Abstract 1865

Poster Board I-890

Background:

The incorporation of novel therapies, including thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide, in the treatment of multiple myeloma as induction, maintenance, or salvage therapy, along with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is expected to result in improved outcome. The impact of a single regimen or drug on Progression Free Survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) is difficult to determine because, even within a single institution, these drugs and treatment modalities are used in varying sequences among patients. The goal of this retrospective analysis is to determine the PFS and OS of patients with multiple myeloma treated with ASCT at a single institution, in the era of novel therapeutic agents and to validate the significance of established prognostic factors.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with multiple myeloma who were eligible to undergo ASCT at MSKCC between 2000 and 2007 and received novel therapies including thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide during the course of their disease. During this period of time, 274 patients were transplanted and were analyzed for overall survival. Among them, a subset of 116 patients who received induction therapy, ASCT, and long term follow up at MSKCC, on whom baseline data and response analysis at all stages of disease was available, was used to analyze prognostic factors. Log-rank test was performed to assess the difference of OS and PFS among subgroups of patients stratified by baseline variables. A time-dependent Cox model was used to assess the effect of post treatment parameters on OS and PFS. Landmark analysis at 6 months after first ASCT was performed to assess the association between post-transplant response and survival endpoints.

Results:

For the entire study population of MM patients (n=274), with a median follow up of 4 years, the median OS measured from the time of transplant is 7 years [95% CI (6, not reached)]. For the subset of 116 patients treated exclusively at MSKCC, with a median follow up of 5 years, the median OS measured from initial treatment has not been reached and median PFS is 3 years =95% CI (2,4)] Using the subset of 116 patients treated exclusively at MSKCC, several baseline characteristics were analyzed as prognostic factors for OS and PFS including age =median age 57 (32 to 72)] gender =M 73, F 43] type of M-spike =IgGK 49, IgGL 21, FKLC 17, IgAK 13, FLLC 10, IgAL 5, IgMK 1] kappa to lambda ratio at diagnosis =Normal 15, Abnormal 75, Not available 26] ISS stage =I 50, II 49, III 16] and cytogenetic risk =standard 95, high 14, N/A 7] As reported by others, the type of monoclonal protein had a significant impact on OS (P = 0.02) with FKLC and IgAK having the worse prognosis. Other baseline characteristics including age, gender and K/L ratio did not influence OS and none affected the PFS. Several post treatment parameters were also analyzed including response to initial therapy =CR 15, nCR 18, VGPR 20, PR 42, SD 15, POD 5] response to ASCT =CR 73, VGPR 14, PR 29] response conversion =based on response before and after first ASCT: ≥VGPR - ≥ VGPR 51; < VGPR - ≥ VGPR 34, and < VGPR - < 0.0001, and P < 0.0001, respectively).

Conclusion:

This retrospective study confirms the marked improvement in OS for patients who undergo ASCT in the era of novel anti-myeloma therapies. It is difficult to ascribe this improvement to a specific regimen but rather probably to the abundance of successive options available to myeloma patients in the current era. Interestingly, we find no prognostic value to the response status to initial therapy or to ASCT for overall survival in contrast to PFS.

Disclosures:

Comenzo:Millenium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution