On page 2103 in the 1 March 2012 issue, there are errors for 7 percentages in Table 2. The errors likely arose from using the wrong denominator in the calculations. However, the absolute numbers do not change. Therefore, the data and consequent conclusions do not change. The correct table is shown.

Table 2

Nonoverlapping classification of primary molecular cytogenetic abnormalities in MM

FISH abnormalityFrequency (%) (N = 484)
Trisomy(ies) without IgH abnormality 201 (42) 
IgH abnormality without trisomy(ies) 146 (30) 
 t(11;14) 74 (15) 
 t(4;14) 28 (6) 
 t(14;16) 19 (4) 
 t(14;20) 1 (<1) 
 Unknown partner/deletion of IgH region 24 (5) 
IgH abnormality with trisomy(ies) 74 (15) 
 t(11;14) 12 (3) 
 t(4;14) 19 (4) 
 t(14;16) 5 (1) 
 t(6;14) 3 (<1) 
 Unknown partner/deletion of IgH region 35 (7) 
Monosomy 14 in absence of IgH translocations or trisomy(ies) 22 (4.5) 
Other cytogenetic abnormalities in absence of IgH translocations or trisomy(ies) or monosomy 14* 26 (5.5) 
Normal 15 (3) 
FISH abnormalityFrequency (%) (N = 484)
Trisomy(ies) without IgH abnormality 201 (42) 
IgH abnormality without trisomy(ies) 146 (30) 
 t(11;14) 74 (15) 
 t(4;14) 28 (6) 
 t(14;16) 19 (4) 
 t(14;20) 1 (<1) 
 Unknown partner/deletion of IgH region 24 (5) 
IgH abnormality with trisomy(ies) 74 (15) 
 t(11;14) 12 (3) 
 t(4;14) 19 (4) 
 t(14;16) 5 (1) 
 t(6;14) 3 (<1) 
 Unknown partner/deletion of IgH region 35 (7) 
Monosomy 14 in absence of IgH translocations or trisomy(ies) 22 (4.5) 
Other cytogenetic abnormalities in absence of IgH translocations or trisomy(ies) or monosomy 14* 26 (5.5) 
Normal 15 (3) 
*

These included primarily monosomy 13 and p53 abnormalities.

Sign in via your Institution