Abstract
Abstract 990
Cancer stem cells are a chemotherapy-resistant subpopulation capable of self-renewal and of regenerating bulk tumor, thereby causing relapse and ultimately patient's death. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) has been found to be a reliable marker for cancer stem cells in many human malignancies. The purpose of this study is to investigate the stem cell–related function and clinical significance of ALDH1 in myeloma.
9 myeloma (MM) cell lines (XG6, KMS12B, ARP1, 8226, U266, H929, JJN3, OPM2, 5T33) were assessed for ALDH1 activity using the ALDEFLUOR® assay. The positive fraction was sorted using FACSAria II. The functional role of ALDH1+ cells in MM was characterized by clonogenic capacity using soft agar assays and tumorigenicity in NOD-RAG/null gamma mice. Gene expression profiling (GEP) comparison between ALDH1+ and ALDH1- cells was performed using the Affymetrix U133Plus2 chips. We also performed GEP on 9 patients including 36 samples at baseline, after chemotherapy (pre-1st and pre-2nd, post-2nd autologous stem cell transplants (ASCT), and pre-consolidation. In addition, a total of 550 samples with GEP and clinical data, obtained from published studies, were analyzed.
ALDH1 expression increases in the samples post-treatment compared to those at baseline using the serial GEPs obtained pre-1st, pre-2nd, and post-2nd ASCT from 9 MM patients. All 9 MM cell lines studied contained a very small subset of cells with ALDH1 activity (ALDH1+), among which XG6, KMS12B, ARP1 (human MM cell lines), and 5TGM1 (mouse MM cell line) had the highest fraction of ALDH1+ cells (3.63%, 3.67%, 1.7%, and 1.9% respectively). The colony-forming efficiency of ALDH1+ cells was almost 2× higher (1390 clones out of 5000 seeding cells) than that of the ALDH1− cells (730 clones out of 5000 seeding cells) in ARP1; p<0.01). The tumorigenicity of FACS-sorted ARP1 ALDH1+ and ALDH1− cells was compared by injecting 10,000 cells subcutaneously into the right flank of NOD-Rag/null gamma mice (n=5). After 8 weeks, ALDH1+ cells showed a greater tumor forming capacity (4/5 or 80%) than the ALDH1− group (1/5 or 20%) and also a larger average tumor volume (6.80cm3 vs 1.94 cm3). Furthermore, we treated the two groups with the bortezomib for 48 hours and found that ALDH1+ cells showed much less sensitivity than the ALDH1− cells (P < 0.01) at different bortezomib concentrations. GEP performed on XG6, KMS12B, and ARP1 human cell lines showed that 20 genes were highly differentially expressed between ALDH1+ and ALDH1− fractions. A risk score determination showed that 17 of the 20 genes were up-regulated (UBE2C, CDC2, FAM83D, TOP2A, ASPM, DEPDC1, HJURP, CDCA3, AURKA, TTK, NCAPH, CCNB1, NEK2, KPNA2, KIF14, NDC80 and AURKB) and the remaining 3 were down-regulated (CALU,228697_at, 231597_X_at). Five of the 17 up-regulated genes are linked to drug resistance (NEK2, CDC2, CCNB1 and TOP2A) and the stemness-related Notch pathway (TTK). Kaplan-Meier analyses of event-free and overall survivals were used to determine the correlation of risk score with patient outcome. These revealed inferior outcomes among the 38 patients with a high level of ALDH1 risk score compared to the remaining 313 patients with a low level of ALDH1 risk score in the TT2 trial (p<0.0001) and also among the 31 patients with ALDH1+ compared to the remaining 150 patients with ALDH1− MM cells in the TT3 trial (p=0.0007).
Our data suggest that MM cells contain a minor but more tumorigenic ALDH1+ stem cell-like compartment consisting of chemotherapy-resistant cells, and that ALDH positivity by GEP confers inferior survival outcomes in MM patients. Future studies to perform include investigating how ALDH1 activity is linked to the stemness-related Notch pathway and whether inhibiting ALDH1 directly or indirectly is a viable target for novel anti-MM therapy.
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Author notes
Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal