Abstract 4922

Introduction.

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs) that develop primarily in the skin but may progress to involve lymph nodes, blood, and visceral organs. CTCL is characterized by skin patches, plaques, tumors, and erythroderma. Pruritus is frequently associated with skin lesions in CTCL and may be severe. Some treatments have been noted to produce improvements in pruritus that appears to be independent of the response rate. Denileukin diftitox (DD, Ontak), a recombinant fusion protein targeting IL-2-receptor-expressing T lymphocytes, has demonstrated a significant effect on overall response rate with minimal immunosuppression in patients with CD25 assay-positive CTCL. For this post-hoc analysis, we used data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III clinical trial to assess the effect of DD on pruritus and overall skin condition in patients with CTCL.

Patients and methods.

Patients with CD25 assay-positive, stage Ia to III CTCL were randomized to receive 9 μg/kg/d DD (n=45), 18 μg/kg/d DD (n=55), or placebo (n=45). Study medications were administered on the first 5 days of a 21-day cycle for up to 8 cycles. Four grading scales were used to assess clinical signs and symptoms (Table 1).

Table 1.

Symptom scoring

ScaleScoringDefinition of Clinically Significant Improvement
Patient's Pruritus Assessment 10-cm VAS (0 = no itch, 10 = worst possible itch) Absolute decrease of 2 cm maintained for ≥ 6 weeks. 
Patient Global Skin Assessment 7-point scale (1 = definitely worse, 7 = normal) Increase of at least 2 points maintained for ≥ 6 weeks 
Physician's Global CTCL Severity Assessment 10-cm VAS (0 = no involvement, 10 = extremely severe Absolute decrease of 2 cm maintained for ≥ 6 weeks. 
Physicians' Erythroderma Severity Assessment 5-point scale (1 = none, 5 = severe) Decrease of 1 point maintained for ≥ 6 weeks 
ScaleScoringDefinition of Clinically Significant Improvement
Patient's Pruritus Assessment 10-cm VAS (0 = no itch, 10 = worst possible itch) Absolute decrease of 2 cm maintained for ≥ 6 weeks. 
Patient Global Skin Assessment 7-point scale (1 = definitely worse, 7 = normal) Increase of at least 2 points maintained for ≥ 6 weeks 
Physician's Global CTCL Severity Assessment 10-cm VAS (0 = no involvement, 10 = extremely severe Absolute decrease of 2 cm maintained for ≥ 6 weeks. 
Physicians' Erythroderma Severity Assessment 5-point scale (1 = none, 5 = severe) Decrease of 1 point maintained for ≥ 6 weeks 

VAS = visual analog scale

Results.

Higher percentages of DD-treated patients experienced clinically significant improvements in skin-related symptoms than did patients on placebo during treatment and follow-up (Table 2). The differences between the proportions of patients in the placebo group experiencing clinically significant improvement and the proportions of those in the 18 μg/kg/d and combined DD dose groups were statistically significant for all 4 assessments. Substantially more DD-treated patients had ≥20% and ≥50% improvement in pruritus (relative to baseline) at any time than those receiving placebo; improvements were maintained for ≥6 weeks. The global skin score improvement and pruritus score improvement in both high dose and low dose groups were significantly correlated, with higher correlation in high dose group compared to low dose group (p=0.0004 vs p=0.0381). There is no correlation in placebo group for the two scores (p=0.3798). Improvement in pruritis was to some extent independent of response, as demonstrated by the proportion of agreement between tumor response and significant pruritus improvement (27% and 19% for high dose and low dose, respectively, in DD groups), based on Kappa concordance coefficient.

Table 2.

Number (%) of patients with clinically significant improvement in clinical assessments during treatment and follow-up

CTCL signs and symptoms assessmentsPlacebo (n=44)DD 9 μg/kg/d (n=45)DD 18 μg/kg/d (n=55)All DD (n=100)
Patient's Pruritus Assessment 4 (9.1) 6 (13.3) 19 (34.5)* 25 (25.0)* 
≥20% improvement at any time 7 (15.9) 16 (35.6) 27 (49.1)* 43 (43.0)* 
≥50% improvement at any time 4 (9.1) 13 (28.9)* 21 (38.2)* 34 (34.0)* 
Patient's Global Skin Assessment 4 (9.1) 17 (37.8)* 24 (43.6)* 41 (41.0)* 
Physician's Erythroderma Severity Assessment 3 (6.8) 7 (15.6) 15 (27.3)* 22 (22.0)* 
Physician's Global CTCL Assessment 6 (13.6) 6 (13.3) 20 (36.4)* 26 (26.0)* 
CTCL signs and symptoms assessmentsPlacebo (n=44)DD 9 μg/kg/d (n=45)DD 18 μg/kg/d (n=55)All DD (n=100)
Patient's Pruritus Assessment 4 (9.1) 6 (13.3) 19 (34.5)* 25 (25.0)* 
≥20% improvement at any time 7 (15.9) 16 (35.6) 27 (49.1)* 43 (43.0)* 
≥50% improvement at any time 4 (9.1) 13 (28.9)* 21 (38.2)* 34 (34.0)* 
Patient's Global Skin Assessment 4 (9.1) 17 (37.8)* 24 (43.6)* 41 (41.0)* 
Physician's Erythroderma Severity Assessment 3 (6.8) 7 (15.6) 15 (27.3)* 22 (22.0)* 
Physician's Global CTCL Assessment 6 (13.6) 6 (13.3) 20 (36.4)* 26 (26.0)* 
*

Statistically significant from placebo (P<.05).

Patient's improvement relative to baseline required ≥6 weeks of confirmation.

Conclusion.

Patients treated with DD, particularly at the 18-μg/kg/d dose, were more likely to experience clinically significant improvements in pruritus and other skin-related symptoms than were patients receiving placebo. DD was observed to improve pruritus independent of response.

Disclosures:

Kozlovski: Eisai Inc.: Employment.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution