Abstract 3230

Poster Board III-167

Background

Pre-apheresis peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells of < 20 cells/μl is a significant risk factor for poor hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization and collection in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing autologous HSC transplantation (auto-HSCT). PB CD34+ cells are routinely monitored to optimize the timing and success of HSC collection after mobilization with cytokines ± chemotherapy. This analysis was designed to compare the efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF to placebo + G-CSF for mobilization in patients with MM who had pre-apheresis PB CD34+ cell counts < 20 cells/μl. We hypothesized that the addition of plerixafor to G-CSF would improve the stem cell yield in these patients with baseline CD34+ cells < 20 cells/μl.

Methods

Data were obtained from a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial that compared the safety and efficacy of plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg/day SC) + G-CSF (10 μg/kg/day) to placebo + G-CSF for mobilization and auto-HSCT in patients with MM. PB CD34+ cell count was measured on Day 4, prior to first plerixafor/placebo dose, and on Day 5, 10-11 hours post study treatment. The proportion of patients achieving the minimal (≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg) or optimal (≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg) cell doses in 2 apheresis days, apheresis yields, and time to engraftment were compared between the plerixafor and placebo groups for PB CD34+ cell count <10 cells/μl (PB<10) and <20 cells/μl (PB<20).

Results

In the plerixafor group (n=148), 27 (18%) and 56 (38%) patients had Day 4 PB CD34+ cells/μl <10 and <20 which was as expected identical to the 30 (19%) and 60 (39%) patients in the placebo group, respectively (n=154). Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. Plerixafor + G-CSF resulted in a statistically significant increase in the absolute PB CD34+ cells/ml on Day 5 compared to placebo + G-CSF (p<0.001; Table 1). For patients with PB <10, the median fold increase in PB CD34+ cells in the plerixafor (n = 27) vs. placebo (n = 30) groups was 9.6 vs. 2 (p<0.001). Similarly, for patients with PB <20 the median fold increase in PB CD34+ cells in the plerixafor (n = 56) vs. placebo (n = 60) groups was 6.6 vs. 2 (p<0.001).The median CD34+ cell yield after 2 aphereses was significantly higher in the plerixafor vs. placebo group: 5.44 vs.1.68 × 106 cells/kg (p<0.001; PB<10) and 7.06 vs. 3.27 × 106 cells/kg (p<0.001; PB <20). The proportion of patients achieving ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in 2 aphereses was significantly higher in the plerixafor group compared to the placebo group: 92.6% vs. 43.3 % in patients with PB<10 (p<0.001), and 94.6% vs. 66.7% in patients with PB<20 (p<0.001). Similarly, the proportion of patients achieving ≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in 2 apheresis days was significantly higher in the plerixafor vs. placebo group: 40.7% vs. 3.3 % in patients with PB<10 (p<0.001), and 55.4% vs. 15% in patients with PB<20 (p<0.001). The median time to platelet (19-20 days) and neutrophil (11 days) engraftment was similar in both groups.

Conclusions

These data demonstrate that in patients with MM who are predicted to fail mobilization based on low PB CD34+ cell count, the addition of plerixafor to G-CSF allows for 2-day collection of the minimal and optimal cell dose in a greater proportion of patients compared to G-CSF alone. Thus, addition of plerixafor to G-CSF can decrease the risk of poor mobilization in patients with MM who have PB CD34+ cell counts < 20 or even < 10 cells/μl.

Table 1
Plerixafor + G-CSF n=148Placebo + G-CSF n=154P-Value
Number of Patients with Day 4 Absolute PB CD34+ cells/μl    
    < 10 27 30 
    < 20 56 60 
Day 5 Absolute PB CD34+ cells/μl*    
    < 10 48.50 (4-314.6) 11.61 (1.2- 27) <0.001 
    < 20 66.00 (4-314.6) 20.20 (1.2-55.8) <0.001 
Fold Increase in PB CD34+ cells/μl from Day 4 to Day 5*#    
    < 10 9.6 (4-70.1) 2.0 (0.4-5.5) <0.001 
    < 20 6.6 (2.7-70.1) 2.0 (0.4-5.5) <0.001 
Cumulative CD34+ cells/kg x 106 after 2 apheresis days*    
    < 10 5.44 (0.63-25.81) 1.68 (0.11-11.37) <0.001 
    < 20 7.06 (0.63-25.81) 3.27 (0.11-11.37) <0.001 
% Patients achieving ≥2 × 106 CD34+ Cells/Kg in 2 days    
    < 10 92.6 43.3 <0.001 
    < 20 94.6 66.7 <0.001 
% Patients achieving ≥6 × 106 CD34+ Cells/Kg in 2 days    
    < 10 40.7 3.3 <0.001 
    < 20 55.4 15.0 <0.001 
Days to Platelet Engraftment*    
    < 10 20 (10-92) 19 (1-95) 0.370 
    < 20 20 (1-92) 19 (1-95) 0.153 
Days to Neutrophil Engraftment*    
    < 10 11 (10-22) 11 (7-18) 0.993 
    < 20 11 (2-22) 11 (7-18) 0.504 
Plerixafor + G-CSF n=148Placebo + G-CSF n=154P-Value
Number of Patients with Day 4 Absolute PB CD34+ cells/μl    
    < 10 27 30 
    < 20 56 60 
Day 5 Absolute PB CD34+ cells/μl*    
    < 10 48.50 (4-314.6) 11.61 (1.2- 27) <0.001 
    < 20 66.00 (4-314.6) 20.20 (1.2-55.8) <0.001 
Fold Increase in PB CD34+ cells/μl from Day 4 to Day 5*#    
    < 10 9.6 (4-70.1) 2.0 (0.4-5.5) <0.001 
    < 20 6.6 (2.7-70.1) 2.0 (0.4-5.5) <0.001 
Cumulative CD34+ cells/kg x 106 after 2 apheresis days*    
    < 10 5.44 (0.63-25.81) 1.68 (0.11-11.37) <0.001 
    < 20 7.06 (0.63-25.81) 3.27 (0.11-11.37) <0.001 
% Patients achieving ≥2 × 106 CD34+ Cells/Kg in 2 days    
    < 10 92.6 43.3 <0.001 
    < 20 94.6 66.7 <0.001 
% Patients achieving ≥6 × 106 CD34+ Cells/Kg in 2 days    
    < 10 40.7 3.3 <0.001 
    < 20 55.4 15.0 <0.001 
Days to Platelet Engraftment*    
    < 10 20 (10-92) 19 (1-95) 0.370 
    < 20 20 (1-92) 19 (1-95) 0.153 
Days to Neutrophil Engraftment*    
    < 10 11 (10-22) 11 (7-18) 0.993 
    < 20 11 (2-22) 11 (7-18) 0.504 
*

Values represent Median (Range)

#

Expressed as a ratio of the pre-G-CSF CD34+ cells/μL on Day 5 to pre-G-CSF CD34+ cells/μL on Day 4

Disclosures

Nademanee:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stadtmauer:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Micallef:Genzyme Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stiff:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Marulkar:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Calandra:Genzyme Corporation: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. DiPersio:Genzyme: Honoraria.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution