Despite impressive cure rates obtained with modern chemotherapy, the optimal therapeutic strategy in advanced classic Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) is still debated due to some remaining open issues. These involve the best choice of upfront chemotherapy, the duration and intensity of frontline treatment, the value of consolidation radiotherapy, the role of functional imaging in treatment planning and monitoring and the adequacy of risk stratification tools. These observations have led us to investigate whether intensification of front-line ABVD would be possible while maintaining acceptable levels of toxicity and improving the performance of the schedule. We designed a dose-dense three-weekly version of the ABVD regimen (six cycles), which was also dose intensified, in the first four cycles, by escalating doxorubicin dose from 50 to 70 mg/m2 per cycle, in the absence of consolidation RT. A series of 172 patients (advanced-stage=124, intermediate-stage=48) was studied. Apart from pre- and post-Tx staging, all patients also underwent 18F-FDG-PET imaging after the 2nd cycle (PET2); in case of pathologic uptake at PET2, a new scan was performed after the 4th cycle (PET4). Open-label phase study began I June 2004; specifications are contained in the published article (Russo F BHJ 166,1118,2014) focused on feasibility and toxicity in 82 patients. The demographics and clinical characteristics are in Tab1.

Ninety-five percent of patients completed the planned six cycles (median duration time=16.7 weeks). Median actual dose intensities were 20.94 (23.12 cycles1-4), 6.69, 3.96 and 245 mg/m2/week for doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine, respectively. This corresponded to a 66.9% (85.0%, cycles 1-4) increase in dose intensity for doxorubicin, (total dose 380 mg/m2) and of 32% for the other agents, over standard ABVD. Intensified ABVD was highly tolerated with low rates of hospitalization during treatment, a low incidence of G3/ G4 events, low post-treatment cardiac and pulmonary toxicities and a very low rate of gonadic toxicity. Only two cases of second cancer have been recorded. PET2 was negative in 87% of patients (85% ADV,92%INT). Remarkably a CR rate of 94% (93% ADV, 98% INT) was achieved and EFS and OS at 7-years were 85% (79%ADV, 91% INT) and 96% (93%ADV, 98%INT) respectively (Tab2, Fig1). At univariate analysis (factors: Age, sex, LDH, IPS,B-symptoms, mediastinal bulky disease (MBD), E-disease, PET2, stage IV) the predictive factors of low CR rate were IPS≥3 (CR 89% vs 97%, p=0.03), and PET2pos (CR 65% vs 99%p<0.001). At multivariate analysis PET2 positivity (p<0.001) was the only independent risk factor predictive of low CR rate. Kaplan-Meyer 7yr-EFS was 77 and 78% (Log Rank 1.1, p=0.28) in MBD and no-MBD subsets, respectively. 7yr-EFS was significantly better in patients with PET2neg (87% vs 52% , log rank 24.7, p<0.001) and in patients with IPS 0-2 (88% vs 71% log rank 4.9, p=0.02). At Cox regression analysis PET2 was the only independent factor predictive of Event Free Survival.

Intensified ABVD without radiotherapy seems to be adequately powered to exploit early disease chemo-sensitivity yielding high percentage of early negative PET2, high rate of response and survival, without new severe or critical short and long-term toxicities.

Table 1
TAB 1Advanced-stage(n=124)Intermediate-stage (n=48)
Characteristics No. No. 
Age, years     
median 32  29  
range 15-77  15 - 62  
>45 years 23 19 10 
Gender, male 64 52 18 37 
Ann Arbor stage     
II 32 26 48 100 
III 40 32   
IV 52 42   
     
B symptoms 88 71 15 31 
Mediastinal bulk 56 45 19 
Extramediastinal bulk ≥10cm 
≥ 3 nodal areas involved 99 80 36 75 
Spleen involvement 23 19   
Extranodal (stage II-III) 
Extranodal (stage IV ) 51 41   
ESR (>50 mm/h) 60 48 15 31 
IPS ≥ 3 61 49 
LDH ratio>1 51 41 12 25 
Histologic subtype     
Nodular sclerosis 102 82 40 83 
Lymphocyte rich 10 10 
Mixed celluarity 
NOS 
TAB 1Advanced-stage(n=124)Intermediate-stage (n=48)
Characteristics No. No. 
Age, years     
median 32  29  
range 15-77  15 - 62  
>45 years 23 19 10 
Gender, male 64 52 18 37 
Ann Arbor stage     
II 32 26 48 100 
III 40 32   
IV 52 42   
     
B symptoms 88 71 15 31 
Mediastinal bulk 56 45 19 
Extramediastinal bulk ≥10cm 
≥ 3 nodal areas involved 99 80 36 75 
Spleen involvement 23 19   
Extranodal (stage II-III) 
Extranodal (stage IV ) 51 41   
ESR (>50 mm/h) 60 48 15 31 
IPS ≥ 3 61 49 
LDH ratio>1 51 41 12 25 
Histologic subtype     
Nodular sclerosis 102 82 40 83 
Lymphocyte rich 10 10 
Mixed celluarity 
NOS 

Table 2
Advanced stage Intermediate stage
Tab 2 95%C.I. 95%C.I. 
Final treatment response 123 100  48 100  
CR 115 93 88 - 97 47 98 94–100 
NearCR/PR 4.9  2.1  
Progression 1.6   
       
Cycle 2 PET 124 100  48 100  
negative 106 85  44 92  
positive 18 15   
Cycle 4 PET 18 100  100  
negative 11 61  75  
positive 39  25  
       
Events 22 21   
<CR   
progression   
early relapse 3-12   
late relapse>12 months   
2nd tumor   
1st line treatment-related death   
       
1-yr EFS  85 83-94  95 94–100 
2-yr EFS  83 76-90  91 83-99 
4-yr EFS  82 74-89    
7-yr EFS  79 70-88  91 83-99 
7-yr OS  93 86-100  97 93–100 
       
Advanced stage Intermediate stage
Tab 2 95%C.I. 95%C.I. 
Final treatment response 123 100  48 100  
CR 115 93 88 - 97 47 98 94–100 
NearCR/PR 4.9  2.1  
Progression 1.6   
       
Cycle 2 PET 124 100  48 100  
negative 106 85  44 92  
positive 18 15   
Cycle 4 PET 18 100  100  
negative 11 61  75  
positive 39  25  
       
Events 22 21   
<CR   
progression   
early relapse 3-12   
late relapse>12 months   
2nd tumor   
1st line treatment-related death   
       
1-yr EFS  85 83-94  95 94–100 
2-yr EFS  83 76-90  91 83-99 
4-yr EFS  82 74-89    
7-yr EFS  79 70-88  91 83-99 
7-yr OS  93 86-100  97 93–100 
       

Disclosures

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution