Introduction: Post-Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB) coagulopathy results in bleeding, transfusion and re-exploration, and increases morbidity, mortality and cost. Some studies have reported a relationship between individual factor levels and chest tube drainage as a marker of bleeding, but few have reported that relationship for multiple factors.

Methods: With IRB approval and informed consent, 98 patients, ages 18 - 85, undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were studied. Factor levels measured five minutes post-protamine included fibrinogen (FIB), and factors II, V, VII, VIII, Von Willebrand Factor Antigen (VWF Ag), Ristocetin Cofactor (VWF Activity), IX, X, XI and XIII. Linear regression models examined the relationship between factor levels and post-op chest tube drainage over 24 hours as a surrogate marker for bleeding. An effect size (ES) was calculated so that each factor deficiency multiplied by the ES and the patient's weight in kg would estimate the contribution of that factor to bleeding. Factors were ranked from most to least impact on bleeding. Conversely, said ES would estimate the decrease in bleeding achieved by a percentage increase in a deficient factor level if such factor was known to be deficient.

Results: F:II was 1st (most associated with bleeding), ES = -0.137, 95% CI -0.214 - -0.059, p < 0.001; F:X was 2nd, ES = -0.130, 95% CI -0.202 - -0.058, p < 0.001; F:VII ES = -0.121, 95% CI -0.198 - -0.045, p = 0.002; F:XI ES = -0.109, 95% CI -0.16 - -0.058, p < 0.001; F:IX ES = -0.100; 95% CI -0.135 - -0.065, p < 0.001; F:V ES = - 0.065; 95% CI -0.114 - -0.016, p = 0.011; F:XIII ES = - 0.055; 95% CI -0.099 - -0.011, p = 0.016; FIB ES = - 0.042; 95% CI -0.063 - -0.022, p < 0.001; F:VIII ES = - 0.007; 95% CI -0.020 - 0.006, p = 0.318; VWF Ag ES = 0.002; 95% CI -0.016 - 0.019, p = 0.855; VWF Activity ES = 0.004; 95% CI -0.015 - 0.023, p = 0.671.

Conclusions: Factors VIII, VWF Ag and Ristocetin Cofactor demonstrated no relationship with bleeding, perhaps because they are elevated as acute-phase reactants. In theory, raising F:II level post-CPB by 30% in an 80 kg patient might decrease bleeding by 328 ml, and raising F:X level post-CPB by 30% in an 80 kg patient might decrease bleeding by 312 ml, etc. A weakness of this study is that the sample size was too small to perform a multi-variate analysis considering all factor levels. Still, the data suggest four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) might be a more effective treatment for post-CPB coagulopathy than FFP. The data do not confirm cause and effect; that would require a large study with control and treatment arms. If multiple factor levels could be measured in a rapid and cost-effective manner it might aid in targeted treatment of post-CPB coagulopathy. The data suggest that work should be performed to better elucidate the contribution of coagulation factor deficiencies to post-CPB bleeding, as improved treatment of such factor deficiencies might decrease bleeding and transfusion requirements.

Disclosures

Goldstein:Coagulation Sciences: Current equity holder in private company. Kagan:Coagulation Sciences: Current equity holder in private company.

This content is only available as a PDF.
Sign in via your Institution