To the editor:

Recently, inhibition of lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) has gained attention as a potential novel treatment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).1-3  However, expression in other hematologic neoplasms has not been examined. LSD1 is a central epigenetic regulator of chromatin, acting in concert with many different activating and repressive histone-modifying complexes.4  It regulates self-renewal and differentiation in human embryonic stem cells5  and is overexpressed in a wide variety of human neoplasms.6  LSD1 depletion disrupts hematopoietic differentiation, and LSD1 has been shown to play a pivotal role in the maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells and differentiation of granulopoiesis, thrombopoiesis, and erythropoiesis.7  In murine leukemia models, targeting of LSD1 via tranylcypromine analogs abrogated oncogenic potential and induced differentiation of tumor cells. Inhibition of LSD1 was effective in unlocking the all-trans-retinoic acid–driven therapeutic response in non-acute promyelocytic leukemia AML.3 

To widen the range of hematologic and lymphatic malignancies that may be targeted by using LSD1 inhibitors, we examined the expression of LSD1 in normal, reactive, and neoplastic diseases in bone marrow trephine biopsies (n = 197) as well as lymphoid neoplasms in biopsies from lymphatic tissues (n = 354). Bone marrow from patients with a completely normal blood count (biopsy obtained for staging purpose) were mostly negative for LSD1 (1 [6.7%] of 15) (Table 1), whereas LSD1 was expressed in the majority of reactive bone marrow samples, especially in erythroid cells and megakaryopoiesis (18 [66.7%] of 27).

Table 1

LSD1 expression in normal and reactive hematopoiesis and hematopoietic and lymphoid neoplasms

ICD-O-3No.Intensity of expressionMean age (y)SDF%M%
Negative%Positive%
Hematopoiesis and hematopoietic neoplasms             
 Normal NA 15 14 93.3 6.7 49.6 18.4 53.3 46.7 
 Reactive NA 27 33.3 18 66.7 61.6 15.9 29.6 19 70.4 
 MPN 9875/3 CML 19 13 68.4 31.6 61.6 11.2 47.4 10 52.6 
 9950/3 PV 66.7 33.3 60.1 12.2 44.4 55.6 
 9961/3 PMF 31 13 41.9 18 58.1 65.2 14.5 16 51.6 15 48.4 
 9962/3 ET 12 58.3 41.7 68.2 11.6 58.3 41.7 
 Total 71 39 54.9 32 45.1 64.1 13.0 36 50.7 35 49.3 
 MDS/MPN 9945/3 CMML 10 50.0 50.0 69.4 6.9 30.0 70.0 
 MDS Various, RA, RARS, RAEB I, RAEB II 16 43.8 56.3 66.8 13.3 25.0 12 75.0 
 AML Various, AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities 42.9 57.1 54.9 13.9 57.1 42.9 
 9895/3 AML with myelodysplasia related changes 18 44.4 10 55.6 69.2 9.2 33.3 12 66.7 
 9861/3 AML NOS 13 46.2 53.8 64.1 13.3 69.2 30.8 
 NA, blast crisis from MPN 100.0 0.0 68.9 5.4 28.6 71.4 
 Total 45 24 53.3 21 46.7 65.4 11.7 21 46.7 24 53.3 
 ALL 9811/3 B-ALL 11 45.5 54.5 54.6 19.5 18.2 81.8 
 9837/3 T-ALL 0.0 100.0 47.0 26.9 0.0 100.0 
 Total 13 38.5 61.5 53.5 19.6 15.4 11 84.6 
Lymphoid neoplasms             
 Low-grade B-NHL 9823/3 CLL/SLL 36 36 100.0 0.0 66.8 10.7 12 33.3 24 66.7 
 9699/3 Marginal zone lymphoma 21 16 76.2 23.8 64.2 12.6 10 47.6 11 52.4 
 9690/3 Follicular lymphoma, grade 1,2 57 54 94.7 5.3 60.6 11.8 29 50.9 28 49.1 
 9673/3 Mantle cell lymphoma 33 22 66.7 11 33.3 68.2 8.8 24.2 25 75.8 
 Total 147 128 87.1 19 12.9 64.3 11.4 59 40.1 88 59.9 
 High-grade B-NHL             
 9690/3 Follicular lymphoma, grade 3a,3b 20 15 75.0 25.0 59.7 16.7 14 70.0 30.0 
 9680/3 DLBCL NOS 102 63 61.8 39 38.2 62.2 17.3 48 47.1 54 52.9 
 9687/3 Burkitt lymphoma 11.1 88.9 56.7 27.5 33.3 66.7 
 Total 131 79 60.3 52 39.7 61.4 17.9 65 49.6 66 50.4 
 B-NHL Total 278 207 74.5 71 25.5 63.0 14.9 124 44.6 154 55.4 
 T-NHL             
 9705/3 AITL 25.0 75.0 66.6 13.3 50.0 50.0 
 9714/3 ALCL 0.0 100.0 44.2 26.2 33.3 66.7 
 9705/3 PTCL NOS 71.4 28.6 76.7 6.8 71.4 28.6 
 Total 21 33.3 14 66.7 62.5 16.7 11 52.4 10 47.6 
 HL             
 9663/3 Nodular sclerosing type 36 14 38.9 22 61.1 34.6 19.0 21 58.3 15 41.7 
 9652/3 Mixed cellularity subtype 10 20.0 80.0 31,8 14.6 50.0 50.0 
 9651/3 Lymphocyte-rich/lymphocyte-predominant 11.1 88.9 50.7 23.6 55.6 44.4 
 Total 55 17 30.9 38 69.1 36.8 19.8 31 56.4 24 43.6 
ICD-O-3No.Intensity of expressionMean age (y)SDF%M%
Negative%Positive%
Hematopoiesis and hematopoietic neoplasms             
 Normal NA 15 14 93.3 6.7 49.6 18.4 53.3 46.7 
 Reactive NA 27 33.3 18 66.7 61.6 15.9 29.6 19 70.4 
 MPN 9875/3 CML 19 13 68.4 31.6 61.6 11.2 47.4 10 52.6 
 9950/3 PV 66.7 33.3 60.1 12.2 44.4 55.6 
 9961/3 PMF 31 13 41.9 18 58.1 65.2 14.5 16 51.6 15 48.4 
 9962/3 ET 12 58.3 41.7 68.2 11.6 58.3 41.7 
 Total 71 39 54.9 32 45.1 64.1 13.0 36 50.7 35 49.3 
 MDS/MPN 9945/3 CMML 10 50.0 50.0 69.4 6.9 30.0 70.0 
 MDS Various, RA, RARS, RAEB I, RAEB II 16 43.8 56.3 66.8 13.3 25.0 12 75.0 
 AML Various, AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities 42.9 57.1 54.9 13.9 57.1 42.9 
 9895/3 AML with myelodysplasia related changes 18 44.4 10 55.6 69.2 9.2 33.3 12 66.7 
 9861/3 AML NOS 13 46.2 53.8 64.1 13.3 69.2 30.8 
 NA, blast crisis from MPN 100.0 0.0 68.9 5.4 28.6 71.4 
 Total 45 24 53.3 21 46.7 65.4 11.7 21 46.7 24 53.3 
 ALL 9811/3 B-ALL 11 45.5 54.5 54.6 19.5 18.2 81.8 
 9837/3 T-ALL 0.0 100.0 47.0 26.9 0.0 100.0 
 Total 13 38.5 61.5 53.5 19.6 15.4 11 84.6 
Lymphoid neoplasms             
 Low-grade B-NHL 9823/3 CLL/SLL 36 36 100.0 0.0 66.8 10.7 12 33.3 24 66.7 
 9699/3 Marginal zone lymphoma 21 16 76.2 23.8 64.2 12.6 10 47.6 11 52.4 
 9690/3 Follicular lymphoma, grade 1,2 57 54 94.7 5.3 60.6 11.8 29 50.9 28 49.1 
 9673/3 Mantle cell lymphoma 33 22 66.7 11 33.3 68.2 8.8 24.2 25 75.8 
 Total 147 128 87.1 19 12.9 64.3 11.4 59 40.1 88 59.9 
 High-grade B-NHL             
 9690/3 Follicular lymphoma, grade 3a,3b 20 15 75.0 25.0 59.7 16.7 14 70.0 30.0 
 9680/3 DLBCL NOS 102 63 61.8 39 38.2 62.2 17.3 48 47.1 54 52.9 
 9687/3 Burkitt lymphoma 11.1 88.9 56.7 27.5 33.3 66.7 
 Total 131 79 60.3 52 39.7 61.4 17.9 65 49.6 66 50.4 
 B-NHL Total 278 207 74.5 71 25.5 63.0 14.9 124 44.6 154 55.4 
 T-NHL             
 9705/3 AITL 25.0 75.0 66.6 13.3 50.0 50.0 
 9714/3 ALCL 0.0 100.0 44.2 26.2 33.3 66.7 
 9705/3 PTCL NOS 71.4 28.6 76.7 6.8 71.4 28.6 
 Total 21 33.3 14 66.7 62.5 16.7 11 52.4 10 47.6 
 HL             
 9663/3 Nodular sclerosing type 36 14 38.9 22 61.1 34.6 19.0 21 58.3 15 41.7 
 9652/3 Mixed cellularity subtype 10 20.0 80.0 31,8 14.6 50.0 50.0 
 9651/3 Lymphocyte-rich/lymphocyte-predominant 11.1 88.9 50.7 23.6 55.6 44.4 
 Total 55 17 30.9 38 69.1 36.8 19.8 31 56.4 24 43.6 

To determine LSD1 expression in hematopoiesis and hematopoietic neoplasms, bone marrow trephine biopsies were decalcified and immunostained by using a monoclonal anti-mouse antibody against LSD1 (1:500; Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO). Intensity of expression was assessed as either none or background (negative) or moderate or strong (positive). Expression was positive in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), normal bone marrow, and reactive bone marrow if 1 to 3 lineages showed intensive expression, which was most often observed in the erythroid and megakaryocytic lineage. In acute leukemias, blasts only were scored. To determine LSD1 expression in lymphoid neoplasms, tissue microarrays of lymphoid tissues were immunostained with anti-mouse antibody against LSD1 (1:2000; Novus Biologicals). Samples with expression in less than 10% of tumor cells were scored as negative; moderate or strong staining in more than 10% of tumor cells was scored positive. Tissue microarrays were constructed from lymphoma tissue samples reclassified according the World Health Organization 2008 classification and were obtained from the archives of the Institute of Pathology at the University of Bonn as described.9  LSD1 was expressed in 75 (48.4%) of 155 hematopoietic neoplasms but in only 123 (34.7%) of 354 lymphoid neoplasms (Pearson χ2 test P < .004). Statistically significant differences were also found in expression of normal and reactive bone marrow (Fisher’s exact test P < .001) and normal and neoplastic bone marrow (Fisher’s exact test, P < .002). Among lymphoid neoplasms, there was a significant difference between high-grade and low-grade B-NHLs (Pearson χ2 test P < .001). Expression in B-NHLs combined differed from T-cell NHLs (T-NHLs) as well as from Hodgkin lymphomas (HLs) (Pearson χ2 test, P < .001 in both cases). All calculations were performed by using SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20 (IBM, Armonk, NY).

AITL, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma; ALCL, anaplastic large-cell lymphoma; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; B-ALL, B-cell ALL; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, B-cell type; CML, chronic myelogenous leukemia; CMML, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; ET, essential thrombocythemia; F, female; ICD-O-03, International Classification of Diseases-Oncology, third edition; M, male; NA, not applicable; NOS, not otherwise specified; PMF, primary myelofibrosis; PTCL, peripheral T-cell-lymphoma; PV, polycythemia vera; RA, refractory anemia; RAEB, refractory anemia with excess blasts; RARS, refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts; SLL, small lymphocytic lymphoma; SD, standard deviation; T-ALL, T-cell ALL.

In myeloproliferative neoplasms, excluding chronic myelogenous leukemia, LSD1 was expressed in half the patients (26 [50.0%] of 52), mainly in megakaryocytes, in erythroid cells and, to a lesser degree, in early myeloid cells. In chronic myelogenous leukemia, LSD1 was expressed in one third of the patients (6 [31.6%] of 19), primarily in myeloid cells and megakaryocytes. Further, in myelodysplastic syndromes, more than half the patients (9 [56.3%] of 16) demonstrated nuclear expression in dysplastic megakaryocytes and early erythroid cells. Atypical myelocytic and monocytic cells as well as megakaryocytes showed LSD1 expression in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (5 [50.0%] of 10). LSD1 was expressed frequently in a blast-specific nuclear pattern in primary and secondary AMLs (21 [46.7%] of 45).

LSD1 expression in lymphoid malignancies was observed in 123 of 354 patients or 34.7% overall. Low-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHLs) expressed LSD1 less often (19 [12.9%] of 147) than did high-grade B-NHLs (52 [39.7%] of 131) (Pearson χ2 test P < .001) (Table 1). Both, T-cell NHLs (14 [66.7%] of 21) and Hodgkin lymphomas (38 [69.1%] of 55) showed LSD1 expression more frequently than B-NHLs (71 [25.5%] of 278) (Pearson χ2 test P < .001 for both).

On the basis of these results, we conclude that in addition to in AML, LSD1 is overexpressed in myeloproliferative neoplasms, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndromes, possibly widening the spectrum of diseases amenable to LSD1 inhibitor therapy.

Expression in reactive hematopoiesis needs to be considered when using LSD1 inhibitors to treat these diseases, consistent with concerns raised by other investigators.7,8  However, transient cytopenias may still be manageable because more established cytotoxic therapies also affect hematopoiesis.

Whether patients with the above-mentioned diseases would benefit from treatment with LSD1 inhibitors requires further investigation.

Contribution: D.N. analyzed data, wrote the manuscript, and collected data; I.G. designed the study, wrote the manuscript, and collected data; J.K. performed the fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis; T.H. performed the statistical analysis; M.M. performed data analysis and collected data; and V.J. analyzed the clinical data and wrote the manuscript.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Ines Gütgemann, Department of Pathology, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53127 Bonn, Germany; e-mail: ines.guetgemann@ukb.uni-bonn.de.

1
Dent
 
SY
Chandra
 
J
The lasting influence of LSD1 in the blood.
Elife
2013
, vol. 
2
 pg. 
e00963
 
2
Harris
 
WJ
Huang
 
X
Lynch
 
JT
, et al. 
The histone demethylase KDM1A sustains the oncogenic potential of MLL-AF9 leukemia stem cells.
Cancer Cell
2012
, vol. 
21
 
4
(pg. 
473
-
487
)
3
Schenk
 
T
Chen
 
WC
Göllner
 
S
, et al. 
Inhibition of the LSD1 (KDM1A) demethylase reactivates the all-trans-retinoic acid differentiation pathway in acute myeloid leukemia.
Nat Med
2012
, vol. 
18
 
4
(pg. 
605
-
611
)
4
Rudolph
 
T
Beuch
 
S
Reuter
 
G
Lysine-specific histone demethylase LSD1 and the dynamic control of chromatin.
Biol Chem
2013
, vol. 
394
 
8
(pg. 
1019
-
1028
)
5
Adamo
 
A
Sesé
 
B
Boue
 
S
, et al. 
LSD1 regulates the balance between self-renewal and differentiation in human embryonic stem cells.
Nat Cell Biol
2011
, vol. 
13
 
6
(pg. 
652
-
659
)
6
Amente
 
S
Lania
 
L
Majello
 
B
 
The histone LSD1 demethylase in stemness and cancer transcription programs. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1829(10):981-986
7
Kerenyi
 
MA
Shao
 
Z
Hsu
 
YJ
, et al. 
Histone demethylase Lsd1 represses hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell signatures during blood cell maturation.
Elife
2013
, vol. 
2
 pg. 
e00633
 
8
Sprüssel
 
A
Schulte
 
JH
Weber
 
S
, et al. 
Lysine-specific demethylase 1 restricts hematopoietic progenitor proliferation and is essential for terminal differentiation.
Leukemia
2012
, vol. 
26
 
9
(pg. 
2039
-
2051
)
9
Khristi
 
J
Mey
 
U
Kirfel
 
J
Schmidt-Wolf
 
IG
Gütgemann
 
I
Sequential Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in non-immunocompromised patients.
Ann Hematol
2013
, vol. 
92
 
11
(pg. 
1565
-
1567
)
Sign in via your Institution