Blood stem cells compared with bone marrow as a source of hematopoietic cells for allogeneic transplantation

Bone marrow transplantation is an accepted treatment for many patients with malignant and nonmalignant diseases. Since the early 1990s, peripheral blood progenitor cells collected by apheresis have largely replaced bone marrow as a source of hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation.1Peripheral blood cells produce more rapid hematopoietic recovery, thereby leading to reduced costs.2-5 For allogeneic transplantation, blood stem cells collected from healthy donors given granulocyte colony-stimulating factor are now often used as an alternative to bone marrow.6-15 The mobilization, collection, and safety of allogeneic blood stem cell donors has been reviewed.16 Preliminary results of allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation in many single centers and a small randomized trial indicate more rapid hematopoietic recovery with this method than with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.6-15 17 

Collections of blood stem cells contain approximately 1 log more lymphocytes than bone marrow harvests.10,18 This could possibly affect immune reconstitution, graft versus host disease (GVHD), and graft versus leukemia effects. In most studies, the incidence of acute GVHD with blood stem cell transplants is similar to that reported for bone marrow transplants. Some studies do not indicate a difference in chronic GVHD,14,19 but others suggest a substantially higher incidence of chronic GVHD with blood stem cell transplantation.20,21 Use of allogeneic blood stem cells reduced early morbidity and mortality in comparison with results of bone marrow transplantation in some22 but not all17 studies. However, all these studies were small, with fewer than 100 patients, and had relatively short follow-up periods. It is still unclear whether blood stem cells are as good as (or better than) bone marrow as a source of hematopoietic stem cells for allogeneic transplantation. We report a nonrandomized comparison of 288 HLA-identical sibling blood stem cell transplantations and 536 HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantations for leukemia.

The study includes data for 288 patients 20 years of age or older who received non–T-cell depleted, HLA-identical sibling blood stem cell transplants for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first or second remission or chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in chronic or accelerated phase in 1995 or 1996 and whose transplantation was reported to the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) or the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) (Table 1). Controls were 536 patients 20 years of age or older who received non–T-cell depleted, HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplants for the same indications during the same period and whose transplantations were reported to the IBMTR. Data were reported by 105 transplant centers in 34 countries and include more than half of the allogeneic blood stem cell transplantations for leukemia done in 1995 and 1996. Cases were reviewed to ensure that patients whose procedure was reported to both organizations were not entered twice. Outcome data were compiled from the date of transplantation through the date of death or last contact. Median follow-up was 12 months (range, 3 to 40 months). Ninety percent of patients were followed for 8 months; 25% were followed for 23 months.

The IBMTR is a voluntary working group of more than 350 transplant teams worldwide that contribute detailed data on their allogeneic transplantations to the Statistical Center at the Medical College of Wisconsin. Participants are required to register all consecutive transplantations. The IBMTR database includes information on 40% to 45% of all patients who have undergone allogeneic transplantation since 1970. Patients are followed longitudinally. Computerized error checks, physician review of submitted data, and on-site audits of participating centers ensure data quality.

The EBMT is a voluntary group of 436 transplant centers in Europe and associated members from non-European countries. Data quality of participating centers is checked by the Statistical Office of EBMT at the University College of London Hospitals and regular site visits to centers selected on a random basis. For this analysis, centers that had reported allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantations in 1995 and 199623 24 were contacted and asked to provide data on all consecutive transplantations using unmanipulated allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells from HLA-identical sibling donors performed between January 1995 and June 1996. IBMTR Report Forms or EBMT Med-A/Med-B forms, with specific addenda to ensure that identical core data were reported, were used for this study.

The study focused on hematopoietic recovery, acute and chronic GVHD, treatment-related mortality (TRM), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and leukemia relapse after blood stem cell transplantation compared with bone marrow transplantation.25 The primary measure of hematopoietic recovery was the time after transplantation until a neutrophil count of at least 0.5 × 10⁹/L was observed for 3 consecutive days. Also recorded were the times until a platelet count of at least 20 × 10⁹/L and a platelet count of at least 50 × 10⁹/L were achieved. The incidence and time to development of grades II to IV acute GVHD and grades III to IV acute GVHD were evaluated in patients surviving 21 days with evidence of engraftment.26 Time to occurrence of any chronic GVHD was evaluated in patients surviving 90 days or longer after transplantation with engraftment.27TRM was defined as death in continuous complete remission; patients were censored at relapse or, for patients in continuous complete remission, at last follow-up.28 LFS was defined as survival in continuous complete remission; relapse and death in remission were events, and patients surviving in continuous complete remission were censored at last contact. Treatment failure was the inverse of LFS. Relapse was defined as hematologic or clinical leukemia recurrence; patients never in remission after transplantation were considered to have had a recurrence on day 1.

The association of graft type (blood stem cell compared with bone marrow) and other patient, disease, and transplant characteristics (Table 2) with each outcome was evaluated by using separate Cox proportional hazard regression models. Continuous variables were discretized using the cut point that minimized the −2-log likelihood of the 1-factor Cox proportional hazards regression model.29 Variables were tested by using a time-varying covariate method to determine whether the proportional hazards assumption was met. Adjustments for factors found to have nonproportional hazards used stratified proportional hazards models or time-dependent covariates. Interactions between each variable of interest and graft type were examined by fitting a proportional hazards model, stratified on transplant type, and examining the interaction term between the factor of interest and the type of transplant. Multivariate models were built by using a stepwise forward selection with a significance level of 0.05. Graft type was held in the model at each step. All multivariate models were examined for center effects by using a random effects or frailty model;30 there was no evidence of confounding of main effects by center effects. All analyses were done with PROC PHREG in SAS version 6.12 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).

Univariate (unadjusted) probabilities of neutrophil and platelet recovery were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Cumulative incidences were estimated for TRM and relapse. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the SE of the survivor function by Greenwood formula. Adjusted probabilities for neutrophil and platelet recovery, acute and chronic GVHD, and LFS were calculated with the multivariate Cox models described previously, stratified on graft type, and weighted by the sample proportion value for each prognostic factor. The 95% CI for adjusted survival probabilities andP values of pair-wise comparisons were derived from point-wise estimates and calculated with standard techniques.31 These adjusted probabilities estimate likelihood of outcomes in populations with similar prognostic factors.

Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Two hundred eighty-eight patients received blood stem cell transplants and 536 received bone marrow transplants. Three hundred five patients (37%) had AML, 112 (14%) had ALL, and 407 (49%) had CML. Six hundred seventy-seven patients (82%) underwent transplantation while in first complete remission or first chronic phase, and the remaining 147 (18%) were in second complete remission or accelerated phase. Patient characteristics were relatively balanced between the blood stem cell and bone marrow transplant groups. There were significant differences in the following variables: the blood stem cell group had fewer CML patients in chronic phase; more patients with high leukocyte counts at diagnosis; a higher proportion of patients who received total-body irradiation for pretransplantation conditioning, hematopoietic growth factors after transplantation, or both; and a lower proportion of patients who received methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis. A higher proportion of blood stem cell transplantations were performed in Europe. The distributions of leukemia subtypes and cytogenetic abnormalities were similar in the 2 groups.

Patients who received blood stem cell transplants had significantly faster recovery of neutrophils and platelets (Table3). This difference was independent of growth factor and methotrexate use. Additionally, there was less variability in recovery times with blood stem cell transplantation (ie, fewer outliers with slow hematologic recovery) (Figures 1 and2). The median time to a neutrophil count of at least 0.5 × 10⁹/L was 14 days (range, 10 to 40 days) with blood stem cells and 19 days (range, 11 to 35 days) with bone marrow (P < .001). The median time to a platelet count of at least 20 × 10⁹/L was 18 days (range, 13 to 68 days) with blood stem cells and 25 days (range, 12 to 87 days) with bone marrow (P < .001). The median time to a platelet count of at least 50 × 10⁹/L was 19 days (range, 11 to 70 days) with blood stem cells and 28 days (range, 20 to 79 days) with bone marrow (P < .001).

In multivariate analyses stratified for GVHD prophylaxis, growth factor use, and Karnofsky performance score, the relative rate of neutrophil recovery to a count of at least 0.5 × 10⁹/L with blood stem cells compared with bone marrow was 1.90 (95% CI, 1.58-2.28; P < .0001; Table 3). Similarly, relative rates of recovery to a platelet count of at least 20 × 10⁹/L and at least 50 × 10⁹/L were higher with blood stem cells than with bone marrow (Table 3). Probabilities of times to neutrophil and platelet recoveries after transplantation (adjusted for effects of other prognostic factors and derived from multivariate analyses) for each graft type are shown in Figures 1 and 2.

Risks of grades II to IV acute GVHD were similar with blood stem cell and bone marrow transplants (Table 3). Adjusted 100-day (after transplantation) probabilities of grades II to IV acute GVHD were 40% (95% CI, 33%-46%) with blood stem cells and 35% (95% CI, 31%-39%) with bone marrow (Figure 3). Results were similar for grades III to IV acute GVHD. Adjusted probabilities of grades III to IV acute GVHD after transplantation were 13% (95% CI, 8%-19%) with blood stem cells and 19% (95% CI, 15%-26%) with bone marrow.

The risk of chronic GVHD in the first year after transplantation was higher in recipients of blood stem cell transplants than in recipients of bone marrow transplants. The probability of chronic GVHD at 1 year after transplantation was 65% (95% CI, 56%-72%) with blood stem cells and 53% (95% CI, 47%-59%) with bone marrow. Adjusted probabilities are shown in Figure4. The relative risk of having chronic GVHD after a blood stem cell transplantation compared with a bone marrow transplantation was 1.30 (95% CI, 1.00-1.70; Table 3). Similar results were obtained when only extensive chronic GVHD was considered. Data on the incidence, severity, and organ involvement of chronic GVHD are summarized in Table 4.

The relative risk of TRM with blood stem cell compared with bone marrow transplants differed according to the type and stage of leukemia. Among patients with acute leukemia in first remission, the risk of TRM in those who received blood stem cells was not different from the risk in those given bone marrow (Table5). The 1-year cumulative incidence of TRM was 18% (95% CI, 11%-26%) with blood stem cells and 28% (95% CI, 21%-35%) with bone marrow (Figure 5A). Among patients with acute leukemia in second remission, the risk of TRM was significantly lower after blood stem cell transplantation than after bone marrow transplantation (Table6). The 1-year cumulative incidence of TRM was 13% (95% CI, 5%-26%) with blood stem cells and 30% (95% CI, 16%-44%) with bone marrow (Figure 5A). Among patients with CML in first chronic phase, the risk of TRM was similar with blood stem cells and bone marrow (Table 5B). The 1-year cumulative incidences of TRM were 37% (95% CI, 25%-49%) and 27% (95% CI, 19%-32%), respectively, with blood stem cells and bone marrow (Figure 5B). Among patients who underwent transplantation while in accelerated or second chronic phase, TRM risk was significantly lower with blood stem cells (Table 6). The 1-year cumulative incidences of TRM were 26% (95% CI, 10%-46%) with blood stem cells and 67% (95% CI, 37%-85%) with bone marrow (Figure 6). Thus, use of blood stem cells rather than bone marrow decreased TRM in patients with advanced disease.

Data on the duration of initial hospitalization were available for 224 blood stem cell transplant recipients and 491 bone marrow transplant recipients. Median time from transplantation to first hospital discharge was 23 days after blood stem cell transplantation and 28 days after bone marrow transplantation (P = .003).

There was no apparent difference in the risk of relapse after blood stem cell and bone marrow transplantation, though the follow-up was relatively short to evaluate this outcome (Table 5). The 1-year cumulative incidences of relapse among patients with acute leukemia in first remission were 14% (95% CI, 7%-23%) with blood stems cells and 11% (95% CI, 7%-17%) with bone marrow (Figure 6A). Among patients who had transplantation while in second remission, the 1-year cumulative incidences of relapse were 8% (95% CI, 2%-20%) with blood stem cells and 13% (95% CI, 4%-26%) with bone marrow (Figure6A).

Patients with CML who underwent transplantation while in first chronic phase had a 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse of 2% (95% CI, 1%-8%) if they were given blood stem cells and 1% (95% CI, 0.5%-3%) if given bone marrow (Figure 6B). Among those who underwent transplantation while in accelerated phase, the 1-year cumulative incidences of relapse were 13% (95% CI, 3%-30%) with blood stem cells and 21% (95% CI, 8%-38%) with bone marrow (Figure 6B).

Similar to the results for TRM, the relation between graft type and LFS after transplantation varied according to the type and stage of leukemia. Among patients with acute leukemia in first remission, the risk of treatment failure (relapse or death; inverse of LFS) was similar with blood stem cell and bone marrow transplants (Table 5). Their adjusted 1-year probabilities of LFS were 70% (95% CI, 56%-80%) with blood stem cells and 61% (95% CI, 52%-68%) with bone marrow (Figure 7A). Among patients with acute leukemia in second remission, the risk of treatment failure was significantly lower after blood stem cell transplantation than after bone marrow transplantation (Table 5). Adjusted 1-year probabilities of LFS in these patients were 77% (95% CI, 57%-88%) with blood stem cells and 57% (95% CI, 40%-71%) with bone marrow (Figure 7A). Among patients with CML in first chronic phase, the risk of treatment failure was similar with blood stem cells and bone marrow (Table 5): their adjusted 1-year probabilities of LFS were 63% (95% CI, 49%-74%) and 74% (95% CI, 66%-80%), respectively, with blood stem cells and bone marrow (Figure 7B). Among patients who had transplantation while in accelerated or second chronic phase, treatment failure was significantly lower with blood stem cells (Table 5). Their adjusted 1-year probabilities of LFS were 68% (95% CI, 45%-84%) with blood stem cells and 23% (95% CI, 9%-40%) with bone marrow (Figure 7B). Causes of death after blood stem cell and bone marrow transplantation were similar (Table 6).

Previous studies of allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation indicated more rapid hematologic recovery than with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation and similar risks of acute GVHD. There are conflicting data on the risk of chronic GVHD. Most studies used historical bone marrow transplantation controls,6-15,22 although 1 small randomized trial has been reported.16 It is unclear from these data whether allogeneic blood stem cells have an advantage over bone marrow in TRM or overall survival.17 The current study compared early results of concurrent allogeneic blood stem cell and bone marrow transplantations by 105 teams that reported data to the IBMTR or EBMT. The source of allografts was chosen by the treatment center. All patients older than 20 years with acute leukemia in first or second remission or with CML in chronic or accelerated phase who underwent transplantation during the period studied were included. All patients had HLA-identical sibling donors and none received T-cell–depleted grafts. Although some differences existed, patient characteristics in the 2 groups were relatively well balanced. Multivariate analyses were used to adjust for potentially confounding effects of other variables. We found a more rapid hematologic recovery, with a shorter interval to recovery of neutrophils and platelets, with blood stem cell transplants than with bone marrow transplants. The risk of acute GVHD was comparable in the 2 groups, similar to results of previous studies.

An effect of graft type on TRM was observed in patients with advanced acute leukemia and accelerated CML. Patients with advanced leukemias who were given allogeneic bone marrow transplants were at a higher risk of both relapse and TRM than those given blood stem cells. The reduced TRM observed with blood stem cell transplants may have resulted from a more rapid and uniform hematopoietic recovery. Such recovery is probably more important in patients who are heavily pretreated or have active leukemia. Patients with acute leukemia in first remission or CML in chronic phase have intrinsically more stable conditions and a lower risk of death from toxicity and infection; thus, more rapid engraftment may not produce measurable survival benefits in them.

With a median follow-up time of 12 months and a maximum of 40 months, there was an increased risk of chronic GVHD with allogeneic blood stem cell transplants. This finding is consistent with several reports of a high incidence of chronic GVHD with blood stem cell grafts. Further follow-up is warranted to better assess this endpoint, to determine factors affecting its incidence, and to evaluate its effect on late mortality, leukemia relapse, and quality of life. Possible explanations are larger numbers of stem cells or T cells in the graft32or skewed cytokine production.33 Longer follow-up is also necessary to critically evaluate whether the risk of relapse is affected by the type of graft. It is possible that the higher rate of chronic GVHD with blood stem cell transplants may also be associated with greater graft versus leukemia effects, but no significant difference in relapse rates can currently be detected.

These data suggest that use of blood stem cells rather than bone marrow may improve the results of allogeneic transplantations in patients with advanced acute leukemia or CML, at least in the first year after transplantation. Overall outcome was similar for acute leukemia patients in first remission or CML patients in first chronic phase. Controlled clinical trials and longer follow-up, especially in good-risk patients, are necessary to better define the role of blood stem cells in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.