Allergen-induced accumulation of airway dendritic cells is supported by an increase in CD31^hiLy-6C^neg bone marrow precursors in a mouse model of asthma

The role of the dendritic cell (DC) as a professional antigen-presenting cell (APC) in the primary immune response is now well established.1 Airway DCs form a network in the epithelium, capture inhaled antigen (Ag), and migrate to the mediastinal lymph nodes (MLN) where Ag is presented to recirculating naive T cells.2-5 Not surprisingly, these cells have been implicated to cause sensitization to inhaled allergens, typical of Th2-mediated allergic asthma. In a mouse model of asthma, intratracheal immunization with ovalbumin (OVA)–pulsed DCs generates Th2 effector cells that control eosinophilic airway inflammation, goblet cell hyperplasia, and bronchial hyperreactivity upon repeated challenge with OVA aerosol.6,7 These observations indicate that airway DCs are essential in the early steps of sensitization. However, less information is available on the role of DCs in stimulating memory and/or effector Th2 cells upon repeated encounter with allergens.8 In patients with stable allergic asthma, the number of airway DCs is elevated compared with healthy controls, and local allergen challenge leads to rapid accumulation of CD1a⁺ HLA-DR⁺ DCs in the airway lamina propria, suggesting that DCs also present allergens to T cells in the secondary immune response leading to airway inflammation.9 

The mechanisms by which DC numbers increase in asthmatic airways include several not mutually exclusive possibilities. First, the increase could be caused by enhanced recruitment of DCs from the bloodstream into the site of airway inflammation. To support an enhanced demand for DCs in the inflamed airways, the bone marrow (BM) might enhance its output of DCs or DC progenitors. Such a mechanism would be similar to the enhanced recruitment of eosinophils into sites of allergic inflammation, supported by a release of eosinophilic progenitors from the BM.10-14 Second, enhanced differentiation of freshly recruited monocytes into DCs could also lead to increased numbers of DCs being found at sites of airway inflammation.15 In such a scenario, one would expect to find enhanced production of DC differentiation and/or growth factors within the lung. Finally, as there is continuous and high throughput migration of airway DCs from the epithelium to the draining MLNs, a small decrease of DC efflux could lead to rapid and profound accumulation of DCs within the epithelium.5,16 To study which of these mechanisms might predominate, we have used a DC-driven mouse model of asthma.6 

All experiments were performed with 8- to 10-week-old female Balb/c (H-2^d) mice (Harlan, Zeist, The Netherlands). Mice were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions at the animal care facility at the Erasmus University Rotterdam. All of the experimental procedures used in this study were approved by the Erasmus University Committee of Animal Experiments.

To induce sensitization to inhaled OVA, BM-derived DCs were pulsed with OVA in vitro and subsequently injected into the airways of naive mice.6 In short, BM cells were cultured for 10 days in tissue culture medium (TCM) (5% fetal calf serum [FCS] from Biocell Laboratories, Rancho Dominguez, CA; RPMI 1640, gentamycine, β-mercaptoethanol, all from Gibco BRL, Paisley, Scotland) supplemented with 20 ng/mL recombinant murine (rm) granulocyte macrophage–colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF).17 After 9 days of culture, cells were pulsed overnight with 100 μg/mL OVA (OVA-DC) (OVA, grade V; Sigma Chemical, St Louis, MO). On day 10 of culture, cells were collected, washed, and 1 × 10⁶ DCs were injected intratracheally in naive mice. Control mice received identical numbers of unpulsed DCs (PBS-DCs). Ten days after immunization, mice were challenged with OVA aerosol (grade III, 1% wt/vol in phosphate buffered saline [PBS], Sigma) or with PBS aerosol during a 30-minute challenge per day for 1, 3, or 7 consecutive days. In separate experiments, an additional control group consisted of naive unmanipulated mice.

At 24 hours after the last OVA challenge, animals were anesthetized and tracheal whole mounts were prepared as described earlier with a modification that the secondary antibody, used to detect rat anti–mouse major histocompatibility complex II (MHCII), was goat anti–rat F(ab′)₂ fragments conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Serotec, Oxford, United Kingdom).18 The entire trachea was mounted in Entellan (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and viewed under a transmission light microscope equipped with Nomarski optics (Leica, Cambridge, United Kingdom).

At 24 hours after the last aerosol, groups of mice were killed by avertin overdose followed by exsanguination. Bronchoalveolaire lavage (BAL) was performed with 3 × 1 mL Ca²⁺- and Mg²⁺-free PBS supplemented with 0.1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). After red blood cells (RBCs) were lysed using ammoniumchloride lysis buffer, cytospin slides were prepared and remaining cells were used for flow cytometric analysis. Supernatants of BAL fluid (BALF) and serum were stored for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) quantification of GM-CSF, interleukin 6 (IL-6) (OptEIA, PharMingen, Becton Dickinson, San Diego, CA; threshold 8 pg/mL), eotaxin, and fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (Flt-3L) (R&D Systems, Abingdon, United Kingdom; threshold 5 pg/mL).

Lymph node (LN) cell suspensions were prepared by a 1-hour incubation at 37°C with 0.02 mg/mL DNAse I (Sigma Chemical) and 100 U/mL Collagenase IV (Life Technologies). RBCs were lysed and cells were passed through a 40-μm cell sieve (Becton Dickinson).

Blood was collected in heparinized tubes from the iliac artery and lysed with 20 mL RBC lysis solution for 4 minutes at 4°C.

BM cells were prepared by flushing femurs and tibiae with 5 mL sterile PBS, followed by RBC lysis and passage through a 100-μm cell sieve.

Cytospin preparations of BALF and cultured BM were acetone fixed and blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin/PBS. Major basic protein (MBP) was detected using a rabbit anti–mouse MBP antibody (Ab) (J. J. Lee, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ), followed by alkaline phosphatase–conjugated goat anti–rabbit Abs (Sigma) and development of signal with New Fuchsin in Tris-HCl. Slides were counterstained with Mayer haematoxilin (Merck). One investigator counted all cells.

Cells were washed in PBS containing 5% FCS and 5 mM sodium azide (FACS wash), and 1 × 10⁶ cells were stained for 30 minutes on ice. To reduce nonspecific binding, cells were incubated with 2.4G2 blocking reagent for 15 minutes. Monoclonals used were as follows: MHCII–fluorescein isothiocyanate (MHCII-FITC) (2G9), allophycocyanin (APC)–labeled CD11c (HL3), phycoerythrin (PE)–labeled Abs against CD3 (145-2C11), B220 (RA3-6B2), and CCR3 (R&D Systems), biotin-labeled CD11b (M1/70), followed by streptavidin (SA)–PE-Cy5 (Quantum Red; Sigma). Propidium iodide (Sigma) was added for exclusion of dead cells before analysis on a FACScalibur flow cytometer using CellQuest (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA) and FlowJo software (Treestar, Costa Mesa, CA).

BM cells were stained with anti-CD31 (anti–platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule PECAM-1; ER-MP12-bio), and anti–Ly-6C (ER-MP20-FITC; both produced in-house) followed by SA-PE or SA-PE-Cy5, allowing the discrimination of 6 distinct populations of cells.19-22 For phenotype description the following mAbs were used: CD11b-APC, CD127-PE (IL-7Rα; SB/14), CD131-PE (JORO50), CCR3-PE, CD3-PECy5 and CD4-APC (GK1.5), CD11c-APC and B220-PECy5, or Gr1-PE (RB6-8C5). Antibodies were from PharMingen or R&D Systems.

In separate sorting experiments, 80 × 10⁶ cells were stained with CD31-bio followed by SA-PE and Ly-6C-FITC and were sorted into CD31^hiLy-6C^neg and into CD31^negLy-6C^med populations under sterile conditions on a FACS Vantage flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson).

After sorting, cells were washed twice in TCM and cultured for 7 days at 0.25 × 10⁶/well in 24-well plates with 40 ng GM-CSF per milliliter to induce DC differentiation. In separate experiments, cells were grown at 8 × 10⁵ cells/well in round-bottom 96-well plates in TCM supplemented with 30% FCS and 24 ng/mL murine recombinant IL-5 (rIL-5) (PharMingen) to induce eosinophil differentiation. As a control, unsorted BM was stained and cultured under identical conditions. After 7 days, cells were analyzed for expression of MHCII-FITC, CD11c-bi (N418) in combination with CD80-PE (16-10A1), CD86-PE (GL-1), or CD40-PE (3/23), followed by SA-PECy5. For eosinophil differentiation, cytospin preparations were stained with an anti–MBP Ab as described above.

BM DCs were labeled using carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), as previously described.6 CFSE⁺ DCs (2-5 × 10⁶) were transferred intratracheally into mice with established eosinophilic airway inflammation (OVA-DC/3xOVA) or into control mice (PBS-DC/3xPBS). At 48 hours after the intratracheal cell transfer, mice were killed. The number of CD11c⁺, CFSE⁺ DCs was determined on BALF, MLN, and inguinal LN samples.

All experiments were performed using 3 to 10 mice per group, and per time point in kinetic experiments. Comparison of means between different groups was performed with a Kruskal-Wallis test for equality among the different groups and in the case of a significant difference, the Mann-Whitney test for unpaired data was used for comparing 2 groups (SPSS 10.0 for Windows) separately. Differences were considered significant if P < .05.

Sensitization was induced by intratracheal injection of 1 × 10⁶ OVA-pulsed DCs. As a marker for inflammation in the lungs, the total number of BAL cells was measured 24 hours after 1, 3, or 7 OVA aerosol exposures in sensitized mice (Figure1A). The total recovery of BAL cells was not different from control mice (PBS-DC/PBS) after 1 OVA exposure, but sequentially increased 10-fold (P = .008) after 3 OVA exposures and 46-fold (P = .008) after 7 OVA exposures.

Differential analysis of the BALF cells using flow cytometry (Figure1B) showed a significant proportional increase in lymphocytes (CD3⁺ or B220⁺ cells) and granulocytes (based on scatter characteristics) with a concomitant decrease in alveolar macrophages/monocytes (highly autofluorescent cells) in OVA-DC/OVA mice (Figure 2A). As the discrimination of eosinophils from other polymorphonuclear granulocytes is impossible based on scatter characteristics alone, eosinophils were further characterized as nonautofluorescent highly granular (SSC^hi) cells expressing intermediate levels of CD11c, and lacking expression of MHCII, B220, and CD3.23 These highly granular cells also expressed the eotaxin receptor CCR3 (Figure 1D).24This method of counting eosinophils was compared with counting BALF cytospins stained with an anti–MBP Ab, yielding a highly statistically significant Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.82 (P = .0001) (Figure 1C). Performing 3 OVA aerosols induced an eosinophilia of 30.7 ± 6.0%, and 7 OVA aerosols induced an eosinophilia of 49.0% ± 5.1 of all BALF cells. Thus, OVA exposure in OVA-DC–immunized mice time-dependently induces eosinophilic airway inflammation.

To determine the number of DCs in the airways of PBS- and OVA-exposed mice, we have analyzed BALF cells 24 hours after the last OVA aerosol (Figure 2A). Dendritic cells were identified with multiparameter flow cytometry as nonautofluorescent CD11c^hi/MHCII^hi/B220⁻/CD3⁻cells, as described previously.3 Additional staining revealed that these cells expressed CD11b, identifying them as myeloid DCs (Figure 2D). First we verified that injected DCs could no longer be recovered from the BALF 5 days following intratracheal injection (data not shown). This eliminates the possibility that nonendogenous DCs still remaining in the BALF could confound the counting of DCs after the aerosol challenge period (day 11 to day 17 after injection). The absolute number of DCs was elevated about 10 times in OVA-DC–immunized mice challenged with 3 OVA aerosols (P = .008) and increased about 100 times after 7 OVA aerosols (P = .016) compared with control PBS-DC/PBS mice (Figure 2B). In addition to an absolute increase in cell number, the percentage of DCs found in BALF cells was similarly increased following 3 aerosols, although not significantly (P = .056), and doubled after 7 aerosols (P = .016). In control mice the number of DCs remained at low levels, comparable to the situation in unmanipulated mice.

To determine if the increase in the number of BALF DCs was also supported by an increase in airway mucosal DCs, we visualized the DC network in tracheal whole mounts, as previously described.18 The pattern of the MHCII staining revealed a dendritic network in the control PBS-DC/PBS mice (Figure3A), whereas in the OVA-DC–immunized mice exposed to 3 OVA aerosols, numerous dense areas of rounded MHCII⁺ cells lacking the typical dendritic morphology were seen (Figure 3B). Due to the fact that MHCII⁺ cells were rounded and could also represent MHCII⁺ B cells or eosinophils, we could not directly compare DC numbers at the tissue level, although clearly, overall MHCII staining was enhanced.

To investigate if the accumulation of lung CD11c⁺CD11b⁺ DCs was supported by recruitment from the bloodstream, the number of DCs (CD11c⁺/MHCII⁺/B220⁻/CD3⁻cells) was determined in the blood 24 hours after the last of 3 aerosols. The percentage of MHCII⁺ CD11c⁺ blood DCs was significantly raised (OVA 0.81 ± 0.09% vs PBS 0.37 ± 0.03 vs naive 0.39 ± 0.03, P < .0001) in response to OVA challenges in OVA-DC mice (Figure4A,C).

In the blood of the control PBS-DC/PBS–immunized mice, levels were comparable with those found in untreated animals. Additional experiments were carried out to define the CD11b⁺ myeloid and CD11b⁻ lymphoid population within the CD11c⁺ MHCII⁺B220⁻CD3⁻ population of blood cells (Figure 4B-C). It appeared that the percentage of blood CD11b⁺myeloid DCs was significantly elevated in OVA-DC/OVA mice compared with PBS-DC/PBS mice (OVA 0.6 ± 0.066% vs PBS 0.231 ± 0.022%,P < .0001). In the blood of OVA-DC/OVA mice, the percentage of MHC II⁺ CD11b⁺CD11c⁻ cells (putative monocytes) was also raised significantly over the control mice (1.00 ± 0.30% vs 0.30 ± 0.03%, P < .0001011).

The increased presence of CD11c⁺ DCs in the bloodstream during OVA challenge, despite the massive influx of DCs into the airways, suggested that DC output from the BM might be enhanced.

Staining of whole BM cells with the monoclonal Abs CD31 (ER-MP12) and Ly-6C (ER-MP20), gives rise to 6 distinct populations of BM cells, each with varying degrees of lineage commitment and progenitor potential (see Figure 5A).19 This staining was used to define the cellular composition of BM in mice with or without eosinophilic airway inflammation. Performing 1, 3, or 7 OVA aerosol exposures to OVA-DC mice sequentially induced an increase in the CD31^hiLy-6C^neg population, from 4.61 ± 0.75% of total BM at baseline up to 7.84 ± 1.25% after 3 aerosols and 11.1 ± 1.48% after 7 aerosols (Figure 5A-B). There was no increase in this population after exposure to PBS aerosols. None of the 5 other distinct populations was altered significantly by OVA aerosol in OVA-DC mice or by PBS aerosol in PBS-DC mice.

To explore whether the increase of the CD31^hiLy-6C^neg population was due to an increase of cells with myeloid or lymphoid commitment, additional staining was performed using the myeloid differentiation marker CD11b in combination with a CD127 Ab against the IL-7Rα chain, identifying cells with lymphoid commitment.25 26 Within the CD31^hiLy-6C^neg subset, cells expressed CD11b or CD127 exclusively. After 4 aerosols, the percentage of CD11b⁺ cells in this subset remained constant, whereas that of CD11b⁻CD127⁺ lymphoid-committed cells was 9.5 ± 1.4% in PBS-DC/PBS mice, compared with 6.1 ± 0.4% in OVA-DC/OVA mice, indicating a small but significant (P = .004) decrease of cells with lymphoid differentiation (potential). Cells were also stained with an Ab against CD131, the common β chain of the IL-3/IL-5/GM-CSF receptor. The CD31^hiLy-6C^neg subset had the highest expression compared with the other populations or whole BM. There was no difference in CD131 expression of the CD31^hiLy-6C^neg subset between the PBS and the OVA exposed group.

As the CD31^hiLy-6C^neg subset of cells was the only population that was increased in the BM of mice with eosinophilic airway inflammation, we examined if this subset could give rise to DCs. The CD31^hiLy-6C^neg population was purified by flow cytometric sorting to 85% to 95% purity, and cultured in GM-CSF (40 ng/mL) (Figure6).

After 7 days culture in the presence of GM-CSF, many colonies of proliferating cells were seen. About 77% of cells were CD11c⁺ and more than half of these expressed MHCII, indicating maturation in culture (Figure 6C). In contrast, the CD31^negLy-6C^med population was sorted and cultured under the same conditions and yielded only 2.2% MHCII⁺/CD11c⁺cells.

Airway eosinophilia is a prominent feature of allergic airway inflammation and was also observed in our model. Therefore, we investigated whether the same CD31^hiLy-6C^negpopulation contained eosinophil precursors. First, to support the concept that cells with eosinophil potential were contained within the CD31^hiLy-6C^neg population, bone marrow subsets were stained with a monoclonal antibody against the eotaxin receptor CCR3.24 Cells within this subset expressed CCR3 at intermediate levels (see Figure 7A). Mature granulocytes contained within the CD31^negLy-6C^med also contained CCR3^hi mature eosinophils. Next, cells in the allergen-induced enlarged CD31^hiLy-6C^negpopulation were sorted (about 85% to 95% pure CD31^hiLy-6C^neg cells) and cultured in the presence of IL-5 (24 ng/mL) for 6 days (Figure 7B-C). Eosinophils were detected after 6 days by MBP staining and morphology on cytospins. The CD31^hiLy-6C^neg subset yielded a 4-fold higher number of cells (P = .029) and a higher percentage of eosinophils compared with whole BM cultured under the same conditions (CD31^hiLy-6C^neg: 51.2 ± 1.1% vs whole BM: 25.6 ± 2.2%, P = .029).

Despite the fact that none of the other populations identified by CD31 and Ly-6C staining were percentually changed, we studied these subsets in greater detail by 4-color analysis. More specifically, the percentage of CD31^hiLy-6C^hi cells, known to contain precursors for DCs as well as plasmacytoid DCs, was not altered by exposure to OVA.22,27 28 The percentage of plasmacytoid CD11c⁺ B220⁺ DCs within the CD31^hiLy-6C^hi subset was 12.2 ± 1.4% in OVA-exposed mice compared with 13.0 ± 0.8% in PBS-exposed mice after 3 aerosols (Figure 5C). However, in response to the OVA challenges, the CD31^hiLy-6C^hi subset, expressed more CD131 compared with the control mice (data not shown).

The percentage of CD3⁺CD4⁺ T cells (falling within the CD31^medLy-6C^neg fraction) in total BM was significantly lower (0.16 ± 0.03%) in the OVA-DC/OVA group compared with the PBS-DC/PBS group (0.37 ± 0.07%;P = .001).

An increase in DCs could also be caused by increased local differentiation of DCs from monocytic precursors within inflamed tissues. To determine the presence of early growth and differentiation factors for DCs, we measured the content of the cytokines IL-6, GM-CSF, and Flt-3L in BALF 24 hours after 3 OVA aerosol exposures, when the number of DCs was significantly increased. IL-6 was significantly raised after 3 aerosols in OVA-DC/OVA mice compared with PBS-DC/PBS mice (OVA: 418.2 ± 74.6 pg/mL, PBS: 12.5 ± 1.9 pg/mL;P = .016). Ag challenge did not effect the GM-CSF level (OVA: 3.90 ± 1.50 pg/mL vs PBS: 9.45 ± 2.3 pg/mL;P = .111). The Flt-3L levels in BALF were just above the detection level of our assay, showing no detectable difference in the various groups.

In serum, levels of IL-6 (13.67 ± 3.39 pg/mL vs 2.55 ± 0.79 pg/mL; P = .016) and eotaxin (564 ± 62 pg/mL vs 282 ± 25 pg/mL; P = .008) were higher in the OVA-DC/OVA group compared with the PBS-DC/PBS group, whereas that of GM-CSF was below the detection limit.

In addition to the mechanisms studied above, a decreased efflux to the draining MLN could contribute to an accumulation of DCs in inflamed airways. We observed that the draining MLNs of OVA-DC/OVA mice were grossly swollen compared with nondraining nodes or MLNs of PBS-DC/PBS mice. After 3 aerosol exposures, the total number (both relative and absolute) of DCs was increased in the OVA-DC/OVA group compared with the control PBS-DC/PBS group (7.00 ± 0.53% vs 2.37 ± 0.27%;P = .002). This was due primarily to an increase in the CD11b^med/hi myeloid DCs (3.5-fold increase), although the lymphoid CD11b⁻ subset was also increased following OVA challenge (Figure 8A-B). To provide further proof that migration of airway DCs was influenced by the eosinophilic airway inflammation, we injected CFSE-labeled, BM-derived, in vitro–cultured DCs intratracheally in mice with (OVA-DC/OVA group) or without (PBS-DC/PBS) eosinophilic airway inflammation. At 48 hours after injection, mice with inflamed lungs had a small, but significantly higher number of CFSE-labeled DCs in the MLNs, compared with control mice with uninflamed lungs (9.74 ± 1.81 × 10² vs 2.41 ± 0.84 × 10² CFSE-labeled CD11c⁺cells; P = .029; Figure 8C), demonstrating that DC efflux to the MLNs was actually enhanced in mice with eosinophilic airway inflammation. After intratracheal injection, CFSE-labeled DCs could not be detected in peripheral LN.

Airway DCs have been implicated in causing the sensitization to inhaled allergens, by taking up Ag in the lung mucosa, transporting it into the draining LN and finally by inducing differentiation of Th2 effector cells that can orchestrate eosinophilic airway inflammation.3,4,6 7 Despite these observations that airway DCs might be essential in the early steps of sensitization, less information is available on the role of DCs in stimulating memory and/or effector Th2 cells at times of repeated exposure to inhaled allergens. In this paper, we have demonstrated that the number of airway CD11c⁺ CD11b⁺ myeloid DCs is strongly increased within the airway epithelium and BALF following allergen challenge in sensitized animals. Within 3 days, an almost 10-fold expansion in the number of DCs was found following repeated OVA challenge, in parallel with an increase in CD4⁺ lymphocytes and eosinophils in the airways, reaching a 100-fold expansion at day 7. At the same time, the number of CD11c⁺ CD11b⁺myeloid DCs in the bloodstream was increased 3-fold.

The massive increase in airway DCs and the accompanying increase in circulating blood DCs led us to investigate whether the production of DCs from the BM (“dendropoiesis”) might be enhanced in mice with eosinophilic airway inflammation, to meet the enhanced demand for DCs in the inflamed lung. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the BM reacts to airway allergen challenge by increasing its output of eosinophilic precursors.10-14 Previously, repopulation experiments in irradiated and BM-reconstituted rats have shown that airway DCs stem from a rapidly dividing precursor cell in the BM.16 It is possible to discriminate distinct populations of BM cells using multiparameter flow cytometry.19,22,29,30 Here, we have used the expression of Ly-6C in combination with CD31, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule PECAM-1, to delineate 6 discrete populations of BM cells, each with differential lineage commitment and differentiation potential.19,22 When we stained BM cells from mice with or without eosinophilic airway inflammation, there was a striking and time-dependent increase in the population of CD31^hiLy-6C^neg cells, whereas none of the other populations were affected by allergen challenge. In previous experiments, this population of BM cells was shown to contain cells with colony-forming unit (CFU) potential for granulocytes/monocytes, erythrocytes, megakaryocytes, and mast cells as well as cells with thymus repopulating capacity. More primitive precursors with long-term repopulating ability were found in the CD31^medLy-6C^neg population.29 31In mice with eosinophilic airway inflammation, CD31^hiLy-6C^neg cells predominantly expressed the myeloid marker CD11b, and the expression of the lymphoid differentiation marker IL-7Rα (CD127) was slightly, but significantly, decreased, suggesting an expansion of cells with myeloid potential. When CD31^hiLy-6C^neg cells were sorted and subsequently grown in the DC-growth factor GM-CSF, clusters were formed in liquid culture and a majority of the outgrowth of these colonies were myeloid CD11b⁺CD11c⁺ cells with a dendritic morphology (data not shown). In contrast, when CD31^negLy-6C^med cells were grown under the same conditions, no colonies were formed and hardly any CD11c⁺cells grew out of the cultures. When the CD31^hiLy-6C^neg DC-precursor population was sorted from both groups of mice, and grown under the same plating density and GM-CSF concentration, there was no difference in the amount or percentage of DCs that grew from these cultures. Therefore, sensitivity to GM-CSF, either by enhanced expression of the GM-CSF receptor or by modified postreceptor events, was not enhanced in mice with eosinophilic airway inflammation. In support of this, the expression of the common β chain of the IL-3/IL-5/GM-CSF on CD31^hiLy-6C^neg cells was not different between mice with or without eosinophilic airway inflammation.

The fact that a time-dependent increase in CD31^hiLy-6C^neg cells with DC potential was observed in mice with massive accumulation of CD11b⁺CD11c⁺ airway and blood DCs strongly suggests that the BM increased its production of DCs to meet the enhanced demand in the airways. Moreover, in mice with airway inflammation, there was no increase in the CD31^hiLy-6C^hi population, known to contain the plasmacytoid B220⁺ CD11c⁺ DCs and some precursors of myeloid DCs.22 The fact that we did not see an increase in any of these more mature DC populations following allergen challenge suggests that DC precursors leave the BM at an early stage of differentiation. One possibility that needs further investigation is that they were attracted to the airways through the action of particular chemokines. Allergic inflammation is accompanied by enhanced production of eotaxin in the airways.32 The subset of CD31^hiLy-6C⁻ BM precursors expressed the eotaxin receptor CCR3, suggesting that these cells might be attracted into inflamed airways.

The observed increase in CD31^hiLy-6C^neg cells in BM, without any other increase in BM populations is unique for eosinophilic airway inflammation. Bacterial infection withListeria monocytogenes leads to profound changes in BM composition with a predominant time-dependent increase in CD31^hiLy-6C^hi monocyte precursors, CD31^negLy-6C^hi mature monocytes, and CD31^negLy-6C^med granulocytes. At the same time, there was a depletion of CD31^medLy-6C^neglymphoid cells and more importantly, the CD31^hiLy-6C^neg population described in this study.19 The changes in the BM ofListeria-infected mice reflect an increased need for granulocytes and monocytes, which are attracted to lesions consisting of mononuclear- and neutrophil-rich cell infiltrates. However, in our model of OVA-induced airway inflammation, eosinophils are strongly recruited to the airways of challenged mice together with DCs. Not surprisingly, we were able to demonstrate that the CD31^hiLy-6C^neg population of BM cells could also differentiate into MBP-positive eosinophils after culture in IL-5, suggesting that enhanced production of eosinophils from the BM was induced to meet the increased demand for eosinophils. This is in line with previous experiments in which mouse BM cells were cultured in the presence of IL-5 in semisolid media to asses eosinophil–colony-forming unit (CFU-Eo) potential and showing increased CFU-Eo in mice with eosinophilic airway inflammation.11-14 

The increase in CFU-Eo in challenged mice has been attributed either to the presence of a serum factor distinct from IL-5, such as eotaxin, or to migration of IL-5–producing T cells to the BM.13,14,33In support of a serum factor in our system, we measured a slightly enhanced level of the DC growth factor IL-6.34 One likely candidate that could be involved in the up-regulation of GM-CSF–responsive BM cells is eotaxin,33 of which the serum levels were indeed doubled in mice with inflammation. Further, the CD31^hiLy-6C^neg cells expressed the eotaxin receptor CCR3, with identical levels in allergic and nonallergic mice (data not shown). The migration of “dendropoiesis”-promoting T cells to the BM is less likely as we measured a decrease in BM CD4⁺ T cells following allergen challenge, probably due to their migration to the lung.

Although the direct recruitment of immature blood DCs is the most likely explanation for the observed accumulation of lung DCs, one contributing mechanism could also be enhanced local proliferation of DCs from monocytic precursors in allergic lung. Although it was shown in irradiation experiments that there is little if any local self-renewal capacity for DCs in rat airways, this situation could be different under inflammatory conditions.16 Indeed, in our experiments, there was an increase in circulating CD11c⁻CD11b⁺MHCII⁺ monocytes that could be recruited to the airways and further differentiate to DCs.15 However, when we measured the concentration of the DC differentiation factors GM-CSF and Flt-3L in the airways of allergic mice, we could not detect enhanced production.34,35 One factor that enhances differentiation of mouse BM–derived DCs that was enhanced in BALF was IL-6.34 It was recently shown that enhanced expression of IL-6 in the lungs of mice receiving IL-13 and interferon-γ correlates with enhanced numbers of CD11c⁺DCs being found in the BALF.36 Definite proof whether locally produced IL-6, GM-CSF, or Flt-3L functionally contributes to enhanced differentiation of monocytes (precursors) to DCs in mice with airway eosinophilia awaits studies using neutralizing antibodies.

One final mechanism that could be responsible for the observed change in airway DCs in mice with airway eosinophilia would be reduced emigration of DCs. There is continuous and high throughput migration of airway DCs from the epithelium to the draining MLN and a small decrease of DC efflux could lead to rapid and profound accumulation within the epithelium.3,5,16 To our surprise, we found that the numbers of CD11c⁺CD11b⁺ myeloid and CD11c⁺CD11b⁻ lymphoid DCs were increased strongly in the MLN of OVA-challenged mice. We believe that the increase in LN DCs was partly due to enhanced migration of lung-derived DCs into the MLN. In support of this, CFSE⁺CCR-7⁺ BM DCs migrated 3 times more efficiently toward the MLNs following injection into the airways of mice with established airway eosinophilia. Reduced migration of DCs to the MLN is therefore not a mechanism that contributes to accumulation of airway DCs in our model. Enhanced migration of Ag-laden DCs to the MLN during a secondary response to inhaled Ag could prove to be necessary to stimulate the recirculating pool of nonpolarized CCR7⁺ central memory T cells, which recirculate through the T-cell area of LN and spleen and fail to migrate into peripheral tissues.37,38 We have shown that a proportion of divided Ag-reactive T cells remain in a nonpolarized, nonrecirculating state in the MLN after immunization with DCs.4 It is possible that migratory DCs recruit these sessile partially activated cells into further cell division during renewed encounters with inhaled Ag.38 

In summary, our data show that CD11b⁺CD11c⁺ DCs are massively attracted into the airways and draining LN upon OVA challenge in sensitized mice, a process supported by increased dendropoiesis in the BM. We have previously shown that systemic abolition of DCs in sensitized thymidine kinase transgenic mice immediately prior to secondary challenge completely suppresses eosinophilic airway inflammation, goblet cell hyperplasia, and IgE synthesis.18 Together, these data imply an important functional role for airway DCs not only in the induction of Th2 cells from naive precursors, but also in the maintenance of eosinophilic airway inflammation. Inhibiting the influx of DCs could prove to be a strategy for reducing airway inflammation that is typical of asthma.8 

We thank C. Snoys (Cell Biology, Erasmus University) for sorting and J. Lee for antibodies.