The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired thrombophilia, characterized by the occurrence of venous and arterial events. This article examines the laboratory and key clinical aspects of APS. Particular focus is given to anti–beta 2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) antibodies in view of their recent inclusion in the APS classification criteria. The clinical utility of using the β2GPI enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, in conjunction with the established lupus anticoagulant assays and cardiolipin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, for diagnosing and risk stratifying patients suspected of having APS is discussed. The relative importance of the various assays in diagnosing obstetric APS (early and late gestation miscarriages) is explored. The implications of recent epidemiologic findings for possibly understanding the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of obstetric APS are highlighted. Insights into which patients with obstetric APS may be at most risk of thrombotic complications are presented.

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an important cause of acquired thrombophilia and recurrent miscarriages. This narrative-style review discusses the key laboratory and clinical aspects of APS. Particular focus is given to antibodies against beta 2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI), in view of their recent inclusion in the APS laboratory classification criteria1  (Figure 1). The evidence for assessing antiprothrombin and antiphosphatidylethanolamine antibodies to diagnose APS is also examined.

Figure 1

The updated classification criteria for APS.

Figure 1

The updated classification criteria for APS.

Close modal

The utility of the β2GPI enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), when used in conjunction with the cardiolipin (CL) ELISA and the lupus anticoagulant (LA) assays, in risk-stratifying APS patients is explored. Work undertaken by many groups over the years, ours included, in delineating the key characteristics of anti-β2GPI antibodies that associate with APS is presented.

Miscarriages are a major feature of APS. The relative importance of the LA assays, the CL-ELISA, and the β2GPI-ELISA in diagnosing APS in the context of early and late gestation miscarriages is assessed. The value of recent epidemiologic and basic science insights in refining our understanding of obstetric APS pathophysiology is examined, particularly with regards to considering the possibility that distinct mechanisms may be responsible for early and late miscarriages. The clinical implications arising from these observations are discussed.

Antiphospholipid antibodies is a term applied to antibodies detected traditionally by 2 types of assays, the CL-ELISA, which stems from the earlier work of Harris et al,2  and the LA assays.3 

The first report of a cofactor requirement for antibodies to bind cardiolipin (an anionic phospholipid) from patients with APS was by McNeil et al in 1989.4  This was subsequently confirmed by Galli et al5  and Matsuura et al6  in 1990. Purification and sequencing of the cofactor as β2GPI was reported by McNeil et al in 1990.7  It was noted that anionic phospholipid is not an absolute requirement for antibodies to bind β2GPI,8  negating the notion that β2GPI is a “cofactor” for antibody binding. Antibodies from these patients can bind to β2GPI immobilized on an irradiated plate in the absence of anionic phospholipids.9  A negatively charged surface serves a 2-fold role. It enables β2GPI clustering, allowing divalent binding by the low affinity antibodies.10,11  It also enables the β2GPI molecule to undergo a conformational change,9  exposing a cryptic epitope on the first domain.12 

Positivity on the CL-ELISA is not directed against β2GPI in the context of a number of infections.13  However, this is not true for all types of infections, as elevated anti-β2GPI antibodies in patients with leishmaniasis, leptospirosis,14  and leprosy15  have been noted. A key distinguishing feature between anti-β2GPI antibodies occurring in the context of leprosy and those that strongly associate with thrombosis is that in the former instance they are directed against an epitope on domain V of β2GPI,15  whereas evidence generated by a number of independent groups suggests in the context of thrombosis they target a specific epitope on domain I16-20  (Figure 2). In addition, anti-β2GPI antibodies that associate with the APS clinical phenotype are predominantly the immunoglobulin G (IgG) isotype, particularly the IgG2 subclass,21  whereas those occurring in association with infections such as leprosy are of the IgM isotype.22  The LA assay detects either anti-β2GPI23-25  or antiprothrombin antibodies,26,27  with the latter also occurring in association with infections, such as leprosy.22 

Figure 2

The β2GPI B-cell epitope in patients with APS is on domain I of the molecule. AA indicates amino acids; G40, glycine at position 40; R43, arginine at position 43; K19, lysine at position 19; I-V, domains I through to V. From Passam and Krilis108  with permission.

Figure 2

The β2GPI B-cell epitope in patients with APS is on domain I of the molecule. AA indicates amino acids; G40, glycine at position 40; R43, arginine at position 43; K19, lysine at position 19; I-V, domains I through to V. From Passam and Krilis108  with permission.

Close modal

Hence, even though it is a misnomer, the term antiphospholipid antibody as a generic term persists when referring to antibodies that specifically target β2GPI and prothrombin.

Lupus anticoagulant

The LA is an assay that detects immunoglobulins that, although prevent coagulation in vitro, associate with thrombosis (Figure 3).28  It is an important tool for diagnosing APS.1  The LA assay system chosen has to comply with the 3-step strategy defined in the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis criteria29 : (1) screening test: demonstration of the prolongation of a phospholipid-dependent clotting time beyond the upper limit of the reference interval; (2) mixing test: confirmation of the presence of an inhibitor and the exclusion of a coagulation factor deficiency; and (3) confirmation that the inhibitor is phospholipid-dependent and not directed against a specific coagulation factor. Hence, evidence for the presence of LA is provided by performing a sequential series of investigations, which are demarcated by the terms screening tests and confirmatory tests, the latter divided into mixing studies and tests assessing for phospholipid dependence.

Figure 3

The lupus anticoagulant (LAC) correlates better with thrombosis than aCL. From Galli et al28  with permission.

Figure 3

The lupus anticoagulant (LAC) correlates better with thrombosis than aCL. From Galli et al28  with permission.

Close modal

There are different assays that can be used to screen for LA, although a number of surveys performed in different countries30-32  suggest that some of the commonly used ones are the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), the dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT), and the kaolin clotting time. A description of the various assays and the methodology for their performance can be found in published guidelines.33,34  In view of the fact that no single screening test is 100% sensitive to detect all LA, at least one additional screening test is recommended.35  One of the screening tests undertaken should use activation of the intrinsic pathway of coagulation (eg, aPTT or kaolin clotting time) and the other the direct activation of factor X (eg, dRVVT).36  Local reference ranges should be established for each LA method used and for each coagulometer.37 

The mixing studies involve combining the patient's plasma with normal plasma (1:1) and assessing the influence of this procedure on clotting time, the theoretical underpinning being that if prolongation of clotting time is the result of a coagulation factor deficiency, it will correct to normal, whereas with LA, correction requires larger volumes of normal plasma.33  A number of methods have been proposed by which this step can be interpreted,36  the most robust being the calculation of the index of circulating anticoagulant, initially proposed by Rosner et al.38 

To determine whether the inhibitor is phospholipid-dependent, the platelet-neutralization procedure, which uses either washed platelets activated with calcium ionophore or platelets lysed by repeated freeze-thawing (leading to the exposure of anionic phospholipid surfaces), is commonly used.33  Correction of the clotting time will occur in the presence of LA. Alternate reagents to assess for this property include a modified aPTT reagent, which contains hexagonal (II) phase phospholipids, which specifically bind LA.39  With regard to the dRVVT confirmatory tests, alternatives to the platelet-neutralization procedure that can be considered include reagents with a high concentration of phospholipid or an LA-insensitive phospholipid.33 

It is pertinent to note that there is considerable interlaboratory variation with the performance of the LA assays. National surveys carried out in Europe,30,32,40  the United States,41  and Australia31  emphasize this issue. In recent surveys there was a false-positive detection of LA in 24% of samples32  and a false-negative result from 18.5% of participating centers.42  One of the factors that might contribute to a false-positive result is heparin contamination.32  This possibility may be assessed for by measuring the thrombin time and, if prolonged, determining anti-FXa activity.32  Other reasons for false-positive results include the presence of specific anticoagulation factor antibodies.29,43  The patient's history, assessing for a bleeding diathesis, is relevant in this setting. Preanalytical variables, such as improper plasma preparation, may lead to false-negative results because of contamination with platelets.44  The diluting effect of mixing studies may also lead to false negatives in instances in which the LA is weak.33,36  In one externally conducted quality control study, half of the weak LAs were not detected.30  There is evidence to suggest that adherence to published guidelines may improve the performance of LA testing.42 

It is recommended that an assessment for LA not be undertaken while the patient is anticoagulated.1  However, if it is necessary to do so, LA can be detected by such methods as assessing the taipan snake venom/ecarin clotting times because they are relatively insensitive to oral anticoagulation.45  Alternatively, the performance of the dRVVT on equal volume mixtures of normal and test plasma can be considered, with a similar procedure for the confirmation steps. A positive result is useful, although a negative result may be unreliable.33 

Regardless of the method chosen to test for LA, internal laboratory quality controls are important, particularly the utilization of known positive and negative LA controls with each batch of testing.33  An attempt in the direction of standardization of the LA test has also been made by the development of monoclonal antibodies with LA activity for spiking normal plasma to overcome restrictions in the availability of patients samples.46,47  In addition, developing reference standards from lyophilized LA plasmas of known potency is being considered (International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis Scientific Subcommittee Session 2007). An update of the criteria for the optimal performance of LA is anticipated in the near future.

To refine the clinical utility of LA testing, investigators have been interested in differentiating the LA immunoglobulin according to target antigen48,49  given reports that β2GPI-dependent LA may more strongly associate with thrombosis than non–β2GPI-dependent LA.50  These novel assays take advantage of the distinct properties of β2GPI-dependent LA to bind cardiolipin48  and to display enhanced phospholipid binding in the presence of calcium chloride, compared with non–β2GPI-dependent LA.49  The value of these tests awaits further clinical trials.

The cardiolipin ELISA

This ELISA involves the assessment of diluted patient serum to binding a CL-coated plate in the presence of bovine serum. It will detect antibodies that bind CL alone and those that bind CL-bound bovine β2GPI. Both types are termed anti-CL antibodies (αCL; Figure 4). An inherent weakness of this assay is that there remains the potential to miss patients with antibodies that bind human but not bovine β2GPI. Hence, some assays now use human β2GPI in the CL-ELISA.

Figure 4

Schematic representation of the cardiolipin ELISA, which detects a number of antibody specificities, including β2GPI. From Passam and Krilis108  with permission.

Figure 4

Schematic representation of the cardiolipin ELISA, which detects a number of antibody specificities, including β2GPI. From Passam and Krilis108  with permission.

Close modal

IgG and IgM αCL are expressed in international standardized GPL and MPL units, respectively. These units should be derived using standardized IgG and IgM αCL calibrators.51  GPL and MPL units are defined as binding observed with 1 μg of affinity-purified polyclonal IgG and IgM αCL that were distributed to participating laboratories.52  Secondary standards were ultimately calibrated against the primary standards. Hence, different batches of calibrators will contain heterogeneous polyclonal αCL from different patients. This has led to suggestions that these calibrators may not necessarily behave in a homogeneous fashion when assayed at different dilutions or using different kits.53  This is underlined by the observation of considerable interlaboratory variability,51  even when using the same batch of calibrators. There is also a high degree of variability between different commercial kits for αCL detection when assessed within the same laboratory, with lower variability seen with different commercial anti-β2GPI kits.54  Methodologic insights pertaining to the optimal performance of the CL-ELISA have recently been published by Pierangeli and Harris.55 

A positive result is defined as a medium or high titer (ie, either > 99th percentile, or > 40 GPL or MPL).1  To satisfy the APS laboratory classification criteria, a patient has to be persistently positive on either one of the assays (CL-ELISA, LA, or β2GPI-ELISA) for at least 12 weeks.

The direct β2GPI ELISA

This type of ELISA involves coating-purified, native β2GPI directly onto an irradiated plate. In theory, this type of assay should detect a greater proportion of clinically relevant antibodies than the CL assay. However, observations that there exist “nonpathogenic” antibodies that bind β2GPI within this assay12  suggest that human β2GPI binding an artificial plastic surface may expose additional neoepitopes, thus reducing the specificity of this assay in detecting clinically relevant antibodies. This may in part explain why some studies have found no association of thrombosis with positivity on the direct β2GPI-ELISA.56 

There remains a lack of a formal, universally accepted method for performing this ELISA, coupled with a lack of standardized calibrators. The commercial kits are calibrated by the manufacturers' own calibrators and expressed in arbitrary units. This has prompted calls to use universally standardized calibrators, such as the humanized monoclonal antibodies HCAL (IgG) and EY2C9 (IgM).57,58  Despite this, there generally seems to be better interlaboratory consensus with this ELISA compared with the CL assay.59,60  In the revised APS classification criteria, a positive result on the direct β2GPI-ELISA is defined as a titer greater than the 99th percentile.1 

The β2GPI molecule is divided into 5 domains (DI-DV).61  Anti-β2GPI antibodies may predominantly target domain I in APS patients.16  There is some controversy, as a number of other epitopes on β2GPI have been reported.62  This area has been extensively reviewed by Giles et al,62  who concluded that the major APS epitope is probably on domain I. The major β2GPI domain I epitope includes the surface-exposed residues Gly40-Arg43.17,18  It is a complex conformational epitope, with evidence suggesting it may include Arg39, the domain I-II interlinker, and Asp8 and Asp9.20  Nondomain I anti-β2GPI antibodies (which target domain V) may be detected in patients with leprosy15  and childhood atopic dermatitis.63 

de Laat et al50  analyzed patients with thrombosis who were positive on the LA assay and satisfied the classification criteria for APS. The predominant autoantibodies were targeting β2GPI,50  involving the domain I residues Gly40-Arg43.19  Non-β2GPI antibodies with LA activity did not independently associate with thrombosis50  (Figure 5). The importance of anti-β2GPI, relative to non-β2GPI antibodies with LA activity, in the context of thrombosis has been suggested by others.64,65  Antiprothrombin and anti-β2GPI antibodies may occur concurrently.66 

Figure 5

β2GPI-dependent LAC strongly associates with thrombosis, compared with factor II (prothrombin)-dependent LAC. From de Laat et al50  with permission.

Figure 5

β2GPI-dependent LAC strongly associates with thrombosis, compared with factor II (prothrombin)-dependent LAC. From de Laat et al50  with permission.

Close modal

Anti-β2GPI antibodies may be divided into high and low avidity, and it is the former that tend to associate with thrombosis.67-71  The 2 types may be distinguished by their ability to dissociate from immobilized β2GPI in the presence of increasing concentrations of urea67  or ionic buffer.70  Both types have been detected in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).67,68 

The epitopes to which the low- and high-avidity antibodies bind has not been determined. de Laat et al19  divided anti-β2GPI antibodies into type A (those targeting the epitope on domain I) and type B (those targeting nondomain I epitopes) in patients with SLE, lupus-like illness, and APS. They found that it was the type A antibodies that associated with thrombosis. It should be noted this association has not been confirmed in rigorous prospective studies. It seems reasonable to hypothesize that high-avidity antibodies probably target the epitope containing the residues Gly40-Arg43, whereas the low-avidity antibodies may be representative of the type B, nondomain I antibodies.

The corollaries to these investigations would seem to be that (1) a patient who tests positive on the LA assay and the direct β2GPI-ELISA may be likely to have a greater proportion of the high-avidity, domain I-targeting anti-β2GPI antibodies than a patient who tests positive on the direct β2GPI-ELISA alone, and (2) the LA in this context is likely to be related to anti-β2GPI antibodies, compared with a patient who tests positive on the LA assay alone. Whether these possibilities explain the greater association with thrombosis described in patients positive on the direct β2GPI-ELISA and the LA assay, compared with positivity on either assay alone,72  needs further analysis.

A strong association in a number of retrospective analyses has been noted between positivity on multiple assays (LA, CL, and β2GPI-ELISA) and thrombosis and miscarriages, compared with patients positive on one or 2 assays72-76  (Figure 6). What do these findings imply? Patients positive on 3 assays (CL, direct β2GPI-ELISA, and LA) tend to have higher levels of anti-β2GPI antibodies than patients positive on fewer assays75  (Figure 7). Hence, this may be a factor. Potentially, they may also be the patients who have high-avidity, domain I binding anti-β2GPI antibodies. Certainly in the future, should assays that specifically detect antibodies with β2GPI-dependent LA activity become widely available,19,48,49  then these possibilities can be assessed.

Figure 6

Positivity on multiple assays (LAC/CL-ELISA/direct β2GPI-ELISA) is associated with an increased risk of thrombosis and pregnancy complications. From Ruffatti et al75  with permission.

Figure 6

Positivity on multiple assays (LAC/CL-ELISA/direct β2GPI-ELISA) is associated with an increased risk of thrombosis and pregnancy complications. From Ruffatti et al75  with permission.

Close modal
Figure 7

Positivity on multiple assays (LAC/CL-ELISA/direct β2GPI-ELISA) is associated with higher levels of anti-β2GPI Abs than patients who are positive only on the CL-ELISA and the direct β2GPI-ELISA. From Ruffatti et al75  with permission.

Figure 7

Positivity on multiple assays (LAC/CL-ELISA/direct β2GPI-ELISA) is associated with higher levels of anti-β2GPI Abs than patients who are positive only on the CL-ELISA and the direct β2GPI-ELISA. From Ruffatti et al75  with permission.

Close modal

There are other possibilities to be considered as to why testing positive on multiple assays may be associated with greater risk. There may be an additive pathogenic effect between multiple distinct antibodies. For this latter notion to be firmly supported, one of the requirements would be the demonstration of an association between the non–β2GPI-reactive autoantibodies detected by the relevant assays with thrombosis, independent of the presence of anti-β2GPI antibodies. Studies in this regard pertaining to antiprothrombin antibodies are not consistent, with some suggesting they may associate independently77  and others suggesting they do not.50,65 

Antiprothrombin and other antibodies

It was noted by Galli et al,56  in their systematic review of the literature, that positivity on the prothrombin ELISA did not consistently associate with thrombosis. Furthermore, a recent study has suggested that this assay does not provide additional utility for diagnosing APS.78  However, it has been proposed that positivity on an ELISA that detects antibodies targeting the prothrombin-phosphatidylserine complex may more consistently associate with thrombosis79 ; hence, this is an area of ongoing research. At the moment, testing positive for antiprothrombin and antiprothrombin/phosphatidylserine antibodies is not a laboratory criterion for APS classification.1 

In recent studies, it was noted that a positive result on an assay that specifically detects antibodies targeting phosphatidylethanolamine associates with thrombosis80  and recurrent miscarriages.81  However, the utility of this assay and other assays that detect antibodies that directly target various types of phospholipids needs further validation, as there are reports, assessing commercially available assays, which question their ability to improve the yield of APS diagnosis.82 

Venous thrombosis

There is evidence derived both from the SLE83,84  and the general population85,86  that LA associates with venous thrombosis. These observations support the notion that LA may be a potential risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). As a point of contrast, in recent longitudinal prospective studies,87,88  which analyzed the general population, positivity on the CL-ELISA did not associate with the occurrence of a first VTE. There are data, however, to suggest that the CL-ELISA may have utility in the prognostic setting. Schulman et al89  noted that, on cessation of warfarin after 6 months of treatment for a VTE, patients who were positive on the CL-ELISA, compared with patients who were negative, had a higher risk of recurrence. The interplay between antibody profile, the type of initial VTE event (below knee, above knee, nonlower limb deep venous thrombosis, or pulmonary embolus), and the presence or absence of concurrent risk factors for VTE (transient, eg, pregnancy; or permanent, eg, genetic thrombophilia) in modulating the risk of VTE recurrence is an area warranting further delineation in prospective studies. These types of studies may allow the development of a risk-stratified approach in guiding the optimal duration of anticoagulation in APS patients who have sustained a VTE.

Arterial thrombosis

LA has been found to associate with stroke in the SLE and the general population settings.90  The association may be greater in young adult stroke patients.90  In view of these findings, it is highly relevant for a physician who orders these tests after a patient has sustained an initial stroke, to know whether a patient's risk for stroke recurrence or other thrombotic events is different relative to a patient who has had a stroke and does not have these antibodies. The importance of knowing this information is worth considering. If the risk for recurrence is the same, all else being equal (ie, the type of stroke: cardioembolic or noncardioembolic, the type of treatment and its duration), then the implication is that patients who are antibody positive do not have a worse prognosis and hence do not need to be treated differently to those who have had a stroke and do not have the antibodies. It also implies that information obtained from large prospective, randomized controlled trials assessing stroke treatment, which involve the general population, may be directly relevant to those who are antibody positive. On the other hand, if the risk for thrombotic recurrence is greater in positive patients, then the implication is that trial data from the general stroke population cannot be confidently extrapolated to antibody-positive stroke patients. The stroke population with antibody positivity would need to be assessed as an entity with distinct therapeutic implications.

The large, prospective, observational, Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Stroke Study, nested within a much larger randomized controlled trial involving the general stroke population,91  addressed this question. It concluded that patients from the general population who have sustained an initial noncardioembolic stroke and are positive for LA and/or the CL-ELISA (low, medium, and high titers included), within 30 days of the stroke (patients were tested once), do not have a different prognosis than those who test negative. This result was consistent within the aspirin and warfarin (low to moderate range international normalized ratio) arms of the trial.

It remains to be assessed in future prospective studies, whether testing positive on multiple assays (CL-ELISA, direct β2GPI-ELISA, and LA) is associated with a greater risk of stroke recurrence relative to the risk of thrombotic recurrence in patients who are antibody negative. The prognostic value of antibody persistence (at least 12 weeks apart) and medium or high titers on the ELISAs also needs to be assessed in the prospective setting.1 

Implications for the recruitment of APS patients for clinical trials

Danowski et al92  noted, in a cohort of SLE patients who had persistent positivity on the direct β2GPI-ELISA, on at least 2 occasions, at least 12 weeks apart, an association with thrombosis to a greater extent than transient positivity. They also demonstrated that positivity on the direct β2GPI-ELISA correlates with LA positivity.92  Whether persistently elevated anti-β2GPI antibodies more strongly correlate with LA than transient ones was not addressed. This would seem a reasonable assumption, in view of the association between anti-β2GPI antibodies with LA activity and thrombosis.50  The implications of this, if verified, would be that persistent and transient anti-β2GPI antibodies may be distinguished by the presence or absence of LA activity, respectively.

The possibility that patients who initially test positive on multiple assays (LA, CL, and β2GPI-ELISA) are more likely to remain positive on repeat testing at a future time interval is also suggested by the study of Nash et al.93  They reported that the presence of persistently elevated IgG αCL, at levels more than 60 GPL, was a strong predictor of the presence of coexisting LA and positivity on the direct β2GPI-ELISA.93 

It was noted by Crowther et al,94  in their randomized controlled trial assessing secondary prophylaxis in APS patients, that one of its limitations was that the first 3-month period after the initial thrombotic event was not included in the analysis because patients had to satisfy the APS laboratory criterion for persistence. This is a legitimate concern because there is currently no validated manner to predict who will remain persistently positive. Trial organizers risk enrolling patients who do not satisfy the classification criteria for the syndrome if they randomize patients after they initially test positive. This possibility is emphasized by a recent study95  looking at young adults who had sustained a stroke and were noted to have a patent foramen ovale. Twelve had elevated titers (> 99th centile of normals) of IgG and IgM anti-β2GPI antibodies on initial testing, and yet on repeat testing at 12 weeks, only 1 of the 12 remained positive. Similar outcomes were seen using the CL-ELISA (IgG and IgM). None of the patients was initially positive for LA.

The importance of being able to analyze the first 3 months after an initial thrombotic event, in any future trials involving APS patients (perhaps when assessing the effectiveness of the newer generation of anticoagulants), can be inferred from the general population. It is not only a high-risk period during which thrombotic recurrences may occur,96  but it is also a period of increased bleeding risk associated with anticoagulation.97  Potentially, patients who initially test positive on all 3 assays (LA, CL, and β2GPI-ELISA) may enable the study of this critical period by allowing early randomization of patients who are likely, on subsequent testing, to satisfy the APS laboratory criterion of persistence.

A meta-analysis has assessed the strength of association of positivity for LA, the β2GPI-ELISA, or the CL-ELISA, with recurrent miscarriages, focusing on women who did not have SLE (the period between 1975 and 2003 was analyzed).98  It was noted that a positive LA strongly associated with late gestation miscarriages (defined by the authors of the study as < 24 weeks), although its association with early miscarriages (defined by the authors as < 13 weeks) was not assessed.98  It should be noted that these definitions for early and late miscarriages are different from those in the APS classification criteria, in which early is defined as before 10 weeks' gestation and late as miscarriage at or beyond 10 weeks.1  In the same analysis,98  positivity on the β2GPI-ELISA did not associate with early recurrent miscarriage (< 13 weeks), although an assessment for an association with late miscarriages was not undertaken. In contrast, antibodies detected by the CL-ELISA associate with both early (< 13 weeks) and late (< 24 weeks) recurrent miscarriages.98 

Ruffatti et al75,76  have noted in 2 retrospective studies that there is a stronger association with recurrent late fetal loss (> 10 weeks gestation) and thromboembolic events in women who are positive on all 3 assays (CL, direct β2GPI-ELISA, and LA), compared with women who are either dual or single assay positive. Furthermore, a recent study has noted that positivity on the β2GPI-ELISA associates with a positive LA in women with miscarriages.99  Hence, one possibility warranting further consideration is whether anti-β2GPI antibodies with LA activity may specifically associate with late miscarriages.

It is relevant to note that in in vivo studies100-102  documenting the role of complement and inflammation in the pathogenesis of fetal loss, in which a murine model of APS was used, the specific human monoclonal antibody used (mAb 519) binds cardiolipin in the absence of β2GPI.103  Polyclonal antibodies from 3 patients diagnosed with APS were also used, although the antigen specificity of the antibody fraction responsible for the experimental murine fetal resorption via a complement/inflammatory-mediated mechanism was not determined.100  As a point of contrast, in a study conducted by Robertson et al,104  a spontaneously occurring murine monoclonal anti-β2GPI antibody directed against domain I, and patient-derived polyclonal antibodies with β2GPI reactivity did not cause murine fetal resorption, nor did they affect fecundity in all mice.

Hence, a conceptual synthesis of the current epidemiologic and in vivo observations raises the possibility that non-β2GPI antibodies detected by the CL-ELISA may be particularly relevant in early miscarriages, perhaps via the induction of an inflammatory mechanism. Anti-β2GPI antibodies with LA activity may mediate a more prominent effect in late gestation miscarriages via distinct mechanism(s), perhaps by inducing intrauterine placental thrombosis (in view of the strong association of this class of antibodies with thrombosis19,50 ). The pathogenic mechanisms operational in association with late miscarriages in women who have anti-β2GPI antibodies may not be reflected in murine APS models, perhaps because of the differences between human and murine placental development.105  The development of obstetric APS animal models with closer homology to human placentation may be relevant to delineate the role of anti-β2GPI antibodies in the latter part of pregnancy.

It is important to confirm in future studies whether distinct antibodies are involved with different obstetric manifestations, as it may lay the foundation for exploring within clinical trials novel therapeutic approaches (eg, modulation of inflammation, such as targeting tumor necrosis factor-α,102  vs further modulation of coagulation, perhaps with novel anticoagulants), based on antibody profile. The possibility is also raised that the risk of maternal thromboembolic events occurring in a patient with obstetric APS may vary according to whether they have anti-β2GPI antibodies with LA activity (perhaps higher risk), or non–β2GPI-dependent CL antibodies (perhaps lower risk). This possibility, if verified in prospective studies, may have implications when considering in which obstetric APS patients (without a history of previous thrombotic events), the administration of postpartum thromboembolic prophylaxis treatment may be most warranted.

When considering the importance of individual assays for diagnosing thrombotic APS, greater weighting would currently have to be given to a positive LA test, based on the systematic reviews of Galli et al.28,56  If a patient tests positive on all 3 assays (LA, β2GPI, and CL-ELISAs), confidence in the notion that the patient may have high titers of anti-β2GPI antibodies with LA activity is increased. The practical implication for initially testing with all 3 assays is as follows: Oral anticoagulants can potentially interfere with the performance of the LA assay,32  which has ramifications when considering repeating the LA test to assess for persistent positivity at 3 months to establish the diagnosis of APS. Knowing that the patient initially tested positive on all 3 assays suggests that the β2GPI and/or the CL-ELISAs can be performed as an alternative to LA at this later time point to enable a definitive diagnosis of APS to be made.

The type of thrombosis of particular relevance for considering APS, based on clinical association studies, appears to be venous thrombosis and perhaps stroke (particularly young adults). It is important when diagnosing thrombotic APS to also assess for concurrent prothrombotic factors, as they may be present in a significant proportion of patients, and some may be treatable in their own right (eg, traditional atherosclerotic risk factors).106  We incorporate investigation with a trans-esophageal cardiac echo to thoroughly assess for a possible cardiac source of the arterial thrombus (cerebral and noncerebral events) in view of the relevance of this mechanism, which has been highlighted by Fulham et al.107 

In the obstetric APS setting, testing positive on all 3 assays (LA, β2GPI, and CL-ELISAs) seems to have implications for which patients may be at a greater risk for thrombosis.75,76  Hence, this may be one reason why it may be useful to perform all 3 assays when considering diagnosing obstetric APS, particularly in the context of late miscarriage (10 weeks and beyond). However, a case can also be made that, if a patient has only had recurrent early miscarriages (< 10 weeks) without a history of thrombosis, then the performance of the β2GPI-ELISA and perhaps LA assays, on the basis of current evidence,98  cannot be confidently supported. In this situation, the CL-ELISA may have better utility in diagnosing APS.98  The exclusion of other causes of miscarriages is necessary.1 

The relevant future research agenda, as can be inferred from this discussion, is broad and multifaceted. The development of novel assays that detect the clinically relevant anti-β2GPI antibodies and their subsequent validation will be of great utility. In addition, the validation of assays that assess for antibodies that specifically target prothrombin/phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylethanolamine is important.

Prospective, controlled epidemiologic analyses examining the relevance of issues, such as antibody profile in risk stratification, will be of value in informing decision making with regards to prognosis, laying the foundations for future therapeutic APS trials.

B.G. was supported by a scholarship from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia (Canberra, Australia).

Contribution: B.G. wrote the paper as main author; F.P. and Y.I. wrote a section of the paper and provided critical appraisal; and S.A.K. provided critical appraisal.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Steven A. Krilis, 2 South Street, Kogarah, NSW 2217, Australia; e-mail: s.krilis@unsw.edu.au.

1
Miyakis
 
S
Lockshin
 
MD
Atsumi
 
T
, et al. 
International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).
J Thromb Haemost
2006
, vol. 
4
 (pg. 
295
-
306
)
2
Harris
 
EN
Gharavi
 
AE
Boey
 
ML
, et al. 
Anticardiolipin antibodies: detection by radioimmunoassay and association with thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Lancet
1983
, vol. 
2
 (pg. 
1211
-
1214
)
3
Wilson
 
WA
Gharavi
 
AE
Koike
 
T
, et al. 
International consensus statement on preliminary classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome: report of an international workshop.
Arthritis Rheum
1999
, vol. 
42
 (pg. 
1309
-
1311
)
4
McNeil
 
HP
Chesterman
 
CN
Krilis
 
SA
Anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulants comprise separate antibody subgroups with different phospholipid binding characteristics.
Br J Haematol
1989
, vol. 
73
 (pg. 
506
-
513
)
5
Galli
 
M
Comfurius
 
P
Maassen
 
C
, et al. 
Anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA) directed not to cardiolipin but to a plasma protein cofactor.
Lancet
1990
, vol. 
335
 (pg. 
1544
-
1547
)
6
Matsuura
 
E
Igarashi
 
Y
Fujimoto
 
M
Ichikawa
 
K
Koike
 
T
Anticardiolipin cofactor(s) and differential diagnosis of autoimmune disease.
Lancet
1990
, vol. 
336
 (pg. 
177
-
178
)
7
McNeil
 
HP
Simpson
 
RJ
Chesterman
 
CN
Krilis
 
SA
Anti-phospholipid antibodies are directed against a complex antigen that includes a lipid-binding inhibitor of coagulation: beta 2-glycoprotein I (apolipoprotein H).
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1990
, vol. 
87
 (pg. 
4120
-
4124
)
8
Arvieux
 
J
Roussel
 
B
Jacob
 
MC
Colomb
 
MG
Measurement of anti-phospholipid antibodies by ELISA using beta 2-glycoprotein I as an antigen.
J Immunol Methods
1991
, vol. 
143
 (pg. 
223
-
229
)
9
Matsuura
 
E
Igarashi
 
Y
Yasuda
 
T
Triplett
 
DA
Koike
 
T
Anticardiolipin antibodies recognize beta 2-glycoprotein I structure altered by interacting with an oxygen modified solid phase surface.
J Exp Med
1994
, vol. 
179
 (pg. 
457
-
462
)
10
Roubey
 
RA
Eisenberg
 
RA
Harper
 
MF
Winfield
 
JB
“Anticardiolipin” autoantibodies recognize beta 2-glycoprotein I in the absence of phospholipid: importance of Ag density and bivalent binding.
J Immunol
1995
, vol. 
154
 (pg. 
954
-
960
)
11
Sheng
 
Y
Kandiah
 
DA
Krilis
 
SA
Anti-beta 2-glycoprotein I autoantibodies from patients with the “antiphospholipid” syndrome bind to beta 2-glycoprotein I with low affinity: dimerization of beta 2-glycoprotein I induces a significant increase in anti-beta 2-glycoprotein I antibody affinity.
J Immunol
1998
, vol. 
161
 (pg. 
2038
-
2043
)
12
de Laat
 
B
Derksen
 
RH
van Lummel
 
M
Pennings
 
MT
de Groot
 
PG
Pathogenic anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies recognize domain I of beta2-glycoprotein I only after a conformational change.
Blood
2006
, vol. 
107
 (pg. 
1916
-
1924
)
13
Hunt
 
JE
McNeil
 
HP
Morgan
 
GJ
Crameri
 
RM
Krilis
 
SA
A phospholipid-beta2-glycoprotein I complex is an antigen for anticardiolipin antibodies occurring in autoimmune disease but not with infection.
Lupus
1992
, vol. 
1
 (pg. 
75
-
81
)
14
Santiago
 
M
Martinelli
 
R
Ko
 
A
, et al. 
Anti-beta2 glycoprotein I and anticardiolipin antibodies in leptospirosis, syphilis and Kala-azar.
Clin Exp Rheumatol
2001
, vol. 
19
 (pg. 
425
-
430
)
15
Arvieux
 
J
Renaudineau
 
Y
Mane
 
I
Perraut
 
R
Krilis
 
SA
Youinou
 
P
Distinguishing features of anti-beta2 glycoprotein I antibodies between patients with leprosy and the antiphospholipid syndrome.
Thromb Haemost
2002
, vol. 
87
 (pg. 
599
-
605
)
16
Iverson
 
GM
Victoria
 
EJ
Marquis
 
DM
Anti-beta2 glycoprotein I (beta2GPI) autoantibodies recognize an epitope on the first domain of beta2GPI.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1998
, vol. 
95
 (pg. 
15542
-
15546
)
17
Reddel
 
SW
Wang
 
YX
Sheng
 
YH
Krilis
 
SA
Epitope studies with anti-beta 2-glycoprotein I antibodies from autoantibody and immunized sources.
J Autoimmun
2000
, vol. 
15
 (pg. 
91
-
96
)
18
Iverson
 
GM
Reddel
 
S
Victoria
 
EJ
, et al. 
Use of single point mutations in domain I of beta 2-glycoprotein I to determine fine antigenic specificity of antiphospholipid autoantibodies.
J Immunol
2002
, vol. 
169
 (pg. 
7097
-
7103
)
19
de Laat
 
B
Derksen
 
RH
Urbanus
 
RT
de Groot
 
PG
IgG antibodies that recognize epitope Gly40-Arg43 in domain I of beta 2-glycoprotein I cause LAC, and their presence correlates strongly with thrombosis.
Blood
2005
, vol. 
105
 (pg. 
1540
-
1545
)
20
Ioannou
 
Y
Pericleous
 
C
Giles
 
I
Latchman
 
DS
Isenberg
 
DA
Rahman
 
A
Binding of antiphospholipid antibodies to discontinuous epitopes on domain I of human beta(2)-glycoprotein I: mutation studies including residues R39 to R43.
Arthritis Rheum
2007
, vol. 
56
 (pg. 
280
-
290
)
21
Guerin
 
J
Casey
 
E
Feighery
 
C
Jackson
 
J
Anti-beta 2-glycoprotein I antibody isotype and IgG subclass in antiphospholipid syndrome patients.
Autoimmunity
1999
, vol. 
31
 (pg. 
109
-
116
)
22
de Larranaga
 
GF
Forastiero
 
RR
Martinuzzo
 
ME
, et al. 
High prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies in leprosy: evaluation of antigen reactivity.
Lupus
2000
, vol. 
9
 (pg. 
594
-
600
)
23
Galli
 
M
Comfurius
 
P
Barbui
 
T
Zwaal
 
RF
Bevers
 
EM
Anticoagulant activity of beta 2-glycoprotein I is potentiated by a distinct subgroup of anticardiolipin antibodies.
Thromb Haemost
1992
, vol. 
68
 (pg. 
297
-
300
)
24
Roubey
 
RA
Pratt
 
CW
Buyon
 
JP
Winfield
 
JB
Lupus anticoagulant activity of autoimmune antiphospholipid antibodies is dependent upon beta 2-glycoprotein I.
J Clin Invest
1992
, vol. 
90
 (pg. 
1100
-
1104
)
25
Oosting
 
JD
Derksen
 
RH
Entjes
 
HT
Bouma
 
BN
de Groot
 
PG
Lupus anticoagulant activity is frequently dependent on the presence of beta 2-glycoprotein I.
Thromb Haemost
1992
, vol. 
67
 (pg. 
499
-
502
)
26
Bevers
 
EM
Galli
 
M
Barbui
 
T
Comfurius
 
P
Zwaal
 
RF
Lupus anticoagulant IgG's (LA) are not directed to phospholipids only, but to a complex of lipid-bound human prothrombin.
Thromb Haemost
1991
, vol. 
66
 (pg. 
629
-
632
)
27
Oosting
 
JD
Derksen
 
RHWM
Bobbink
 
IW
Hackeng
 
TM
Bouma
 
B
de Groot
 
PG
Antiphospholipid antibodies directed against a combination of phospholipids with prothrombin, protein C, or protein S: an explanation for their pathogenic mechanism?
Blood
1993
, vol. 
81
 (pg. 
2618
-
25
)
28
Galli
 
M
Luciani
 
D
Bertolini
 
G
Barbui
 
T
Lupus anticoagulants are stronger risk factors for thrombosis than anticardiolipin antibodies in the antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review of the literature.
Blood
2003
, vol. 
101
 (pg. 
1827
-
1832
)
29
Brandt
 
JT
Barna
 
LK
Triplett
 
DA
Laboratory identification of lupus anticoagulants: results of the Second International Workshop for Identification of Lupus Anticoagulants. On behalf of the Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulants/Antiphospholipid Antibodies of the ISTH.
Thromb Haemost
1995
, vol. 
74
 (pg. 
1597
-
1603
)
30
Jennings
 
I
Kitchen
 
S
Woods
 
TA
Preston
 
FE
Greaves
 
M
Potentially clinically important inaccuracies in testing for the lupus anticoagulant: an analysis of results from three surveys of the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) for Blood Coagulation.
Thromb Haemost
1997
, vol. 
77
 (pg. 
934
-
937
)
31
Favaloro
 
EJ
Bonar
 
R
Sioufi
 
J
, et al. 
Multilaboratory testing of thrombophilia: current and past practice in Australasia as assessed through the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program for Hematology.
Semin Thromb Hemost
2005
, vol. 
31
 (pg. 
49
-
58
)
32
Pengo
 
V
Biasiolo
 
A
Gresele
 
P
, et al. 
Survey of lupus anticoagulant diagnosis by central evaluation of positive plasma samples.
J Thromb Haemost
2007
, vol. 
5
 (pg. 
925
-
930
)
33
Greaves
 
M
Cohen
 
H
MacHin
 
SJ
Mackie
 
I
Guidelines on the investigation and management of the antiphospholipid syndrome.
Br J Haematol
2000
, vol. 
109
 (pg. 
704
-
715
)
34
Wong
 
RC
Adelstein
 
S
Gillis
 
D
Favaloro
 
EJ
Development of consensus guidelines for anticardiolipin and lupus anticoagulant testing.
Semin Thromb Hemost
2005
, vol. 
31
 (pg. 
39
-
48
)
35
Brandt
 
JT
Triplett
 
DA
Alving
 
B
Scharrer
 
I
Criteria for the diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants: an update: on behalf of the Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibody of the Scientific and Standardisation Committee of the ISTH.
Thromb Haemost
1995
, vol. 
74
 (pg. 
1185
-
1190
)
36
Tripodi
 
A
Laboratory testing for lupus anticoagulants: a review of issues affecting results.
Clin Chem
2007
, vol. 
53
 (pg. 
1629
-
1635
)
37
Gardiner
 
C
MacKie
 
IJ
Malia
 
RG
, et al. 
The importance of locally derived reference ranges and standardized calculation of dilute Russell's viper venom time results in screening for lupus anticoagulant.
Br J Haematol
2000
, vol. 
111
 (pg. 
1230
-
1235
)
38
Rosner
 
E
Pauzner
 
R
Lusky
 
A
Modan
 
M
Many
 
A
Detection and quantitative evaluation of lupus circulating anticoagulant activity.
Thromb Haemost
1987
, vol. 
57
 (pg. 
144
-
147
)
39
Rauch
 
J
Tannenbaum
 
M
Janoff
 
AS
Distinguishing plasma lupus anticoagulants from anti-factor antibodies using hexagonal (II) phase phospholipids.
Thromb Haemost
1989
, vol. 
62
 (pg. 
892
-
896
)
40
Roussi
 
J
Roisin
 
JP
Goguel
 
A
Lupus anticoagulants: first French interlaboratory Etalonorme survey.
Am J Clin Pathol
1996
, vol. 
105
 (pg. 
788
-
793
)
41
Brandt
 
JT
Triplett
 
DA
Rock
 
WA
Bovill
 
EG
Arkin
 
CF
Effect of lupus anticoagulants on the activated partial thromboplastin time: results of the College of American Pathologists survey program.
Arch Pathol Lab Med
1991
, vol. 
115
 (pg. 
109
-
114
)
42
Jennings
 
I
Greaves
 
M
Mackie
 
IJ
Kitchen
 
S
Woods
 
TA
Preston
 
FE
Lupus anticoagulant testing: improvements in performance in a UK NEQAS proficiency testing exercise after dissemination of national guidelines on laboratory methods.
Br J Haematol
2002
, vol. 
119
 (pg. 
364
-
369
)
43
Tripodi
 
A
Mancuso
 
ME
Chantarangkul
 
V
, et al. 
Lupus anticoagulants and their relationship with the inhibitors against coagulation factor VIII: considerations on the differentiation between the 2 circulating anticoagulants.
Clin Chem
2005
, vol. 
51
 (pg. 
1883
-
1885
)
44
Sletnes
 
KE
Gravem
 
K
Wisloff
 
F
Preparation of plasma for the detection of lupus anticoagulants and antiphospholipid antibodies.
Thromb Res
1992
, vol. 
66
 (pg. 
43
-
53
)
45
Moore
 
GW
Smith
 
MP
Savidge
 
GF
The Ecarin time is an improved confirmatory test for the Taipan snake venom time in warfarinized patients with lupus anticoagulants.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis
2003
, vol. 
14
 (pg. 
307
-
312
)
46
Arnout
 
J
Meijer
 
P
Vermylen
 
J
Lupus anticoagulant testing in Europe: an analysis of results from the first European Concerted Action on Thrombophilia (ECAT) survey using plasmas spiked with monoclonal antibodies against human beta2-glycoprotein I.
Thromb Haemost
1999
, vol. 
81
 (pg. 
929
-
934
)
47
Jennings
 
I
Mackie
 
I
Arnout
 
J
Preston
 
FE
Lupus anticoagulant testing using plasma spiked with monoclonal antibodies: performance in the UK NEQAS proficiency testing programme.
J Thromb Haemost
2004
, vol. 
2
 (pg. 
2178
-
2184
)
48
Simmelink
 
MJ
Derksen
 
RH
Arnout
 
J
De Groot
 
PG
A simple method to discriminate between beta2-glycoprotein I- and prothrombin-dependent lupus anticoagulants.
J Thromb Haemost
2003
, vol. 
1
 (pg. 
740
-
747
)
49
Pengo
 
V
Biasiolo
 
A
Pegoraro
 
C
Iliceto
 
S
A two-step coagulation test to identify antibeta-glyco-protein I lupus anticoagulants.
J Thromb Haemost
2004
, vol. 
2
 (pg. 
702
-
707
)
50
de Laat
 
HB
Derksen
 
RH
Urbanus
 
RT
Roest
 
M
de Groot
 
PG
Beta2-glycoprotein I-dependent lupus anticoagulant highly correlates with thrombosis in the antiphospholipid syndrome.
Blood
2004
, vol. 
104
 (pg. 
3598
-
3602
)
51
Harris
 
EN
Pierangeli
 
SS
Revisiting the anticardiolipin test and its standardization.
Lupus
2002
, vol. 
11
 (pg. 
269
-
275
)
52
Harris
 
EN
Gharavi
 
AE
Patel
 
SP
Hughes
 
GR
Evaluation of the anti-cardiolipin antibody test: report of an international workshop held 4 April 1986.
Clin Exp Immunol
1987
, vol. 
68
 (pg. 
215
-
222
)
53
Wong
 
RC
Consensus guidelines for anticardiolipin antibody testing.
Thromb Res
2004
, vol. 
114
 (pg. 
559
-
571
)
54
Audrain
 
MA
Colonna
 
F
Morio
 
F
Hamidou
 
MA
Muller
 
JY
Comparison of different kits in the detection of autoantibodies to cardiolipin and beta2glycoprotein 1.
Rheumatology (Oxf)
2004
, vol. 
43
 (pg. 
181
-
185
)
55
Pierangeli
 
SS
Harris
 
EN
A protocol for determination of anticardiolipin antibodies by ELISA.
Nat Protoc
2008
, vol. 
3
 (pg. 
840
-
848
)
56
Galli
 
M
Luciani
 
D
Bertolini
 
G
Barbui
 
T
Anti-beta 2-glycoprotein I, antiprothrombin antibodies, and the risk of thrombosis in the antiphospholipid syndrome.
Blood
2003
, vol. 
102
 (pg. 
2717
-
2723
)
57
Ichikawa
 
K
Tsutsumi
 
A
Atsumi
 
T
, et al. 
A chimeric antibody with the human gamma1 constant region as a putative standard for assays to detect IgG beta2-glycoprotein I-dependent anticardiolipin and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies.
Arthritis Rheum
1999
, vol. 
42
 (pg. 
2461
-
2470
)
58
Reber
 
G
de Moerloose
 
P
Anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies: when and how should they be measured?
Thromb Res
2004
, vol. 
114
 (pg. 
527
-
531
)
59
Favaloro
 
EJ
Wong
 
RC
Jovanovich
 
S
Roberts-Thomson
 
P
A review of beta2 -glycoprotein-l antibody testing results from a peer-driven multilaboratory quality assurance program.
Am J Clin Pathol
2007
, vol. 
127
 (pg. 
441
-
448
)
60
Reber
 
G
Schousboe
 
I
Tincani
 
A
, et al. 
Inter-laboratory variability of anti-beta2-glycoprotein I measurement: a collaborative study in the frame of the European Forum on Antiphospholipid Antibodies Standardization Group.
Thromb Haemost
2002
, vol. 
88
 (pg. 
66
-
73
)
61
Kato
 
H
Enjyoji
 
K
Amino acid sequence and location of the disulfide bonds in bovine beta 2 glycoprotein I: the presence of five Sushi domains.
Biochemistry
1991
, vol. 
30
 (pg. 
11687
-
11694
)
62
Giles
 
IP
Isenberg
 
DA
Latchman
 
DS
Rahman
 
A
How do antiphospholipid antibodies bind beta2-glycoprotein I?
Arthritis Rheum
2003
, vol. 
48
 (pg. 
2111
-
2121
)
63
Ambrozic
 
A
Avicin
 
T
Ichikawa
 
K
, et al. 
Anti-beta(2)-glycoprotein I antibodies in children with atopic dermatitis.
Int Immunol
2002
, vol. 
14
 (pg. 
823
-
830
)
64
Zoghlami-Rintelen
 
C
Vormittag
 
R
Sailer
 
T
, et al. 
The presence of IgG antibodies against beta2-glycoprotein I predicts the risk of thrombosis in patients with the lupus anticoagulant.
J Thromb Haemost
2005
, vol. 
3
 (pg. 
1160
-
1165
)
65
Sailer
 
T
Vormittag
 
R
Zoghlami
 
C
, et al. 
The clinical significance of anti-prothrombin antibodies for risk assessment of thromboembolism in patients with lupus anticoagulant.
Thromb Res
2007
, vol. 
120
 (pg. 
295
-
302
)
66
Horbach
 
DA
van Oort
 
E
Derksen
 
RH
de Groot
 
PG
The contribution of anti-prothrombin-antibodies to lupus anticoagulant activity: discrimination between functional and non-functional anti-prothrombin-antibodies.
Thromb Haemost
1998
, vol. 
79
 (pg. 
790
-
795
)
67
Vlachoyiannopoulos
 
PG
Petrovas
 
C
Tektonidou
 
M
Krilis
 
S
Moutsopoulos
 
HM
Antibodies to beta 2-glycoprotein-I: urea resistance, binding specificity, and association with thrombosis.
J Clin Immunol
1998
, vol. 
18
 (pg. 
380
-
391
)
68
Cucnik
 
S
Kveder
 
T
Krizaj
 
I
Rozman
 
B
Bozic
 
B
High avidity anti-beta 2-glycoprotein I antibodies in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.
Ann Rheum Dis
2004
, vol. 
63
 (pg. 
1478
-
1482
)
69
Cucnik
 
S
Bozic
 
B
Kveder
 
T
Tomsic
 
M
Rozman
 
B
Avidity of anti-beta2-glycoprotein I and thrombosis or pregnancy loss in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.
Ann N Y Acad Sci
2005
, vol. 
1051
 (pg. 
141
-
147
)
70
de Laat
 
B
Derksen
 
RH
de Groot
 
PG
High-avidity anti-beta glycoprotein I antibodies highly correlate with thrombosis in contrast to low-avidity anti-beta glycoprotein I antibodies.
J Thromb Haemost
2006
, vol. 
4
 (pg. 
1619
-
1621
)
71
Metzger
 
J
von Landenberg
 
P
Kehrel
 
M
Buhl
 
A
Lackner
 
KJ
Luppa
 
PB
Biosensor analysis of beta2-glycoprotein I-reactive autoantibodies: evidence for isotype-specific binding and differentiation of pathogenic from infection-induced antibodies.
Clin Chem
2007
, vol. 
53
 (pg. 
1137
-
1143
)
72
Lee
 
EY
Lee
 
CK
Lee
 
TH
, et al. 
Does the anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibody provide additional information in patients with thrombosis?
Thromb Res
2003
, vol. 
111
 (pg. 
29
-
32
)
73
Detkov Gil-Aguado
 
A
Lavilla
 
P
Cuesta
 
MV
Fontan
 
G
Pascual-Salcedo
 
D
Do antibodies to beta2-glycoprotein 1 contribute to the better characterization of the antiphospholipid syndrome?
Lupus
1999
, vol. 
8
 (pg. 
430
-
438
)
74
Pengo
 
V
Biasiolo
 
A
Pegoraro
 
C
Cucchini
 
U
Noventa
 
F
Iliceto
 
S
Antibody profiles for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome.
Thromb Haemost
2005
, vol. 
93
 (pg. 
1147
-
1152
)
75
Ruffatti
 
A
Tonello
 
M
Del Ross
 
T
, et al. 
Antibody profile and clinical course in primary antiphospholipid syndrome with pregnancy morbidity.
Thromb Haemost
2006
, vol. 
96
 (pg. 
337
-
341
)
76
Ruffatti
 
A
Tonello
 
M
Cavazzana
 
A
Bagatella
 
P
Pengo
 
V
Laboratory classification categories and pregnancy outcome in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome prescribed antithrombotic therapy.
Thromb Res
2008
5
5
 
[Epub ahead of print]
77
Forastiero
 
R
Martinuzzo
 
M
Pombo
 
G
, et al. 
A prospective study of antibodies to beta2-glyco-protein I and prothrombin, and risk of thrombosis.
J Thromb Haemost
2005
, vol. 
3
 (pg. 
1231
-
1238
)
78
Tincani
 
A
Morozzi
 
G
Afeltra
 
A
, et al. 
Antiprothrombin antibodies: a comparative analysis of homemade and commercial methods. A collaborative study by the Forum Interdisciplinare per la Ricerca nelle Malattie Autoimmuni (FIRMA).
Clin Exp Rheumatol
2007
, vol. 
25
 (pg. 
268
-
274
)
79
Atsumi
 
T
Amengual
 
O
Yasuda
 
S
Koike
 
T
Antiprothrombin antibodies: are they worth assaying?
Thromb Research
2004
, vol. 
114
 (pg. 
533
-
538
)
80
Sanmarco
 
M
Gayet
 
S
Alessi
 
MC
, et al. 
Antiphosphatidylethanolamine antibodies are associated with an increased odds ratio for thrombosis: a multicenter study with the participation of the European Forum on antiphospholipid antibodies.
Thromb Haemost
2007
, vol. 
97
 (pg. 
949
-
954
)
81
Gris
 
JC
Quere
 
I
Sanmarco
 
M
, et al. 
Antiphospholipid and antiprotein syndromes in non-thrombotic, non-autoimmune women with unexplained recurrent primary early foetal loss: the Nimes Obstetricians and Haematologists Study–NOHA.
Thromb Haemost
2000
, vol. 
84
 (pg. 
228
-
236
)
82
Tebo
 
AE
Jaskowski
 
TD
Phansalkar
 
AR
Litwin
 
CM
Branch
 
DW
Hill
 
HR
Diagnostic performance of phospholipid-specific assays for the evaluation of antiphospholipid syndrome.
Am J Clin Pathol
2008
, vol. 
129
 (pg. 
870
-
875
)
83
Wahl
 
DG
Guillemin
 
F
de Maistre
 
E
Perret
 
C
Lecompte
 
T
Thibaut
 
G
Risk for venous thrombosis related to antiphospholipid antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis.
Lupus
1997
, vol. 
6
 (pg. 
467
-
473
)
84
Somers
 
E
Magder
 
LS
Petri
 
M
Antiphospholipid antibodies and incidence of venous thrombosis in a cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
J Rheumatol
2002
, vol. 
29
 (pg. 
2531
-
2536
)
85
Wahl
 
DG
Guillemin
 
F
de Maistre
 
E
Perret-Guillaume
 
C
Lecompte
 
T
Thibaut
 
G
Meta-analysis of the risk of venous thrombosis in individuals with antiphospholipid antibodies without underlying autoimmune disease or previous thrombosis.
Lupus
1998
, vol. 
7
 (pg. 
15
-
22
)
86
de Groot
 
PG
Lutters
 
B
Derksen
 
RH
Lisman
 
T
Meijers
 
JC
Rosendaal
 
FR
Lupus anticoagulants and the risk of a first episode of deep venous thrombosis.
J Thromb Haemost
2005
, vol. 
3
 (pg. 
1993
-
1997
)
87
Runchey
 
SS
Folsom
 
AR
Tsai
 
MY
Cushman
 
M
McGovern
 
PD
Anticardiolipin antibodies as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism in a population-based prospective study.
Br J Haematol
2002
, vol. 
119
 (pg. 
1005
-
1010
)
88
Naess
 
IA
Christiansen
 
SC
Cannegieter
 
SC
Rosendaal
 
FR
Hammerstroem
 
J
A prospective study of anticardiolipin antibodies as a risk factor for venous thrombosis in a general population (the HUNT study).
J Thromb Haemost
2006
, vol. 
4
 (pg. 
44
-
49
)
89
Schulman
 
S
Svenungsson
 
E
Granqvist
 
S
Anticardiolipin antibodies predict early recurrence of thromboembolism and death among patients with venous thromboembolism following anticoagulant therapy: Duration of Anticoagulation Study Group.
Am J Med
1998
, vol. 
104
 (pg. 
332
-
338
)
90
Brey
 
RL
Antiphospholipid antibodies in young adults with stroke.
J Thromb Thrombolysis
2005
, vol. 
20
 (pg. 
105
-
112
)
91
Levine
 
SR
Brey
 
RL
Tilley
 
BC
, et al. 
Antiphospholipid antibodies and subsequent thrombo-occlusive events in patients with ischemic stroke.
JAMA
2004
, vol. 
291
 (pg. 
576
-
584
)
92
Danowski
 
A
Kickler
 
TS
Petri
 
M
Anti-beta2-glycoprotein I: prevalence, clinical correlations, and importance of persistent positivity in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus.
J Rheumatol
2006
, vol. 
33
 (pg. 
1775
-
1779
)
93
Nash
 
MJ
Camilleri
 
RS
Kunka
 
S
Mackie
 
IJ
Machin
 
SJ
Cohen
 
H
The anticardiolipin assay is required for sensitive screening for antiphospholipid antibodies.
J Thromb Haemost
2004
, vol. 
2
 (pg. 
1077
-
1081
)
94
Crowther
 
MA
Ginsberg
 
JS
Julian
 
J
, et al. 
A comparison of two intensities of warfarin for the prevention of recurrent thrombosis in patients with the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome.
N Engl J Med
2003
, vol. 
349
 (pg. 
1133
-
1138
)
95
Offelli
 
P
Zanchetta
 
M
Pedon
 
L
, et al. 
Thrombophilia in young patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO).
Thromb Haemost
2007
, vol. 
98
 (pg. 
906
-
907
)
96
Moroney
 
JT
Bagiella
 
E
Paik
 
MC
Sacco
 
RL
Desmond
 
DW
Risk factors for early recurrence after ischemic stroke: the role of stroke syndrome and subtype.
Stroke
1998
, vol. 
29
 (pg. 
2118
-
2124
)
97
Palareti
 
G
Leali
 
N
Coccheri
 
S
, et al. 
Bleeding complications of oral anticoagulant treatment: an inception-cohort, prospective collaborative study (ISCOAT): Italian Study on Complications of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy.
Lancet
1996
, vol. 
348
 (pg. 
423
-
428
)
98
Opatrny
 
L
David
 
M
Kahn
 
SR
Shrier
 
I
Rey
 
E
Association between antiphospholipid antibodies and recurrent fetal loss in women without autoimmune disease: a metaanalysis.
J Rheumatol
2006
, vol. 
33
 (pg. 
2214
-
2221
)
99
Sailer
 
T
Zoghlami
 
C
Kurz
 
C
, et al. 
Anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies are associated with pregnancy loss in women with the lupus anticoagulant.
Thromb Haemost
2006
, vol. 
95
 (pg. 
796
-
801
)
100
Girardi
 
G
Berman
 
J
Redecha
 
P
, et al. 
Complement C5a receptors and neutrophils mediate fetal injury in the antiphospholipid syndrome.
J Clin Invest
2003
, vol. 
112
 (pg. 
1644
-
1654
)
101
Girardi
 
G
Redecha
 
P
Salmon
 
JE
Heparin prevents antiphospholipid antibody-induced fetal loss by inhibiting complement activation.
Nat Med
2004
, vol. 
10
 (pg. 
1222
-
1226
)
102
Berman
 
J
Girardi
 
G
Salmon
 
JE
TNF-alpha is a critical effector and a target for therapy in antiphospholipid antibody-induced pregnancy loss.
J Immunol
2005
, vol. 
174
 (pg. 
485
-
490
)
103
Ikematsu
 
W
Luan
 
FL
La Rosa
 
L
, et al. 
Human anticardiolipin monoclonal autoantibodies cause placental necrosis and fetal loss in BALB/c mice.
Arthritis Rheum
1998
, vol. 
41
 (pg. 
1026
-
1039
)
104
Robertson
 
SA
Roberts
 
CT
van Beijering
 
E
, et al. 
Effect of beta2-glycoprotein I null mutation on reproductive outcome and antiphospholipid antibody-mediated pregnancy pathology in mice.
Mol Hum Reprod
2004
, vol. 
10
 (pg. 
409
-
416
)
105
Carter
 
AM
Animal models of human placentation: a review.
Placenta
2007
, vol. 
28
 
suppl A
(pg. 
S41
-
S47
)
106
Erkan
 
D
Yazici
 
Y
Peterson
 
MG
Sammaritano
 
L
Lockshin
 
MD
A cross-sectional study of clinical thrombotic risk factors and preventive treatments in antiphospholipid syndrome.
Rheumatology (Oxf)
2002
, vol. 
41
 (pg. 
924
-
929
)
107
Fulham
 
MJ
Gatenby
 
P
Tuck
 
RR
Focal cerebral ischemia and antiphospholipid antibodies: a case for cardiac embolism.
Acta Neurol Scand
1994
, vol. 
90
 (pg. 
417
-
423
)
108
Passam
 
F
Krilis
 
S
Laboratory tests for the antiphospholipid syndrome: current concepts.
Pathology
2004
, vol. 
36
 (pg. 
129
-
138
)
Sign in via your Institution