Introduction

Secondary plasma cell leukemia (SPCL) is an aggressive variant of multiple myeloma (MM) characterized by the presence of >20% and/or an absolute number of >2 × 109/L circulating PCs cells in the peripheral blood. Recently, combinations of bortezomib (bor) or lenalidomide (len) with conventional cytotoxic  drugs have demonstrated very high rates and quality of response in MM, and, based on this data, we aimed to assess the efficacy of len, bor and dexamethasone (RVD) in SPCL.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we reviewed the records of all patients (pts) with SPCL treated with RVD at Princess Margaret Cancer Center between 03/09 and 06/12. A total of 9 pts were identified. Pts received oral len 10-15 mg/d on days 1-14 (dose adjusted for creatinine clearance), bor 1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of 21-day cycles (in 3 pts) and once weekly (in 6 pts) along with dexamethasone (20 mg or 40 mg weekly). Primary endpoints were response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

Results

Clinical characteristics are showed in Table 1. Pts had received a median of 3 lines of therapy (1-5).  Thalidomide, len and bor containing regimens were previously used in 3, 5 and 7 pts respectively. After a median of 3 cycles (1-14), CR was seen in 1, VGPR in 2, PR in 1 and 5 pts progressed while on therapy. Pts who achieved ≥ PR experienced a significantly better PFS (11.67 versus 1.57 months) (p=0.0049). At the time of analysis all of the cases had progressed and died. The median PFS was 5.23 months (range 1.68-31.53) with 2 pts progressing after 27 months. Median OS for the entire group was 5.13 months (range 1.17-32). Furthermore, median OS was significantly longer for pts achieving ≥ PR compared to those who did not (7.93 versus 2.93 months, p=0.0472). The median time to first and best response was 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. Two pts (22.2%) experienced non-hematological grade 3/4 adverse events, including sepsis and pneumonia. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred  in 6 pts, and 3 pts required G-CSF to avoid treatment delays.

In conclusion

we demonstrated that the combination of RVD is able to obtain responses in 44% of in SPCL cases within one month of therapy. Although the median PFS was only 5.23 months, 2 pts experienced responses exceeding 2 years. Thus, we recommend trying RVD for 1 cycle; if no response is seen, an alternative approach should be utilized. Newer agents such as pomalidomide and carfilzomib should be investigated in this aggressive disease in which the majority of responses are short-lived.

Table 1

Clinical characteristics of patients with SPCL treated with RVD

 Age/Gender IFE Hb/Cal/Creat Cytogenetics Prior Therapy Response/cycles 
57/Male IgA kappa 106/2.57/117 Standard risk VAD/ASCT
Len/DexVel/Dex 
VGPR/12 cycles 
53/Female IgG lambda 109/2.46/79 Standard risk (-13) DTPACE Progression/2 cycles 
38/Female IgG kappa/ kappa light chain 128/2.32/36 High risk (p53 deletion) CTD/ASCT
CPRVel/Dex 
Progression/2 cycles 
55/Female IgG lambda 78/2.90/176 Standard risk TD/ASCT
Velcade/DexRev/Dex 
VGPR/8 cycles 
40/Female Kappa light chain 105/2.28/72 n/a Dex/ASCT
Rev/DexVel/Dex
CPR 
Progression/3 cycles 
63/Female IgG lambda 108/2.18/56 Standard risk, del 13q RVDD/ASCT
Rev/DexCTD 
PR/16 cycles 
59/Male IgG kappa 83/2.26/122 n/a VAD/ASCT
Dex/ASCTVel/Dex
CPRCyBORP 
Progression/1cycle 
52/Female IgG kappa 97/2.3/51 High risk (t(4;14), del 13q VAD
Vel/Doxil/DexDTPACE 
Progression/3 cycles 
41/Male IgG kappa 78/2.41/109 Aneuploidy DTPACE/ASCT
TD and Len/Dex 
CR/14 cycles 
 Age/Gender IFE Hb/Cal/Creat Cytogenetics Prior Therapy Response/cycles 
57/Male IgA kappa 106/2.57/117 Standard risk VAD/ASCT
Len/DexVel/Dex 
VGPR/12 cycles 
53/Female IgG lambda 109/2.46/79 Standard risk (-13) DTPACE Progression/2 cycles 
38/Female IgG kappa/ kappa light chain 128/2.32/36 High risk (p53 deletion) CTD/ASCT
CPRVel/Dex 
Progression/2 cycles 
55/Female IgG lambda 78/2.90/176 Standard risk TD/ASCT
Velcade/DexRev/Dex 
VGPR/8 cycles 
40/Female Kappa light chain 105/2.28/72 n/a Dex/ASCT
Rev/DexVel/Dex
CPR 
Progression/3 cycles 
63/Female IgG lambda 108/2.18/56 Standard risk, del 13q RVDD/ASCT
Rev/DexCTD 
PR/16 cycles 
59/Male IgG kappa 83/2.26/122 n/a VAD/ASCT
Dex/ASCTVel/Dex
CPRCyBORP 
Progression/1cycle 
52/Female IgG kappa 97/2.3/51 High risk (t(4;14), del 13q VAD
Vel/Doxil/DexDTPACE 
Progression/3 cycles 
41/Male IgG kappa 78/2.41/109 Aneuploidy DTPACE/ASCT
TD and Len/Dex 
CR/14 cycles 
Disclosures:

Reece:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy. Chen:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Tiedemann:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Kukreti:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution