The aim of the trial was to compare three modalities of chemotherapy and involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT) in adult patients with supradiaphragmatic CS I-II HL with risk factors. Patients were randomized if they presented with age ≥ 50, or CS II4–5, or A + ESR ≥ 50, or B + ESR ≥ 30, or MT ratio ≥ 0.35. The trial compared ABVD x 6 cycles and IF-RT (36–40 Gy) vs ABVD x 4 cycles and IF-RT vs BEACOPP baseline x 4 cycles and IF-RT. From October 1998 to September 2002, 808 patients were enrolled in 111 institutions from 10 European countries. The proportions of grade 3–4 chemotherapy-related hematological toxicity (mainly WBC) were 74%, 70% and 63%, respectively; That of grade 1–3 RT-related hematological toxicity were 10%, 12% and 17%, respectively. Ten (2+3+5, 1%) patients stopped chemotherapy because of toxicity and 8 (2+2+4, 1%) refused the treatment; Six (2+2+2, 1%) patients stopped radiotherapy because of toxicity and 9 (3+1+5, 1%) refused the treatment. The proportions of patients in CR/CRu were 74%, 71% and 59% after 6, 4 ABVD and 4 BEACOPP, respectively. After a median follow-up of 57 months (range 33–81), 78 events (26 progressions, 37 relapses, 15 deaths) were observed. At July 2005, the 4-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates are as follows:

TreatmentNo. PtsCR-CRu /PR /NC-PD4-yr EFS4-yr OS
6 ABVD + IF-RT 276 87% /8% /5% 91% 95% 
4 ABVD + IF-RT 277 86% /11% /3% 87% 94% 
4 BEACOPP + IF-RT 255 84% /12% /4% 90% 93% 
P value  0.607 0.380 0.978 
TreatmentNo. PtsCR-CRu /PR /NC-PD4-yr EFS4-yr OS
6 ABVD + IF-RT 276 87% /8% /5% 91% 95% 
4 ABVD + IF-RT 277 86% /11% /3% 87% 94% 
4 BEACOPP + IF-RT 255 84% /12% /4% 90% 93% 
P value  0.607 0.380 0.978 

Overall, 42 patients have died of progressive disease (5, 7 and 7 patients), treatment-related complication (7, 5 and 2), intercurrent disease (1, 0 and 2), second malignancy (1 NHL, 0 and 1 AML) or cause unspecified (0, 3 and 1). These preliminary results indicate that a combination of 4 cycles of ABVD and IF-RT is sufficient to cure a large majority of HL patients with unfavorable early stage disease and that BEACOPP baseline has no advantage over ABVD in these patients.

Author notes

Corresponding author

Sign in via your Institution