Introduction: Radiotherapy is an important risk factor for the development of secondary malignancies in children with Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The GPOH-HD-study group tries to restrict the indication for radiotherapy after two cycles of intensive OPPA (OEPA) chemotherapy. In the GPOH-HD 95 trial 113/394 (29%) of patients with early stage HL were in complete remission (CR) after chemotherapy based on CT/MRI (=CRI) criteria. They were not irradiated and achieved an excellent 97% EFS rate at 5 yrs (Dörffel, 2003).

Objective: Our next study will drop radiotherapy also in patients with residual findings according to CRI criteria if FDG-PET converts to negative after chemotherapy as ascertained by real-time central review of all images. Here we report pilot data on the conversion rate.

Results: During the GPOH-HD 2002 Pilot study 41 patients with early stage HL received both a staging PET at diagnosis and a restaging PET after chemotherapy. Images were centrally reviewed in Leipzig. 7 patients were in CR based on both PET and CRI criteria, one patient with CRI-based CR had still a positive PET result; in a further patient PET was not completely evaluable. In 17/32 patients with residual masses PET was completely negative after chemotherapy. In one patient PET was completely negative except for one initially involved site, where it was not informative due to a local artefact; however, CRI showed local CR in this region. In summary, 27/41 (66%) patients would qualify for no radiotherapy within a PET-based response adaptation strategy in contrast to only 9/41 (22%) patients when CRI-based. Interestingly, in 13/17 patients with negative PET, a residual mass within the mediastinum was found, indicating that a PET-based strategy will prevent many patients from mediastinal irradiation.

Conclusion: A FDG-PET-based response evaluation has the prospect to avoid radiotherapy in about 60 – 70% of all patients with early stage HL. Our next trial is designed to demonstrate that this does not lead to an unacceptable increase of the relapse rate.

This study was supported by ‚Peter Escher Stiftung für krebskranke Kinder’, ‚Hand in Hand for children’, ‚Lions Kinderkrebsforschungszentrum’ and ‚Menschen für Kinder’.

Author notes

Corresponding author

Sign in via your Institution