Abstract 2724

Background:

The NHL 1 study, a prospective, multicenter, randomized, phase 3 study which compared B-R and CHOP-R as first-line treatment in indolent lymphomas and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), demonstrated a significant benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) as well as improved tolerability for B-R compared with CHOP-R. Here we present an analysis of the impact of response quality on outcome.

Methods:

514 patients (pts) with indolent or MCL were randomized to receive B-R or CHOP-R for a maximum of 6 cycles.

Results:

The overall response rate in the 514 pts (261 B-R; 253 CHOP-R) was 92.7% and 91.3% in the B-R and CHOP-R arms, respectively (as presented at the last ASCO meeting, J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl; abstr 3). A complete response (CR) was observed in 39.8% in the B-R arm and in 30% in the CHOP-R arm (p=0.021). The achievement of CR was associated with a significantly prolonged PFS and overall survival (OS) (Table 1). Analysis by treatment arm revealed a trend for superior PFS and a significantly improved OS for patients achieving CR following treatment with B-R. In the CHOP-R arm, patients in CR had a significantly superior PFS compared to those in PR with a trend to superior OS.

Regardless of the quality of response, PFS was superior with B-R versus CHOP-R: For patients in CR, the median PFS was not reached with B-R, whereas for CHOP-R it was 53.7 months (p=0.0204). In patients achieving PR, treatment with B-R resulted in a median PFS of 57.2 months, and this was 30.9 months with CHOP-R (p=0.0002).

We noted a statistically significant difference in CR rates between male (n=272, median age 63 years) and female (n=242, median age 64 years) patients. The CR rate was 28.6% in male patients and 42.1% in female patients (p=0.0016). Female patients had a longer median PFS (51.4 months) compared to male patients (38.6 months), however, this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.0866).

Conclusions:

Patients in CR following first-line treatment in our study had a significantly longer PFS and OS compared to those achieving a PR. Therefore, our results strongly suggest an association between quality of response and outcome.

Table 1:

PFS and OS according to quality of response

CRPRp
All patients PFS (median) 57.5 months 43.5 months 0.0037 
OS rate at 5 years 90.3% 77.5% 0.0008 
B-R arm PFS (median) not reached 57.2 months 0.1912 
OS rate at 5 years 91.0% 80.1% 0.0044 
CHOP-R arm PFS (median) 53.7 months 30.9 months 0.0215 
OS rate at 5 years 89.6% 75.4% 0.0737 
CRPRp
All patients PFS (median) 57.5 months 43.5 months 0.0037 
OS rate at 5 years 90.3% 77.5% 0.0008 
B-R arm PFS (median) not reached 57.2 months 0.1912 
OS rate at 5 years 91.0% 80.1% 0.0044 
CHOP-R arm PFS (median) 53.7 months 30.9 months 0.0215 
OS rate at 5 years 89.6% 75.4% 0.0737 
Disclosures:

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution