Abstract
Background:
IO was found to be highly active in pts with refractory-relapsed ALL, with an overall response rate of 58% and a median survival of 6.3 months (mos). Identifying factors associated with different outcomes on IO therapy may help select patients for this treatment and advice of prognosis.
Methods:
A total of 89 pts treated with IO on previous studies were analyzed. IO was given at 1.3-1.8 mg/m2 IV x 1 every 3-4 weeks or weekly (0.8 mg/m2 Day 1, 0.5 mg/m2 Days 8 and 15) every 3-4 weeks. Pretreatment factors associated with achieving marrow complete response (CR) and with survival were analyzed using standard statistical methods.
Results:
Baseline characteristics of the 89 pts are summarized in Table 1. Overall, 17 pts (19%) achieved CR, 29 (33%) had CRp, and 6 pts (7%) had bone marrow CR with incomplete recovery (Cri). 5 pts (6%) died within 4 weeks of starting therapy. The ORR was 58%. The rate of cytogenetic CR by morphologic responses was as follows: 8 cytogenetic CR/10 morphologic CR (80%); 16 cytogenetic CR/22 morphologic CRp (73%); and 4 cytogenetic CR/4 morphologic CRi (100%). The median survival of patients with at least marrow CR was 9 mos versus 3.4 mos for those without marrow CR (p<0.001). By multivariate analysis, a high peripheral blood absolute blast count (ABC) and low platelet count were independently associated with a lower likelihood of achieving at least marrow CR. With a median follow-up of 23 mos, (5-44), the median overall survival of pts who received IO was 6 mos; the median survival was 5 mos with the single-dose schedule and 9.5 mos with the weekly schedule. The median remission duration was 12 mos (1-year rate, 48%) (Figure 1A). Baseline characteristics independently associated with worse survival included adverse cytogenetics [complex karyotype, translocation (4;11), translocation (9;22), abnormal chromosome 17], disease beyond first salvage, and high peripheral blood ABC. Pts with 0, 1-2 or 3 adverse factors had a median survival of 42+, 7.5, and 2.4 mos, respectively (Figure 1B). To assess the benefit of achieving a marrow CR, we repeated the multivariate survival analysis using a 6-week landmark that excluded 5 pts who died within 6 weeks. The median survival was 9.2 mos and 3.4 mos for patients with and without marrow CR (p<0.001). The multivariate analysis selected the achievement of response as independently associated with survival improvement [HR=0.5 (95% CI=0.28-0.89); p=0.02]. Disease with complex karyotype, translocation (4;11), translocation (9;22), and abnormal chromosome 17 [HR=2.9 (95% CI=1.29-6.62); p=0.009], and disease status beyond first Salvage regimen [HR=1.2 (95% CI=2.16-3.91); p=0.01] were independently associated with significant worse survival. Pts with 0, 1- 2 or 3 adverse factors had a median survival of 42+, 8, and 3 mos, respectively (Figure 1C).
Conclusion:
Our current analyses identified a subset of adult pts with ALL in whom outcome of therapy with IO can be differentially predicted.
Patients' characteristics
. | . | N (%) . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter . | . | Single-Dose, n=49 . | Weekly, n=40 . | Overall, n=89 . |
Age, year | ≤18 | 3 (6) | 3 (8) | 6 (7) |
≥60 | 12 (24) | 13 (33) | 25 (28) | |
ECOG, PS | 0-1 | 44 (90) | 36 (90) | 80 (90) |
≥2 | 5 (10) | 4 (10) | 9 (10) | |
Salvage Status | S1 | 13 (27) | 16 (40) | 29 (33) |
>S1 | 36 (73) | 24 (60) | 60 (67) | |
PB ABC, x 109/L | <1.0 | 33 (67) | 25 (63) | 58 (65) |
≥1.0 | 16 (33) | 15 (38) | 31 (35) | |
WBC, x 109/L | <4.0 | 28 (57) | 17 (43) | 45 (51) |
4-11 | 11 (22) | 16 (40) | 27 (30) | |
>11 | 10 (20) | 7 (18) | 17 (19) | |
BM blasts, % | <20 | 3 (6) | 8 (20) | 11 (12) |
20-49 | 10 (20) | 8 (20) | 18 (20) | |
50-69 | 8 (16) | 6 (15) | 14 (16) | |
≥70 | 28 (57) | 18 (45) | 46 (52) | |
Platelets, x 109/L | <100 | 43 (88) | 28 (70) | 71 (80) |
≥100 | 6 (12) | 12 (30) | 18 (20) | |
Karyotype | Diploid | 8 (16) | 9 (23) | 17 (19) |
Ph-positive | 9 (18) | 8 (20) | 17 (19) | |
Translocation (4;11) | 6 (12) | 3 (8) | 9 (10) | |
Complex | 13 (27) | 11 (28) | 24 (27) | |
Abnormal chromosome 17 | 6 (12) | 5 (13) | 11 (12) | |
Other | 6 (12) | 4 (10) | 10 (11) | |
Prior ASCT | 7 (14) | 2 (5) | 9 (10) | |
Prior HCVAD regimen | 35 (71) | 32 (80) | 67 (75) | |
CD22-positive, % | ≥90 | 28 (57) | 31 (78) | 59 (66) |
70-89 | 14 (29) | 7 (18) | 21 (24) | |
50-69 | 7 (14) | 2 (5) | 9 (10) |
. | . | N (%) . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter . | . | Single-Dose, n=49 . | Weekly, n=40 . | Overall, n=89 . |
Age, year | ≤18 | 3 (6) | 3 (8) | 6 (7) |
≥60 | 12 (24) | 13 (33) | 25 (28) | |
ECOG, PS | 0-1 | 44 (90) | 36 (90) | 80 (90) |
≥2 | 5 (10) | 4 (10) | 9 (10) | |
Salvage Status | S1 | 13 (27) | 16 (40) | 29 (33) |
>S1 | 36 (73) | 24 (60) | 60 (67) | |
PB ABC, x 109/L | <1.0 | 33 (67) | 25 (63) | 58 (65) |
≥1.0 | 16 (33) | 15 (38) | 31 (35) | |
WBC, x 109/L | <4.0 | 28 (57) | 17 (43) | 45 (51) |
4-11 | 11 (22) | 16 (40) | 27 (30) | |
>11 | 10 (20) | 7 (18) | 17 (19) | |
BM blasts, % | <20 | 3 (6) | 8 (20) | 11 (12) |
20-49 | 10 (20) | 8 (20) | 18 (20) | |
50-69 | 8 (16) | 6 (15) | 14 (16) | |
≥70 | 28 (57) | 18 (45) | 46 (52) | |
Platelets, x 109/L | <100 | 43 (88) | 28 (70) | 71 (80) |
≥100 | 6 (12) | 12 (30) | 18 (20) | |
Karyotype | Diploid | 8 (16) | 9 (23) | 17 (19) |
Ph-positive | 9 (18) | 8 (20) | 17 (19) | |
Translocation (4;11) | 6 (12) | 3 (8) | 9 (10) | |
Complex | 13 (27) | 11 (28) | 24 (27) | |
Abnormal chromosome 17 | 6 (12) | 5 (13) | 11 (12) | |
Other | 6 (12) | 4 (10) | 10 (11) | |
Prior ASCT | 7 (14) | 2 (5) | 9 (10) | |
Prior HCVAD regimen | 35 (71) | 32 (80) | 67 (75) | |
CD22-positive, % | ≥90 | 28 (57) | 31 (78) | 59 (66) |
70-89 | 14 (29) | 7 (18) | 21 (24) | |
50-69 | 7 (14) | 2 (5) | 9 (10) |
Survival and response duration for the whole population
Survival and response duration for the whole population
Survival by risk score according to baseline adverse factors
Survival by risk score according to baseline adverse factors
Survival by risk score according to a landmark analysis taking into account response as an additional variable
Survival by risk score according to a landmark analysis taking into account response as an additional variable
Kadia:GSK: Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria. Hagop:ARIAD: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding.
Author notes
Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.