Abstract 2807

CCDC26 is a retinoic acid-dependent modulator of myeloid cell differentiation and death (Yin W et al. Oncogene 2006 :25 :3735). CCDC26 maps to chromosome 8q24.21 and germline polymorphisms in the gene have been associated with low-grade gliomas (Jenkins RB et al. Cancer Genetics 2011;204 :13), which in turn have recently been shown to frequently express IDH1 mutations (Parsons D et al, Science 2008;321 :1807). More recently, we have discovered that CCDC26 SNP associations in gliomas are primarily restricted to patients with IDH1 mutations (Jenkins et al. unpublished observations). We therefore hypothesized that germline CCDC26 SNPS might be associated with patients with myeloid malignancies that harbor IDH1 mutations (Mardis et al. NEJM 2009;361 :1058). Seventy-two IDH -mutated patients with chronic or blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia (most constituting post-MPN events) were identified: 18 IDH1 R132, one IDH2 R172 and 53 IDH2 R140. These 72 patients and a control group of 153 IDH unmutated cases with myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic neoplasms (total n =225) were genotyped for CCDC26 risk alleles associated with IDH -mutated gliomas: rs10464870, rs891835 and rs4295627. The respective minor allele frequencies (MAF) were significantly different between IDH1 (11%, 8% and 6%) and IDH2 (30%, 27% and 24%) mutated cases (p=0.037, 0.040 and 0.021; OR 3.4, 3.7 and 6.1 with 95% CI of 1.1–10.5, 1.1–13.0 and 1.3–28.9) as well as between IDH- wild type (24%, 24% and 21%) and IDH1 -mutated (11%, 8% and 6%) cases (p=0.10, 0.043 and 0.035; OR 0.42, 0.29 and 0.21 with 95% CI of 0.15–1.19, 0.09–0.96 and 0.05–0.90). The MAF values in our IDH -unmutated cases were similar to that of population-based controls. However, the direction of SNP associations in IDH1 -mutated myeloid malignancies were opposite of those seen in IDH1 -mutated gliomas. Our observations suggest a differential effect of CCDC26 genetic polymorphisms in IDH1 -mutated myeloid malignancies compared to either their IDH2 R140-mutated or IDH1 -mutated gliomas. Such differences in genomic context might contribute to hitherto seen differences in prognostic impact between IDH2 R140 vs. IDH1 R132 vs. IDH2 R172, in AML (Green CL et al. Blood Published online before print May 19, 2011, doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-322479).

Disclosures:

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution