The UK Infected Blood Inquiry report was published in May 2024 after 6 years of taking oral and written evidence from patients, clinicians, blood services, government officials and politicians about the transmission of infection by blood transfusion to thousands of patients in the 1970s through to the 1990s. The same problems with transfusion-transmitted infection occurred in many other countries in the same period but their reviews, inquiries and decisions about compensation occurred many years earlier than in the UK. The publication of the report has been welcomed but begs two important questions. Why was the inquiry so delayed in the UK? And why did it take so long to report? Further, the report itself deserves scrutiny. What were its findings and lessons learned? How will the findings be implemented and what are the implications, if any, for other countries?
Skip Nav Destination
Discussion|
February 12, 2025
The United Kingdom Infected Blood Inquiry: Its findings and lessons for the future of transfusion
Michael F Murphy,
University of Oxford, United Kingdom
* Corresponding Author; email: mike.murphy@nhsbt.nhs.uk
Search for other works by this author on:
Susan R Brailsford,
Susan R Brailsford
NHS Blood & Transplant, London, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
David J Roberts
David J Roberts
NHS Blood and Transplant, United States
Search for other works by this author on:
Blood blood.2024025976.
Article history
Submitted:
December 11, 2024
Revision Received:
January 30, 2025
Accepted:
January 31, 2025
Citation
Michael F Murphy, Susan R Brailsford, David J Roberts; The United Kingdom Infected Blood Inquiry: Its findings and lessons for the future of transfusion. Blood 2025; blood.2024025976. doi: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2024025976
Download citation file:
My Account
Sign InAdvertisement intended for health care professionals
Cited By
Advertisement intended for health care professionals
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal