Introduction:

Cancer is a serious condition that has an affect not only on patients' physical but also on their emotional well-being.Adults with hematological cancers (HC) have high prevalence rates of depression and anxiety.No reports are yet available about their prevalence in such patients' population in the Arab world. We aimed in this study to determine the prevalence of depression and GAD in HC patients seen at our facility.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study was conducted and recruited 211 participants. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained prior to conducting the study. All patients 14 years or older, with confirmed HC in the period of March 2014 -March 2015 were asked to participate in the study. Patients known to have a mental disorder were excluded. After obtaining the informed consent, a structured face to face interview was conducted using an internally developed and validated questionnaire.

Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) standardized questionnaire, translated into Arabic language was used to screen participants for GAD.It is 7-item scale that provides a 0-21 severity score. A score 5 to 9 is indicative of mild GAD, a score of 10 indicates moderate GAD, while a score of 15 indicates severe GAD. We only report cases of moderate and severe GAD.

Patient Health Questionaire-9 (PHQ-9) standardized, translated into Arabic language was used to screen participants for depression.It includes 9 items; with severity score of 0-27. Scores of 5, 10, 15 and 20 represents cut off points for mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression respectively. A cut-off point of 10 is used to identify depression in our study.

Results:

The median age was 46 (27 - 64) years and 121 (57.35%) were males. GAD was detected in 47 (22.3%) and depression was detected in 98 (46.5%) participants; while concurrent GAD and depression were detected in 38 (18.01%). Multivariate analyses revealed that the presence of multiple co-morbidities and tense home atmosphere are significant predictors for GAD and depression, while lower or no education is only associated with depression. We found no association between gender, smoking, family income or being on active therapy and the presence of depression or GAD.

Conclusion:

The prevalence of GAD and depression in HC in KAMC seems to be in the same range compared to what is reported by the international studies. Health care providers in the region ought to screen HC patients for depression and GAD as early referral and intervention may improve their emotional well being and possibly their disease outcome.

Table 1.

Multivariate analysis for patients with anxiety (n=211)

Variable (anxiety)OR95% CIP-value
Gender
Female vs. male 
1.499 (0.687 - 3.271) 0.3092 
Education
College graduate vs. not educated
Elementary/middle/high vs. not educated 
1.849
2.295 
(0.522 - 6.192)
(0.874 - 6.030) 
0.6910
0.1749 
Employment
Employed vs. unemployed 
1.242 (0.484 - 3.186) 0.6520 
Marital status
Unmarried vs. married 
1.914 (0.867 - 4.225) 0.1080 
Support
Socially supported vs. poorly supported 
2.107 (0.707 - 6.276) 0.1810 
Home atmosphere
Tense vs. relaxed home atmosphere 
4.494 (1.686 - 11.979) 0.0027 
Income
Low income vs. high income 
1.043 (0.426 - 2.549) 0.9272 
Comorbidities
Comorbidity vs. no comorbidity 
7.673 (3.136 - 18.777) 0.0001 
Actively receiving treatment
Yes vs. no 
1.053 (0.424 - 2.615) 0.9120 
Variable (anxiety)OR95% CIP-value
Gender
Female vs. male 
1.499 (0.687 - 3.271) 0.3092 
Education
College graduate vs. not educated
Elementary/middle/high vs. not educated 
1.849
2.295 
(0.522 - 6.192)
(0.874 - 6.030) 
0.6910
0.1749 
Employment
Employed vs. unemployed 
1.242 (0.484 - 3.186) 0.6520 
Marital status
Unmarried vs. married 
1.914 (0.867 - 4.225) 0.1080 
Support
Socially supported vs. poorly supported 
2.107 (0.707 - 6.276) 0.1810 
Home atmosphere
Tense vs. relaxed home atmosphere 
4.494 (1.686 - 11.979) 0.0027 
Income
Low income vs. high income 
1.043 (0.426 - 2.549) 0.9272 
Comorbidities
Comorbidity vs. no comorbidity 
7.673 (3.136 - 18.777) 0.0001 
Actively receiving treatment
Yes vs. no 
1.053 (0.424 - 2.615) 0.9120 

Table 2.

Multivariate analysis for patients with depression (n=211)

Variable (depression)OR95% CIP-Value
Gender
Females vs. males 
1.352 (0.682 - 2.680) 0.3874 
Education
College/graduate vs. elementary/middle/high
N ot educated vs. elementary/middle/high 
1.365 2.541 (0.584 - 3.190) (1.106 - 5.833) 0.7309 0.0803 
Employment
Employed vs. unemployed 
2.270 (1.000 - 5.149) 0.0499 
Marital status
Unmarried vs. married 
1.806 (0.901 - 3.621) 0.0960 
Family support
Supported vs. poorly supported 
1.854 (0.728 - 4.725)  0.1957 
Home atmosphere
Tense vs. relaxed 
2.591 (1.199 - 5.599) 0.0154 
Income
Low vs. high 
1.816 (0.779 - 4.235) 0.1670 
Comorbidities
Comorbidity vs. no comorbidity 
6.578 (3.315 - 13.055) 0.0001 
Actively receiving treatment
Yes vs. no 
1.627 (0.744 - 3.562) 0.2230 
Variable (depression)OR95% CIP-Value
Gender
Females vs. males 
1.352 (0.682 - 2.680) 0.3874 
Education
College/graduate vs. elementary/middle/high
N ot educated vs. elementary/middle/high 
1.365 2.541 (0.584 - 3.190) (1.106 - 5.833) 0.7309 0.0803 
Employment
Employed vs. unemployed 
2.270 (1.000 - 5.149) 0.0499 
Marital status
Unmarried vs. married 
1.806 (0.901 - 3.621) 0.0960 
Family support
Supported vs. poorly supported 
1.854 (0.728 - 4.725)  0.1957 
Home atmosphere
Tense vs. relaxed 
2.591 (1.199 - 5.599) 0.0154 
Income
Low vs. high 
1.816 (0.779 - 4.235) 0.1670 
Comorbidities
Comorbidity vs. no comorbidity 
6.578 (3.315 - 13.055) 0.0001 
Actively receiving treatment
Yes vs. no 
1.627 (0.744 - 3.562) 0.2230 

Disclosures

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution