Since the introduction of reduced-toxicity conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) we transplanted from 1999 to 2012, 250 consecutive patients (pts) with myeloid malignancies (AML, MDS) aged ≥ 60 years (yrs).

The 144 male and 106 female pts with a median age of 66 yrs (range 60-77) were transplanted for de novo AML (n=95), s/tAML (n=104) and MDS (n=51) with 89% unfavorable cytogenetics (CALGB). Since 2004 pts received a prospective fitness assessment (Deschler et al., Haematologica 2013). In 74% the donor was matched/mismatched unrelated and in 26% related. Only 16% were transplanted in CR1/2, 84 % with advanced or untreated disease. The conditioning regimen was the FBM protocol (fludarabine, carmustine, melphalan; Bertz et al., JCO 2003) in 98%, and 97% of the pts received PBSC. For GVHD prophylaxis in 91% a combination of cyclosporine plus alemtuzumab or ATG-F™ was used.

At day +30, 94% of the pts had achieved CR by standard measures. With a median follow up of 57 months (3-157) 37% of the pts are alive; main causes of death were relapse (n=62), infection (n=35) and age-related diseases (n=13). The probability of OS/DFS was at 1yr 61%/49%, at 2 yrs 49%/41% and at 5 yrs 37%/34%, respectively. The probability for NRM at 1 yr is 24%. Nineteen known prognostic factors for outcome were evaluated: e.g. patient and donor age, graft size, days between diagnosis and alloHCT, CMV, early/advanced disease, cytogenetics, Sorror and Gratwohl score, donor type, HLA-identity. In the multivariate analysis a better OS (factors with p<0.1; table) was seen with a matched donor; a better DFS with a related donor, and high CD34+ graft content; in contrast, a mismatched donor is a risk factor for reduced DFS.

Table

Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors* for OS and DFS

variablevalueHazard Ratio95% CI lower limit95% CI upper limitP value
Overall survival      
Remission at alloHCT advanced 1.37 0.86 2.16 0.1825 
HLA mismatch yes 1.40 1.01 1.96 0.0463 
HCT-CI (Sorror) >= 2 1.31 1.01 1.96 0.1007 
Peripheral blood blasts yes 1.21 0.84 1.76 0.3034 
Disease-free survival      
Remission at alloHCT advanced 1.29 0.72 2.30 0.3946 
Donor related 0.64 0.43 0.95 0.0258 
HLA mismatch yes 1.44 0.99 2.09 0.0561 
CD34+ cells > median 0.76 0.55 1.04 0.0867 
Bone marrow blasts > 5% 1.21 0.78 1.88 0.3915 
variablevalueHazard Ratio95% CI lower limit95% CI upper limitP value
Overall survival      
Remission at alloHCT advanced 1.37 0.86 2.16 0.1825 
HLA mismatch yes 1.40 1.01 1.96 0.0463 
HCT-CI (Sorror) >= 2 1.31 1.01 1.96 0.1007 
Peripheral blood blasts yes 1.21 0.84 1.76 0.3034 
Disease-free survival      
Remission at alloHCT advanced 1.29 0.72 2.30 0.3946 
Donor related 0.64 0.43 0.95 0.0258 
HLA mismatch yes 1.44 0.99 2.09 0.0561 
CD34+ cells > median 0.76 0.55 1.04 0.0867 
Bone marrow blasts > 5% 1.21 0.78 1.88 0.3915 

*in univariate analysis p<0.157 (AIC criterion; Sauerbrei W, 1999 Applied Statistics,48:313-329.70.)

In conclusion, this unique large cohort of older pts with AML/MDS with mainly advanced disease and unfavorable cytogenetics shows a high feasibility, safety and efficacy of alloHCT after the FBM protocol. AML/MDS pts in their 7th and 8th decade of life fit for transplant should be evaluated for alloHCT as very important long-term curative option.

Disclosures:

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution