There are reports indicating that older patients (pts) may have better outcomes after stem cell transplantation (SCT) from young fully matched unrelated donors (MUD) than from matched siblings (MRD) perhaps because of donor age. In some of these studies MUD and MRD recipients may have been treated differently, for example with more intense GVHD prophyaxis for MUD SCT such as antithymocyte globulin (ATG). We have compared outcomes of SCT pts receiving myeloablative fludarabine & busulfan based conditioning (FLUBUP) between 05/99 and 05/05. Only 10/10 (HLA–A, −B, C, DR & DQ) matched SCT were considered. Recipients of MRD SCT were ≥50 years old, MUD SCT recipients were unselected for age but their donors were ≤30 years old. All pts received fludarabine 50mg/m2 on days −6 to −2 and IV busulfan (Busulfex, PDL Pharma) at a myeloablative dose of 3.2 mg/kg once daily days −5 to −2 inclusive (FLUBUP) +/− TBI 200cGy x 2 on day −1 or 0. Prophylaxis for GVHD was cyclosporine A, methotrexate with folinic acid and Thymoglobulin (Genzyme) 4.5 mg/kg in divided doses over 3 consecutive days pretransplant finishing D0.[table 1]These data demonstrate that TRM for older SCT pts given the FLUBUP regimen with ATG is similar to that for adults in general transplanted from young MUD. When using these protocols in older pts there is usually no justification for the expense and inconvenience of using a young MUD in preference to a matched sibling.

Patient, donor & SCT characteristics and outcomes

UnrelatedRelatedp
* at 5 years 
Number 41 63  
Patient age median (range) 44 (16–61) 55 (50–65) <0.0001 
Donor age median (range) 24 (19–30) 52 (37–71) <0.0001 
Low risk (Acute leukemia CR1/2, CML CP1) 22 (54%) 14 (22%) 0.0015 
CMV+ve recipient or donor 31 (76%) 53 (84%) ns 
Female to male SCT 8 (20%) 18 (29%) ns 
Blood cells 20 (49%) 56 (89%) <0.0001 
CD 34+ cell dose x 10e6 median (range) 5.35 (0.91–15.47) 4.23 (0.83–13.52) 0.08 
TBI (not TRM risk factor) 19 (46%) 10 (16%) 0.0014 
Acute GVHD II–IV 21±7% 16±5% ns 
Acute GVHD III–IV 10±5% 5±3% ns 
Chronic GVHD 64±7% 61±9% ns 
Pts≥50 TRM * 26±15% (n = 12) 16±5% ns 
Low risk TRM 5±5% 0% ns 
High risk TRM 31±12% 23±7% ns 
BCT TRM 10±7% 19±6% ns 
All pts TRM 16±6% 16±5% ns 
UnrelatedRelatedp
* at 5 years 
Number 41 63  
Patient age median (range) 44 (16–61) 55 (50–65) <0.0001 
Donor age median (range) 24 (19–30) 52 (37–71) <0.0001 
Low risk (Acute leukemia CR1/2, CML CP1) 22 (54%) 14 (22%) 0.0015 
CMV+ve recipient or donor 31 (76%) 53 (84%) ns 
Female to male SCT 8 (20%) 18 (29%) ns 
Blood cells 20 (49%) 56 (89%) <0.0001 
CD 34+ cell dose x 10e6 median (range) 5.35 (0.91–15.47) 4.23 (0.83–13.52) 0.08 
TBI (not TRM risk factor) 19 (46%) 10 (16%) 0.0014 
Acute GVHD II–IV 21±7% 16±5% ns 
Acute GVHD III–IV 10±5% 5±3% ns 
Chronic GVHD 64±7% 61±9% ns 
Pts≥50 TRM * 26±15% (n = 12) 16±5% ns 
Low risk TRM 5±5% 0% ns 
High risk TRM 31±12% 23±7% ns 
BCT TRM 10±7% 19±6% ns 
All pts TRM 16±6% 16±5% ns 

Disclosures: Both Thymoglobulin and daily i.v busulfan off label for SCT.; ESP Pharma.; ESP Pharma, Genzyme.; ESP Pharma, Genzyme speakers bureau.

Author notes

*

Corresponding author

Sign in via your Institution