Using a similar strategy that successfully identified PR1 as a leukemia-associated antigen (LAA), we identified two homologous HLA-A2-restricted peptides from cyclin E1 (CCNE1) and cyclin E2 (CCNE2) that could be used to elicit peptide-specific CTL from healthy donors in vitro. Two homologous nonameric peptides from CCNE1 (CCNE1144–152) and CCNE2 (CCNE2144–152), which differ by a single amino acid at position 7, have equal binding affinity for HLA-A2 and each elicited peptide-specific CTL with equal efficiency, as measured by specific lysis of T2 cells pulsed with either peptide (CCNE1 59.7% vs CCNE2 72.6% specific lysis, respectively, at E: T 10:1). TCR-Vβ spectratype analysis showed CCNE1-CTL clones to be derived from 3 Vβ families, while CCNE2-CTL clones were derived from a single Vβ family. The CCNE1-CTL and the CCNE2-CTL bound to each of the CCNE1/A2 and CCNE2/A2 tetramers, but staining intensity was greater for the CCNE1-CTL, suggesting greater TCR avidity of the CCNE1-CTL for both peptides. Because each clone cross-recognized the other homologous peptide, we hypothesized that each clone would efficiently kill leukemia that over-expressed either or both CCNE1 and CCNE2 proteins. FACsorted high avidity CTL showed higher specific lysis of peptide-pulsed T2 than did low avidity CTL (38.8% vs 31.9% specific lysis, respectively, at E: T 10:1, p = 0.02). The fluorescence decay of tetramer dissociation (ln (peptide/HLA-A2 tetramer)) over time was linear for each clone, suggesting that avidity was proportional to TCR affinity and tetramer dissociation t1/2 was determined based on first order kinetics. CCNE1-CTL had higher affinity for CCNE1144–152/HLA-A2 (CCNE1/A2, t1/2=84.5min; CCNE2/A2, t1/2=25.3min) and preferentially killed CCNE1144–152-pulsed T2 cells (CCNE1, 56.9% vs CCNE2, 38%, respectively, at E: T 10:1, p = 0.004). Interestingly, CCNE2-CTL also had higher TCR affinity for CCNE1144–152/HLA-A2 (CCNE1/A2, t1/2=29.5min; CCNE2/A2, t1/2=10.7min), but showed only slightly higher specific lysis of CCNE1144–152-pulsed T2 cells (CCNE1 = 49.3% vs CCNE2 = 44.2% specific lysis, respectively, at E: T 10:1, p = 0.33). Each clone specifically lysed HLA-A2+ T-ALL leukemia cells in proportion to both CCNE1 and CCNE2 protein overexpression assessed by Western blot (CCNE1-CTL, R2=0.89; CCNE2-CTL, R2=0.88). In contrast, healthy HLA-A2+ BM cells, which do not overexpress CCNE1 or CCNE2, and control HLA-A2 CML cells that overexpress both proteins, were not lysed. Both the high and low affinity clones showed equal lysis of T-ALL cells that expressed large amounts of each protein (specific lysis = 24.3% by CCNE1-CTL, vs lysis = 23.8% by CCNE2-CTL, at E: T 10:1). However, high affinity CCNE1-CTL killed T-ALL cells significantly better than low affinity CCNE2-CTL (16.8% vs 6.6% lysis, respectively, at E: T 10:1, p =0.02) when the T-ALL expressed a 2.5-fold lower amount of both CCNE1 and CCNE2 proteins. We conclude that the CCNE1 and CCNE2 homologous self-peptides are lymphoid leukemia-associated antigens. Furthermore, while the higher TCR affinity of CCNE1-CTL suggests that the CCNE1 peptide is the more dominant epitope, ultimate target susceptibility is enhanced due to degeneracy of the resulting CTL clones against homologous peptide epitopes.

Author notes

Corresponding author

Sign in via your Institution