Abstract 1603

Background:

We have previously reported similar outcomes for patients with bulky stage I or II mediastinal HL treated with combined modality therapy either with ABVD + radiotherapy or the Stanford V regimen in the North American Intergroup trial E2496 (Advani et al, ASH 2010 abstract 416). In the current analysis, we compare the patterns of failure between the two groups.

Methods:

Patients with stage I/II bulky mediastinal HL (maximum mediastinal mass width > 1/3 of intrathoracic diameter) were randomized to receive chemotherapy (CT) on either Arm A (ABVD x 6–8 cycles administered q 28 days) or Arm B (12 weeks of Stanford V administered weekly). Two-3 weeks after completion of chemotherapy all patients received modified involved field radiotherapy (RT) (36 Gy) delivered to the mediastinum, hila, and supraclavicular regions. Patients on Stanford V arm also received involved field RT to any other sites ≥ 5 cm at diagnosis. Patients were assessed 3, 6 and 12 months after completing RT with computed tomography scanning and then every 6 months for 5 years. The primary end points were failure free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS). Disease progression was defined as 'in-field', 'distant' or both relative to the radiation fields prescribed in the E2496 protocol. Distant sites of failure were further characterized as intra-thoracic, intra-abdominal or other (bone, bone marrow and axillae, if not previously irradiated).

Results:

Two hundred and sixty-seven patients were randomized: 136 on the ABVD arm and 131 on the Stanford V arm. Patient characteristics were well matched with no differences between two arms in overall response rates (ORR), FFS and OS. (Advani et al ASH 2010 abstract 416). At a median follow up of 5.5 years 40 patients have relapsed with no difference in ABVD (n=18, 13%) versus Stanford V (n=22, 17%) (p=0.49). Central review of RT fields available in 37/40 patients found major violations with under treatment of tumor noted in 7/37 (19%). Patterns of failure are shown in Table 1.

Table I
ABVDStanford V
136 131 
Total Relapses, n (%) 18 (13.2) 22 (16.8) 
    In-Field Only 6 (4.4) 7 (5.3) 
    Both In-Field and Distant 3 (2.2) 4 (3.0) 
    Distant 9 (6.6) 11 (8.4) 
    Intra-thoracic 
    Intra-abdominal 
    Other/axilla 3/3 9/6 
Total In-Field 9 (6.6) 11 (8.4) 
Total Distant 12 (8.8) 15 (11.4) 
ABVDStanford V
136 131 
Total Relapses, n (%) 18 (13.2) 22 (16.8) 
    In-Field Only 6 (4.4) 7 (5.3) 
    Both In-Field and Distant 3 (2.2) 4 (3.0) 
    Distant 9 (6.6) 11 (8.4) 
    Intra-thoracic 
    Intra-abdominal 
    Other/axilla 3/3 9/6 
Total In-Field 9 (6.6) 11 (8.4) 
Total Distant 12 (8.8) 15 (11.4) 

There were no differences in patterns of relapse for the two study arms. In-field relapses occurred in <10% in both study arms.

Conclusion:

For patients with stage I/II bulky mediastinal HL, combined modality therapy with either ABVD +RT or the Stanford V regimen results in excellent disease control. In-field relapse was uncommon. These results set a benchmark for assessing ongoing trials omitting RT in patients with stage I/II bulky mediastinal HL. Future research efforts should focus on risk stratification to identify the small subset of patients who are likely to fail standard upfront therapy. US cooperative group efforts in this subset of patients are ongoing that use interim PET-CT imaging based risk-adapted strategies.

Disclosures:

Horning:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution