The outcome for patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) is highly variable. Understanding the prognosis for a particular patient can help when selecting the intensity of treatment to be used and the frequency of reviews. The quantification of heavy/light chains pairs by the immunoassay Hevylite (HLC) allows us a precise measurement of monoclonal and non-monoclonal immunoglobulins of the same isotype. In this study we evaluate i) the impact of the "HLC ratio" defined as monoclonal immunoglobulin over isotype matched non-monoclonal immunoglobulin (involved/uninvolved HLC ratio or i/u HLC ratio), ii) the suppression of non-monoclonal pair denominated "HLC-matched pair suppression" and iii) the effect of "systemic immunoparesis", at diagnosis and at +100 days after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT).

Methods: 85 patients (50 M:35 F) with a median age of 70 years (56-78) were followed (35 IgGK, 18 IgGl, 17 IgAK and 15 IgAl) for a median of 19 (5-30) months. Sixteen patients (18%) presented ISS stage I, 15 (28%) stage II and 54 (64%) stage III. Thirty transplanted patients were evaluated at day +100 of ASCT. Serum free light chains (FLC) and immunoglobulin heavy/light chain pairs (HLC) were assessed by Freelite and Hevylite assays, respectively (The Binding Site, UK). FLC, HLC, b2-microglobulin, albumin, creatinine, hemogloblin, calcium, LDH, bone marrow plasma cell infiltration, presence of lytic bone lesions and ISS stage were evaluated for their impact on patient´s outcome. Statistical analysis with SPSS 23. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox Regression.

Results: The median OS of the 85 patients was 54% and 26 patients deceased during the study due to MM. The median value of i/u HLC ratio at diagnosis was 80 (31.5-319.71) and values >80 were significantly associated with worse OS (48 vs. 61%, p=0,005, fig.1A and Table 1) and shorter PFS (23% vs. 42%, p=0,006, fig.1B). Severe HLC-matched pair suppression (i.e. more than 50% below the lower reference range) was identified in 68% of the newly diagnosed patients and was associated with shorter OS (35% vs. 81%, p=0,004, fig. 1C) and PFS (21% vs. 50%, p=0,013, fig.1D). Severe (>50%) systemic immunoparesis was identified in 64% of the patients and was also significantly associated with shorter OS (32% vs. 81%, p=0,030, fig.1E) but not with shorter PFS (26% vs. 44%, p=0,306, fig. 1F). In a multivariate analysis, severe HLC-matched pair suppression and albumin were found as independent risk factors for OS whereas creatinine and i/u HLC ratio >80 were independent risk factors for PFS.

In the post-ASCT evaluation of the patients (n=30), normalization of HLC Ig´k/Ig´l ratio was observed in 8 patients (27%). An altered HLC ratio was predictive of shorter PFS after ASCT (25% vs. 70%, HR: 3,42, 95%CI 1,12-11,97, p=0,039, fig. 2B) and with a trend towards a worse OS (p=0,072, fig. 2A). Severe HLC-matched pair suppression was found in 12 patients (40%) and was predictive of worse OS (0% vs 70%, HR: 10,63, 95%CI: 1,11-114,11, p=0,023, fig.2C) and shorter PFS (35% vs. 71%, HR: 8,87, 95%CI: 1,72-45,92, p=0,002, fig. 2D). The severe systemic immunoparesis observed in 17 patients (57%) was not associated with OS (p=0,644, fig.2E) or PFS (p=0,750, fig. 2F).

Conclusions: Severe HLC-matched pair suppression and i/u HLC>80 are associated with worse OS and shorter PFS in MM patients suggesting a potential use of these parameters as prognostic biomarkers in newly diagnosed patients. Severe HLC-matched pair suppression is an independent risk factor for OS whereas i/u HLC>80 is independently associated with shorter PFS. In patients after ASCT, severe HLC-matched pair suppression reflects the persistence of clonal cells that is not associated with severe systemic immunoparesis.

Table 1

Analysis of prognostic factors for OS and PFS in newly diagnosed MM patients. Only significant variables are shown.

Table 1

Analysis of prognostic factors for OS and PFS in newly diagnosed MM patients. Only significant variables are shown.

Close modal
Figure 1

Newly diagnosed MM patients. OS (A) and PFS (B) by i/u HLC ratio >80; OS (C) and PFS (D) according to severe (>50%) HLC-matched pair suppression; OS (E) and PFS (F) according to severe (>50%) systemic suppression.

Figure 1

Newly diagnosed MM patients. OS (A) and PFS (B) by i/u HLC ratio >80; OS (C) and PFS (D) according to severe (>50%) HLC-matched pair suppression; OS (E) and PFS (F) according to severe (>50%) systemic suppression.

Close modal
Figure 2

MM patients at day +100 after ASCT. OS (A) and PFS (B) by HLC ratios; OS (C) and PFS (D) according to severe (>50%) HLC-matched pair suppression; OS (E) and PFS (F) according to severe (>50%) systemic suppression.

Figure 2

MM patients at day +100 after ASCT. OS (A) and PFS (B) by HLC ratios; OS (C) and PFS (D) according to severe (>50%) HLC-matched pair suppression; OS (E) and PFS (F) according to severe (>50%) systemic suppression.

Close modal
Disclosures

Barbosa:The Binding Site: Employment. Pais:The Binding Site: Employment.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution