myeloma.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.
93
1996
13931
13936
6
Ahmann
 
GJ
Jalal
 
SM
Juneau
 
AL
et al
A novel three-color, clone-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization procedure for monoclonal gammopathies.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet.
101
1998
7
11
7
Gabrea
 
A
Bergsagel
 
PL
Chesi
 
M
Shou
 
Y
Kuehl
 
WM
Insertion of excised IgH switch sequences causes overexpression of cyclin D1 in a myeloma tumor cell.
Mol Cell.
3
1999
119
123
8
Janssen
 
JW
Vaandrager
 
JW
Heuser
 
T
et al
Concurrent activation of a novel putative transforming gene, myeov, and cyclin D1 in a subset of multiple myeloma cell lines with t(11;14)(q13;q32).
Blood.
95
2000
2691
2698
9
Vaandrager
 
JW
Schuuring
 
E
Zwikstra
 
E
et al
Direct visualization of dispersed 11q13 chromosomal translocations in mantle cell lymphoma by multicolor DNA fiber fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Blood.
88
1996
1177
1182
10
Vaandrager
 
JW
Kluin
 
P
Schuuring
 
E
The t(11;14) (q13;q32) in multiple myeloma cell line KMS12 has its 11q13 breakpoint 330 kb centromeric from the cyclin D1 gene [letter].
Blood.
89
1997
349
350
11
Anscombe
 
F
The transformation of Poisson, binomial and negative-binomial data.
Biometrika.
35
1949
246
254
12
Gertz
 
MA
Kyle
 
RA
Amyloidosis: prognosis and treatment [review].
Semin Arthritis Rheum.
24
1994
124
138
13
Gertz
 
MA
Lacy
 
MQ
Dispenzieri
 
A
Amyloidosis: recognition, confirmation, prognosis, and therapy.
Mayo Clin Proc.
74
1999
490
494
14
Kyle
 
RA
Gertz
 
MA
Primary systemic amyloidosis: clinical and laboratory features in 474 cases.
Semin Hematol.
32
1995
45
59
15
Fonseca
 
R
Harrington
 
D
Oken
 
MM
et al
Prognostic significance of 13q- deletions and the t(11;14)(q13;q32) in myeloma (MM): an interphase FISH study of 351 patients entered into the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E9487 Clinical Trial [abstract].
Blood.
96
2000
547
16
Avet-Loiseau
 
H
Brigaudeau
 
C
Morineau
 
N
et al
High incidence of cryptic translocations involving the Ig heavy chain gene in multiple myeloma, as shown by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer.
24
1999
9
15
17
Avet-Loiseau
 
H
Li
 
JY
Facon
 
T
et al
High incidence of translocations t(11;14)(q13;q32) and t(4;14)(p16;q32).
Cancer Res.
58
1998
5640
5645
18
Avet-Loiseau
 
H
Facon
 
T
Daviet
 
A
et al
14q32 Translocations and monosomy 13 observed in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance delineate a multistep process for the oncogenesis of multiple myeloma: Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome.
Cancer Res.
59
1999
4546
4550
19
Fonseca
 
R
Bailey
 
R
Ahmann
 
G
et al
Translocations involving 14q32 are common in patients with the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.
Proc Int Myeloma Workshop; Stockholm, Sweden:
1999
20
Chesi
 
M
Bergsagel
 
PL
Shonukan
 
OO
et al
Frequent dysregulation of the c-maf proto-oncogene at 16q23 by translocation to an Ig locus in multiple myeloma.
Blood.
91
1998
4457
4463
21
Chesi
 
M
Nardini
 
E
Brents
 
LA
et al
Frequent translocation t(4;14)(p16.3;q32.3) in multiple myeloma is associated with increased expression and activating mutations of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3.
Nat Genet.
16
1997
260
264
22
Chesi
 
M
Nardini
 
E
Lim
 
R
Smith
 
K
Kuehl
 
W
Bergsagel
 
P
The t(4;14) translocation in myeloma dysregulates both FGFR3 and a novel gene, MMSET, resulting in IgH/MMSET hybrid transcripts.
Blood.
92
1998
3025
3034
23
Perfetti
 
V
Ubbiali
 
P
Vignarelli
 
MC
et al
Evidence that amyloidogenic light chains undergo antigen-driven selection.
Blood.
91
1998
2948
2954
24
Fonseca
 
R
Ahmann
 
GJ
Jalal
 
SM
et al
Chromosomal abnormalities in systemic amyloidosis.
Br J Haematol.
103
1998
704
710

Author notes

Rafael Fonseca, Department of Hematology and Internal Medicine, 200 First St SW, Bldg W10B, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905; e-mail: fonseca.rafael@mayo.edu.

Sign in via your Institution