On page 2390 in the 3 October 2013 issue, “γ” was omitted from the eighth sentence of the Abstract. The sentence reads, “The diagnosis of partial IFN-γR2 deficiency is clinically useful, as affected patients should be treated with IFN-, unlike patients with complete IFN-γR2 deficiency.” The sentence should have read, “The diagnosis of partial IFN-γR2 deficiency is clinically useful, as affected patients should be treated with IFN-γ, unlike patients with complete IFN-γR2 deficiency.”

Sign in via your Institution