Abstract
Introduction: AuSCT using conditioning such as BEAM, for relapsed DLBCL and HL results in progression-free survival (PFS) of 60% of cases in second complete remission (CR). Those who do not achieve a second CR or who have primary refractory disease have significantly reduced benefit from BEAM/AuSCT. Consequently, we have been offering dose intensified conditioning prior to AuSCT with the Stanford regimen using Etoposide 60mg/kg day-4, Cyclophosphamide 100mg/kg day-2 and either BCNU 15mg/kg day-6 or fractionated TBI 12Gy days-8 to -5 to patients with poor risk haematologic malignancy.
Methods: We assessed the outcome of AuSCT in 46 patients with poor risk haematologic disease; DLBCL (n=16), HL (n=16), multiply relapsed indolent lymphoma (n=8) and aggressive “other” lymphomas (n=6) who received conditioning with either the BNCU (n=31) or TBI (n=15) protocols. Of the 32 patients with HL or DLBCL, 28 had previously failed to achieve a CR to salvage chemotherapy; PR (21/32) or induction failure/early progression (7/32).
Results: There were no transplant-related deaths among the 32 HL or DLBCL patients. One case of fatal radiation pneumonitis occurred following consolidative radiotherapy 6 months post AuSCT. The PFS for the combined HL/DLBCL cohort was 65±9% at 12, and 61±9% at 24 months. The 24 month PFS by BCNU or TBI regimen was 63% and 57% respectively (p=0.56). The 24 month PFS for HL or DLBCL treated with either regimen was 54±13% and 68±12% respectively (P=0.34) Additional groups were too heterogeneous to statistically assess. 1 of 6 patients with aggressive “other” lymphoma maintained a durable remission (39 months) and 4/8 patients with indolent lymphoma have ongoing CR at 9 – 59 months follow up.
Conclusions: Stanford TBI or BCNU conditioning prior to AuSCT are well-tolerated and result in substantial rates of PFS in patients with poor risk HL or DLBCL.
Author notes
Corresponding author
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal