Because of potential synergy with chemotherapy and non-overlapping toxicity, we investigated the addition of Rituximab or Campath 1-H to the standard myeloablative conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg daily x 2) and total body irradiation (12.0 Gy in four fractions) prior to allogeneic transplantation for ALL. Transplantation was performed on day 0. Rituximab was added if patients’ disease expressed CD20+ > 20% by flow-cytometry. It was administered (375 mg/m2 ) on days −6, −1, +7 and +14. Campath I-H (10 mg daily intravenously, days −6 to −2) was added if patients’ CD20 expression was <20% and CD52 >20%. Thirty-two adult consecutive patients were studied. Eleven were in first remission with poor prognostic features, 11 in 2nd remission, and 10 were ≥ 3rd remission, or in relapse. Twenty-nine patients had B-cell, two had T-cell and one had an undifferentiated phenotyping. The study group included 19 males and 13 females of median age 35 yrs (range, 19–57). Median # of prior chemoregimens received was 2 (range, 1–6). In both groups of patients, prophylaxis for GVHD consisted of a combination of tacrolimus and methotrexate. Pharmacokinetic studies in patients who received Campath I-H showed no detectable level of the antibody one-day prior to- or after the infusion of the donor graft. Median follow-up for survivors was 19 months. Outcomes were:

Campath-study groupRituximab-study groupP -value
Prior Chemoregimens (range) 2(1–6) 2(1–3) 0.04 
Donor Type    
    Matched unrelated 3(28%) 8(38%) 0.2 
    Matched sibling 7(63%) 12(57%)  
    Mismatched sibling 1(9%) 1(5%)  
Cell Source    
    PB 8(73%) 11(52%) 0.2 
    Marrow 3(27%) 10(48%)  
Disease Status    
    CR1/CR2 5(45%) 17(81%) 0.05 
    Others 6(55%) 4(19%)  
Median time ANC >500 13 12 0.07 
    (range) (11–17) (10–24)  
Median time Platelets >20K 13 13 0.8 
    (range) (6 – 31) (7 – 34)  
Day 100 TRM 1(5%)  
Acute GVHD II–IV (N,% kM) 2 (18%) 5 (24%) 0.7 
Acute GVHD III–IV (N, % kM) 2 (9%)  
Chronic extensive GVHD (N, cumulative incidence) 3 (27%) 9 (54%) 0.4 
Overall Survival (18 mos) (95% CI) 53% (21 – 77) 52% (26 – 73) 0.9 
Disease-free survival (18 mos) (95% CI) 54% (23 – 75) 37% (15 – 60) 0.8 
Campath-study groupRituximab-study groupP -value
Prior Chemoregimens (range) 2(1–6) 2(1–3) 0.04 
Donor Type    
    Matched unrelated 3(28%) 8(38%) 0.2 
    Matched sibling 7(63%) 12(57%)  
    Mismatched sibling 1(9%) 1(5%)  
Cell Source    
    PB 8(73%) 11(52%) 0.2 
    Marrow 3(27%) 10(48%)  
Disease Status    
    CR1/CR2 5(45%) 17(81%) 0.05 
    Others 6(55%) 4(19%)  
Median time ANC >500 13 12 0.07 
    (range) (11–17) (10–24)  
Median time Platelets >20K 13 13 0.8 
    (range) (6 – 31) (7 – 34)  
Day 100 TRM 1(5%)  
Acute GVHD II–IV (N,% kM) 2 (18%) 5 (24%) 0.7 
Acute GVHD III–IV (N, % kM) 2 (9%)  
Chronic extensive GVHD (N, cumulative incidence) 3 (27%) 9 (54%) 0.4 
Overall Survival (18 mos) (95% CI) 53% (21 – 77) 52% (26 – 73) 0.9 
Disease-free survival (18 mos) (95% CI) 54% (23 – 75) 37% (15 – 60) 0.8 

No prognostic factor was found to be of significance for survival, disease-free survival, or relapse. This included: age (<35 vs ≥ 35), source of graft, disease status at transplant, # prior regimens (<2 vs ≥ 2), acute or chronic GVHD, use of Rituximab or Campath. Our results indicate that the addition of Rituximab or Campath I-H in allogeneic transplantation for ALL is safe. There was no delay in engraftment and no added toxicity or risk of mortality. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the impact of this strategy upon survival and relapse.

Author notes

Corresponding author

Sign in via your Institution