Acute corticosteroid-refractory graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD) is a life-threatening complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with reported mortality rates of 40-60%. Our previous study (Spoerl S et al. Blood 2014) had shown the induction of tolerogenic regulatory T cells after ruxolitinib treatment in the mouse and clinical responses in six patients with corticosteroid-refractory GvHD.

Here we report the outcome of 14 patients with GvHD refractory to steroids and at least two other lines of treatment who received ruxolitinib as a salvage treatment.

Ten patients were classified as acute and four as chronic GvHD involving the skin, intestinal tract and liver as detailed in Table 1. Patients were treated with ruxolitinib at a starting dose of 5 mg orally twice daily with a dose increase to 10 mg orally twice daily. Clinical and histopathological grading of skin, intestinal and liver GvHD was performed according to established criteria.

Of 14 patients, 13 responded with respect to clinical GvHD symptoms and serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Three patients with histologically proven acute skin or intestinal GvHD grade I, achieved a complete response. One non-responder discontinued ruxolitinib after one week because of lack of efficacy. In all other patients corticosteroids could be reduced after a median treatment of 1.5 weeks. Serum levels of IL-6 and soluble IL-2R were measured prior and after the start of ruxolitinib and declined in the majority of the analyzed patients (n=11). CMV reactivation was observed in four out of 14 patients and responded well to antiviral therapy. Two out of 14 patients developed cytopenia during ruxolitinib treatment that was mild and did not require dose reduction or transfusion.

Our results indicate that treatment of corticosteroid-refractory GvHD with ruxolitinib is safe and well tolerated. Despite the low number of patients treated so far, our results demonstrate that ruxolitinib reduces the severity of corticosteroid-refractory GvHD and support further development of therapeutic JAK1/2 inhibition as a salvage treatment in GvHD.

Table 1:

GvHD and response to ruxolitinib


Pt.
no.1


GvHD:
organ/grade2

Reduction
of cortico-steroids
after
ruxolitinib

Clinical response
(PR / CR)3

Time to response
(weeks)

Duration of response4/
Current follow up (weeks)5
01  Intestines / IV
(acute)  
Yes CR 42
/
43  
02  Skin / III
(acute) 
Yes PR 1.5 46.5
/
48 
03 Skin / IV
liver / III
(acute) 
Yes CR 57
/
58 
04 Skin / III
intestines / IV
(acute) 
Yes PR 1.5 24.5
/
26 
05 Skin / III
(chronic) 
Yes PR 64
/
65 
06 intestine/III-IV
(acute) 
Yes PR 15
/
16 
07 Skin/ III
(chronic) 
Yes Response 46
/
47 
08 Skin/ III
(acute) 
Yes Response 2
/
09 Skin/ II
intestine/II
(chronic) 
Yes No response
stopped after
1 week 
N/A N/A 
10 Skin/ III
liver/III
(acute) 
Yes PR 1
/
11 intestines IV
(acute) 
Yes PR 6
/
12 Skin/III
(chronic)  
Yes Response 8
/
13 intestines/IV
Skin/ II
(late onset
acute)  
Yes CR 17
/
18 
14 intestines/IV
Skin/ II
(acute) 
Yes PR 1,5 3
/

Pt.
no.1


GvHD:
organ/grade2

Reduction
of cortico-steroids
after
ruxolitinib

Clinical response
(PR / CR)3

Time to response
(weeks)

Duration of response4/
Current follow up (weeks)5
01  Intestines / IV
(acute)  
Yes CR 42
/
43  
02  Skin / III
(acute) 
Yes PR 1.5 46.5
/
48 
03 Skin / IV
liver / III
(acute) 
Yes CR 57
/
58 
04 Skin / III
intestines / IV
(acute) 
Yes PR 1.5 24.5
/
26 
05 Skin / III
(chronic) 
Yes PR 64
/
65 
06 intestine/III-IV
(acute) 
Yes PR 15
/
16 
07 Skin/ III
(chronic) 
Yes Response 46
/
47 
08 Skin/ III
(acute) 
Yes Response 2
/
09 Skin/ II
intestine/II
(chronic) 
Yes No response
stopped after
1 week 
N/A N/A 
10 Skin/ III
liver/III
(acute) 
Yes PR 1
/
11 intestines IV
(acute) 
Yes PR 6
/
12 Skin/III
(chronic)  
Yes Response 8
/
13 intestines/IV
Skin/ II
(late onset
acute)  
Yes CR 17
/
18 
14 intestines/IV
Skin/ II
(acute) 
Yes PR 1,5 3
/

1Pt.: patient, no: individual patient number, 2Acute and chronic GvHD were defined according to NIH criteria, 3PR: partial response, CR: complete response; 4Until last follow up, none of the patients experienced a relapse of GvHD. 5Follow up was calculated from the time of initiation of ruxolitinib treatment.

In patient 01, ruxolitinib was discontinued at week 16 because of complete resolution of all GvHD signs. The patient did not develop any signs of GvHD after discontinuation of ruxolitinib until last follow up.

Disclosures

Off Label Use: Ruxolitinib in GvHD.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution