Acalabrutinib-Obinutuzumab Improves Survival vs Chemoimmunotherapy in treatment-naive CLL in the 6-year Follow-up of ELEVATE-TN

• Acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab results in significantly higher PFS and OS vs chemoimmunotherapy regardless of high-risk features in TN CLL

• Acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab results in improved PFS rates vs acalabrutinib monotherapy in a post hoc analysis

Acalabrutinib is a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. We present results from ELEVATE-TN (NCT02475681) after median follow-up of 74.5 months. Overall, 535 patients were randomized (acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab, n = 179; acalabrutinib, n = 179; chlorambucil-obinutuzumab, n = 177). Median age was 70 years, 63.0% had unmutated IGHV (uIGHV), 13.6% had del(17p) and/or mutated TP53, and 17% had complex karyotype (CK; ≥3 chromosomal abnormalities). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached (NR) for acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab and acalabrutinib vs 27.8 months for chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (both P < .0001); estimated 72-month overall PFS rates were 78.0%, 61.5%, and 17.2%, respectively. Acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab resulted in improved PFS vs acalabrutinib monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.58, P = .0229). Patients with uIGHV, del(17p) and/or mutated TP53, or CK had significantly improved PFS with acalabrutinib ± obinutuzumab vs chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (P < .0001, P ≤ .0009, and P < .0001 for both acalabrutinib-containing arms, respectively). Median overall survival (OS) was NR for all treatments, with significantly longer OS for acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab vs chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (HR: 0.62, P = .0349). Estimated 72-month OS rates were 83.9%, 75.5%, and 74.7% for acalabrutinib-obinutuzumab, acalabrutinib, and chlorambucil-obinutuzumab, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) occurring after >4 years were mostly grade 1-2. Rates of AEs, serious AEs, and events of clinical interest were similar between acalabrutinib-containing arms and consistent with the known safety profiles of acalabrutinib and obinutuzumab. Efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib-containing arms were maintained, with longer PFS in both acalabrutinib arms vs chlorambucil-obinutuzumab including in patients with high-risk features.